GNU bug report logs - #10715
24.0.93; doc of `buffer-local-variables'

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 10715 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 10715 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
Subject: 24.0.93; doc of `buffer-local-variables'
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:52:55 -0800

(elisp) `Creating Buffer-Local' says:
 
"However, when a variable's buffer-local binding in BUFFER is void, then
the variable appears directly in the resulting list."
 
It is true that a Lisp variable is a symbol.  But this sentence is not
as clear as it could be, because some readers will not immediately
understand that "the variable appears directly in the resulting list"
means that the corresponding list element is the symbol.
 
The doc string is clearer (and shorter) in this case:
 
"For a symbol that is locally unbound, just the symbol appears in the
value."
 
The manual is right to mention BUFFER explicitly in this regard, but the
wording should be made clearer.
 

In GNU Emacs 24.0.93.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
 of 2012-01-29 on MARVIN
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
Configured using:
 `configure --with-gcc (4.6) --no-opt --cflags
 -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/include
 -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/src
 -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libpng-dev_1.4.3-1/include
 -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/zlib-dev_1.2.5-2/include
 -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/giflib-4.1.4-1/include
 -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/jpeg-6b-4/include
 -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/tiff-3.8.2-1/include
 -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/gnutls-3.0.9/include --ldflags
 -LD:/devel/emacs/libs/gnutls-3.0.9/lib'
 

Message #8 received at 10715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> gnu.org>
To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 10715 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10715: 24.0.93; doc of `buffer-local-variables'
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:34:47 +0800

"Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> writes:

> The manual is right to mention BUFFER explicitly in this regard, but the
> wording should be made clearer.

Fixed, thanks.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.