GNU bug report logs - #28167
decide how to deal with gschemas

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: guix; Reported by: ng0 <ng0@HIDDEN>; dated Sun, 20 Aug 2017 20:06:02 UTC; Maintainer for guix is bug-guix@HIDDEN.

Message received at 28167 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 28167) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2017 13:58:50 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 21 09:58:50 2017
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47896 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1djnE9-0007Vf-UF
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:58:50 -0400
Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21094)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <rekado@HIDDEN>) id 1djnE8-0007VW-Ar
 for 28167 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:58:48 -0400
Received: from localhost (141.80.244.60 [141.80.244.60]) by mx.zohomail.com
 with SMTPS id 1503323926004822.3575361213436;
 Mon, 21 Aug 2017 06:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
References: <20170820200438.kouji7n6hkr2i6hz@abyayala>
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@HIDDEN>
To: ng0 <ng0@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#28167: decide how to deal with gschemas
In-reply-to: <20170820200438.kouji7n6hkr2i6hz@abyayala>
X-URL: https://elephly.net
X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey
X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:58:43 +0200
Message-ID: <87fuclvx7w.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-ZohoMailClient: External
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 28167
Cc: 28167 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)


ng0 <ng0@HIDDEN> writes:

> Creating manual page database for 59 packages... done in 2.152 s
> warning: collision encountered: /gnu/store/7dq7vkvrykv3wm9l8j617v3xbn44g51i-epiphany-3.24.3/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled /gnu/store/1c7w0pjf80z8l6yb9a8wmni8za3mpx85-simple-scan-3.24.1/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled
> warning: arbitrarily choosing /gnu/store/7dq7vkvrykv3wm9l8j617v3xbn44g51i-epiphany-3.24.3/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled
>
> 1.
> How do we deal with these gschema collisions? I know eventually we
> should solve almost all collisions we have, but gschemas seems
> more important than the usual ones.

For reference, here’s the discussion of the same issue by the Nix folks:

  https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/1455

> 2.
> I also think we should formalize how to deal with the collisions
> or specific groups of collisions, so that we might have a better
> way to tackle these issues.

I don’t know what “formalize” means in this context, but I agree that we
should aim to reduce the number of conflicts where possible.

-- 
Ricardo

GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net





Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#28167; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Aug 2017 20:05:11 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 20 16:05:11 2017
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46949 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1djWT5-0005e0-VQ
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 16:05:11 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42916)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ng0@HIDDEN>) id 1djWT4-0005dn-Qi
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 16:05:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <ng0@HIDDEN>) id 1djWSy-0007DE-NI
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 16:05:01 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=disabled
 version=3.3.2
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:46301)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ng0@HIDDEN>)
 id 1djWSy-0007DA-JM
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 16:05:00 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33886)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <ng0@HIDDEN>) id 1djWSx-0001yU-GV
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 16:05:00 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <ng0@HIDDEN>) id 1djWSu-0007CV-B5
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 16:04:59 -0400
Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:37404)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ng0@HIDDEN>)
 id 1djWSu-0007CK-3d
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 16:04:56 -0400
Received: from [10.9.9.210] (helo=mailfront10.runbox.com)
 by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <ng0@HIDDEN>) id 1djWSr-0003Wx-9A
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 22:04:53 +0200
Received: from [109.236.90.209] (helo=localhost)
 by mailfront10.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:892961 )
 (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1djWSl-00007g-4T
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 22:04:47 +0200
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 20:04:38 +0000
From: ng0 <ng0@HIDDEN>
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Subject: decide how to deal with gschemas
Message-ID: <20170820200438.kouji7n6hkr2i6hz@abyayala>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="f6oby7jj2ote5ttc"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
 [fuzzy]
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11
X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----)


--f6oby7jj2ote5ttc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Creating manual page database for 59 packages... done in 2.152 s
warning: collision encountered: /gnu/store/7dq7vkvrykv3wm9l8j617v3xbn44g51i=
-epiphany-3.24.3/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled /gnu/store/1c7w0p=
jf80z8l6yb9a8wmni8za3mpx85-simple-scan-3.24.1/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschem=
as.compiled
warning: arbitrarily choosing /gnu/store/7dq7vkvrykv3wm9l8j617v3xbn44g51i-e=
piphany-3.24.3/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled

1.
How do we deal with these gschema collisions? I know eventually we
should solve almost all collisions we have, but gschemas seems
more important than the usual ones.

2.
I also think we should formalize how to deal with the collisions
or specific groups of collisions, so that we might have a better
way to tackle these issues.
--=20
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org

--f6oby7jj2ote5ttc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Gyky
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--f6oby7jj2ote5ttc--




Acknowledgement sent to ng0 <ng0@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#28167; Package guix. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.