Received: (at 54944) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jun 2022 20:24:37 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 08 16:24:37 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44342 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1nz2EH-0004Lh-DZ for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 16:24:37 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f177.google.com ([209.85.160.177]:42909) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>) id 1nz2EF-0004LU-TW for 54944 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 16:24:36 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f177.google.com with SMTP id p8so15745075qtx.9 for <54944 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 13:24:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=qr5mUOmDWOaUTB3SzvGpqno5NRb70Tk5eehHbrMU4zQ=; b=dIOqoYU12IdYItNYksi1CdBhL/4CfijlCvTiAJjL3+9Pfp7M4dGYLqTZhbiB1WYGZM JAYsh7uFxabIB9goTbLOBgmyKsq78l9qi2mnkfcA/iVx0gm4OsxHqIsqcXP7BuX46hnc YZ9GkoZg4XPKsvX8lJRfLOq0T2aJqYtDxmcDW5jY4OueUkPkiwiHrcnNHMCI67Q89Pl3 B3XIPeMqdRrX4jVgR2Z82r3zzC5Rd8N4LD+cWJu1z8zs5B5Wmup3v1Oyyg6ekThuCwuN P+SFWWiCxa84++YulBT7rrNLONjXbDOywdn3ICjpMB6h8SyiF4egJG7604o7vA18gvXa 0IjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=qr5mUOmDWOaUTB3SzvGpqno5NRb70Tk5eehHbrMU4zQ=; b=SsYHlpzjx7ptdKGu2QK10zN4wkT9vBEPzBHfWIybxxwyhTu4z+LcnYA7ywbPZosDJr cQcZL1mJH8pWPtDp0rqZALyljJ8UIwou9ebM2/R1KSPANiqEEctis98bLRPtXEDrRWjd qOOXZMMTUrdDyQcW2QgnOxv2tmGHn1CRRQ0xSQtSG+nHX/59OM4YKzyEUEZz24df1/Zn OTAOQj80aRinbN6l+s92NSACeNjT3EpNx6XFCx3jeQqyNPRg3RIwf8FyXjGhigiy+CGN FZdk4iqW9DGE5U/Def8tkHYLpMqW70JOkXPs1J6sUlVPMNrGsff8W+vHkWwoUGsO7vZa qS8g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532gcuJB6Z8FiuILQPdWlJTtyR5oDhwYW9bDzq3VOUKUExmepsLR v9NraRvYJIycaUOK/fzBFQ8hnidsmYMrvw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy9EKjYCJ7G1Ij3MGG/HEBKuR2LmVFzarB0o0B5r+SlQJFSgiYmJ2qtUIGDElYq0JKmvpDKtA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:388:b0:304:e380:451d with SMTP id j8-20020a05622a038800b00304e380451dmr22042009qtx.265.1654719869771; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 13:24:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-151-172.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.151.172]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t16-20020a05622a01d000b00304e95ec0fbsm9205216qtw.89.2022.06.08.13.24.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 08 Jun 2022 13:24:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN> To: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#54944: guix pull hangs on 32 bit References: <20220415020828.00b7865c@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 16:24:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20220415020828.00b7865c@HIDDEN> (raingloom@HIDDEN's message of "Fri, 15 Apr 2022 02:08:28 +0200") Message-ID: <87czfikio4.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 54944 Cc: 54944 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi! raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN> writes: > It's been at 67% on guix-packages-base for at least an hour now. The > system itself is responsive and with the swap I gave it, it has more > than enough memory. Htop shows three guile processes at the top of the > list when sorted by CPU%, their states are S, D, D. > Both CPUs are practically idling. > This looks like some kind of lockup to me. > > Fresh install based on bare-bones example on a 32 bit netbook, but the > install image used is the latest tagged version, since apparently there > is no 32 bit option for edge. > > I also tried pulling using channel-with-substitutes, since I'm not too > keen on locally building everything on such an old machine. Although > Guix itself should frankly not take this long to build if we want to be > competitive with other distros. Anyways, pulling with that in > channels.scm gives a cert related error, so that's great, means old > images can't easily be used for installation. Have you been able to reproduce this? If so, could you share the commit you are starting from and the CPU architecture, so that we may hopefully reproduce too? Thanks, Maxim
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#54944; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2022 00:18:05 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 14 20:18:05 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57648 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1nf9f3-0000E7-0r for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 20:18:05 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:51768) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1nf9f2-0000Du-4Y for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 20:18:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51232) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1nf9f1-0002Ui-Ve for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 20:18:03 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:60760) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <raingloom@HIDDEN>) id 1nf9f0-0003Sr-4H for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 20:18:03 -0400 Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KfcNm1VWGzDrlw for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 17:18:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1649981880; bh=O47yyHMDVfZoQvHLnHXk7M/fYXeKQoISJ4/xZsu27ak=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=ZwikjWdVgknuDBHztaDBagRIKB77i8YG5v136u5MNk870WpQBhIl2cTBIzBLfZozz bUOGnJ/ecwxMq7KDrLS2/kYXsnGAsSF82gqzLonMlbjgVX+zdCd2KMVcysky4K639Z X79Djf4+IKNSdd2bU0kknrGD59DTiMTRruH1ZGFY= X-Riseup-User-ID: BEBAEC9C4DD13917A4D59EE38AE78144188CF5DDF84F1A0CF3DC3D1592DB00CA Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4KfcNl3ZFwz5vLq for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 17:17:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 02:08:28 +0200 From: raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN> To: Guix Bugs <bug-guix@HIDDEN> Subject: guix pull hangs on 32 bit Message-ID: <20220415020828.00b7865c@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=raingloom@HIDDEN; helo=mx1.riseup.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) It's been at 67% on guix-packages-base for at least an hour now. The system itself is responsive and with the swap I gave it, it has more than enough memory. Htop shows three guile processes at the top of the list when sorted by CPU%, their states are S, D, D. Both CPUs are practically idling. This looks like some kind of lockup to me. Fresh install based on bare-bones example on a 32 bit netbook, but the install image used is the latest tagged version, since apparently there is no 32 bit option for edge. I also tried pulling using channel-with-substitutes, since I'm not too keen on locally building everything on such an old machine. Although Guix itself should frankly not take this long to build if we want to be competitive with other distros. Anyways, pulling with that in channels.scm gives a cert related error, so that's great, means old images can't easily be used for installation.
raingloom <raingloom@HIDDEN>:bug-guix@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#54944; Package guix.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.