GNU bug report logs -
#12462
24.2.50; `C-x C-q' is bound to an obsolete command
Previous Next
Reported by: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:04:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 24.2.50
Done: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 12462 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 12462 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#12462
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:04:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:04:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
C-h k C-x C-q
C-x C-q runs the command toggle-read-only, which is an interactive
compiled Lisp function in `files.el'.
It is bound to C-x C-q.
(toggle-read-only &optional ARG INTERACTIVE)
This function is obsolete since 24.3;
use `read-only-mode' instead.
Not documented.
If the command is obsolete, why is the key bound to it and not to its
replacement?
Why does the help say "Not documented"? Well, because there is no
longer any doc string. That's a second bug: users now have no doc for
the key. They can follow the link to the doc for `read-only-mode', but
that is not the command that is invoked.
If `C-x C-q' still invokes `toggle-read-only', then `C-h k C-x C-q'
should still provide the doc for `toggle-read-only'. You removed the
doc string, which explains what `toggle-read-only' does.
In GNU Emacs 24.2.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
of 2012-09-17 on MARVIN
Bzr revision: 110062 cyd <at> gnu.org-20120917054104-r93rtwkrtva73ewe
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
Configured using:
`configure --with-gcc (4.7) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags
-ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/include
-ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/src
-ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libpng-dev_1.4.3-1/include
-ID:/devel/emacs/libs/zlib-dev_1.2.5-2/include
-ID:/devel/emacs/libs/giflib-4.1.4-1/include
-ID:/devel/emacs/libs/jpeg-6b-4/include
-ID:/devel/emacs/libs/tiff-3.8.2-1/include
-ID:/devel/emacs/libs/gnutls-3.0.9/include
-ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libiconv-1.13.1-1-dev/include
-ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libxml2-2.7.8/include/libxml2'
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#12462
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:41:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 12462 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Let me add that the doc string for `read-only-mode' is also not up-to-date, in
the sense that it, in turn, refers back to `toggle-read-only'.
If the latter is really deprecated (let alone obsolete), then the doc should be
updated to reflect this: `read-only-mode' doc should stand alone etc.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#12462
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:50:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 12462 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> writes:
> If the command is obsolete, why is the key bound to it and not to its
> replacement?
Fixed in trunk.
bug closed, send any further explanations to
12462 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Request was from
Chong Yidong <cyd <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:50:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#12462
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 22 Sep 2012 23:01:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 12462 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>> If the command is obsolete, why is the key bound to it and not to its
>> replacement?
>
> Fixed in trunk.
I added [remap read-only-mode] to dired.el because this change
broke wdired. An old [remap toggle-read-only] could still remain for
backward-compatibility.
Also I'm not sure whether `toggle-read-only' should be replaced with
`read-only-mode' in the function `dired-toggle-read-only' and maybe the
name of the function `dired-toggle-read-only' should be changed to
`dired-read-only-mode' in a similar way?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#12462
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 23 Sep 2012 10:24:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 12462 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Juri Linkov <juri <at> jurta.org> writes:
> Also I'm not sure whether `toggle-read-only' should be replaced with
> `read-only-mode' in the function `dired-toggle-read-only'
Yes, this should use (read-only-mode 'toggle). I changed that and
several other similar use-cases in the trunk. Thanks.
> and maybe the name of the function `dired-toggle-read-only' should be
> changed to `dired-read-only-mode' in a similar way?
I don't think such a name change would be apropriate, since
dired-read-only-mode is not a separate minor mode.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 21 Oct 2012 11:24:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 12 years and 210 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.