GNU logs - #35034, boring messages

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#35034: One libgit2 derivation fails on armhf, another succeeds
Resent-From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 20:43:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.35034.B.155380572424515 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 35034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:38:27 -0400
Message-ID: <875zs2d99d.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

The 'guile2.0-git-0.2.0' package fails to build on hydra.gnu.org,
because its dependency 'libgit2' fails to build:

  https://hydra.gnu.org/build/3429713#tabs-buildsteps

However, there's another 'libgit2' derivation in the same evaluation,
which succeeds:

  https://hydra.gnu.org/eval/110449?filter=libgit2

Looking at the source for 'guile2.0-git', defined in
gnu/packages/guile.scm, it appears to use the standard 'libgit2'
package, unless 'package-for-guile-2.0' is somehow modifying the
'libgit2' derivation.

Any idea what's going on here?

       Mark

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#35034: Acknowledgement (One libgit2 derivation fails on
 armhf, another succeeds)
Message-ID: <handler.35034.B.155380572424515.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <875zs2d99d.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 35034
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix
Reply-To: 35034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 20:43:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guix@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 35034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
35034: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D35034
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#35034: One libgit2 derivation fails on armhf, another succeeds
Resent-From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 21:41:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.35034.B35034.155380923630188 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Cc: 35034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 22:40:22 +0100
From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <20190328224014.1dc8fb02@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <875zs2d99d.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <875zs2d99d.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 boundary="Sig_/Z.E4UDRqYxg_/HbnVLl7k4Y"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

--Sig_/Z.E4UDRqYxg_/HbnVLl7k4Y
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Mark,

On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:38:27 -0400
Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN> wrote:

> unless 'package-for-guile-2.0' is somehow modifying the
> 'libgit2' derivation.
>=20
> Any idea what's going on here?

Not really, *but* I've recently replaced Python by Guile in libgit2
tests.

Maybe that broke something - especially if package-for-guile-2.0 somehow
either provides both guile versions as native inputs or selects one
incompatible with the "generate.scm" I wrote.

Here, (ice-9 textual-ports) seems to be not found.  Does it not exist in
guile 2.0 ? (I wasn't aware we still used guile 2.0 for something...)

--Sig_/Z.E4UDRqYxg_/HbnVLl7k4Y
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAlydP0YACgkQ5xo1VCww
uqVIlwf7BTRyk2KHj5WDEsSYOIs6wjmCnBp7bca3EOLPntMgR4sSTn+3Ehczjlwh
76n2uUD+F5JgzAJatY06lkbbEKEoD52+W2NZ53KeTyeYU3dCruRTUwyJ39v/n7wr
q3uATj5ZQPHWEcw4mXIDVkn122PWzz4LpRT7eRoqsGXVv/dJnDZoj/zbZ0CVuLSt
Gor2DBT8nX7FVfnjS73U7hjM8nxkJaoaUY+27SSnjUvfq74U0qvXqEIsMgUkaGBs
hFaQq+ZQvTsh4jXUo5P9j3Cy+eEJ1EegKLuuqP9NWv9Dl0jfp9jpviVIBm7S87ZG
qqdnKAeRLTSj9nE7brWGzHi0nqtFYA==
=CtrJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/Z.E4UDRqYxg_/HbnVLl7k4Y--

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2019 22:00:02 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 28 18:00:02 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34843 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1h9d45-0008K4-HX
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 18:00:01 -0400
Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:42510)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>)
 id 1h9d43-0008Jp-Le; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:59:59 -0400
Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>)
 id 1h9d3x-0001dD-NL; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:59:53 -0400
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
To: 35034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: guile2.0-git rewrites libgit2 input to use guile-2.0 (was: One
 libgit2 derivation fails on armhf, another succeeds)
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:58:27 -0400
Message-ID: <871s2qd5k1.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
Cc: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@HIDDEN>,
 Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

retitle 35034 guile2.0-git rewrites libgit2 input to use guile-2.0
thanks

It turns out that this problem is not specific to armhf.  'guile2.0-git'
recently started failing to build on all Hydra-supported systems.

I see now what's going on.  The problem was introduced by:

  commit 03fb5ff6ae01a680c786d9ee148839543c519411
  Author: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@HIDDEN>
  Date:   Thu Mar 21 23:28:43 2019 +0100
  
    gnu: libgit2: Avoid Python.
    
    * gnu/packages/patches/libgit2-avoid-python.patch: New file.
    * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
    * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (libgit2)[source]: Use it.
    [inputs]: Remove python.
    [native-inputs]: Add guile-2.2.

The 'guile-git' package has 'libgit2' as an input.  The 'guile2.0-git'
variant package uses 'package-for-guile-2.0' to rewrite 'guile-git' to
use 'guile-2.0'.  Unfortunately, this rewrites more deeply than we
probably want.  In this case, the rewriting extends into 'libgit2',
changing its native-input from 'guile-2.2' to 'guile-2.0'.  However, the
Guile code that Danny wrote doesn't work with 'guile-2.0', because it
uses the (ice-9 textual-ports) module, which doesn't exist in Guile 2.0.

Suggestions?

      Mark

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#35034: guile2.0-git rewrites libgit2 input to use guile-2.0 (was: One libgit2 derivation fails on armhf, another succeeds)
References: <875zs2d99d.fsf@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <875zs2d99d.fsf@HIDDEN>
Resent-From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 22:00:05 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.35034.B35034.155381040332036 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35034
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: 35034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@HIDDEN>, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 35034-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B35034.155381040332036
          (code B ref 35034); Thu, 28 Mar 2019 22:00:05 +0000
Received: (at 35034) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2019 22:00:03 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34845 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1h9d45-0008KO-TR
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 18:00:02 -0400
Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:42510)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>)
 id 1h9d43-0008Jp-Le; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:59:59 -0400
Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>)
 id 1h9d3x-0001dD-NL; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:59:53 -0400
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:58:27 -0400
Message-ID: <871s2qd5k1.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

retitle 35034 guile2.0-git rewrites libgit2 input to use guile-2.0
thanks

It turns out that this problem is not specific to armhf.  'guile2.0-git'
recently started failing to build on all Hydra-supported systems.

I see now what's going on.  The problem was introduced by:

  commit 03fb5ff6ae01a680c786d9ee148839543c519411
  Author: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@HIDDEN>
  Date:   Thu Mar 21 23:28:43 2019 +0100
  
    gnu: libgit2: Avoid Python.
    
    * gnu/packages/patches/libgit2-avoid-python.patch: New file.
    * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
    * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (libgit2)[source]: Use it.
    [inputs]: Remove python.
    [native-inputs]: Add guile-2.2.

The 'guile-git' package has 'libgit2' as an input.  The 'guile2.0-git'
variant package uses 'package-for-guile-2.0' to rewrite 'guile-git' to
use 'guile-2.0'.  Unfortunately, this rewrites more deeply than we
probably want.  In this case, the rewriting extends into 'libgit2',
changing its native-input from 'guile-2.2' to 'guile-2.0'.  However, the
Guile code that Danny wrote doesn't work with 'guile-2.0', because it
uses the (ice-9 textual-ports) module, which doesn't exist in Guile 2.0.

Suggestions?

      Mark

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#35034: guile2.0-git rewrites libgit2 input to use guile-2.0
Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:30:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.35034.B35034.155387338013581 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35034
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Cc: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@HIDDEN>, 35034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 35034-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B35034.155387338013581
          (code B ref 35034); Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:30:01 +0000
Received: (at 35034) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Mar 2019 15:29:40 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35979 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1h9tRs-0003Wx-2G
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:29:40 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36133)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1h9tRq-0003Wk-7g
 for 35034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:29:38 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44369)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1h9tRk-0004Rs-Fy; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:29:32 -0400
Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=54630 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1h9tRj-0003YR-Ln; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:29:32 -0400
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
References: <871s2qd5k1.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: 9 Germinal an 227 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?=
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 16:29:30 +0100
In-Reply-To: <871s2qd5k1.fsf@HIDDEN> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Thu, 28
 Mar 2019 17:58:27 -0400")
Message-ID: <87imw1aecl.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hi Mark,

Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN> skribis:

> retitle 35034 guile2.0-git rewrites libgit2 input to use guile-2.0
> thanks
>
> It turns out that this problem is not specific to armhf.  'guile2.0-git'
> recently started failing to build on all Hydra-supported systems.
>
> I see now what's going on.  The problem was introduced by:
>
>   commit 03fb5ff6ae01a680c786d9ee148839543c519411
>   Author: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@HIDDEN>
>   Date:   Thu Mar 21 23:28:43 2019 +0100
>=20=20=20
>     gnu: libgit2: Avoid Python.

[...]

> The 'guile-git' package has 'libgit2' as an input.  The 'guile2.0-git'
> variant package uses 'package-for-guile-2.0' to rewrite 'guile-git' to
> use 'guile-2.0'.  Unfortunately, this rewrites more deeply than we
> probably want.  In this case, the rewriting extends into 'libgit2',
> changing its native-input from 'guile-2.2' to 'guile-2.0'.  However, the
> Guile code that Danny wrote doesn't work with 'guile-2.0', because it
> uses the (ice-9 textual-ports) module, which doesn't exist in Guile 2.0.

I=E2=80=99m tempted to sidestep the problem by removing =E2=80=9Cguile2.0-g=
it=E2=80=9D, which I
think is of little use.

WDYT?

Ludo=E2=80=99.

Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.