GNU logs - #65001, boring messages

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#65001: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98guix_?= =?UTF-8?Q?locate=E2=80=99?= method is silently ignored when a cache exists
Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 21:06:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.65001.B.16909239338339 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 65001 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 23:05:12 +0200
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <fd693f39e633bf39777d0c528a5c2275@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=80.241.217.52; envelope-from=me@HIDDEN;
 helo=tobias.gr
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/)

Quick niggle I noticed:

~/guix master ↑2 λ guix locate libstdc++.so.
guix locate: indexing files from /gnu/store...
guix locate: traversing local profile manifests...
indexing 735 packages
…
~/guix master ↑29 ↓26 λ guix locate --method=store libstdc++.so.6
…
~/guix master ↑29 ↓26 λ guix locate --method=store --update 
libstdc++.so.6
guix locate: indexing files from /gnu/store...
indexing 24,455 packages
…

Either:
- the second invocation should imply --update, so Guix should store the 
currently cache method(s),
- or Guix should use separate databases for each method.  That's 
probably too ugly.

Kind regards,

T G-R

Sent from a Web browser.  Excuse or enjoy my brevity.

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#65001: Acknowledgement (=?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98guix_?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?locate=E2=80=99?= method is silently ignored when a cache
 exists)
Message-ID: <handler.65001.B.16909239338339.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <fd693f39e633bf39777d0c528a5c2275@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 65001
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix
Reply-To: 65001 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 21:06:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guix@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 65001 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
65001: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D65001
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#65001: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98guix_?= =?UTF-8?Q?locate=E2=80=99?= method is silently ignored when a cache exists
Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2023 20:04:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.65001.B65001.169377140926568 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN>
Cc: 65001 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
References: <fd693f39e633bf39777d0c528a5c2275@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2023 22:03:19 +0200
In-Reply-To: <fd693f39e633bf39777d0c528a5c2275@HIDDEN> (Tobias
 Geerinckx-Rice's message of "Tue, 01 Aug 2023 23:05:12 +0200")
Message-ID: <87pm2zc9dk.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Hi,

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@HIDDEN> skribis:

> Either:
> - the second invocation should imply --update, so Guix should store
>   the currently cache method(s),
> - or Guix should use separate databases for each method.  That's
>   probably too ugly.

The latter sounds ugly.  The former, why not; we then only need to
distinguish between =E2=80=9Cuser-specified method=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9Cde=
fault method=E2=80=9D to
determine whether =E2=80=98--update=E2=80=99 is implied.

Ludo=E2=80=99.

Last modified: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 20:15:01 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.