GNU bug report logs - #41387
"Building from Git" on foreign distro starting with NO guix?

Message received at 41387 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at 41387) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2020 18:20:25 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 19 14:20:25 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50919 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1jb6qn-0001wf-6j
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 14:20:25 -0400
Received: from imta-37.everyone.net ([216.200.145.37]:34898
 helo=imta-38.everyone.net)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <bokr@HIDDEN>) id 1jb6ql-0001wV-7t
 for 41387 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 14:20:23 -0400
Received: from pps.filterd (omta004.sj2.proofpoint.com [127.0.0.1])
 by imta-38.everyone.net (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 04JIK9J0019745;
 Tue, 19 May 2020 11:20:21 -0700
X-Eon-Originating-Account: PksKnHvSNhJRQ5mJ1OmFVSWn8Yt3iRCA7ETzcRSnBXY
X-Eon-Dm: m0116787.ppops.net
Received: by m0116787.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2 - 53b92fa9)
 id m0116787.5e67f91f.89d6c9; Tue, 19 May 2020 11:15:35 -0700
X-Eon-Sig: AQMHrIJexCJHHxgPWwIAAAAC,dfed869a02af8442cd521b9d932a85bf
X-Eip: IJRfMvQpUKAO-udkOku2JvGp-oZNXkOkMv6SAVmRBZQ
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 20:15:24 +0200
From: Bengt Richter <bokr@HIDDEN>
To: Julien Lepiller <julien@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#41387: "Building from Git" on foreign distro starting with
 NO guix?
Message-ID: <20200519181524.GA3150@LionPure>
References: <20200519030742.GA16910@LionPure>
 <1FCE7BDD-371F-45B1-9D9E-4C4E0D8531BD@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <1FCE7BDD-371F-45B1-9D9E-4C4E0D8531BD@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.676
 definitions=2020-05-19_07:2020-05-19,
 2020-05-19 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0
 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0
 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1034
 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0
 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2004280000
 definitions=main-2005190155
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41387
Cc: 41387 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Bengt Richter <bokr@HIDDEN>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)

Hi Julien,

On +2020-05-19 08:03:37 -0400, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> Le 18 mai 2020 23:07:42 GMT-04:00, Bengt Richter <bokr@HIDDEN> a écrit :
> >Hi,
> >
> >[~/wb/guix110git/guix]$ ./configure --prefix=$(realpath ./mybuild)
> >checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
> >checking whether build environment is sane... yes
> >...
> >...
> >checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
> >configure: checking for guile 3.0
> >configure: checking for guile 2.2
> >configure: found guile 2.2
> >checking for guile-2.2... /usr/bin/guile-2.2
> >checking for Guile version >= 2.2... 2.2.4
> >checking for guild-2.2... /usr/bin/guild-2.2
> >checking for guile-config-2.2... /usr/bin/guile-config-2.2
> >checking for GUILE... yes
> >checking if (gnutls) is available... no
> >configure: error: The Guile bindings of GnuTLS are missing; please
> >install them.
> >--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> >
> >Well, it was looking for guile 3.0 and my foreign distro only has 2.2.4
> >--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> >guile (GNU Guile) 2.2.4
> >Packaged by Debian (2.2.4-deb+1-2)
> >Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> >--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> >which it seemed ok with, but I don't seem to be able get my distro's
> >GnuTLS
> >hooked up with this installation procedure, and suspect a GnuTLS/Guile
> >version
> >mismatch problem or such, but then I ran out of enthusiasm :)
> 
> As you can see, configure looks for guile 3.0, fails and falls back to guile 2.2, which it finds as /usr/bin/guile-2.2.
> 
> Gnutls provides guile bindings, but they are not necessarily built by your distribution. From my experiments with debian/hurd, the bindings were not present, so probably the same with debian/linux? You'll probably have to checkout gnutls and build the bindings.
> 
> The configure script only checks that the guile it found (your 2.2) can load the (gnutls) module, so there cannot be a version mismatch, unless debian built the gnutls module with guile 3.0. Check with your distribution what files are installed with the gnutls package. There should be some in /usr/lib/guile/.
> 
> You'll need to look at the dependencies, some of them are probably not provided by debian yet. I remember some discussions about creating a debian package of guix. If this was accepted, then the dependencies must be available at least in unstable. You might want to check.
>

Thanks for your tips!
I also went on to read Pjotr Prins' extensive notes on installing [1].

Looks like he can say "Been there, done that" re most install travails,
and IIUC he recommends against "Building from Git" as step 1, advising
to use a binary install first, and then use guix tools to hack further in a full repo.

BTW, he suggests a recursive clone, but I didn't see what that really does or entails.
Not sure I want to download the entire history of all development branches of guix,
if that's what it means :)

(re that: it would be nice to see an approximate download size when advice to download
appears in docs, for those who pay for GBs ;-)

Perhaps 14.1 in the docs should be updated with a reference to [1] and to suggest (emphatically?)
there in 14.1 (as it does elsewhere) that the easier path will be to do a binary install first?
And also un-mix directions for the two kinds of install activities!

Leading people into frustrating experiences can't be good PR for guix. Cui bono?

Anyway, I think I'll give up on Building from Git for now, and go back to monkeying with
guix-install.sh (making it incrementally restartable to avoid re-downloading etc. and
seeing how far I can factor out root both in the script and the resulting guix daemonium) :)

[1] https://gitlab.com/pjotrp/guix-notes/-/blob/master/INSTALL.org

Thanks again.

-- 
Regards,
Bengt Richter

Message received at 41387 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at 41387) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2020 12:03:55 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 19 08:03:55 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49445 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1jb0yR-0006q6-1j
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 08:03:55 -0400
Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:44472)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <julien@HIDDEN>) id 1jb0yO-0006pw-Rl
 for 41387 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 08:03:53 -0400
Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 010d978e;
 Tue, 19 May 2020 12:03:50 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date
 :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
 :content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:from:message-id; s=dkim;
 bh=vR5zlnjfZtlcZodg53t+RJCpf54183LMDnKQTNSYc+0=; b=S6U0xSxE6siM
 oM3cyXNMNF1q7jdP4mlyt0bVREI3+0xkPEka9zsp0b8HNg0VXcE/7s+uv9Jq+Q6Q
 /ezI+RQezKMNBFan7aLWavO++KKQc2cY2sgUUBH1kKMKK9CXh/WzbNg4pZpA5j6E
 Ztz/twpNIHH+rur3ASrS1c3uGiCOet7h13OLHU0jm08XZkvQqul+E6nG455Kl6pv
 gVU8+ybbEm5WgZOq29CFuXsunup/OJOIKnQYda9VueFuWpbElUu+7TPfVck2sSLz
 O8D1w2DBWNwOtXZ0e3EMxgqKOhh26ncV1bFCIPDT/yaGANiVk6nyWbNlBxEnnckR
 v0gJgSQhMw==
Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 71c8b9c8
 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); 
 Tue, 19 May 2020 12:03:49 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 08:03:37 -0400
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <20200519030742.GA16910@LionPure>
References: <20200519030742.GA16910@LionPure>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: bug#41387: "Building from Git" on foreign distro starting with NO
 guix?
To: Bengt Richter <bokr@HIDDEN>,41387 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Julien Lepiller <julien@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <1FCE7BDD-371F-45B1-9D9E-4C4E0D8531BD@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41387
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Le 18 mai 2020 23:07:42 GMT-04:00, Bengt Richter <bokr@bokr=2Ecom> a =C3=A9=
crit :
>Hi,
>
>[~/wb/guix110git/guix]$ =2E/configure --prefix=3D$(realpath =2E/mybuild)
>checking for a BSD-compatible install=2E=2E=2E /usr/bin/install -c
>checking whether build environment is sane=2E=2E=2E yes
>=2E=2E=2E
>=2E=2E=2E
>checking pkg-config is at least version 0=2E9=2E0=2E=2E=2E yes
>configure: checking for guile 3=2E0
>configure: checking for guile 2=2E2
>configure: found guile 2=2E2
>checking for guile-2=2E2=2E=2E=2E /usr/bin/guile-2=2E2
>checking for Guile version >=3D 2=2E2=2E=2E=2E 2=2E2=2E4
>checking for guild-2=2E2=2E=2E=2E /usr/bin/guild-2=2E2
>checking for guile-config-2=2E2=2E=2E=2E /usr/bin/guile-config-2=2E2
>checking for GUILE=2E=2E=2E yes
>checking if (gnutls) is available=2E=2E=2E no
>configure: error: The Guile bindings of GnuTLS are missing; please
>install them=2E
>--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
>Well, it was looking for guile 3=2E0 and my foreign distro only has 2=2E2=
=2E4
>--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>guile (GNU Guile) 2=2E2=2E4
>Packaged by Debian (2=2E2=2E4-deb+1-2)
>Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc=2E
>--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>which it seemed ok with, but I don't seem to be able get my distro's
>GnuTLS
>hooked up with this installation procedure, and suspect a GnuTLS/Guile
>version
>mismatch problem or such, but then I ran out of enthusiasm :)

As you can see, configure looks for guile 3=2E0, fails and falls back to g=
uile 2=2E2, which it finds as /usr/bin/guile-2=2E2=2E

Gnutls provides guile bindings, but they are not necessarily built by your=
 distribution=2E From my experiments with debian/hurd, the bindings were no=
t present, so probably the same with debian/linux? You'll probably have to =
checkout gnutls and build the bindings=2E

The configure script only checks that the guile it found (your 2=2E2) can =
load the (gnutls) module, so there cannot be a version mismatch, unless deb=
ian built the gnutls module with guile 3=2E0=2E Check with your distributio=
n what files are installed with the gnutls package=2E There should be some =
in /usr/lib/guile/=2E

You'll need to look at the dependencies, some of them are probably not pro=
vided by debian yet=2E I remember some discussions about creating a debian =
package of guix=2E If this was accepted, then the dependencies must be avai=
lable at least in unstable=2E You might want to check=2E

>I thought maybe I could cheat and find a path into the cloned repo,
>since
>all the magic has to be there somehow, but that way seems pretty
>kludgey=2E
>
>Any help past this GnuTLS obstacle is welcome!
>
>BTW, could I check out at a commit prior to the guile3 introduction
>so that my distro might have a matching GnuTLS for that?
>If so, which commit would be best?
>
>In the meanwhile, back to hacking guix-install=2Esh :)
>
>Thanks for reading=2E
>
>--
>Regards,
>Bengt Richter

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2020 03:08:10 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 18 23:08:10 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48790 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1jasbt-0003IV-U8
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2020 23:08:10 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39744)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <bokr@HIDDEN>) id 1jasbs-0003IO-MU
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2020 23:08:05 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49482)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <bokr@HIDDEN>) id 1jasbs-0006Ki-IO
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 18 May 2020 23:08:04 -0400
Received: from imta-36.everyone.net ([216.200.145.36]:53756
 helo=imta-38.everyone.net)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <bokr@HIDDEN>) id 1jasbq-0006vq-OI
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 18 May 2020 23:08:04 -0400
Received: from pps.filterd (omta002.sj2.proofpoint.com [127.0.0.1])
 by imta-38.everyone.net (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 04J37TmG007893
 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Mon, 18 May 2020 20:07:54 -0700
X-Eon-Originating-Account: eZH_ne-54FKWQCvD6alOGkAy5EfQ8m4kdY6hnM4bbH8
X-Eon-Dm: m0116952.ppops.net
Received: by m0116952.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2 - 5a81c847) id
 m0116952.5e67f932.7c98f7
 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Mon, 18 May 2020 20:07:52 -0700
X-Eon-Sig: AQMHrIJew02IpipcNAIAAAAB,685a3181cdda55bbf0ea64bae1601a08
X-Eip: XG0-Tny_G-BNyZS7cs7oNgNR_Fjz5NtJTTS6XeG6q7s
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 05:07:42 +0200
From: Bengt Richter <bokr@HIDDEN>
To: New-Bug <bug-guix@HIDDEN>
Subject: "Building from Git" on foreign distro starting with NO guix?
Message-ID: <20200519030742.GA16910@LionPure>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.676
 definitions=2020-05-18_11:2020-05-15,
 2020-05-18 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0
 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0
 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1034
 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0
 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2004280000
 definitions=main-2005190025
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.200.145.36; envelope-from=bokr@HIDDEN;
 helo=imta-38.everyone.net
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/18 23:07:54
X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS   = Linux 3.x [generic]
X-Spam_score_int: -22
X-Spam_score: -2.3
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9,
 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Bengt Richter <bokr@HIDDEN>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--)

Hi,

Playing with guix-install.sh, which is binary installation,
I got into reading a bit at [1], and decided I'd like to try it.

[1] https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Building-from-Git.html#Building-from-Git

Is there anyone here who has succeeded installing guix following the
directions at "14.1 Building from Git" on a "foreign distro"
WITH NO TRACE OF GUIX on it to start?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I read,
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
14.1 Building from Git

If you want to hack Guix itself, it is recommended to use the latest version from the Git repository:

git clone https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Great, my foreign /usr/bin/git cloned that handily (that was the intent right?)

Onwards,
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
How do you ensure that you obtained a genuine copy of the repository? Guix itself provides a tool to authenticate your checkout, but you must first make sure this tool is genuine in order to “bootstrap” the trust chain. To do that, run:

git verify-commit `git log --format=%H build-aux/git-authenticate.scm`
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Guix itself? How is that meant? Really looks like my git again, albeit showing info probably from guix :)

Anyway, it worked. At least I counted 19 or so repeat outputs of this:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
gpg: Signature made Fri 27 Dec 2019 01:52:49 PM CET
gpg:                using RSA key 3CE464558A84FDC69DB40CFB090B11993D9AEBB5
gpg: Good signature from "Ludovic Court\u00e8s <ludo@HIDDEN>" [unknown]
gpg:                 aka "Ludovic Court\u00e8s <ludo@HIDDEN>" [unknown]
gpg:                 aka "Ludovic Court\u00e8s (Inria) <ludovic.courtes@HIDDEN>" [unknown]
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I don't know what in the repo was signed, but I recognize the name ;-)

Ok, next step. No brick wall yet ;-)
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---

From there on, you can authenticate all the commits included in your checkout by running:

make authenticate

The first run takes a couple of minutes, but subsequent runs are faster.

    Note: You are advised to run make authenticate after every git pull invocation. This ensures you keep receiving valid changes to the repository 
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

First bump, misunderstood that it wasn't time *right now* to do "make authenticate":
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
[21:17 ~/wb/guix110git/guix]$ make authenticate
make: *** No rule to make target 'authenticate'.  Stop.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

After being distracted and feeling a bit teased reading about what I could do easily
if I already had guix installed I overlooked the "(see Requirements)" and
just checked on the list following. (Gettext needed unmentioned Autopoint, BTW, but NBD :)

on to ./bootstrap ... mostly ok 
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
If you are unable to use Guix when building Guix from a checkout, the following are the required packages in addition to those mentioned in the installation instructions (see Requirements).

    GNU Autoconf;
    GNU Automake;
    GNU Gettext;
    GNU Texinfo;
    Graphviz;
    GNU Help2man (optional). 

On Guix, extra dependencies can be added by instead running guix environment with --ad-hoc:

guix environment guix --pure --ad-hoc help2man git strace

Run ./bootstrap to generate the build system infrastructure using Autoconf and Automake. If you get an error like this one:

configure.ac:46: error: possibly undefined macro: PKG_CHECK_MODULES
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Well, didn't get that one, but did get
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
configure.ac:23: warning: The 'AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' macro is deprecated, and its use is discouraged.
configure.ac:23: You should use the Autoconf-provided 'AC_PROG_MKDIR_P' macro instead,
configure.ac:23: and use '$(MKDIR_P)' instead of '$(mkdir_p)'in your Makefile.am files.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
and
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Makefile.am:649: warning: AM_GNU_GETTEXT used but 'po' not in SUBDIRS
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

So, onwards again :)
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Then, run ./configure as usual. Make sure to pass --localstatedir=directory where directory is the localstatedir value used by your current installation (see The Store, for information about this). We recommend to use the value /var. 
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
My "current installation" ?? I don't have one yet ;-(

Ok, run ./configure in any case:
I decided to make a test directory for --prefix
Fumbled the absolute directory, but then it ran ...
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
[~/wb/guix110git/guix]$ mkdir -p mybuild/var
[~/wb/guix110git/guix]$ ./configure --prefix=./mybuild
configure: error: expected an absolute directory name for --prefix: ./mybuild
[~/wb/guix110git/guix]$ ./configure --prefix=$(realpath ./mybuild)
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
...
...
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
configure: checking for guile 3.0
configure: checking for guile 2.2
configure: found guile 2.2
checking for guile-2.2... /usr/bin/guile-2.2
checking for Guile version >= 2.2... 2.2.4
checking for guild-2.2... /usr/bin/guild-2.2
checking for guile-config-2.2... /usr/bin/guile-config-2.2
checking for GUILE... yes
checking if (gnutls) is available... no
configure: error: The Guile bindings of GnuTLS are missing; please install them.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Well, it was looking for guile 3.0 and my foreign distro only has 2.2.4
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
guile (GNU Guile) 2.2.4
Packaged by Debian (2.2.4-deb+1-2)
Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
which it seemed ok with, but I don't seem to be able get my distro's GnuTLS
hooked up with this installation procedure, and suspect a GnuTLS/Guile version
mismatch problem or such, but then I ran out of enthusiasm :)

Debian's packages on my system matching tls are:
[~/bs]$ dpkg -l '*tls*'
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name                    Version          Architecture Description
+++-=======================-================-============-=============================================================
un  exim-tls                <none>           <none>       (no description available)
ii  gnutls-bin              3.6.7-4+deb10u3  amd64        GNU TLS library - commandline utilities
ii  gnutls-doc              3.6.7-4+deb10u3  all          GNU TLS library - documentation and examples
ii  libcurl3-gnutls:amd64   7.64.0-4+deb10u1 amd64        easy-to-use client-side URL transfer library (GnuTLS flavour)
un  libcurl4-gnutls-dev     <none>           <none>       (no description available)
ii  libgnutls-dane0:amd64   3.6.7-4+deb10u3  amd64        GNU TLS library - DANE security support
ii  libgnutls30:amd64       3.6.7-4+deb10u3  amd64        GNU TLS library - main runtime library
ii  libneon27-gnutls:amd64  0.30.2-3         amd64        HTTP and WebDAV client library (GnuTLS enabled)
ii  libxmlsec1-gnutls:amd64 1.2.27-2         amd64        Gnutls engine for the XML security library
un  rsyslog-gnutls          <none>           <none>       (no description available)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

I thought maybe I could cheat and find a path into the cloned repo, since
all the magic has to be there somehow, but that way seems pretty kludgey.

Any help past this GnuTLS obstacle is welcome!

BTW, could I check out at a commit prior to the guile3 introduction
so that my distro might have a matching GnuTLS for that?
If so, which commit would be best?

In the meanwhile, back to hacking guix-install.sh :)

Thanks for reading.

--
Regards,
Bengt Richter