GNU bug report logs - #52767
Unexpected problem with Guix System installer

Previous Next

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 52767 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mathieu <matf <at> disr.it>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Unexpected problem with Guix System installer
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 02:46:55 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hey,

Trying to install Guix on a 32GB thum drive, I get the attached backtrace.

The partition table is gpt with 500MB for ESP, 20GB for /, 2GB for swap and remaining space for /home. I have tried btrfs and ext4 for / and /home but got backtraces related to either mkfs.btrfs or mkfs.ext4 in both cases. I also have tried encryption or no encryption, but still got backtraces. The partitions are created to the drive because I can see they are still there when I restart the installer.

This is not the drive that was used to boot the Guix installer in the first place.

Thanks, hope someone can understand what the issue is.

[20211224_022912.jpg (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

Message #8 received at 52767 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>
To: Mathieu <matf <at> disr.it>, 52767 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#52767: Unexpected problem with Guix System installer
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 06:15:47 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

From the backtrace I can't tell you more than this. The installer tried to run "mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/napper/crypt" but the command ended with status 1 (error). Unfortunately guix didn't capture the error. Next time you try, could you run the failid command (you'll find the exact one at the bottom) from another tty and report any error message?

Le 23 décembre 2021 20:46:55 GMT-05:00, Mathieu <matf <at> disr.it> a écrit :
>Hey,
>
>Trying to install Guix on a 32GB thum drive, I get the attached backtrace.
>
>The partition table is gpt with 500MB for ESP, 20GB for /, 2GB for swap and remaining space for /home. I have tried btrfs and ext4 for / and /home but got backtraces related to either mkfs.btrfs or mkfs.ext4 in both cases. I also have tried encryption or no encryption, but still got backtraces. The partitions are created to the drive because I can see they are still there when I restart the installer.
>
>This is not the drive that was used to boot the Guix installer in the first place.
>
>Thanks, hope someone can understand what the issue is.

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #11 received at 52767 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>
To: Mathieu <matf <at> disr.it>
Cc: 52767 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#52767: Unexpected problem with Guix System installer
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 17:35:36 +0100

Hello Mathieu,

> This is not the drive that was used to boot the Guix installer in the
> first place.
>
> Thanks, hope someone can understand what the issue is.

Sorry for the very late reply. We recently added a bunch of error
reporting features to the installer. Any chance you still have the
hardware around and would be able to test again using the latest
installation image available here:
https://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/?

That would be super useful for us :)

Thanks,

Mathieu

Message #14 received at 52767 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mathieu <matf <at> disr.it>
To: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 52767 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#52767: Unexpected problem with Guix System installer
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 23:51:37 +0100

Hi Mathieu,

Good news about the new features of the installer, thanks for your work! I rarely use that machine but I am now wondering if I haven't managed to install Guix on it, in the end. If that is correct, and working fine, I doubt I will reinstall from scratch, but if it is not running Guix already, then I will let you know when I try again (it may be in weeks or months though).

That machine was supposed to be my test bed before deciding if I could migrate my main hardware to Guix, which I did a few months later.  

Cheers,

Mathieu

On 2022-11-12 17:35 Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org> wrote:

>  
> Hello Mathieu,
>  
>> This is not the drive that was used to boot the Guix installer in
>> the
>> first place.
>>  
>> Thanks, hope someone can understand what the issue is.
>  
> Sorry for the very late reply. We recently added a bunch of error
> reporting features to the installer. Any chance you still have the
> hardware around and would be able to test again using the latest
> installation image available here:
> https://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/?
>  
> That would be super useful for us :)
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Mathieu

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.