GNU bug report logs -
#22613
25.1.50; dired-aux missing require 'cl-lib
Previous Next
Reported by: Tino Calancha <f92capac <at> gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:35:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 25.1.50
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 22613 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 22613 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:35:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Tino Calancha <f92capac <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:35:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
emacs -Q /tmp
M-! echo a > foo && echo a > bar RET
g
% m ^\(foo\|bar\)$ RET
Q a RET A RET
In GNU Emacs 25.1.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.23)
Repository revision: 4ccd2688911b90bcb8cdcd2a8de608e09471a91a
[dired-aux.patch (text/plain, attachment)]
Added indication that bug 22613 blocks19759
Request was from
Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:47:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:25:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:37:22 +0900 (JST)
> From: Tino Calancha <f92capac <at> gmail.com>
>
> M-! echo a > foo && echo a > bar RET
> g
> % m ^\(foo\|bar\)$ RET
> Q a RET A RET
cl-mapcan is an autoloaded function, so requiring cl-lib is not the
right solution, IMO. Some other factor is at work here.
(This problem doesn't exist on the emacs-25 branch, btw.)
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:33:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #13 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> cl-mapcan is an autoloaded function, so requiring cl-lib is not the
> right solution, IMO. Some other factor is at work here.
Yes, hmm, I also saw that once: cl-lib autoloads were not loaded
(i.e. the autoloads file had not been loaded, though it existed).
Didn't investigate at that moment, however.
Michael.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 13 Feb 2016 15:10:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
> Cc: Tino Calancha <f92capac <at> gmail.com>, 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 15:32:45 +0100
>
> > cl-mapcan is an autoloaded function, so requiring cl-lib is not the
> > right solution, IMO. Some other factor is at work here.
>
> Yes, hmm, I also saw that once: cl-lib autoloads were not loaded
> (i.e. the autoloads file had not been loaded, though it existed).
But the only one who seems to load cl-loaddefs.el is cl-lib.el, so
perhaps requiring it _is_ TRT after all.
Or maybe we should make cl-mapcan autoloaded in loaddefs.el?
What is confusing is that "emacs -Q" knows cl-mapcan is autoloaded,
even though its autoload form was not loaded, evidently. Where does
it get this information, and why can't it get the autoload form from
the same place?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 13 Feb 2016 16:18:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> What is confusing is that "emacs -Q" knows cl-mapcan is autoloaded,
> even though its autoload form was not loaded, evidently. Where does
> it get this information, and why can't it get the autoload form from
> the same place?
Maybe this is package.el related - cl-lib is a built-in package. I had
hoped to find some information in (info "(elisp) Startup Summary").
Michael.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:09:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #22 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Sorry, I'm confused: what does package.el have to do with this issue,
> and what do you mean by "a built-in package" in this context?
I mean: in the package manager, cl-lib is listed as "built-in" package.
And packages also have autoloads. So maybe the autoload definition for
cl-mapcan we didn't understand why it is dloaded at all comes from the
package mechanism. Just speculating.
Michael.
Reply sent
to
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:14:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Tino Calancha <f92capac <at> gmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:14:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #27 received at 22613-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
> Cc: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>, f92capac <at> gmail.com, 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 12:58:35 -0500
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > But the only one who seems to load cl-loaddefs.el is cl-lib.el, so
> > perhaps requiring it _is_ TRT after all.
>
> Yes.
Done.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:17:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #30 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
> Cc: f92capac <at> gmail.com, 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:43:39 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Sorry, I'm confused: what does package.el have to do with this issue,
> > and what do you mean by "a built-in package" in this context?
>
> I mean: in the package manager, cl-lib is listed as "built-in" package.
> And packages also have autoloads. So maybe the autoload definition for
> cl-mapcan we didn't understand why it is dloaded at all comes from the
> package mechanism. Just speculating.
Could be. But what bothers me is that Emacs _knows_ it's autoloaded,
and from which file, but it cannot autoload it. That shouldn't
happen, no matter where did the knowledge come from. Right?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:21:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #33 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> > But the only one who seems to load cl-loaddefs.el is cl-lib.el, so
>> > perhaps requiring it _is_ TRT after all.
>>
>> Yes.
>
> Done.
Thanks, but wrong branch I think! :)
I did it simultaneously in emacs-25.
Not sure what's causing cl-lib to be loaded at startup - that shouldn't
happen.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:22:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #36 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> But the only one who seems to load cl-loaddefs.el is cl-lib.el, so
> perhaps requiring it _is_ TRT after all.
Yes.
> Or maybe we should make cl-mapcan autoloaded in loaddefs.el?
No.
> What is confusing is that "emacs -Q" knows cl-mapcan is autoloaded,
> even though its autoload form was not loaded, evidently.
Because something is causing cl-lib to be loaded.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:22:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #39 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
> Cc: f92capac <at> gmail.com, 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 17:17:06 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
> > What is confusing is that "emacs -Q" knows cl-mapcan is autoloaded,
> > even though its autoload form was not loaded, evidently. Where does
> > it get this information, and why can't it get the autoload form from
> > the same place?
>
> Maybe this is package.el related - cl-lib is a built-in package. I had
> hoped to find some information in (info "(elisp) Startup Summary").
Sorry, I'm confused: what does package.el have to do with this issue,
and what do you mean by "a built-in package" in this context?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:46:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #42 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Glenn Morris wrote:
> Not sure what's causing cl-lib to be loaded at startup - that shouldn't
> happen.
It only happens in -nw mode, so I guess it is the use of cl-defmethod in
term/xterm.el. I'm not sure if this (cl-lib always being loaded in emacs
-Q -nw) is a problem or not. I guess not? (Stefan, any opinion?)
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:53:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #45 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>> Not sure what's causing cl-lib to be loaded at startup - that shouldn't
>> happen.
> It only happens in -nw mode, so I guess it is the use of cl-defmethod in
> term/xterm.el. I'm not sure if this (cl-lib always being loaded in emacs
> -Q -nw) is a problem or not. I guess not? (Stefan, any opinion?)
Hmm... cl-defmethod should cause cl-lib to be loaded (cl-generic is
preloaded, after all).
Usually we consider it a bug if "emacs -Q" (or "emacs -nw -Q") needs to
load a package, tho we tend not to apply that rule to lisp/term/*.el.
In any case, the fact that "emacs -Q -nw" loads cl-lib is not intended
and I think it'd be good to track down why it does and if/how we can fix it.
Stefan
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 13 Feb 2016 19:06:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #48 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Hmm... cl-defmethod should cause cl-lib to be loaded (cl-generic is
^^^
not
Stefan "Damn it!"
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 13 Feb 2016 19:59:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #51 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> Hmm... cl-defmethod should cause cl-lib to be loaded (cl-generic is
> preloaded, after all).
(yes, "should not")
It seems to come from the call to `byte-compile' in
`cl--generic-get-dispatcher' at load time. "byte-comp" requires
"cl-extra", and that "cl-lib".
Michael.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 13 Feb 2016 21:12:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #54 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
> Cc: michael_heerdegen <at> web.de, f92capac <at> gmail.com, 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:20:19 -0500
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> >> > But the only one who seems to load cl-loaddefs.el is cl-lib.el, so
> >> > perhaps requiring it _is_ TRT after all.
> >>
> >> Yes.
> >
> > Done.
>
> Thanks, but wrong branch I think! :)
> I did it simultaneously in emacs-25.
No, I did it exactly to the right branch: this problem doesn't exist
on emacs-25 (as I wrote previously).
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 13 Feb 2016 21:24:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #57 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> No, I did it exactly to the right branch: this problem doesn't exist
> on emacs-25 (as I wrote previously).
There's no difference between dired-aux in emacs-25 and master.
Of course the emacs-25 version needs cl-lib, since it uses cl- functions.
Perhaps you were testing in an Emacs where cl-lib happened to be loaded.
Eg a -nw one, as we have discussed.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 13 Feb 2016 21:34:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #60 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
> Cc: michael_heerdegen <at> web.de, f92capac <at> gmail.com, 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 16:23:27 -0500
>
> Perhaps you were testing in an Emacs where cl-lib happened to be loaded.
> Eg a -nw one, as we have discussed.
No, I didn't.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 13 Feb 2016 22:10:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #63 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>> Hmm... cl-defmethod should cause cl-lib to be loaded (cl-generic is
>> preloaded, after all).
> (yes, "should not")
> It seems to come from the call to `byte-compile' in
Oh, right, just as for the preloaded uses of cl-generic, if we want to
avoid loading cl-lib, we'd have to pre-fill cl-generic's dispatcher
cache with the specific dispatcher used (grep for
cl--generic-prefill-dispatchers to see what that looks like).
Stefan
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 14 Feb 2016 22:48:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #66 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Perhaps you were testing in an Emacs where cl-lib happened to be loaded.
>> Eg a -nw one, as we have discussed.
>
> No, I didn't.
Then I have no explanation for how your dired-aux could possibly use
cl-* functions without loading cl-lib.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 15 Feb 2016 03:37:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #69 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
> Cc: michael_heerdegen <at> web.de, f92capac <at> gmail.com, 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:47:16 -0500
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> >> Perhaps you were testing in an Emacs where cl-lib happened to be loaded.
> >> Eg a -nw one, as we have discussed.
> >
> > No, I didn't.
>
> Then I have no explanation for how your dired-aux could possibly use
> cl-* functions without loading cl-lib.
I don't have an explanation, either. I just know that the OP's report
was for the master branch, and the problem doesn't happen on emacs-25.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 15 Feb 2016 08:15:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #72 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 05:36:24 +0200 Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
>> Cc: michael_heerdegen <at> web.de, f92capac <at> gmail.com, 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:47:16 -0500
>>
>> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>
>> >> Perhaps you were testing in an Emacs where cl-lib happened to be loaded.
>> >> Eg a -nw one, as we have discussed.
>> >
>> > No, I didn't.
>>
>> Then I have no explanation for how your dired-aux could possibly use
>> cl-* functions without loading cl-lib.
>
> I don't have an explanation, either. I just know that the OP's report
> was for the master branch, and the problem doesn't happen on emacs-25.
I'm late to this thread, but when I execute the OP's recipe in emacs-25
revision a91b4b51ddf2575d821adb8b84fdf32cff83886e (i.e. before Glenn's
patch was applied), I do get the error "dired-do-find-regexp: Symbol’s
function definition is void: cl-mapcan". My build: GNU Emacs 25.0.90.2
(x86_64-suse-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.14.15) of 2016-02-11.
Steve Berman
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:37:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #75 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net> writes:
> > I don't have an explanation, either. I just know that the OP's report
> > was for the master branch, and the problem doesn't happen on emacs-25.
>
> I'm late to this thread, but when I execute the OP's recipe in emacs-25
> revision a91b4b51ddf2575d821adb8b84fdf32cff83886e (i.e. before Glenn's
> patch was applied), I do get the error "dired-do-find-regexp: Symbol’s
> function definition is void: cl-mapcan". My build: GNU Emacs 25.0.90.2
> (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.14.15) of 2016-02-11.
Isn't there actually something wrong with autoloading? `cl-mapcan' has
an autoload cookie above its def in "cl-extra". But if you try to call
it in scratch or with M-: in emacs -Q, it's unknown.
C-h f cl-mapcan shows the correct doc then, but only because the help
stuff requires cl-lib.
Michael.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 15 Feb 2016 12:59:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #78 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de> writes:
> Isn't there actually something wrong with autoloading? `cl-mapcan' has
> an autoload cookie above its def in "cl-extra". But if you try to call
> it in scratch or with M-: in emacs -Q, it's unknown.
Autoloads from cl-* are collected in cl-loaddefs, which is only loaded
by cl-lib.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab <at> suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 16 Feb 2016 07:08:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #81 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Oh, right, just as for the preloaded uses of cl-generic, if we want to
> avoid loading cl-lib, we'd have to pre-fill cl-generic's dispatcher
> cache with the specific dispatcher used (grep for
> cl--generic-prefill-dispatchers to see what that looks like).
I cargo-culted the following, which seems to work.
Is it what you meant?
--- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-generic.el
+++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-generic.el
@@ -1019,6 +1019,10 @@ cl--generic-eql-used
(cl--generic-prefill-dispatchers 0 (eql nil))
(cl--generic-prefill-dispatchers window-system (eql nil))
+(cl--generic-prefill-dispatchers (terminal-parameter nil 'xterm--get-selection)
+ (eql nil))
+(cl--generic-prefill-dispatchers (terminal-parameter nil 'xterm--set-selection)
+ (eql nil))
;;; Support for cl-defstructs specializers.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:17:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #84 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>> Oh, right, just as for the preloaded uses of cl-generic, if we want to
>> avoid loading cl-lib, we'd have to pre-fill cl-generic's dispatcher
>> cache with the specific dispatcher used (grep for
>> cl--generic-prefill-dispatchers to see what that looks like).
> I cargo-culted the following, which seems to work.
> Is it what you meant?
Looks about right, yes.
Stefan
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:58:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #87 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:07:17 -0500
> Cc: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>, 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
> --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-generic.el
> +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-generic.el
> @@ -1019,6 +1019,10 @@ cl--generic-eql-used
> (cl--generic-prefill-dispatchers 0 (eql nil))
> (cl--generic-prefill-dispatchers window-system (eql nil))
> +(cl--generic-prefill-dispatchers (terminal-parameter nil 'xterm--get-selection)
> + (eql nil))
> +(cl--generic-prefill-dispatchers (terminal-parameter nil 'xterm--set-selection)
> + (eql nil))
Is the problem really worth putting such "magic" into our sources? If
it does, I think we should document this somewhere, at least.
Thanks.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22613
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:42:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #90 received at 22613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>> +(cl--generic-prefill-dispatchers (terminal-parameter nil 'xterm--get-selection)
>> + (eql nil))
>> +(cl--generic-prefill-dispatchers (terminal-parameter nil 'xterm--set-selection)
>> + (eql nil))
> Is the problem really worth putting such "magic" into our sources? If
> it does, I think we should document this somewhere, at least.
Maybe we can also improve the situation by putting those lines right
where they come from, and "preload" them via some kind of
autoload cookie.
Stefan
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:24:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 35 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.