GNU bug report logs - #17069
24.4.50; HAVE_GLIB is not defined when gfilenotify is the only user

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 17069 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 17069 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <mituharu <at> math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 24.4.50; HAVE_GLIB is not defined when gfilenotify is the only user
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 17:58:47 +0900

Steps to reproduce:

  1. Install glib.
  2. ./configure --with-x-toolkit=athena --without-rsvg

Result:

  In src/config.h, HAVE_GFILENOTIFY is defined, but not for HAVE_GLIB.
  (I guess the latter is necessary for proper gfilenotify support.)

				     YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
				mituharu <at> math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp

In GNU Emacs 24.4.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw scroll bars)
 of 2014-03-23 on ubuntu
Repository revision: 116853 dancol <at> dancol.org-20140323060236-dtlsz33veq7asjfb
Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11103000
System Description:	Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS

Configured using:
 `configure --with-x-toolkit=athena --without-rsvg'

Message #10 received at 17069-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Daniel Colascione <dancol <at> dancol.org>
To: 17069-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Fixed
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 02:24:32 -0700

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Fixed in trust r116856..

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #13 received at 17069 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Daniel Colascione <dancol <at> dancol.org>
Cc: 17069 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, mituharu <at> math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp
Subject: Re: bug#17069: Fixed
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 18:13:40 +0200

> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 02:24:32 -0700
> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol <at> dancol.org>
> 
> Fixed in trust r116856..

Thanks, but why on the trunk?  The same problem exists on the release
branch, no?

Message #16 received at 17069 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 17069 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Daniel Colascione <dancol <at> dancol.org>
Subject: Re: bug#17069: Fixed
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:34:48 -0400

In any case, can I again prod people to put

Version: 24.5

(or whatever) at the start of their -done messages.
Because otherwise when someone looks at

http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=17069

a year from now, they have a hard time figuring out which Emacs release
the fix is supposed to be in.

Message #19 received at 17069 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
To: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 17069 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#17069: Fixed
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 19:49:56 +0100

On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> In any case, can I again prod people to put
>
> Version: 24.5
>
> (or whatever) at the start of their -done messages.

Does that work in all -done messages (I mean, not Bcc:ed to
control <at> debbugs.org)?

I'm asking because AFAICS, admin/notes/bugtracker only mentions
Version: in the context of reporting new bugs. Elsewhere it refers to
the "fixed BUGNO VERSION" control syntax, not pseudo-headers.

Message #22 received at 17069 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 17069 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#17069: Fixed
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 19:24:31 -0400

Juanma Barranquero wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> In any case, can I again prod people to put
>>
>> Version: 24.5
>>
>> (or whatever) at the start of their -done messages.
>
> Does that work in all -done messages (I mean, not Bcc:ed to
> control <at> debbugs.org)?

Yes. In fact, only in such messages.

Message #25 received at 17069 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
To: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 17069 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#17069: Fixed
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 00:27:05 +0100

On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> Yes. In fact, only in such messages.

Good to know, thanks.

I'd suggest adding that info to admin/notes/bugtracker, BTW.

Message #28 received at 17069 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 17069 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Daniel Colascione <dancol <at> dancol.org>
Subject: Re: bug#17069: Fixed
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:59:13 -0400

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

>> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 02:24:32 -0700
>> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol <at> dancol.org>
>> 
>> Fixed in trust r116856..
>
> Thanks, but why on the trunk?  The same problem exists on the release
> branch, no?

I also think this should be in emacs-24.
Please could someone backport it?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.