From unknown Fri Apr 19 11:10:34 2024 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#11941 <11941@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#11941 <11941@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.1.50; Error in debbugs-gnu with gnus-inews-do-gcc Reply-To: bug#11941 <11941@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:10:34 +0000 retitle 11941 24.1.50; Error in debbugs-gnu with gnus-inews-do-gcc reassign 11941 emacs,gnus submitter 11941 Chong Yidong severity 11941 normal tag 11941 fixed thanks From unknown Fri Apr 19 11:10:34 2024 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#11941: 24.1.50; Error in debbugs-gnu with gnus-inews-do-gcc Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 05:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 11941 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 11941@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13422440911981 (code B ref -1); Sat, 14 Jul 2012 05:35:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jul 2012 05:34:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40160 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Spv0E-0000Vu-Q6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 01:34:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56328) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Spv0D-0000Vn-7o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 01:34:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Spuug-0000Aa-QP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 01:29:07 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:52473) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Spuug-0000AW-NS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 01:29:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57021) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Spuuf-0007Wp-Ua for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 01:29:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Spuuf-0000AK-6J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 01:29:05 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:47667) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Spuuf-0000AG-31 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 01:29:05 -0400 Received: from [155.69.186.151] (port=33966 helo=ulysses) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Spuue-0005Tc-1a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 01:29:04 -0400 From: Chong Yidong Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 13:28:59 +0800 Message-ID: <877gu67vxg.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) With latest trunk, I do this: 1. M-x debbugs-gnu-search RET [some search string] RET 2. [Move point to one of the entries in the *Emacs Bugs* buffer] 3. RET 4. In the ephemeral Gnus buffer, type `r' to reply to a message. 5. In the *unsent reply* buffer, type `C-c C-c' to send. Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "No such function: nnspool-request-create-group") signal(error ("No such function: nnspool-request-create-group")) error("No such function: %s" nnspool-request-create-group) gnus-get-function((nnspool "" (nnspool-active-file "/dev/null")) request-create-group) gnus-request-create-group("sent.2012-07" (nnspool "" (nnspool-active-file "/dev/null"))) gnus-inews-do-gcc() run-hooks(message-sent-hook) message-send(nil) message-send-and-exit(nil) The message still gets delivered, so only the gcc seems to be failing. I guess something in Gnus has changed. Note that any fix committed to the debbug-gnus package should continue to work with Emacs 24.1. In GNU Emacs 24.1.50.10 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.2) of 2012-07-14 on ulysses Bzr revision: 109085 cyd@gnu.org-20120714021907-0txw01oym3aoqrwt From unknown Fri Apr 19 11:10:34 2024 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#11941: 24.1.50; Error in debbugs-gnu with gnus-inews-do-gcc Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11941 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Chong Yidong Cc: 11941@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 11941-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11941.13425214188836 (code B ref 11941); Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:37:01 +0000 Received: (at 11941) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jul 2012 10:36:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45414 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sr59E-0002IR-VF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 06:36:58 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:39690) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sr59C-0002IJ-6q for 11941@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 06:36:55 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2012 10:22:39 -0000 Received: from p57BB95D4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO detlef.gmx.de) [87.187.149.212] by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 17 Jul 2012 12:22:39 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3708877 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18qnFcq2sAqVGwpBAcFBliNxfOCkJqUe45soSp/ZB 3jVUrNw8aqVq8F From: Michael Albinus References: <877gu67vxg.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:22:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: <877gu67vxg.fsf@gnu.org> (Chong Yidong's message of "Sat, 14 Jul 2012 13:28:59 +0800") Message-ID: <87k3y2n0ur.fsf@gmx.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Chong Yidong writes: package 11941 emacs,gnus thanks > With latest trunk, I do this: > > 1. M-x debbugs-gnu-search RET [some search string] RET > 2. [Move point to one of the entries in the *Emacs Bugs* buffer] > 3. RET > 4. In the ephemeral Gnus buffer, type `r' to reply to a message. > 5. In the *unsent reply* buffer, type `C-c C-c' to send. > > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "No such function: nnspool-request-create-group") > signal(error ("No such function: nnspool-request-create-group")) > error("No such function: %s" nnspool-request-create-group) > gnus-get-function((nnspool "" (nnspool-active-file "/dev/null")) request-create-group) > gnus-request-create-group("sent.2012-07" (nnspool "" (nnspool-active-file "/dev/null"))) > gnus-inews-do-gcc() > run-hooks(message-sent-hook) > message-send(nil) > message-send-and-exit(nil) > > The message still gets delivered, so only the gcc seems to be failing. > I guess something in Gnus has changed. This does not look like a debbugs-gnu bug. I suspect rather a gnus problem. I've added the "gnus" package to the report. This might increase the visibility for the gnus maintainers :-) Best regards, Miuchael. From unknown Fri Apr 19 11:10:34 2024 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#11941: 24.1.50; Error in debbugs-gnu with gnus-inews-do-gcc Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 23:14:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11941 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Michael Albinus Cc: Chong Yidong , 11941@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 11941-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11941.13436036022723 (code B ref 11941); Sun, 29 Jul 2012 23:14:01 +0000 Received: (at 11941) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jul 2012 23:13:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49461 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Svcfp-0000hr-EY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:13:22 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:33205) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Svcfm-0000hk-LX for 11941@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:13:19 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SvcYq-0004oL-4K; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:06:08 -0400 From: Glenn Morris References: <877gu67vxg.fsf@gnu.org> <87k3y2n0ur.fsf@gmx.de> X-Spook: Iran Peking clones offensive information warfare NSA X-Ran: VHx2WLRc,TdjQxKP*auYF+!d6)9{=L X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:06:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87k3y2n0ur.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:22:36 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Michael Albinus wrote: > package 11941 emacs,gnus > thanks You want "reassign" not "package", and must send such commands to the control server. (And it only affects bug comments from that point onwards.) > This does not look like a debbugs-gnu bug. I suspect rather a gnus > problem. > > I've added the "gnus" package to the report. This might increase the > visibility for the gnus maintainers :-) From unknown Fri Apr 19 11:10:34 2024 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#11941: 24.1.50; Error in debbugs-gnu with gnus-inews-do-gcc Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11941 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Glenn Morris Cc: cyd@gnu.org, 11941@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: Chong Yidong , 11941@debbugs.gnu.org, help-debbugs@gnu.org Received: via spool by 11941-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11941.134372129412666 (code B ref 11941); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:55:01 +0000 Received: (at 11941) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jul 2012 07:54:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52124 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sw7I5-0003IE-Sv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 03:54:54 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:58508) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sw7I3-0003I5-24 for 11941@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 03:54:52 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2012 07:47:31 -0000 Received: from p57BB9539.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO detlef.gmx.de) [87.187.149.57] by mail.gmx.net (mp017) with SMTP; 31 Jul 2012 09:47:31 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3708877 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19q1MYdzjRqNALUX6jasp7ttu+CouKOxES82F6i9i tBXgwmMxpZbdKt From: Michael Albinus References: <877gu67vxg.fsf@gnu.org> <87k3y2n0ur.fsf@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:47:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:06:08 -0400") Message-ID: <876294wewk.fsf@gmx.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Glenn Morris writes: >> package 11941 emacs,gnus >> thanks > > You want "reassign" not "package", and must send such commands to the > control server. (And it only affects bug comments from that point > onwards.) Thanks for fixing this. I've used blindly the control message template what I've got by accessing . This proposes package 11941 emacs,gnus which seems to be wrong. Could you fix it on the server? Sending to the wrong address is my own error, I haven't found an excuse. Sorry for that. Best regards, Michael. From unknown Fri Apr 19 11:10:34 2024 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#11941: 24.1.50; Error in debbugs-gnu with gnus-inews-do-gcc Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 19:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11941 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Chong Yidong Cc: 11941@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 11941-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11941.134687202925214 (code B ref 11941); Wed, 05 Sep 2012 19:08:02 +0000 Received: (at 11941) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2012 19:07:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41055 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T9KwP-0006Yd-Gk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:07:09 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:52817) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T9KwN-0006YW-Kq for 11941@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:07:08 -0400 Received: from ip-200-13-149-91.dialup.ice.net ([91.149.13.200] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T9Kw6-00038p-Ax; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 21:06:53 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <877gu67vxg.fsf@gnu.org> X-Now-Playing: Isotope 217's _The Unstable Molecule_ Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 21:06:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: <877gu67vxg.fsf@gnu.org> (Chong Yidong's message of "Sat, 14 Jul 2012 13:28:59 +0800") Message-ID: <87bohkqofx.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1T9Kw6-00038p-Ax X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1347476813.56025@9QL+F7GkDvcH7UMsCHUEMw X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Chong Yidong writes: > gnus-get-function((nnspool "" (nnspool-active-file "/dev/null")) request-create-group) > gnus-request-create-group("sent.2012-07" (nnspool "" (nnspool-active-file "/dev/null"))) > gnus-inews-do-gcc() Looking at the code, it seems likely that (gnus-inews-group-method "sent.2012-07") returns nnspool instead of the real backend you wanted to use, for some reason or other. Is that correct? Or perhaps it only returns that if the group doesn't exist at all. What does the following return? (gnus-inews-group-method "sent.2012-07.no-such-group") -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen From unknown Fri Apr 19 11:10:34 2024 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#11941: 24.1.50; Error in debbugs-gnu with gnus-inews-do-gcc Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 19:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11941 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Chong Yidong Cc: 11941@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 11941-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11941.134687210625339 (code B ref 11941); Wed, 05 Sep 2012 19:09:02 +0000 Received: (at 11941) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2012 19:08:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41060 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T9Kxd-0006ae-Tk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:08:26 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:52827) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T9Kxb-0006aX-Rv for 11941@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:08:24 -0400 Received: from ip-200-13-149-91.dialup.ice.net ([91.149.13.200] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T9KxN-00039o-1y; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 21:08:09 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <877gu67vxg.fsf@gnu.org> X-Now-Playing: Isotope 217's _The Unstable Molecule_ Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 21:08:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <877gu67vxg.fsf@gnu.org> (Chong Yidong's message of "Sat, 14 Jul 2012 13:28:59 +0800") Message-ID: <877gs8qodl.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1T9KxN-00039o-1y X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1347476890.0091@FXVcjCinYnvq0bN7Huc+SQ X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Hm. Come to think of it, that Gcc header should have been something like nnfolder+archive:sent.2012w36 and not just the shorter form. What does your Gcc header look like when responding from a debbugs group? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen From unknown Fri Apr 19 11:10:34 2024 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#11941: 24.1.50; Error in debbugs-gnu with gnus-inews-do-gcc Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 04:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11941 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 11941@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 11941-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11941.134690450225999 (code B ref 11941); Thu, 06 Sep 2012 04:09:01 +0000 Received: (at 11941) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Sep 2012 04:08:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41738 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T9TO6-0006lD-NC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:08:22 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com ([209.85.223.172]:59488) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T9TO0-0006ky-CL for 11941@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:08:16 -0400 Received: by ieak13 with SMTP id k13so2293263iea.3 for <11941@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 21:08:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=cEuXzU4dPDSNxPeOuLOWqN8wbTZ2783pz8j3AbVjzVE=; b=LN9BMOZFGcXbAMx2sKpwbzQ1B9OOwadx1fz0BafxcUSQ8rzB6FD9XOiHOUizY1EPux Nja0IE24d/SMzaRIFCE8JCSRygS3mtYOhsBpYi+NUR7jX4NPPpSdU4rHChdNvQ1uGFsr LDqRrJ3fTfhBMVX04F58hzTfuFNAO9RiV6puZdXMHPwx724956vyqYUBuFstK2Ne1wsK yEbrVtwE4Ae3WCK5Clyx47a0a4brfVZV2H7SPVz3rOiDZvAw/kRixt/9Ux3CbpM3HWm+ aaygBShjBB99trV1ydz5A6Cias81AC5Cn51IvKB76HsiqlzvBEsPmWcl9MFl/2P5j9rI a9RQ== Received: by 10.50.100.165 with SMTP id ez5mr643521igb.68.1346904481855; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 21:08:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ulysses ([155.69.16.255]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c5sm1803802igj.6.2012.09.05.21.07.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 05 Sep 2012 21:08:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Chong Yidong References: <877gu67vxg.fsf@gnu.org> <877gs8qodl.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 12:07:56 +0800 In-Reply-To: <877gs8qodl.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 05 Sep 2012 21:08:06 +0200") Message-ID: <878vcnequb.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Hm. Come to think of it, that Gcc header should have been something > like > > nnfolder+archive:sent.2012w36 > > and not just the shorter form. What does your Gcc header look like when > responding from a debbugs group? Gcc: sent.2012-09 > What does the following return? > > (gnus-inews-group-method "sent.2012-07.no-such-group") (nnspool "" (nnspool-active-file "/dev/null")) From unknown Fri Apr 19 11:10:34 2024 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#11941: 24.1.50; Error in debbugs-gnu with gnus-inews-do-gcc Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 14:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11941 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Chong Yidong Cc: 11941@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 11941-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11941.134694073819199 (code B ref 11941); Thu, 06 Sep 2012 14:13:01 +0000 Received: (at 11941) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Sep 2012 14:12:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44181 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T9cob-0004zb-FZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 10:12:18 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:40584) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T9coZ-0004zU-R2 for 11941@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 10:12:16 -0400 Received: from ip-200-13-149-91.dialup.ice.net ([91.149.13.200] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T9coD-0004Dz-6p; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:11:53 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <877gu67vxg.fsf@gnu.org> <877gs8qodl.fsf@gnus.org> <878vcnequb.fsf@gnu.org> X-Now-Playing: Isotope 217's _The Unstable Molecule_ Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:11:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: <878vcnequb.fsf@gnu.org> (Chong Yidong's message of "Thu, 06 Sep 2012 12:07:56 +0800") Message-ID: <87627ri6l5.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1T9coD-0004Dz-6p X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1347545513.9234@csiiP7ZEQHyTAGCKoPa+fQ X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Chong Yidong writes: >> and not just the shorter form. What does your Gcc header look like when >> responding from a debbugs group? > > Gcc: sent.2012-09 Right. That's the error. Does your Gcc header look like this in all groups? It should look something like "nnfolder+archive:sent.2012-09". -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen From unknown Fri Apr 19 11:10:34 2024 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#11941: 24.1.50; Error in debbugs-gnu with gnus-inews-do-gcc Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 04:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11941 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 11941@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 11941-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11941.13469920341831 (code B ref 11941); Fri, 07 Sep 2012 04:28:02 +0000 Received: (at 11941) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Sep 2012 04:27:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45177 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T9q9x-0000TT-5o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:27:13 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com ([209.85.223.172]:55433) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T9q9t-0000TK-36 for 11941@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:27:12 -0400 Received: by ieak13 with SMTP id k13so4319824iea.3 for <11941@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 21:26:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=VgW2aMFhXXIK/F2Rws2KsuXO9RsjwMzNgpaukZIzEJQ=; b=qRkfhuVdyV5exH/Ome1buVDflHv5Jeq9EFj5EaMUf+wFIiNy+WnK9UkBULx9BcO+K9 h11hHnIMd36xgHtpbjyfy/O/i/FdORaSDYf//eKcJgdVJj7N99Eso1BMMWcyM0gMhGVE 7Nz631sFduR6Ngh6OC8OJOlUmwhuu4Ob4/zFdmyfj2kJ2zyl3yEJQxWaqMq8lzjDHnw8 7EKhDrBjz3bf2XrIodz3dBN5fjVCvijPEg3kjOOLokmwmHAUnbKcdX7uW8olE7srzdQZ kVQ5wnU6/0ONGGl0LAJnj3URhs8hr+EfD52moKlcfUOizcSb6U3jNo6k/GcwbI/MdXqC GmBQ== Received: by 10.50.159.130 with SMTP id xc2mr6343049igb.33.1346992012922; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 21:26:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ulysses ([155.69.18.183]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c5sm6500512igj.6.2012.09.06.21.26.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 06 Sep 2012 21:26:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Chong Yidong References: <877gu67vxg.fsf@gnu.org> <877gs8qodl.fsf@gnus.org> <878vcnequb.fsf@gnu.org> <87627ri6l5.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 12:26:47 +0800 In-Reply-To: <87627ri6l5.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:11:50 +0200") Message-ID: <87vcfqzce0.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >>> and not just the shorter form. What does your Gcc header look like when >>> responding from a debbugs group? >> >> Gcc: sent.2012-09 > > Right. That's the error. Does your Gcc header look like this in all > groups? It should look something like "nnfolder+archive:sent.2012-09". When I reply to you via Gnus, the Gcc header is Gcc: nnfolder+archive:sent.2012-09 Similarly, on Emacs 24.2 when I respond from a debbugs group, the Gcc header is also Gcc: nnfolder+archive:sent.2012-09 On trunk, when I respond from a debbugs group, the Gcc header is the faulty one given above. From unknown Fri Apr 19 11:10:34 2024 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#11941: 24.1.50; Error in debbugs-gnu with gnus-inews-do-gcc Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 17:30:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11941 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Chong Yidong Cc: 11941@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 11941-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11941.13564565458139 (code B ref 11941); Tue, 25 Dec 2012 17:30:01 +0000 Received: (at 11941) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2012 17:29:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59500 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnYJI-00026t-Fn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 12:29:05 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:45315) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnYJD-00026i-02 for 11941@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 12:29:00 -0500 Received: from ip-90-20-179-93.dialup.ice.net ([93.179.20.90] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnYIR-0005CN-89; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:28:08 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <877gu67vxg.fsf@gnu.org> <877gs8qodl.fsf@gnus.org> <878vcnequb.fsf@gnu.org> <87627ri6l5.fsf@gnus.org> <87vcfqzce0.fsf@gnu.org> X-Now-Playing: Winston Tong's _Theoretically Chinese_ Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:28:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87vcfqzce0.fsf@gnu.org> (Chong Yidong's message of "Fri, 07 Sep 2012 12:26:47 +0800") Message-ID: <878v8m3uu4.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1TnYIR-0005CN-89 X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1357061288.61755@XgyiN6OGg2cHkuwpqLaFcQ X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Chong Yidong writes: > When I reply to you via Gnus, the Gcc header is > > Gcc: nnfolder+archive:sent.2012-09 > > Similarly, on Emacs 24.2 when I respond from a debbugs group, the Gcc > header is also > > Gcc: nnfolder+archive:sent.2012-09 > > On trunk, when I respond from a debbugs group, the Gcc header is the > faulty one given above. The Gcc header is inserted by `gnus-inews-insert-gcc'. I've traced through the function, and the following form is the one evaluated to insert the group name. (gnus-group-prefixed-name "sent.2012-09" gnus-message-archive-method) What does it eval to for you? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen From unknown Fri Apr 19 11:10:34 2024 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#11941: 24.1.50; Error in debbugs-gnu with gnus-inews-do-gcc Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 02:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11941 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 11941@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 11941-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11941.13564901329151 (code B ref 11941); Wed, 26 Dec 2012 02:49:02 +0000 Received: (at 11941) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Dec 2012 02:48:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59808 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tnh32-0002NS-Pp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:48:52 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com ([209.85.160.54]:65077) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tnh2w-0002NF-1R for 11941@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:48:47 -0500 Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id wz12so4548732pbc.27 for <11941@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:48:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=ORJMtaEnCNy7+Z9hWNHjqBqm+t6E5JpvBACJYr66kC4=; b=tTH6s9FGKU5+a3HX/jvgC4bNadhnzlxiCPJxnbyidR9Hv2Wn7FMm+r1rhgVNwZ0wJh RieCN0qJXFNWDZJA7IDarL96nA/nb93KcuK535CSKoJ9rpgylbdSQBhVOR2ZCKe/EDCi nM/Cf3oOOreW55sWy1iRXiEyex+JIoaQakeDnHMZUC/ebjiiwS25967Hg4IwWV9pvabE GM/ogm1VxMe3iqEoFkVLK5HKW4U2k+hj22B1ohpU1vM8prKuT6QErS47Ngm0zpCfPlTT /hcoWhZnAh31RBgLjbQ+JsXW6kOQrEJqMylQ3yr5baAReF68yxOoi42VCkUsW4l5Ejx4 Ru3w== X-Received: by 10.68.232.195 with SMTP id tq3mr81467227pbc.70.1356490080036; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:48:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from ulysses ([155.69.17.89]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ni8sm15009303pbc.70.2012.12.25.18.47.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:47:58 -0800 (PST) From: Chong Yidong References: <877gu67vxg.fsf@gnu.org> <877gs8qodl.fsf@gnus.org> <878vcnequb.fsf@gnu.org> <87627ri6l5.fsf@gnus.org> <87vcfqzce0.fsf@gnu.org> <878v8m3uu4.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 10:47:53 +0800 In-Reply-To: <878v8m3uu4.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:28:03 +0100") Message-ID: <87liclsf52.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >> Similarly, on Emacs 24.2 when I respond from a debbugs group, the Gcc >> header is also >> >> Gcc: nnfolder+archive:sent.2012-09 >> >> On trunk, when I respond from a debbugs group, the Gcc header is the >> faulty one given above. > > The Gcc header is inserted by `gnus-inews-insert-gcc'. I've traced > through the function, and the following form is the one evaluated to > insert the group name. > > (gnus-group-prefixed-name "sent.2012-09" gnus-message-archive-method) > > What does it eval to for you? Evaluating this in the (Message mode) reply buffer, evaluating the above gives "sent.2012-09". Evaluating `gnus-message-archive-method' gives "archive". Looking through the `gnus-group-prefixed-name' function, I see that this happens because (gnus-server-to-method "archive") returns nil. Perhaps because some part of Gnus has not been initialized? (I did not run M-x gnus before using debbug-gnus.) Am I to understand that you can't reproduce this? It is 100% reproducible for me. From unknown Fri Apr 19 11:10:34 2024 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#11941: 24.1.50; Error in debbugs-gnu with gnus-inews-do-gcc Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11941 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Chong Yidong Cc: 11941@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 11941-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11941.135652837210153 (code B ref 11941); Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:27:02 +0000 Received: (at 11941) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Dec 2012 13:26:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60102 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tnqzn-0002da-8R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 08:26:11 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:58154) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tnqzi-0002dA-T6 for 11941@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 08:26:05 -0500 Received: from ip-90-20-179-93.dialup.ice.net ([93.179.20.90] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tnqyv-0006or-GI; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:25:14 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <877gu67vxg.fsf@gnu.org> <877gs8qodl.fsf@gnus.org> <878vcnequb.fsf@gnu.org> <87627ri6l5.fsf@gnus.org> <87vcfqzce0.fsf@gnu.org> <878v8m3uu4.fsf@gnus.org> <87liclsf52.fsf@gnu.org> X-Now-Playing: Winston Tong's _Theoretically Chinese_ Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:25:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87liclsf52.fsf@gnu.org> (Chong Yidong's message of "Wed, 26 Dec 2012 10:47:53 +0800") Message-ID: <8738yt6j48.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1Tnqyv-0006or-GI X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1357133114.32812@XInBoe3VstBKDxPDNIFm9g X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Chong Yidong writes: > (gnus-server-to-method "archive") > > returns nil. Perhaps because some part of Gnus has not been > initialized? (I did not run M-x gnus before using debbug-gnus.) Oh, I see. I somehow missed that Gnus wasn't running. I'm able to reproduce this now. However, I'm not sure how to fix this. Even if the right Gcc line were inserted, no message would be stored on the backend, because Gnus sets up all that stuff during startup. For instance, if we're storing on IMAP (which is pretty common these days), Gnus kinda really has to go through the startup process to find out how to contact the IMAP server. So I think the right fix here is to not insert a Gcc header at all if Gnus isn't running. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen From unknown Fri Apr 19 11:10:34 2024 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#11941: 24.1.50; Error in debbugs-gnu with gnus-inews-do-gcc Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11941 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Chong Yidong Cc: 11941@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 11941-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11941.135697344815700 (code B ref 11941); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:05:01 +0000 Received: (at 11941) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Dec 2012 17:04:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38228 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TpimV-00045A-Lz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:04:07 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:45022) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TpimN-00044S-TS for 11941@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:04:04 -0500 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tpil5-0006fq-9H; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:02:39 +0100 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen References: <877gu67vxg.fsf@gnu.org> <877gs8qodl.fsf@gnus.org> <878vcnequb.fsf@gnu.org> <87627ri6l5.fsf@gnus.org> <87vcfqzce0.fsf@gnu.org> <878v8m3uu4.fsf@gnus.org> <87liclsf52.fsf@gnu.org> <8738yt6j48.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Neneh Cherry & The Thing's _The Cherry Thing Remixes_: "Accordion (Remixed by Jim O`Rourke)" Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:02:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8738yt6j48.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:25:11 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1Tpil5-0006fq-9H X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1357578159.76947@ofah6y//Yhpu3YqxybD9DQ X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > So I think the right fix here is to not insert a Gcc header at all if > Gnus isn't running. I've now done this. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 31 12:04:03 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Dec 2012 17:04:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38226 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TpimR-00044u-5N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:04:03 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:45025) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TpimO-00044U-5j for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:04:01 -0500 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tpil9-0006fx-Lm for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:02:43 +0100 Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:02:43 +0100 Message-Id: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #11941 X-MailScanner-ID: 1Tpil9-0006fx-Lm X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1357578163.75045@SJ4kNj4XWoSyWb1+aCoErQ X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) tags 11941 fixed close 11941 24.4