GNU bug report logs - #14570
[c.] Re: New development for emacs's octave-mode

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 12:25:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 14570 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 14570 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#14570; Package emacs. (Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:25:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:25:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: [c.] Re: New development for emacs's octave-mode
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 20:23:45 +0800

[Message part 1 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: "c." <carlo.defalco <at> gmail.com>
To: Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
Cc: "help\@octave.org List" <help <at> octave.org>
Subject: Re: New development for emacs's octave-mode
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 13:15:24 +0200

On 5 Jun 2013, at 20:05, c. <carlo.defalco <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> On 5 Jun 2013, at 19:22, c. <carlo.defalco <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 5 Jun 2013, at 18:17, Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> These were added a few weeks ago.
>> oh, then maybe my octave.el is outdated, I'll get a new version.
>> Thanks!
>> c.
> 
> Indeed, with the latest version classdef keywords are highlighted.
> c.


Hi,

I just noticed a strange behaviour editing a function file with a default parameter:

I have a function with the following signature:

   function disordine_quad_fast_neumann (csvfilename, nprocs=1, range = [])


in a file with the same name whenever I try to save the file I am asked 'which name to use':

  a) use function name '1'
  b) use file name 'disordine_quad_fast_neumann'
  q) Don't fix

It seems the default parameter value is being mistaken for the function name.

c.
Reply sent to Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>:
You have taken responsibility. (Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:13:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Notification sent to Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:13:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 14570-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
To: 14570-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#14570: [c.] Re: New development for emacs's octave-mode
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 21:12:07 +0800

Fixed in trunk.
bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sat, 06 Jul 2013 11:24:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 10 years and 304 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.