Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
Full text available.Received: (at 69596) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Apr 2024 22:04:28 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 28 18:04:28 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53129 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1s1CdH-0002hO-L2 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 18:04:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42008) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1s1CdF-0002hG-Ng for 69596 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 18:04:26 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1s1Ccq-0003O6-Qj for 69596 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 18:04:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=AB0aSjCjRLKl/piNrs9wyI4nJqdpC3fBD02dxcPerBY=; b=AQHkT6xLgNar6O+8HlxH 655exyDUmvhqyDuXL+VgQgF1lpKAIsy18GSl0x25iUysOjW4rkuGZQaH/eRImsBk0WMze/M+osNOd vNYXPEyPFAlEysPqvDlC4NfcpEocq8m6bQ/GmZ+UJifPY0Nl/oNafis9cejIghTvgumv7lxS5HypT q9DtEGHTYOFxgFIkcemso34ThWC6Hv4LHSNKHXniEZG5yW2s3dseidpvDCE1UPhdspVxs1gN5Ajf5 2vx8hj9Yf2ZD0hwVWZ9nTajkZGNP9qmwn9J1QYg+NfcBURthLj1+/2W1XlbuptshK0/WQMKcngXaZ /g6TapgFPbwhoA==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: 69596 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#69596: =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98guix_publish=E2=80=99?= memory leak In-Reply-To: <87zfvb6nwi.fsf@HIDDEN> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22?= =?utf-8?Q?'s?= message of "Wed, 06 Mar 2024 22:39:09 +0100") References: <87zfvb6nwi.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:03:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87le4xgn5n.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 69596 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi! Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> skribis: > It seems that =E2=80=98guix publish=E2=80=99 has been leaking memory noti= ceably I=E2=80=99d say > since the beginning of the year on berlin. After roughly 10 days, it > has several GiB resident and needs to be restarted or it becomes too > unresponsive. > > I wonder what could be causing this because we used to let it run for > months without problems I believe. > > This is what=E2=80=99s currently running on berlin: > > /gnu/store/cpnshv80n3mar5lwp4qqa2dxxxv4zb03-guix-1.4.0-16.aeb4943/libex= ec/guix/guile \ > /gnu/store/cpnshv80n3mar5lwp4qqa2dxxxv4zb03-guix-1.4.0-16.aeb4943/bin/g= uix \ > publish -u guix-publish -p 3000 -C lzip:9 -C zstd:19 --nar-path=3Dnar \ > --listen=3Dlocalhost --workers=3D8 --ttl=3D15552000s \ > --cache=3D/var/cache/guix/publish --cache-bypass-threshold=3D157286400 > > =E2=80=A6 coming from commit 21e4d6cd6913eca131f2c0fd0cd509fc843c7eb8. It turned out to be a guile-lzlib leak that had always been present: https://notabug.org/guile-lzlib/guile-lzlib/commit/74bd35b690801a10ed775d= 486fffc7372b1b341c The reason we were seeing it more on berlin is probably because we increased the cache-bypass-threshold, which goes through the =E2=80=98make-lzip-output-port=E2=80=99 code path (as opposed to =E2=80=98call-with-lzip-output-port=E2=80=99). The bug could be reproduced with: guix publish -p 8124 =E2=80=A6 & while true ; do wget -q -O/dev/full http://localhost:8124/nar/lzip/=E2=80= =A6-coreutils-9.1 ; done (Replace the ellipses with the actual store file name of coreutils.) Fixed by commit 7cef6b7ba555a9dfaf6d09cb7e112b0df77d5141, which updates guile-lzlib. Ludo=E2=80=99.
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#69596
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2024 21:39:51 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 06 16:39:51 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51797 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rhyzP-0005dZ-2V for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2024 16:39:51 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:40462) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1rhyzN-0005dS-9p for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2024 16:39:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1rhyyq-00075o-U6 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 06 Mar 2024 16:39:17 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1rhyyq-0001LX-I0 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 06 Mar 2024 16:39:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:Subject:To:From:in-reply-to: references; bh=cR2wWvr0foz1YvKiA76O2Vr+w000yQC5TGnQ9hAQ0Dw=; b=MlswYMaH/4xxjH tYy8LMeHGdYk+akwD1qkm5Enn8d1msQJxVukJnFvYXHJXPLH6CJBBBmZObbpKw9b6Zmd8LQ7vk5Z/ TuZgIsVUGHcSJtePmZMMrc4M5dHcCa6ze2x6P9vpZR0h623BbZAmXtbhwYLBwC+fKMZbzPo36HcSz m138EYakx2uW1WRisGzUCceUVuvNNJLY2oCwFWs/nk9SG2D4JSCgFBibma20vgDkGc+d95HVTAKI3 25e0PQBj+ijN4zvyJzbwwCNL5aQalWbabGR7y3+lwsgzdOkIowyCnY+BDOIkVxSDeg1GaEwftg1FF 4x5AHiMjvvH0T38bEoaQ==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN> To: bug-guix@HIDDEN Subject: =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98guix_publish=E2=80=99?= memory leak X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Septidi 17 =?utf-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 232 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour du Doronic X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 22:39:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87zfvb6nwi.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) It seems that =E2=80=98guix publish=E2=80=99 has been leaking memory notice= ably I=E2=80=99d say since the beginning of the year on berlin. After roughly 10 days, it has several GiB resident and needs to be restarted or it becomes too unresponsive. I wonder what could be causing this because we used to let it run for months without problems I believe. This is what=E2=80=99s currently running on berlin: /gnu/store/cpnshv80n3mar5lwp4qqa2dxxxv4zb03-guix-1.4.0-16.aeb4943/libexec= /guix/guile \ /gnu/store/cpnshv80n3mar5lwp4qqa2dxxxv4zb03-guix-1.4.0-16.aeb4943/bin/gui= x \ publish -u guix-publish -p 3000 -C lzip:9 -C zstd:19 --nar-path=3Dnar \ --listen=3Dlocalhost --workers=3D8 --ttl=3D15552000s \ --cache=3D/var/cache/guix/publish --cache-bypass-threshold=3D157286400 =E2=80=A6 coming from commit 21e4d6cd6913eca131f2c0fd0cd509fc843c7eb8. I don=E2=80=99t see anything that changed recently, be it in maintenance.git (for the parameters), =E2=80=98guix publish=E2=80=99, guile-{lzlib,zstd}, o= r Guile. Maybe we had just been lucky? Anyone else seeing this? Ludo=E2=80=99.
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@HIDDEN>
:bug-guix@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#69596
; Package guix
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.