GNU bug report logs - #39415
[core-updates] Removing SSL patches in CMake and Kodi - help wanted

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2020 13:13:12 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 04 08:13:11 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42790 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1iyy0t-00072u-OB
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 08:13:11 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:34140)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <kuba@HIDDEN>) id 1iyy0s-00072o-S1
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 08:13:11 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41968)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <kuba@HIDDEN>) id 1iyy0r-000451-RE
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 08:13:10 -0500
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <kuba@HIDDEN>) id 1iyy0q-0004G8-RI
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 08:13:09 -0500
Received: from pat.zlotemysli.pl ([37.59.186.212]:32852)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <kuba@HIDDEN>) id 1iyy0q-0003pZ-IF
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 08:13:08 -0500
Received: (qmail 23928 invoked by uid 1009); 4 Feb 2020 14:13:00 +0100
Received: from 188.123.215.55 (kuba@HIDDEN@188.123.215.55) by pat
 (envelope-from <kuba@HIDDEN>, uid 1002) with qmail-scanner-2.08st 
 (clamdscan: 0.98.6/25715. spamassassin: 3.4.0. perlscan: 2.08st.  
 Clear:RC:1(188.123.215.55):. 
 Processed in 0.021871 secs); 04 Feb 2020 13:13:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO gravity) (kuba@HIDDEN@188.123.215.55)
 by pat.zlotemysli.pl with SMTP; 4 Feb 2020 14:13:00 +0100
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 14:13:26 +0100
From: Jakub =?utf-8?B?S8SFZHppb8WCa2E=?= <kuba@HIDDEN>
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Subject: [core-updates] Removing SSL patches in CMake and Kodi - help wanted
Message-ID: <20200204131326.buc2ad6s3ann5nl7@gravity>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="innxfkag25qn6y7j"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x
X-Received-From: 37.59.186.212
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)


--innxfkag25qn6y7j
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In commit a76a343082d61d5303b61a9e4cbde4ab8515a1e7 (currently on
CORE-UPDATES), the patch curl-use-ssl-cert-env.patch was added. This
makes programs linking to curl work with Guix's SSL certificates.
Previously, separate workarounds for each dependent package were
required.

This means that the following patches are, as far as I know, obsolete:
- cmake-curl-certificates.patch
- kodi-set-libcurl-ssl-parameters.patch

However, I don't use neither cmake nor kodi, and as such I don't think I
can sufficiently test that these patches are no longer needed. I would
like to ask somebody more familiar with those packages to verify.

Regards,
Jakub K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka

--innxfkag25qn6y7j
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=WwZ0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--innxfkag25qn6y7j--