GNU bug report logs - #64734
Recursive hackage import fails

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Saku Laesvuori <saku <at> laesvuori.fi>

Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 20:13:02 UTC

Severity: normal

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 64734 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#64734; Package guix. (Wed, 19 Jul 2023 20:13:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Saku Laesvuori <saku <at> laesvuori.fi>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Wed, 19 Jul 2023 20:13:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Saku Laesvuori <saku <at> laesvuori.fi>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Recursive hackage import fails
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 23:12:03 +0300
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Importing hackage packages recursively fails with similar error to this:

```
$ guix import hackage linear-generics --recursive
Backtrace:
          11 (primitive-load "/home/saku/.config/guix/current/bin/gu…")
In guix/ui.scm:
   2309:7 10 (run-guix . _)
  2272:10  9 (run-guix-command _ . _)
In guix/scripts/import.scm:
    90:11  8 (guix-import . _)
In guix/scripts/import/hackage.scm:
   129:26  7 (guix-import-hackage . _)
In guix/import/utils.scm:
    651:3  6 (recursive-import _ #:repo->guix-package _ #:guix-name . #)
   613:31  5 (topological-sort _ #<procedure 7f8f515f4720 at guix/i…> …)
   655:29  4 (_ _)
In unknown file:
           3 (remove #<procedure 7f8f51610ce0 at guix/import/utils.…> …)
In guix/import/utils.scm:
   635:39  2 (exists? #<<upstream-input> name: "th-abstraction" dow…> …)
In guix/import/hackage.scm:
    128:6  1 (hackage-name->package-name #<<upstream-input> name: "t…>)
In unknown file:
           0 (string-prefix? "ghc-" #<<upstream-input> name: "th-ab…> …)

ERROR: In procedure string-prefix?:
In procedure string-prefix?: Wrong type argument in position 2 (expecting string): #<<upstream-input> name: "th-abstraction" downstream-name: "ghc-th-abstraction" type: regular min-version: any max-version: any>

```

I tried to find out what passes the `upstream-input` to
`hackage-name->package-name`, but only found out with `pk` that it seems
to only happen with the recursed dependencies and not with the root
package. I also tried to make `hackage-name->package-name` accept
`upstream-input` records but that a new error, so I assume the issue is
that something in the importer is returning `upstream-input` records
when it should return package names.

I could try to debug this further but I don't feel like I know enough
about debugging with guile nor about debugging scheme.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 289 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.