GNU bug report logs - #13625
24.1; Enable 'package-menu-execute being non-interactive

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Yves Baumes <ybaumes <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 00:20:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 24.1

Fixed in version 24.4

Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 13625 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 13625 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#13625; Package emacs. (Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:20:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Yves Baumes <ybaumes <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:20:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Yves Baumes <ybaumes <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 24.1; Enable 'package-menu-execute being non-interactive
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:49:08 +0100
Hi,

I was trying to make a little program to upgrade automatically my
packages archives. Basically something looking like that:

(progn
  (list-packages)
  (with-current-buffer "*Packages*"
    (package-menu-mark-upgrades)
    (package-menu-execute)
    (kill-buffer)))

The 'package-menu-execute implementation relies on the user to,
interactively, answer yes-or-no to a question asking him to confirm
he wants to upgrade the packages needing an upgrade.

Well, from my point of view the implementation must be silent when
called non interactively. And proceed with the packages upgrades.

Here is a modification that I made that suit my needs:

(defun package-menu-execute ()
...
    (when install-list
      (if (or
           (not (called-interactively-p 'any))
           (yes-or-no-p
...
    ;; Delete packages, prompting if necessary.
    (when delete-list
      (if (or
           (not (called-interactively-p 'any))
           (yes-or-no-p
...


Then, first, I am a newbie in Emacs Lisp modifications. Secondly, the
changelog suggests that package.el has not been modified for a while
ago. Since I could not believe I would be the first needing that
modification in five years, I guess that I maybe wrong somewhere, and
that there must be an easier way to perform what I am trying to do. Then
my question is basically what is a correct behavior according to you and
is my "solution" acceptable?

Regards
Yves





Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#13625; Package emacs. (Mon, 04 Feb 2013 03:42:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 13625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Yves Baumes <ybaumes <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 13625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#13625: 24.1;
	Enable 'package-menu-execute being non-interactive
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 22:39:43 -0500
> Well, from my point of view the implementation must be silent when
> called non interactively.

As a general rule, I tend to agree.

> Here is a modification that I made that suit my needs:

> (defun package-menu-execute ()
> ...
>     (when install-list
>       (if (or
>            (not (called-interactively-p 'any))
>            (yes-or-no-p
> ...
>     ;; Delete packages, prompting if necessary.
>     (when delete-list
>       (if (or
>            (not (called-interactively-p 'any))
>            (yes-or-no-p
> ...

Better would be to move those questions to the `interactive' spec, so
you don't even need called-interactively-p.

But you'd also want to check if there are callers of this function that
would need to be adjusted.


        Stefan




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#13625; Package emacs. (Mon, 04 Feb 2013 11:20:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 13625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Yves Baumes <ybaumes <at> gmail.com>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 13625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#13625: 24.1;
	Enable 'package-menu-execute being non-interactive
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 12:18:29 +0100
Le 4 févr. 2013 à 04:39, Stefan Monnier a écrit :
> Better would be to move those questions to the `interactive' spec, so
> you don't even need called-interactively-p.

Ok. I've read the Emacs Lisp Reference manual. As you told, they say an alternative to `called-interactively-p' is possible with `interactive'. Note sure if I understand it all with this example:

(defun test (&optional print-msg)
  (interactive "p")
  (if print-msg
      (message "IS INTERACTIVE")
    (message "IS *NOT* INTERACTIVE")))

So, if I understand it all, it would imply to add an extra argument to the `package-menu-execute' function, right? To me it sounds weird, but then it may be an usual idiom in Emacs Lisp I am not used to. If so just confirm me please :-).


> But you'd also want to check if there are callers of this function that
> would need to be adjusted.
> 
I've checked inside the package.el file. And this function is never called. It is only defined, and referenced (when building the keymap). 
As a side note: I didn't checked in other Elpa/Marmalade/etc packages. I guess it doesn't make sense to try to research potential callers everywhere in the world. I don't even know if there is a simple way to do that.

I am checking right now the emacs savannah homepage for contribution. How to checkout the latest bazzar code and what to provide along the patch. I will try to find an issue in the bug tracker corrrectly formatted. I keep you in touch :-)

Regards
Yves  





Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#13625; Package emacs. (Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:15:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 13625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Yves Baumes <ybaumes <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 13625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#13625: 24.1;
	Enable 'package-menu-execute being non-interactive
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 10:13:48 -0500
>> Better would be to move those questions to the `interactive' spec, so
>> you don't even need called-interactively-p.

> Ok. I've read the Emacs Lisp Reference manual. As you told, they say
> an alternative to `called-interactively-p' is possible with
> `interactive'. Note sure if I understand it all with this example:

> (defun test (&optional print-msg)
>   (interactive "p")
>   (if print-msg
>       (message "IS INTERACTIVE")
>     (message "IS *NOT* INTERACTIVE")))

That's one option: it doesn't move the questions to the interactive
spec, but it removes the use of called-interactively-p.

What I was suggesting was more like:

  (defun test ()
    (interactive
     (if (yes-or-no-p ...) ... ...)))

but I see that it's probably not applicable to package-menu-execute.
Maybe the best option here is to add an optional `dont-query' argument.


        Stefan




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#13625; Package emacs. (Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:01:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #17 received at 13625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Yves Baumes <ybaumes <at> gmail.com>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 13625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#13625: 24.1;
	Enable 'package-menu-execute being non-interactive
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 18:59:22 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Le 4 févr. 2013 à 16:13, Stefan Monnier a écrit :

> Maybe the best option here is to add an optional `dont-query' argument.

I've fiddled around a little bit, so tell me if my reasoning is ok.
I've found that whatever you do, an interactive call provide a
numeric value of '1'. Reading the Emacs Lisp Reference Manual,
I didn't find a way to negate the boolean value with `interactive'. As a matter
of fact I would suggest that `dont-query' must not be a good name since its value
would be 'true' when the function is called interactively while we want the user
to be queried in that case.

I made my modification with `prompt-user' as a parameter name.
One could think as another alternative, such as `query-user'.
Would it be more appropriate? I can't tell which one sounds better actually.
I am not fluent in english.. :-/

So here is the diff:

=== modified file 'lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el'
--- lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el	2013-01-01 09:11:05 +0000
+++ lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el	2013-02-04 17:17:41 +0000
@@ -1588,11 +1588,11 @@
 	       (length upgrades)
 	       (if (= (length upgrades) 1) "" "s")))))
 
-(defun package-menu-execute ()
+(defun package-menu-execute (&optional prompt-user)
   "Perform marked Package Menu actions.
 Packages marked for installation are downloaded and installed;
 packages marked for deletion are removed."
-  (interactive)
+  (interactive "p")
   (unless (derived-mode-p 'package-menu-mode)
     (error "The current buffer is not in Package Menu mode"))
   (let (install-list delete-list cmd id)
@@ -1611,26 +1611,30 @@
 		 (push (car id) install-list))))
 	(forward-line)))
     (when install-list
-      (if (yes-or-no-p
-	   (if (= (length install-list) 1)
-	       (format "Install package `%s'? " (car install-list))
-	     (format "Install these %d packages (%s)? "
-		     (length install-list)
-		     (mapconcat 'symbol-name install-list ", "))))
+      (if (or
+           (not prompt-user)
+           (yes-or-no-p
+            (if (= (length install-list) 1)
+                (format "Install package `%s'? " (car install-list))
+              (format "Install these %d packages (%s)? "
+                      (length install-list)
+                      (mapconcat 'symbol-name install-list ", ")))))
 	  (mapc 'package-install install-list)))
     ;; Delete packages, prompting if necessary.
     (when delete-list
-      (if (yes-or-no-p
-	   (if (= (length delete-list) 1)
-	       (format "Delete package `%s-%s'? "
-		       (caar delete-list)
-		       (cdr (car delete-list)))
-	     (format "Delete these %d packages (%s)? "
-		     (length delete-list)
-		     (mapconcat (lambda (elt)
-				  (concat (car elt) "-" (cdr elt)))
-				delete-list
-				", "))))
+      (if (or
+           (not prompt-user)
+           (yes-or-no-p
+            (if (= (length delete-list) 1)
+                (format "Delete package `%s-%s'? "
+                        (caar delete-list)
+                        (cdr (car delete-list)))
+              (format "Delete these %d packages (%s)? "
+                      (length delete-list)
+                      (mapconcat (lambda (elt)
+                                   (concat (car elt) "-" (cdr elt)))
+                                 delete-list
+                                 ", ")))))
 	  (dolist (elt delete-list)
 	    (condition-case-unless-debug err
 		(package-delete (car elt) (cdr elt))


The new code in this patch negates the `prompt-user' value since we want to
apply the changes when the user is not prompted *or* in the case he must be
prompted then he must reply 'yes'.

Maybe a good Changelog line could be:
"* emacs-lisp/package.el(package-menu-execute): Don't prompt for the user when `package-menu-execute' is called non-interactively."

Tell me if I forget something, or if something is wrong for you.

Regards
Yves





[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#13625; Package emacs. (Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:47:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #20 received at 13625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Yves Baumes <ybaumes <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 13625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#13625: 24.1;
	Enable 'package-menu-execute being non-interactive
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:44:54 -0500
> I've found that whatever you do, an interactive call provide a numeric
> value of '1'.  Reading the Emacs Lisp Reference Manual, I didn't find
> a way to negate the boolean value with `interactive'.

But since it's an optional parameter, you can just not provide it, in
which case it defaults to nil.

> -(defun package-menu-execute ()
> +(defun package-menu-execute (&optional prompt-user)
                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^
                                          dont-query

>    "Perform marked Package Menu actions.
>  Packages marked for installation are downloaded and installed;
>  packages marked for deletion are removed."
> -  (interactive)
> +  (interactive "p")

Leave it as (interactive) which will not provide any argument, so
dont-query will be nil for interactive calls. And for your own calls,
you can pass a non-nil argument.


        Stefan




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#13625; Package emacs. (Mon, 04 Feb 2013 22:11:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #23 received at 13625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Yves Baumes <ybaumes <at> gmail.com>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 13625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#13625: 24.1;
	Enable 'package-menu-execute being non-interactive
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 23:09:40 +0100
Ok! I was stuck, with the `interactive' ... Then here is the revised diff:

=== modified file 'lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el'                                                                          
--- lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el  2013-01-01 09:11:05 +0000                                                               
+++ lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el	2013-02-04 21:49:41 +0000
@@ -1588,7 +1588,7 @@
 	       (length upgrades)
 	       (if (= (length upgrades) 1) "" "s")))))
 
-(defun package-menu-execute ()
+(defun package-menu-execute (&optional dont-query)
   "Perform marked Package Menu actions.
 Packages marked for installation are downloaded and installed;
 packages marked for deletion are removed."
@@ -1611,26 +1611,30 @@
 		 (push (car id) install-list))))
 	(forward-line)))
     (when install-list
-      (if (yes-or-no-p
-	   (if (= (length install-list) 1)
-	       (format "Install package `%s'? " (car install-list))
-	     (format "Install these %d packages (%s)? "
-		     (length install-list)
-		     (mapconcat 'symbol-name install-list ", "))))
+      (if (or
+           dont-query
+           (yes-or-no-p
+            (if (= (length install-list) 1)
+                (format "Install package `%s'? " (car install-list))
+              (format "Install these %d packages (%s)? "
+                      (length install-list)
+                      (mapconcat 'symbol-name install-list ", ")))))
 	  (mapc 'package-install install-list)))
     ;; Delete packages, prompting if necessary.
     (when delete-list
-      (if (yes-or-no-p
-	   (if (= (length delete-list) 1)
-	       (format "Delete package `%s-%s'? "
-		       (caar delete-list)
-		       (cdr (car delete-list)))
-	     (format "Delete these %d packages (%s)? "
-		     (length delete-list)
-		     (mapconcat (lambda (elt)
-				  (concat (car elt) "-" (cdr elt)))
-				delete-list
-				", "))))
+      (if (or
+           dont-query
+           (yes-or-no-p
+            (if (= (length delete-list) 1)
+                (format "Delete package `%s-%s'? "
+                        (caar delete-list)
+                        (cdr (car delete-list)))
+              (format "Delete these %d packages (%s)? "
+                      (length delete-list)
+                      (mapconcat (lambda (elt)
+                                   (concat (car elt) "-" (cdr elt)))
+                                 delete-list
+                                 ", ")))))
 	  (dolist (elt delete-list)
 	    (condition-case-unless-debug err
 		(package-delete (car elt) (cdr elt))

As you wrote in previous emails, every possible call to
`package-menu-execute' remains compatible as is.
And I just needed to add a `t' parameter in my script.
Just perfect. :-)

Regards
Yves


Le 4 févr. 2013 à 20:44, Stefan Monnier a écrit :

>> I've found that whatever you do, an interactive call provide a numeric
>> value of '1'.  Reading the Emacs Lisp Reference Manual, I didn't find
>> a way to negate the boolean value with `interactive'.
> 
> But since it's an optional parameter, you can just not provide it, in
> which case it defaults to nil.
> 
>> -(defun package-menu-execute ()
>> +(defun package-menu-execute (&optional prompt-user)
>                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^
>                                          dont-query
> 
>>   "Perform marked Package Menu actions.
>> Packages marked for installation are downloaded and installed;
>> packages marked for deletion are removed."
>> -  (interactive)
>> +  (interactive "p")
> 
> Leave it as (interactive) which will not provide any argument, so
> dont-query will be nil for interactive calls. And for your own calls,
> you can pass a non-nil argument.
> 
> 
>        Stefan





Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#13625; Package emacs. (Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:40:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #26 received at 13625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Yves Baumes <ybaumes <at> gmail.com>
To: 13625 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Subject: Rép : bug#13625: 24.1; Enable
	'package-menu-execute being non-interactive
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 17:38:34 +0100
[bug_16325.txt (text/plain, inline)]
# Bazaar merge directive format 2 (Bazaar 0.90)
# revision_id: ybaumes <at> gmail.com-20130205153237-82xdt2b5f4i85bv2
# target_branch: bzr://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/trunk/
# testament_sha1: 509b0f8920808cc725a441fb32877e16e6ec513f
# timestamp: 2013-02-05 16:34:09 +0100
# source_branch: bzr://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/trunk
# base_revision_id: jan.h.d <at> swipnet.se-20130205122155-exqwhauamc0k0y1a
# 
# Begin patch
=== modified file 'lisp/ChangeLog'
--- lisp/ChangeLog	2013-02-05 12:16:35 +0000
+++ lisp/ChangeLog	2013-02-05 15:32:37 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2013-02-05  Yves Baumes  <ybaumes <at> gmail.com>
+
+	* lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el (package-menu-execute): Don't query
+	for the user input when called non-interactively (bug#13625).
+
 2013-02-05  Jan Djärv  <jan.h.d <at> swipnet.se>
 
 	* cus-start.el (all): Add ns-use-native-fullscreen.

=== modified file 'lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el'
--- lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el	2013-01-01 09:11:05 +0000
+++ lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el	2013-02-05 15:32:37 +0000
@@ -1588,7 +1588,7 @@
 	       (length upgrades)
 	       (if (= (length upgrades) 1) "" "s")))))
 
-(defun package-menu-execute ()
+(defun package-menu-execute (&optional dont-query)
   "Perform marked Package Menu actions.
 Packages marked for installation are downloaded and installed;
 packages marked for deletion are removed."
@@ -1611,26 +1611,30 @@
 		 (push (car id) install-list))))
 	(forward-line)))
     (when install-list
-      (if (yes-or-no-p
-	   (if (= (length install-list) 1)
-	       (format "Install package `%s'? " (car install-list))
-	     (format "Install these %d packages (%s)? "
-		     (length install-list)
-		     (mapconcat 'symbol-name install-list ", "))))
+      (if (or
+           dont-query
+           (yes-or-no-p
+            (if (= (length install-list) 1)
+                (format "Install package `%s'? " (car install-list))
+              (format "Install these %d packages (%s)? "
+                      (length install-list)
+                      (mapconcat 'symbol-name install-list ", ")))))
 	  (mapc 'package-install install-list)))
     ;; Delete packages, prompting if necessary.
     (when delete-list
-      (if (yes-or-no-p
-	   (if (= (length delete-list) 1)
-	       (format "Delete package `%s-%s'? "
-		       (caar delete-list)
-		       (cdr (car delete-list)))
-	     (format "Delete these %d packages (%s)? "
-		     (length delete-list)
-		     (mapconcat (lambda (elt)
-				  (concat (car elt) "-" (cdr elt)))
-				delete-list
-				", "))))
+      (if (or
+           dont-query
+           (yes-or-no-p
+            (if (= (length delete-list) 1)
+                (format "Delete package `%s-%s'? "
+                        (caar delete-list)
+                        (cdr (car delete-list)))
+              (format "Delete these %d packages (%s)? "
+                      (length delete-list)
+                      (mapconcat (lambda (elt)
+                                   (concat (car elt) "-" (cdr elt)))
+                                 delete-list
+                                 ", ")))))
 	  (dolist (elt delete-list)
 	    (condition-case-unless-debug err
 		(package-delete (car elt) (cdr elt))

# Begin bundle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[Message part 2 (text/plain, inline)]
Attached is a bzr bundle for the modifications.

Regards
Yves 

Reply sent to Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Wed, 13 Feb 2013 05:03:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Yves Baumes <ybaumes <at> gmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Wed, 13 Feb 2013 05:03:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #31 received at 13625-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: 13625-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#13625: 24.1;
	Enable 'package-menu-execute being non-interactive
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:01:26 -0500
Version: 24.4

Thanks; applied.




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:24:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 11 years and 67 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.