GNU logs - #69487, boring messages

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#69487: Regression regarding guix shell and its "pure" flag?
Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9?= A. Gomes <andremegafone@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 15:15:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.69487.B.170930607627502 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 69487 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9?= A. Gomes <andremegafone@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 17:11:32 +0200
Message-ID: <87ttlqvvff.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::136;
 envelope-from=andremegafone@HIDDEN; helo=mail-lf1-x136.google.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)

Hi Guix,

Take a package that you have installed in the default profile, say
"which".  Then notice that when issuing "guix shell --pure" followed by
"which which" replies that the command can't be found.  On the other
hand, when starting the environment via "guix shell", the command can be
found.

If my memory isn't tricking me, the "pure" flag used to behave
differently.  It simply started the shell with a clean env, but it still
exposed the packages from the default profile.  Am I missing something
or is this a regression?

Thanks.

--=20
Andr=C3=A9 A. Gomes
"You cannot even find the ruins..."

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9?= A. Gomes <andremegafone@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#69487: Acknowledgement (Regression regarding guix shell and
 its "pure" flag?)
Message-ID: <handler.69487.B.170930607627502.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <87ttlqvvff.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 69487
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix
Reply-To: 69487 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 15:15:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guix@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 69487 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
69487: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D69487
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#69487: Regression regarding guix shell and its "pure" flag?
Resent-From: Josselin Poiret <dev@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2024 16:47:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.69487.B69487.170948441711851 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9?= A. Gomes <andremegafone@HIDDEN>, 69487 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Josselin Poiret <dev@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87ttlqvvff.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87ttlqvvff.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2024 17:46:23 +0100
Message-ID: <87edcrmffk.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Andr=C3=A9

Andr=C3=A9 A. Gomes <andremegafone@HIDDEN> writes:

> Hi Guix,
>
> Take a package that you have installed in the default profile, say
> "which".  Then notice that when issuing "guix shell --pure" followed by
> "which which" replies that the command can't be found.  On the other
> hand, when starting the environment via "guix shell", the command can be
> found.
>
> If my memory isn't tricking me, the "pure" flag used to behave
> differently.  It simply started the shell with a clean env, but it still
> exposed the packages from the default profile.  Am I missing something
> or is this a regression?

No, this is `--pure` working as expected, the other behavior you
describe would be considered a bug.  Maybe you used to have the default
profile loaded through .bashrc, even though this is discouraged exactly
for that reason?

Best,
=2D-=20
Josselin Poiret

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=7+9J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

Last modified: Sun, 3 Mar 2024 17:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.