GNU bug report logs - #8459
24.0.50; (elisp) Lexical Binding - what about `defcustom'?

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 17:58:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 24.0.50

Done: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 8459 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 8459 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#8459; Package emacs. (Sat, 09 Apr 2011 17:58:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Sat, 09 Apr 2011 17:58:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
Subject: 24.0.50; (elisp) Lexical Binding - what about `defcustom'?
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 10:57:03 -0700

Subject says it all.  The page says that `defvar' and `defconst' are the
only exceptions to lexical variables, i.e., the only way to make a
variable "special".  Really?

In GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
 of 2011-04-04 on 3249CTO
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.5) --no-opt --cflags
-Ic:/imagesupport/include'
Information forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#8459; Package emacs. (Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:48:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 8459 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 8459 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: 24.0.50; (elisp) Lexical Binding - what about `defcustom'?
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:45:05 +0200

"Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> writes:

> Subject says it all.  The page says that `defvar' and `defconst' are the
> only exceptions to lexical variables, i.e., the only way to make a
> variable "special".  Really?

I've now mentioned `defcustom', too.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
bug closed, send any further explanations to 8459 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> Request was from Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 21 Aug 2011 02:43:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:24:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 12 years and 228 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.