GNU bug report logs - #68895
Difference between trace behavior in guix repl and guile

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Adriel Dumas--Jondeau <leirda <at> disroot.org>

Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 16:28:02 UTC

Severity: normal

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 68895 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#68895; Package guix. (Fri, 02 Feb 2024 16:28:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to Adriel Dumas--Jondeau <leirda <at> disroot.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Fri, 02 Feb 2024 16:28:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Adriel Dumas--Jondeau <leirda <at> disroot.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Difference between trace behavior in guix repl and guile
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 17:21:37 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Here's what's happening in a guix repl:

```
(guix-user)> ,use (guix scripts build)
(guix-user)> ,trace (guix-build "hello") ; doesn't output any trace for some reason
```

And here'the same for a guile repl:

```
(guile-user)> ,use (guix scripts build)
(guile-user)> ,trace (guix-build "hello") ; however it does work
trace: |  (guix-build "hello")
trace: |  |  (_ (guix scripts) #:ensure #f)
trace: |  |  (_ #<procedure 7ff4802c5000 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:3241:7 ()>)
trace: |  |  |  (lock-mutex #<mutex 7ff487d01fc0>)
...
```

This was observed during a working group on profiling during the Guix Days.

-- 
Adriel

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 92 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.