GNU bug report logs -
#3042
23.0.92; display-visual class doc
Previous Next
Reported by: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 06:35:02 UTC
Severity: minor
Tags: fixed
Fixed in version 24.1
Done: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 3042 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 3042 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
:
bug#3042
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 18 Apr 2009 06:35:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
.
(Sat, 18 Apr 2009 06:35:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):
The doc does not explain what the possible values mean. There are no
other occurrences of the various values (e.g. `static-color') in the
Elisp manual or other doc strings (that I can find) than what is said
about `display-visual-class'.
To use a function, it helps to know its possible values, but if you
have no idea what those values indicate or mean, then you really don't
know much about the function.
Grepping the Emacs sources doesn't really help here either. Looking at
the definition of `display-visual-class', you can at least learn
something (partial) about `static-color' and `static-gray', but that's
about it.
In GNU Emacs 23.0.92.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
of 2009-03-30 on SOFT-MJASON
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4)'
Information forwarded
to
bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
:
bug#3042
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:40:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to
Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
.
(Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:40:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at submit <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):
> The doc does not explain what the possible values mean. There are no
> other occurrences of the various values (e.g. `static-color') in the
> Elisp manual or other doc strings (that I can find) than what is said
> about `display-visual-class'.
>
> To use a function, it helps to know its possible values, but if you
> have no idea what those values indicate or mean, then you really don't
> know much about the function.
>
> Grepping the Emacs sources doesn't really help here either. Looking at
> the definition of `display-visual-class', you can at least learn
> something (partial) about `static-color' and `static-gray', but that's
> about it.
Not being very knowledgeable in this area, I googled a bit. "Color cell" didn't
turn up much. This term needs explaining, no doubt.
Wikipedia helped with this page, which I got to after looking at the bit-plane
page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_depth. We might draw on its description of
"direct color" and "true color", for example. I'm guessing that what we call
"static color" might be what that page calls "indexed color"? If so, perhaps we
should also mention that term, if it's commonly used.
HTH.
Information forwarded
to
bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
:
bug#3042
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:40:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to
Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
.
(Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:40:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Severity set to 'minor' from 'normal'
Request was from
Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
.
(Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:10:20 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#3042
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:38:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 3042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> writes:
> The doc does not explain what the possible values mean. There are no
> other occurrences of the various values (e.g. `static-color') in the
> Elisp manual or other doc strings (that I can find) than what is said
> about `display-visual-class'.
I've now changed the section to this:
@defun display-visual-class &optional display
This function returns the visual class for the screen. The value is
one of the symbols @code{static-gray} (a limited, unchangeable number
of grays), @code{gray-scale} (a full range of grays),
@code{static-color} (a limited, unchangeable number of colors),
@code{pseudo-color} (a limited number of colors), @code{true-color} (a
full range of colors), and @code{direct-color} (a full range of
colors).
@end defun
I think that's probably somewhat correct, although I'm not sure what
`pseudo-color' really is. Anybody?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
Added tag(s) fixed.
Request was from
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:38:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug marked as fixed in version 24.1, send any further explanations to
3042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Request was from
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:38:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#3042
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:42:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #27 received at 3042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> I've now changed the section to this:
>
> @defun display-visual-class &optional display
> This function returns the visual class for the screen. The value is
> one of the symbols @code{static-gray} (a limited, unchangeable number
> of grays), @code{gray-scale} (a full range of grays),
> @code{static-color} (a limited, unchangeable number of colors),
> @code{pseudo-color} (a limited number of colors), @code{true-color} (a
> full range of colors), and @code{direct-color} (a full range of
> colors).
> @end defun
Thanks; that helps, I think.
> I think that's probably somewhat correct, although I'm not sure what
> `pseudo-color' really is. Anybody?
Someone else?
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 12 years and 285 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.