GNU bug report logs - #16696
frameset-to-register: Different from frame-configuration-to-register?

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 16696 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 16696 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
To: "T.V. Raman" <tv.raman.tv <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Bug-Gnu-Emacs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>,
 Emacs developers <emacs-devel <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: frameset-to-register: Different from
 frame-configuration-to-register?
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 21:40:34 +0100

Package: emacs
Version: 24.3.50

I'm creating a bug report for this, but I am not able to reproduce it.
Could you please answer to the bug thread and put a step-by-step
recipe starting from emacs -Q?

TIA,

   Juanma


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: T. V. Raman <tv.raman.tv <at> gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 8:31 PM
Subject: frameset-to-register: Different from frame-configuration-to-register?
To: emacs-devel <at> gnu.org


If you do C-x rf to invoke the new frameset-to-register -- and
later attempt to jump to that configuration via C-x rj it throws
an error like so:
this does not happen with the older command
frmae-configuration-to-register.

Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Register doesn't contain a
buffer position or configuration")
  signal(error ("Register doesn't contain a buffer position or configuration"))
  error("Register doesn't contain a buffer position or configuration")
  #[513 "\301 !\302 !\203Y \211G\303Y\203Y \211\304H >\203Y \211\304H
>\204& \305\306\307\310#\210\211\311H\2043 \305\312\313
!\"\210\211\304H >\204A \305\306\307\310#\210\211\311H \304H >\204R
\305\306\314\310#\210 \315H!\202\362 \211:\203v \316 @!\203v \317 @
?\"\210\211\211A@\262 b\202\362 \211:\203\221 \320 @!\203\221 \321
@!\210\211\211A@\262 b\202\362 \322 !\203\254 \323 !\204\241
\305\324!\210\325\323 !!\210\211b\202\362 \211:\203\277
\211@\326=\203\277 \327 A!\202\362 \211:\203\357 \211@\330=\203\357
\331 A@!\204\342 \332\333\334 A@\"!\204\342 \305\335!\210\327
A@!\210\336 8b\202\362 \305\337!\207" [cl-struct-registerv-tags
get-register vectorp 5 0 error "%s accessing a non-%s"
registerv-jump-func registerv 3 "Don't know how to jump to register
%s" single-key-description registerv-data 1 frame-configuration-p
set-frame-configuration window-configuration-p
set-window-configuration markerp marker-buffer "That register's buffer
no longer exists" switch-to-buffer file find-file file-query
find-buffer-visiting y-or-n-p format "Visit file %s again? " "Register
access aborted" 2 "Register doesn't contain a buffer position or
configuration"] 8 2384059 (byte-code "\301\302! D\207"
[current-prefix-arg register-read-with-preview "Jump to register: "]
2)](102 nil)
  ad-Advice-jump-to-register(#[513 "\301 !\302 !\203Y \211G\303Y\203Y
\211\304H >\203Y \211\304H >\204& \305\306\307\310#\210\211\311H\2043
\305\312\313 !\"\210\211\304H >\204A \305\306\307\310#\210\211\311H
\304H >\204R \305\306\314\310#\210 \315H!\202\362 \211:\203v \316
@!\203v \317 @ ?\"\210\211\211A@\262 b\202\362 \211:\203\221 \320
@!\203\221 \321 @!\210\211\211A@\262 b\202\362 \322 !\203\254 \323
!\204\241 \305\324!\210\325\323 !!\210\211b\202\362 \211:\203\277
\211@\326=\203\277 \327 A!\202\362 \211:\203\357 \211@\330=\203\357
\331 A@!\204\342 \332\333\334 A@\"!\204\342 \305\335!\210\327
A@!\210\336 8b\202\362 \305\337!\207" [cl-struct-registerv-tags
get-register vectorp 5 0 error "%s accessing a non-%s"
registerv-jump-func registerv 3 "Don't know how to jump to register
%s" single-key-description registerv-data 1 frame-configuration-p
set-frame-configuration window-configuration-p
set-window-configuration markerp marker-buffer "That register's buffer
no longer exists" switch-to-buffer file find-file file-query
find-buffer-visiting y-or-n-p format "Visit file %s again? " "Register
access aborted" 2 "Register doesn't contain a buffer position or
configuration"] 8 2384059 (byte-code "\301\302! D\207"
[current-prefix-arg register-read-with-preview "Jump to register: "]
2)] 102 nil)
  apply(ad-Advice-jump-to-register #[513 "\301 !\302 !\203Y
\211G\303Y\203Y \211\304H >\203Y \211\304H >\204&
\305\306\307\310#\210\211\311H\2043 \305\312\313 !\"\210\211\304H
>\204A \305\306\307\310#\210\211\311H \304H >\204R
\305\306\314\310#\210 \315H!\202\362 \211:\203v \316 @!\203v \317 @
?\"\210\211\211A@\262 b\202\362 \211:\203\221 \320 @!\203\221 \321
@!\210\211\211A@\262 b\202\362 \322 !\203\254 \323 !\204\241
\305\324!\210\325\323 !!\210\211b\202\362 \211:\203\277
\211@\326=\203\277 \327 A!\202\362 \211:\203\357 \211@\330=\203\357
\331 A@!\204\342 \332\333\334 A@\"!\204\342 \305\335!\210\327
A@!\210\336 8b\202\362 \305\337!\207" [cl-struct-registerv-tags
get-register vectorp 5 0 error "%s accessing a non-%s"
registerv-jump-func registerv 3 "Don't know how to jump to register
%s" single-key-description registerv-data 1 frame-configuration-p
set-frame-configuration window-configuration-p
set-window-configuration markerp marker-buffer "That register's buffer
no longer exists" switch-to-buffer file find-file file-query
find-buffer-visiting y-or-n-p format "Visit file %s again? " "Register
access aborted" 2 "Register doesn't contain a buffer position or
configuration"] 8 2384059 (byte-code "\301\302! D\207"
[current-prefix-arg register-read-with-preview "Jump to register: "]
2)] (102 nil))
  jump-to-register(102 nil)
  call-interactively(jump-to-register nil nil)
  command-execute(jump-to-register)

Message #8 received at 16696 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
To: 16696 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: raman <tv.raman.tv <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: frameset-to-register: Different from
 frame-configuration-to-register?
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:07:52 +0100

Following your recipe, I do not see the same error that you reported.
I get a message "Marker points into wrong buffer: #<marker at 192 in
*scratch*>", but the frame is restored. I'll have to look into it.

As for making a bug report, it already exists and it's bug#16696 (I'm
forwarding this message to that bug thread). Please answer any
followup comment there and not to emacs-devel.

Thanks,

     Juanma


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: raman <tv.raman.tv <at> gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 11:01 PM
Subject: Re: frameset-to-register: Different from
frame-configuration-to-register?
To: emacs.devel <at> gnu.org


To repro, make sure you switch buffers etc after invoking C-x rf so the
config you jump to with C-x rj is different from your current setup.

So repro steps:

1. M-x calendar
2. C-x4b *scratch*
3. C-xrf a
4. M-x shell
5. C-x 1
6. C-xrj a

Re filing a detailed bug report, I've stayed away because I was afraid
I'd not be able to do that from the comfort of Emacs --

Message #11 received at 16696 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
To: 16696 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: raman <tv.raman.tv <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#16696: Fwd: frameset-to-register: Different from
 frame-configuration-to-register?
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:51:12 +0100

I've fixed the bug I was able to reproduce. Could you please try to
reproduce your problem with the current trunk?

Thanks.

Message #16 received at 16696-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
To: "T.V. Raman" <tv.raman.tv <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 16696-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#16696: Fwd: frameset-to-register: Different from
 frame-configuration-to-register?
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 04:09:43 +0100

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:36 AM, T. V. Raman <tv.raman.tv <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> works.

Great. Closing.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.