GNU logs - #67829, boring messages

Message sent to john.kehayias@HIDDEN, bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#67829: qtwebengine new failure on i686
Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: john.kehayias@HIDDEN, bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 20:34:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.67829.B.170258604127783 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 67829 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 15:33:49 -0500
Message-ID: <8734w48qxe.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::72f;
 envelope-from=maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN; helo=mail-qk1-x72f.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)

Hello,

qtwebengine was marked as newly failing by Cuirass on Berlin, as a
result to the xorg-server update in
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=8083c7abbf3a346162fcc4b8d5aa50555c0f3179.

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
v8_use_external_startup_data=false
CMake Error at /tmp/guix-build-qtwebengine-6.5.2.drv-0/qtwebengine-everywhere-src-6.5.2/cmake/Gn.cmake:75 (message):
  

  -- GN FAILED

  ERROR at //BUILD.gn:1652:1: Assertion failed.

  assert(

  ^-----

  'target_cpu=x86' is not supported for 'target_os=linux'.  Consider omitting
  'target_cpu' (default) or using 'target_cpu=x64' instead.

  See //BUILD.gn:1653:5:

      is_valid_x86_target || target_cpu != "x86" || v8_target_cpu == "arm",
      ^-------------------------------------------------------------------

  This is where it was set.

  1

ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

I don't see how the two would be related, but I've CC'd John in case
they'd have some hunch.

Perhaps some non-deterministic issue with the 'gn' build system?  It had
succeeded here: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2803939/details about a
week ago.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#67829: Acknowledgement (qtwebengine new failure on i686)
Message-ID: <handler.67829.B.170258604127783.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <8734w48qxe.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 67829
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix
Reply-To: 67829 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 20:34:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

As you requested using X-Debbugs-CC, your message was also forwarded to
  John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>
(after having been given a bug report number, if it did not have one).

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guix@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 67829 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
67829: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D67829
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#67829: qtwebengine new failure on i686
Resent-From: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 06:05:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.67829.B67829.17026202917267 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
Cc: 67829 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 06:04:30 +0000
From: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <874jgkrogm.fsf@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <8734w48qxe.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <8734w48qxe.fsf@HIDDEN>
Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Hello Maxim,

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 03:33 PM, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:

> Hello,
>
> qtwebengine was marked as newly failing by Cuirass on Berlin, as a

This "newly failing" is the same false alarm as we saw recently. I
think Cuirass gets confused on same package with different versions as
the only one I see on i686-linux building in the past year is v5.

> result to the xorg-server update in
> <https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=3D8083c7abbf3a3461=
62fcc4b8d5aa50555c0f3179>.
>
> v8_use_external_startup_data=3Dfalse
> CMake Error at /tmp/guix-build-qtwebengine-6.5.2.drv-0/qtwebengine-everyw=
here-src-6.5.2/cmake/Gn.cmake:75 (message):
>
>
>   -- GN FAILED
>
>   ERROR at //BUILD.gn:1652:1: Assertion failed.
>
>   assert(
>
>   ^-----
>
>   'target_cpu=3Dx86' is not supported for 'target_os=3Dlinux'.  Consider =
omitting
>   'target_cpu' (default) or using 'target_cpu=3Dx64' instead.
>
>   See //BUILD.gn:1653:5:
>
>       is_valid_x86_target || target_cpu !=3D "x86" || v8_target_cpu =3D=
=3D "arm",
>       ^------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
>
>   This is where it was set.
>
>   1
>
> ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
>
> I don't see how the two would be related, but I've CC'd John in case
> they'd have some hunch.
>
> Perhaps some non-deterministic issue with the 'gn' build system?  It had
> succeeded here: <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2803939/details> about a
> week ago.

As for the actual error, no idea (I saw the same thing when I noticed
the "new failure"). But I'm cc'ing Efraim as having figured out the
fix for the other package (sorry don't remember which, qt something)
on i686 recently...

John

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#67829: qtwebengine new failure on i686
Resent-From: Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 17:35:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.67829.B67829.170274809323397 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>
Cc: 67829 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 19:34:37 +0200
From: Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <ZX3frUhH_OMwr8T1@3900XT>
Mail-Followup-To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN>,
 John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>,
 Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>, 67829 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
References: <8734w48qxe.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <874jgkrogm.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vGYhNmPscXBVbEMC"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <874jgkrogm.fsf@HIDDEN>
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>


--vGYhNmPscXBVbEMC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 06:04:30AM +0000, John Kehayias wrote:
> Hello Maxim,
>=20
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 03:33 PM, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>=20
> > Hello,
> >
> > qtwebengine was marked as newly failing by Cuirass on Berlin, as a
>=20
> This "newly failing" is the same false alarm as we saw recently. I
> think Cuirass gets confused on same package with different versions as
> the only one I see on i686-linux building in the past year is v5.
>=20
> > result to the xorg-server update in
> > <https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=3D8083c7abbf3a34=
6162fcc4b8d5aa50555c0f3179>.
> >
> > v8_use_external_startup_data=3Dfalse
> > CMake Error at /tmp/guix-build-qtwebengine-6.5.2.drv-0/qtwebengine-ever=
ywhere-src-6.5.2/cmake/Gn.cmake:75 (message):
> >
> >
> >   -- GN FAILED
> >
> >   ERROR at //BUILD.gn:1652:1: Assertion failed.
> >
> >   assert(
> >
> >   ^-----
> >
> >   'target_cpu=3Dx86' is not supported for 'target_os=3Dlinux'.  Conside=
r omitting
> >   'target_cpu' (default) or using 'target_cpu=3Dx64' instead.
> >
> >   See //BUILD.gn:1653:5:
> >
> >       is_valid_x86_target || target_cpu !=3D "x86" || v8_target_cpu =3D=
=3D "arm",
> >       ^----------------------------------------------------------------=
---
> >
> >   This is where it was set.
> >
> >   1
> >
> > ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
> >
> > I don't see how the two would be related, but I've CC'd John in case
> > they'd have some hunch.
> >
> > Perhaps some non-deterministic issue with the 'gn' build system?  It had
> > succeeded here: <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2803939/details> about a
> > week ago.
>=20
> As for the actual error, no idea (I saw the same thing when I noticed
> the "new failure"). But I'm cc'ing Efraim as having figured out the
> fix for the other package (sorry don't remember which, qt something)
> on i686 recently...

Upstream chromium removed support for i686 so that's why it's failing.

https://sources.debian.org/src/qt6-webengine/6.6.1%2Bdfsg-1/debian/patches/=
support-i386.patch/
https://sources.debian.org/src/qt6-webengine/6.6.1%2Bdfsg-1/debian/patches/=
disable_32bit_node_check.patch/
https://sources.debian.org/src/qt6-webengine/6.6.1%2Bdfsg-1/debian/patches/=
compressing_files.patch/

There's two or three patches we can add to re-enable builds on i686, or
we can mark it as unsupported.  I don't have a strong opinion either
way.

It also looks like debian doesn't support very many architectures with
qtwebengine@6

https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=3Dqt6-webengine

They also have limited architectures for qtwebengine@5

https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=3Dqtwebengine-opensource-src

--=20
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@HIDDEN>   =D7=A8=D7=A0=D7=A9=D7=9C=D7=A4 =
=D7=9D=D7=99=D7=A8=D7=A4=D7=90
GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

--vGYhNmPscXBVbEMC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmV936oACgkQQarn3Mo9
g1GhIRAApw5o5Y5vzPDE8gm/jh2aZjCBRikMeWQvVfONjztVlP4dcOfjc+fJ+OW3
5Ms67F+zcHhO8VfvC5AQCA1SnSU7ffn+RIzeOXKCeOchPC3dzSoD6mToRUI6BpOM
0NRq10y9IcfjUcMPsckYdY+MVAvlVITsL8W8N6K/9tLRJgRyLdyXPuCTl4OrIY3U
+REKPyzqsspvON9oNJv9CMCqm4vOZ1tQbslO5Oc1AhEMgw24k+mCFdTlykqkrKbQ
I7lVPB3msK3QLOg286lZcLtmE/1XgL84QtTVmDtuPvEZa/DXPRm05XxcCKmzCw4e
c5p37lpjibRNi1eGbnNADRYwVaU6BuQbBAeRPU1YgVm8yFAVTffftRCL1agzs13O
6jBk6Nk4EN/XcRID12OK3yRs3Nixn84lEaJ4uHOVvkF3IcUVoTOpOIT8T/1U6jWZ
X63NyJQkQODn25V9mSk8111eg2XcDhXgpR7aUrX90MO8u5X2CG0R0LW6KCRqg5DD
kX8kePxDU2oek5IlyXj6XnREvaxajtORmbrx8PL2QVuzpqmwNFUHuZEVHfNcPup3
4EKSQAIFWDEOcrBJ/YEmOtK2ViT3ba/92kVmSftzoE5oJPIfptKYOnv2DgjA4Y86
coOOmHtz0lXRdfoKstcp+/aouV4S4HLlO7WB7FN2qpwk5SGb8/A=
=vp6u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vGYhNmPscXBVbEMC--

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#67829: qtwebengine new failure on i686
Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:47:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.67829.B67829.170300440915433 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67829
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN>
Cc: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>, 67829 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 67829-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B67829.170300440915433
          (code B ref 67829); Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:47:02 +0000
Received: (at 67829) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2023 16:46:49 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37158 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1rFdF3-00040r-FG
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:46:49 -0500
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2f]:42094)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>) id 1rFdF1-00040b-2J
 for 67829 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:46:47 -0500
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com with SMTP id
 6a1803df08f44-67f1880a849so35030856d6.0
 for <67829 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 08:46:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1703004398; x=1703609198; darn=debbugs.gnu.org;
 h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=AUHfr3sgz1jFWt+Sb5ezNW9sbCUQ3SHzcCnYsLtCdeE=;
 b=XQE3s9h6jbJD35/nul5ymywfgh+mr8korj+bCaDQ8CX8pbA3GYIGGNZTFCkl/duJmj
 XvBuVZ9JPbt5N9khVl0N+KWarL6SaHxDvW34HqNIRVbM295jEM+JdM+AIX5FjLrjHTWi
 Z7Ygj+6ipJPCyxsq/QiNXmXTcOKxzv+SruRqMSCZQv/WqNl7cVFuBau3sQXsboioJF3q
 lINt5OPsP2XfztrTptTfvgRh6LDJevS9ByeHge9cYDwksrXeL7rFyIMAv9DXEcOqEc4J
 o+MiWObUKTJzkEFsXvYcRWbnzEnNemZQ3Lb0w/YJ/l+W01800IDFtcWDlSLY50ENiu9L
 qU1Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1703004398; x=1703609198;
 h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to
 :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=AUHfr3sgz1jFWt+Sb5ezNW9sbCUQ3SHzcCnYsLtCdeE=;
 b=AYQ4biIGFLgchA9fXe1DGWaZhBLTe+6BA4PjErncFmPVFpn5snwsWwac1VUcsEBDei
 CGWciCsRUCHfwgDlgTljos4fgFfzt/xlSIVdlUFK+h88bgTw54Yn9Rz2nPQ4XLHGyzWY
 RgxeEqTsqBek7nvcACFYmZc7sE3Ep5NQ1C7Bu6wT/AjaTR6/PQs+dbEUYEa2H0gx3KbB
 qzmhSsCcvU8oVKaZSo8PmaSD7wCPFnj8+v9oJyUhMv3z8nm3qKGUm4Ia4ueQciLzQ4SS
 OOoPjW+dMkOjXueB2nd1H6n0d1QHMJ1b4y8CiiIMrs3x5oULi3QcoNdbal/vq2W6XzYs
 Nivg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyStomwTkS9VzDoU/NEQ6QniCo1n8mpLIlEO1uIK0nJ/0/xlasC
 93fqfWm9lkYxUO7HNwuZSrtVZypEdsg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH3EmebMkBnq4VVbfryw3zZOTc2m1RiByvCF+1ddIaAx++WGBUnXPwakPnMzeG/naSMc04CZA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:5284:b0:67f:2c13:3c81 with SMTP id
 kj4-20020a056214528400b0067f2c133c81mr1752820qvb.8.1703004398536; 
 Tue, 19 Dec 2023 08:46:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hurd (dsl-205-233-125-220.b2b2c.ca. [205.233.125.220])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 c17-20020a056214071100b0067f5a26d929sm920485qvz.143.2023.12.19.08.46.37
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Tue, 19 Dec 2023 08:46:38 -0800 (PST)
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <ZX3frUhH_OMwr8T1@3900XT> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Sat, 16
 Dec 2023 19:34:37 +0200")
References: <8734w48qxe.fsf@HIDDEN> <874jgkrogm.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <ZX3frUhH_OMwr8T1@3900XT>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:46:37 -0500
Message-ID: <87edfi5edu.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

Hi Efraim,

Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN> writes:

[...]

> Upstream chromium removed support for i686 so that's why it's failing.
>
> https://sources.debian.org/src/qt6-webengine/6.6.1%2Bdfsg-1/debian/patches/support-i386.patch/
> https://sources.debian.org/src/qt6-webengine/6.6.1%2Bdfsg-1/debian/patches/disable_32bit_node_check.patch/
> https://sources.debian.org/src/qt6-webengine/6.6.1%2Bdfsg-1/debian/patches/compressing_files.patch/
>
> There's two or three patches we can add to re-enable builds on i686, or
> we can mark it as unsupported.  I don't have a strong opinion either
> way.

If Debian already did the hard work, the best option seems to use their
patches to enable the build on i686 at least :-).  If it becomes to hard
to maintain and they lag on upstream, we could reconsider just marking
it as unsupported.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Last modified: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 12:30:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.