GNU bug report logs - #15085
Doc Fix for the Emacs Lips Intro

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 15085 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 15085 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: Doc Fix for the Emacs Lips Intro
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:40:52 +0200

Hi,

The following patch adapts one example (and its explanation) to the
current code.


--- emacs-lisp-intro.texi 2013-08-13 12:14:44 +0200
+++ emacs-lisp-intro.texi 2013-08-13 12:32:36 +0200
@@ -6323,7 +6323,7 @@
                         (/ (+ 10 (* size (prefix-numeric-value arg)))
                            10)))
                  (point-min))))
-  (if arg (forward-line 1)))
+  (if (and arg (not (consp arg))) (forward-line 1)))
 @end group
 @end smallexample

@@ -6390,7 +6390,7 @@
 invoked with an argument:

 @smallexample
-(if arg (forward-line 1)))
+(if (and arg (not (consp arg))) (forward-line 1))
 @end smallexample

 @noindent
@@ -6401,13 +6401,6 @@
 perhaps, not necessary, but which, if it did not occur, would be sure
 to draw complaints.

-On the other hand, it also means that if you specify the command with
-a @kbd{C-u}, but without a number, that is to say, if the `raw prefix
-argument' is simply a cons cell, then the command puts you at the
-beginning of the second line @dots{}  I don't know whether this is
-intended or whether no one has dealt with the code to avoid this
-happening.
-
 @node Second Buffer Related Review
 @section Review



-- 
Dani Moncayo

Message #8 received at 15085 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>
To: 15085 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#15085: Doc Fix for the Emacs Lips Intro
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:53:57 +0200

> The following patch adapts one example (and its explanation) to the
> current code.

By the way: I understand that the introduction has not to be based on
the current code.  But in this case, the original code contained a bug
(I think), and therefore I've thought that it would be better to also
remove that bug from the introduction.

-- 
Dani Moncayo

Message #13 received at 15085-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: 15085-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#15085: Doc Fix for the Emacs Lips Intro
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 21:19:01 -0400

Version: 24.4

Thanks; applied.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.