GNU bug report logs - #69835
Fwd: Eldoc drastically increases CPU usage after update

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: emacs; Reported by: Alexander Prähauser <ahprae@HIDDEN>; dated Sun, 17 Mar 2024 00:09:02 UTC; Maintainer for emacs is bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN.

Message received at 69835 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 69835) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Mar 2024 08:11:29 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 17 04:11:29 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57618 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1rllc8-0001M0-OQ
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 04:11:29 -0400
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:48257)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <michael.albinus@HIDDEN>) id 1rllc6-0001Lm-C6
 for 69835 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 04:11:27 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmx.de;
 s=s31663417; t=1710663033; x=1711267833; i=michael.albinus@HIDDEN;
 bh=rFvtq3kXp+yPDU/VuIseVabGNKmNszaFuZDOg7KLi6E=;
 h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:
 Date;
 b=NtSdZhCcfBnykgjUpJ2GCtucZASgu0kSfOmr+gENukCwq74r8LMRxO3on2KuRf8n
 cr3FtUk0noxi0wqgwFQ9bjqyhzIfJ/zaAUB18rQWS3TKFR9mpaPcU5VMhW8IX3HAI
 pMTEWzWzP07Gl5g3loozIM3rXRlbASxgiCvncCVTFsST4h5jg3gjRbUZDqHK4Xhbr
 Z/OeVuhcpxOhUNHzqwsODVyJxF45P5xs3p6F/c0g1xP6ZIVb7M36gS646KKpM7iNV
 11q2fDYntVQOgVfBGSxrAB15JCjr31W/VoaXcT93SPo9E3utYVjW/Fh4HTK1m8k/D
 VuRsWZGOAF7XUeNicw==
X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a
Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([185.89.39.16]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004
 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MfHEP-1r9z4E08Ut-00gpjE; Sun, 17
 Mar 2024 09:10:33 +0100
From: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@HIDDEN>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#69835: Fwd: Eldoc drastically increases CPU usage after update
In-Reply-To: <86bk7d5r3m.fsf@HIDDEN> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 17 Mar
 2024 08:07:09 +0200")
References: <6baad279-400c-4da1-9d6e-20bba211dc64@HIDDEN>
 <86bk7d5r3m.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 09:10:31 +0100
Message-ID: <878r2hi8i0.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:WrO0K9+NCBS5Xf+gLun+V6ypJpjHhA7twnoTFB3Ye1lB5jcFF7S
 UNpYqA9Mz53BNHJPf/mxMEj1aze2oFCrcBM5fmbq0oMh17Y6EXGy/3D9XZorLSMZukXmQ1c
 Ey2IXjr3qFm4fkSaT6pD9NAv//c5jZ4YuBZ1unj7ZnQrtCeN3/cM2tPCcgDFOQ9vR1QUUuv
 96q+SNA2RVW2kj4wHUgGg==
X-Spam-Flag: NO
UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:mnUm/rPSe5E=;gmZhHvRdX6zATg/00hyLyLvVZHV
 rOquN2YaqiHA6ecSJfLjWXYDKoX//3n0kAOjNmKeo+v7+n+xLy3Vpi1cLqAyexX89tpQkUVLX
 fi/7QwEajBuEmevLxMNss9F4+Dgen8HzsoFi6HV7TRtqVGTDx8NXKbgQqOm3FOzm3S4cYICMu
 9uxVsdTMIDPa3gU9VJUfACNHNiaNu00TmXByxU25jP/1INIi7K0f2vnIlH0LhUGMapVrx/ALU
 0by9BTmvjjks6hAv0WynyYIZrVa7FpGyXP50cg9sx9wfQh0X8O2kbBHKagHFDlzGFiBuIb6WW
 YpYLfWD+fF/ITjU8tdtd5Q+ntTO9R2HzJFN+phQlsRmVo0sNwBVf33iQoegxZ8g4TBmJGvELC
 olM6de8oMLI/pFr/6vnstLjelxCzDUKi4O396b1qegC88xaNjZ7F2V4K4FEN2+5m5dGajrBmc
 JdXk+tLUvFLLIvLzOh+h/pl4fRjDSM931+v4YhUoZF+7MUPhGOUiXkND+v3Keg4q3+zqhfDSM
 6XUpIrLOfsm7Y4AyKqWd3aERfZu58aSlX4sKhBl2FdiaM6nO+EPg93Pr6avReBm8ybihYlU/j
 uyZn8/F+z7Lvz6rnYVKlWZdsjgOrx4JzBg7GyvPMqcLRgllsV1FgBCxDRz5LRiF6B+UdnJa8+
 GQhoZdem8b05FD3rMrv7bYnbGLy+SP0Ql08SPj7CFjGyDAhZYhL1GMGWzjl//DtI9xEQAVp3r
 tYV1jvYPtYeKxePUukNkX/1kePI0nhqODqrwl4NWmQJwHzbC8ooPLRH+enTbYd9hbcwAbXLVN
 ZOZQHJL7O6KtBuX7TfwIegT32+a8mlj7JZX8jfTzKKUAPqmIIekPYy13b2ItZ1WPlW
X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  Eli Zaretskii writes: Hi Eli, >> Please mark original sender
 as the reporter. Thanks. > > I don't know what that means in practice, sorry.
 Michael, can you > help? 
 Content analysis details:   (2.9 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 low trust [212.227.15.19 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS        RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS
 [185.89.39.16 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3      RBL: Good reputation (+3)
 [212.227.15.19 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
 provider (michael.albinus[at]gmx.de)
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
 -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE   No description available.
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 69835
Cc: Alexander =?utf-8?Q?Pr=C3=A4hauser?= <ahprae@HIDDEN>,
 69835 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Noah Friedman <noah@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Eli Zaretskii writes: Hi Eli, >> Please mark original sender
    as the reporter. Thanks. > > I don't know what that means in practice, sorry.
    Michael, can you > help? 
 
 Content analysis details:   (1.9 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3      RBL: Good reputation (+3)
                             [212.227.15.19 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
  3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS        RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS
                             [185.89.39.16 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
                             low trust
                             [212.227.15.19 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
                             provider (michael.albinus[at]gmx.de)
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
 -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE   No description available.
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:

Hi Eli,

>> Please mark original sender as the reporter. Thanks.
>
> I don't know what that means in practice, sorry.  Michael, can you
> help?

You must send a debbugs control message like

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
submitter 69835 Alexander Pr=C3=A4hauser <ahprae@HIDDEN>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Done.

Best regards, Michael.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:
bug#69835; Package emacs. Full text available.
Changed bug submitter to 'Alexander Prähauser <ahprae@HIDDEN>' from 'Noah Friedman <noah@HIDDEN>' Request was from Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@HIDDEN> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Full text available.

Message received at 69835 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 69835) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Mar 2024 06:08:01 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 17 02:08:01 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57528 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1rljgf-0005ut-3u
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 02:08:01 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51100)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1rljgc-0005uZ-CW
 for 69835 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 02:07:59 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>)
 id 1rljft-0000AX-2y; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 02:07:15 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:
 Date; bh=t0dkYCaSnUwl/joffiORyAPqY8KNcoN+Khozcrl1EIc=; b=l4WeXrNT1cMPliPYdolo
 ApSPlDCV0K3X7T0ET2+4B8xWq+B+lp70BX2FRzLidrhwDjJ85M+qrSzmLApWvLZXW7hvPJa8l7YN3
 DVUH8fe3Wt0dF4ql98IlFa4wzAGKhpEE5KngaKFElpsnEYMJ5gqSDJpF0yzF5vEXYJN4iQrJmfGzX
 dzwUoTkDMpCNh1ydA40Cxin6QoQUPOmFc39xWsLjF+9a1So/mm01jF5h0Vxz4tcPRj+yO7Fq5dl9Z
 SCUJgGz+BQihz+LHlqRVctYiEi7vMweqmHULfomlCT66lyAYOcbOI1DgCDwa0MpSCzPeOTI2zYKVL
 b6dRWjY7S3Bd4g==;
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 08:07:09 +0200
Message-Id: <86bk7d5r3m.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
To: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@HIDDEN>,
 Alexander =?utf-8?Q?Pr=C3=A4hauser?= <ahprae@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <6baad279-400c-4da1-9d6e-20bba211dc64@HIDDEN> (message from
 Noah Friedman on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 17:08:05 -0700 (PDT))
Subject: Re: bug#69835: Fwd: Eldoc drastically increases CPU usage after update
References: <6baad279-400c-4da1-9d6e-20bba211dc64@HIDDEN>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 69835
Cc: 69835 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Noah Friedman <noah@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

> Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 17:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Noah Friedman <noah@HIDDEN>
> 
> Please mark original sender as the reporter. Thanks.

I don't know what that means in practice, sorry.  Michael, can you
help?

> From: Alexander Prähauser <ahprae@HIDDEN>
> To: Noah Friedman <friedman@HIDDEN>
> Date: Feb 13, 2024 08:57:32
> Subject: Eldoc drastically increases CPU usage after update
> 
> After I recently (within a week) updated my system and Emacs, I noticed that Emacs was a
> lot slower and needed more power than previously. I deactivated all
> minor modes and re-activated them one after the other, and found that
> editing speed decreased drastically when I re-activated Eldoc mode.
> Emacs version returns
> 
> GNU Emacs 30.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, cairo version 1.18.0) of 2024-02-08
> 
> My system is Arch with the newest updates. Please let me know if I can do anything to help with debugging.

Please tell what was the previous HEAD against which you measure the
performance.  The latest change in eldoc.el was on Feb 23 and was
related to obarray changes; I find it hard to believe that change
could have had such an effect.  The change before that was on Jan 20.
Both are outside of the "within a week" period you seem to be
referring to.

A recipe to reproduce the problem starting from "emacs -Q" would be
nice.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:
bug#69835; Package emacs. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Mar 2024 00:09:00 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 16 20:09:00 2024
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57312 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1rle5E-0004Aj-4G
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 20:09:00 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:34594)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <noah@HIDDEN>) id 1rle5C-0004Ac-Ur
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 20:08:59 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <noah@HIDDEN>) id 1rle4W-0000qs-80
 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 20:08:20 -0400
Received: from bacon-event-horizon.splode.com
 ([2600:3c01:e000:3d5:f03c:91ff:fe96:f92b])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <noah@HIDDEN>) id 1rle4T-0002vb-J4
 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 20:08:15 -0400
Received: from dummy.faircode.eu (71-212-75-85.tukw.qwest.net [71.212.75.85])
 (authenticated bits=0)
 by bacon-event-horizon.splode.com (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id
 42H085dg932150
 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO)
 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 17:08:06 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=splode.com;
 s=splode-20130101; t=1710634086;
 bh=nuzodj99HCJw8dKi/1fb0zKgw/RA/qsLlHga/oB4PHQ=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:From;
 b=gGWL8oVqTuYb/LMCWj12L8UUm+ntgRRaRmCbvkqgkQJ51CgucT84/cij38hqHJGsp
 nU1Wlelk3xK2mYscVGfGYm3Kogc4SRT1nhLF2ik0Qf1p9EKtnF5pqByGS8SgG8qxDV
 BVHkcbpObmJv4rns5UL1eCA1kdzbo4WctEDNo4rc=
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 17:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Noah Friedman <noah@HIDDEN>
To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Message-ID: <6baad279-400c-4da1-9d6e-20bba211dc64@HIDDEN>
Subject: Fwd: Eldoc drastically increases CPU usage after update
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Correlation-ID: <6baad279-400c-4da1-9d6e-20bba211dc64@HIDDEN>
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4
 (bacon-event-horizon.splode.com [74.207.245.10]);
 Sat, 16 Mar 2024 17:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,
 DATE_IN_FUTURE_Q_PLUS,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,
 DKIM_VALID_EF,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
 version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 bacon-event-horizon.splode.com
Received-SPF: none client-ip=2600:3c01:e000:3d5:f03c:91ff:fe96:f92b;
 envelope-from=noah@HIDDEN; helo=bacon-event-horizon.splode.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Please mark original sender as the reporter. Thanks.

From: Alexander Pr=C3=A4hauser <ahprae@HIDDEN>
To: Noah Friedman <friedman@HIDDEN>
Date: Feb 13, 2024 08:57:32
Subject: Eldoc drastically increases CPU usage after update


Hello!

After I recently (within a week) updated my system and Emacs, I noticed tha=
t Emacs was a
lot slower and needed more power than previously. I deactivated all
minor modes and re-activated them one after the other, and found that
editing speed decreased drastically when I re-activated Eldoc mode.
Emacs version returns

GNU Emacs 30.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, cairo version 1.18.0) of 2=
024-02-08

My system is Arch with the newest updates. Please let me know if I can do a=
nything to help with debugging.





Acknowledgement sent to Noah Friedman <noah@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:
bug#69835; Package emacs. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 08:15:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.