Received: (at 70178-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2024 10:53:12 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 17 06:53:12 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45876 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rx2ud-0003oR-3m for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 06:53:12 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([2a01:7e00:e000:2f8:fd4d:b5c7:13fb:3d27]:45311) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1rx2ua-0003nw-Cv for 70178-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 06:53:09 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [212.132.255.10]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12B4D27BBE9; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:52:55 +0100 (BST) Received: from felis (localhost.lan [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id d0635d75; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 10:52:54 +0000 (UTC) From: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> To: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#70178: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch In-Reply-To: <87zfts1ryj.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> (John Kehayias's message of "Wed, 17 Apr 2024 05:25:13 +0000") References: <87ttkhvfie.fsf@HIDDEN> <87h6ghilyw.fsf@HIDDEN> <87y19ex6fl.fsf@HIDDEN> <87zfts1ryj.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.2; emacs 29.3 Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:52:54 +0100 Message-ID: <875xwgtg55.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70178-done Cc: 70178-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Simon Streit <simon@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN> writes: > Hello, > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 11:32 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: > >> Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> writes: >> >>> John Kehayias via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@HIDDEN> writes: >>> >>>> I submitted a bunch of patches to mesa-updates a few days ago. From >>>> what I can tell things have gone well on x86_64, with most of the >>>> "new" failures listed are compared to previous mesa-updates and are >>>> ones broken on master too. A few failed from some time issue on hydra >>>> 128. And a few were legitimate failures which I have fixed. I'll go >>>> through again and make sure I didn't miss anything. I've been using >>>> this branch locally for a few things without issues so far. >>>> >>>> So...I'm guessing the main thing is to wait for non-x86 coverage. Is >>>> there a way to see that on Bordeaux? As always, please report any >>>> issues, but hopefully this will be good to go once builds are done. >>> >>> The page on QA should show substitute availability [1]. It's probably >>> going to take a week, probably closer to two to get to a reasonable >>> level. >> >> Substitute availability is getting there, it's just i686-linux which is >> lagging behind (which is expected with the limited compute resources >> available). >> >> I've just pushed a merge commit to keep the branch up to date with >> master. > > Thanks for helping out. I merged with > 2d5736cc3e869fadd2592cc13a8d332fac63b144. i686 is still a bit lower but > seemed to really slow down or pause, even after I gave it another day. > Anyways, hopefully is fine! Great. As for the i686 builds, this was probably slowed down by the x86_64 builds taking priority after pushing the master merge, since that triggered builds for both i686 and x86_64. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmYfqgZfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9Xd1qxAAn8RoAZMEQS1lwR30rrcGkIS16l3dkvnt oDO0sHmnZwPY+CayqB0G0xKiV2qtVqn8PmQzhFTivA0LD8cMHD4Z6AcI8JZgdgtw tGAsI344bseeDelIShA+AxZKEsEowonhZPW7vleToB23quYaYK2YQD1zcRqai3aZ ZYecDurfHJr7oE1wYjwdjkF7c3kkiOC6VxlxOvfwnxqr9ansuyVaOpNxvF1vZeWZ Gbpa4t5w3/RCIy0NuA/IeXFU+QpLftMSqUhq9j89zTG8fXOncnumbR9QBn4I/xEb 08ZYvgSQR7Z0sci2aB3aRO9tZI+4toKqffH2xsYELxS64p6kZQoWFSCfP/yQMBLZ K+LCWanB/4wJ9q8zveiIvSjzge7jEc99SJt8Zs8g3gY2G4g6RjZX2tu0lXvMsnpN Bw+DAcbD2MZ0Q1uQUpWhaZNB9y0zja7p166c+KQUKhcvsz+0B++DjSQilPB4VAq/ uoti3BvMZIYDLh6yuq5ir0dMsdp++M9vuWIlm3mQC4sgH12/IN/i1Vwnw5coxal8 qoSx/4qfQrOsK8azxr5WjOOf/Jbmcd/XBKYE6UrYMoiaEU76zBpLGZhBuvmz0byh IYCf2w5Z4CnskSKkwwiOtdjMheP0oOMNrivBohNrb2ztT29fdgNCyCNJCtzFDr92 kqFrCLDGk6g= =McVL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#70178; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 70178-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2024 05:25:40 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 17 01:25:40 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45533 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rwxne-0003wT-1S for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 01:25:40 -0400 Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.134]:60337) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>) id 1rwxnb-0003vD-F3 for 70178-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 01:25:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1713331516; x=1713590716; bh=XIcOxQN8qF4etiNXfXi5aUka8vbpZsZXVVbSBMNx2mU=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=CiVzpUpzQ28vVNxYXT/jmMCS+WemLHSfSWf5y2WTeEvkj7XqLRQ802FOmD1ObYy3a a54+dC9yAW+IHPkYVjcq3qkOr0I5DiQaFYsyEZ9Sm21Qg+6rwodGFdyW1wewLG9FA3 UymmAN9V5wdscZGT1cCR81hB6nNvEx9Npx3/cP6HjUJf4rMcMT0x1eg2eNCB6IXUk1 /uqPaZgblfsS3D4omXJSLpkrAFRaYhIYnLWkNEBENVmh8bMgGqWgkQLJUWZ8jc+U34 x5o/4+Ej+cx1vQewz34ER0czME9uaFRSeRS/7bghij/6kHrDJZaxGDhOklinG5GACx XJNPi+YniwCZg== Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 05:25:13 +0000 To: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> From: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#70178: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Message-ID: <87zfts1ryj.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <87y19ex6fl.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <87ttkhvfie.fsf@HIDDEN> <87h6ghilyw.fsf@HIDDEN> <87y19ex6fl.fsf@HIDDEN> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70178-done Cc: 70178-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Simon Streit <simon@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 11:32 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: > Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> writes: > >> John Kehayias via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@HIDDEN> writes: >> >>> I submitted a bunch of patches to mesa-updates a few days ago. From >>> what I can tell things have gone well on x86_64, with most of the >>> "new" failures listed are compared to previous mesa-updates and are >>> ones broken on master too. A few failed from some time issue on hydra >>> 128. And a few were legitimate failures which I have fixed. I'll go >>> through again and make sure I didn't miss anything. I've been using >>> this branch locally for a few things without issues so far. >>> >>> So...I'm guessing the main thing is to wait for non-x86 coverage. Is >>> there a way to see that on Bordeaux? As always, please report any >>> issues, but hopefully this will be good to go once builds are done. >> >> The page on QA should show substitute availability [1]. It's probably >> going to take a week, probably closer to two to get to a reasonable >> level. > > Substitute availability is getting there, it's just i686-linux which is > lagging behind (which is expected with the limited compute resources > available). > > I've just pushed a merge commit to keep the branch up to date with > master. Thanks for helping out. I merged with 2d5736cc3e869fadd2592cc13a8d332fac63b144. i686 is still a bit lower but seemed to really slow down or pause, even after I gave it another day. Anyways, hopefully is fine! Also, thanks Simon for testing and reporting, apologies for not responding earlier to your message. Thanks, John
John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>:John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>:Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2024 10:33:09 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 15 06:33:09 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36906 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rwJe7-0003ZW-Lg for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:33:08 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:45792) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1rwJdv-0003W2-Km for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:33:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1rwJde-0002fM-40 for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:32:38 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([2a01:7e00:e000:2f8:fd4d:b5c7:13fb:3d27]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1rwJdN-0007et-AO for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:32:37 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [212.132.255.10]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7125427BBE9; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 11:32:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from felis (localhost.lan [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id eeb90475; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:32:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> To: John Kehayias via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#70178] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch In-Reply-To: <87h6ghilyw.fsf@HIDDEN> (Christopher Baines's message of "Thu, 04 Apr 2024 09:13:59 +0100") References: <87ttkhvfie.fsf@HIDDEN> <87h6ghilyw.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.2; emacs 29.3 Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 11:32:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87y19ex6fl.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:7e00:e000:2f8:fd4d:b5c7:13fb:3d27; envelope-from=mail@HIDDEN; helo=mira.cbaines.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 70178 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> writes: > John Kehayias via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@HIDDEN> writes: > >> I submitted a bunch of patches to mesa-updates a few days ago. From >> what I can tell things have gone well on x86_64, with most of the >> "new" failures listed are compared to previous mesa-updates and are >> ones broken on master too. A few failed from some time issue on hydra >> 128. And a few were legitimate failures which I have fixed. I'll go >> through again and make sure I didn't miss anything. I've been using >> this branch locally for a few things without issues so far. >> >> So...I'm guessing the main thing is to wait for non-x86 coverage. Is >> there a way to see that on Bordeaux? As always, please report any >> issues, but hopefully this will be good to go once builds are done. > > The page on QA should show substitute availability [1]. It's probably > going to take a week, probably closer to two to get to a reasonable > level. Substitute availability is getting there, it's just i686-linux which is lagging behind (which is expected with the limited compute resources available). I've just pushed a merge commit to keep the branch up to date with master. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmYdAi5fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9XcyzxAAi3TcPzKVHSLZeLlh1/zc/BIKvP1I5aU9 yrNc43sIRKlctxKhTV2mPXafO8kgERsozrEQ8onUmeSOS95P9tUaAKUmAg/Lgus9 YDcjwnsrBqvVKbxeQUcmjLIKmDTai7xSmGNOKUKFWQy6e1WkSzvxsc6lxp7v2/wU u/UbTNcnvzV7UXzlH8JAYmHlbW+EC71BahNDUZOMwjz2+pvIglN8cvC4pbWuVu4g mZvrvhpVlJpaEKF50cOqNVnWsXzdavq0/iz/5gGJL4Bxq8miope7OQuVxEZNtdOK csco96Jb8AzaJUcs+3A7heCYniRrsvHzH/UMUZDGm3I/nUkUko3wG2kyQb683nQx vtYS/Nj0MW71GYB4mVTSPieb+w65eXi8qcIUsDYsTwzMbxxN7TXv90MN9taog1tY ynCgPreA5hoj3WhaxhY+f4sboUFwjRkWPtNA4kePwGJgSSqNuJalKJdI46IwVV9v AD00MkWYFyRiyvDMXCnbMPMJ1yY6HvlbKb4FkrUosHP5u9R4H+T6RbZeKhiyVc9E CSKRTOP9iLZviLJ/BbklyixdzS0AEfW0/QrxsNB5XNMhdZ5f8E48Liu1hyPLX+Pf xRRsa6MWsdd4z6fcoVlPRJqJ8QPl7dmiZpuO+uU4q6WEN3ZylwHrpxl5YTF0Fnpm llEsYx6quUk= =M0dH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#70178; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 70178) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2024 10:32:45 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 15 06:32:45 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36902 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rwJdl-0003Ve-39 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:32:45 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([2a01:7e00:e000:2f8:fd4d:b5c7:13fb:3d27]:50637) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1rwJdW-0003Tg-6a for 70178 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:32:43 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [212.132.255.10]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7125427BBE9; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 11:32:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from felis (localhost.lan [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id eeb90475; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:32:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> To: John Kehayias via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#70178] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch In-Reply-To: <87h6ghilyw.fsf@HIDDEN> (Christopher Baines's message of "Thu, 04 Apr 2024 09:13:59 +0100") References: <87ttkhvfie.fsf@HIDDEN> <87h6ghilyw.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.2; emacs 29.3 Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 11:32:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87y19ex6fl.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70178 Cc: 70178 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> writes: > John Kehayias via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@HIDDEN> writes: > >> I submitted a bunch of patches to mesa-updates a few days ago. From >> what I can tell things have gone well on x86_64, with most of the >> "new" failures listed are compared to previous mesa-updates and are >> ones broken on master too. A few failed from some time issue on hydra >> 128. And a few were legitimate failures which I have fixed. I'll go >> through again and make sure I didn't miss anything. I've been using >> this branch locally for a few things without issues so far. >> >> So...I'm guessing the main thing is to wait for non-x86 coverage. Is >> there a way to see that on Bordeaux? As always, please report any >> issues, but hopefully this will be good to go once builds are done. > > The page on QA should show substitute availability [1]. It's probably > going to take a week, probably closer to two to get to a reasonable > level. Substitute availability is getting there, it's just i686-linux which is lagging behind (which is expected with the limited compute resources available). I've just pushed a merge commit to keep the branch up to date with master. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmYdAi5fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9XcyzxAAi3TcPzKVHSLZeLlh1/zc/BIKvP1I5aU9 yrNc43sIRKlctxKhTV2mPXafO8kgERsozrEQ8onUmeSOS95P9tUaAKUmAg/Lgus9 YDcjwnsrBqvVKbxeQUcmjLIKmDTai7xSmGNOKUKFWQy6e1WkSzvxsc6lxp7v2/wU u/UbTNcnvzV7UXzlH8JAYmHlbW+EC71BahNDUZOMwjz2+pvIglN8cvC4pbWuVu4g mZvrvhpVlJpaEKF50cOqNVnWsXzdavq0/iz/5gGJL4Bxq8miope7OQuVxEZNtdOK csco96Jb8AzaJUcs+3A7heCYniRrsvHzH/UMUZDGm3I/nUkUko3wG2kyQb683nQx vtYS/Nj0MW71GYB4mVTSPieb+w65eXi8qcIUsDYsTwzMbxxN7TXv90MN9taog1tY ynCgPreA5hoj3WhaxhY+f4sboUFwjRkWPtNA4kePwGJgSSqNuJalKJdI46IwVV9v AD00MkWYFyRiyvDMXCnbMPMJ1yY6HvlbKb4FkrUosHP5u9R4H+T6RbZeKhiyVc9E CSKRTOP9iLZviLJ/BbklyixdzS0AEfW0/QrxsNB5XNMhdZ5f8E48Liu1hyPLX+Pf xRRsa6MWsdd4z6fcoVlPRJqJ8QPl7dmiZpuO+uU4q6WEN3ZylwHrpxl5YTF0Fnpm llEsYx6quUk= =M0dH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#70178; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 70178) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2024 12:58:12 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 04 08:58:12 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60792 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rsMfT-0002iB-Gi for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 08:58:11 -0400 Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de ([80.67.18.43]:21682) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <simon@HIDDEN>) id 1rsMfN-0002hI-8Y for 70178 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 08:58:09 -0400 Received: from [195.52.136.164] (helo=motorball) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from <simon@HIDDEN>) id 1rsMfF-000000000DO-1sSC; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 14:57:57 +0200 From: Simon Streit <simon@HIDDEN> To: John Kehayias via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#70178] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch In-Reply-To: <87ttkhvfie.fsf@HIDDEN> (John Kehayias via Guix-patches via's message of "Thu, 04 Apr 2024 05:55:08 +0000") References: <87ttkhvfie.fsf@HIDDEN> Gcc: nnfolder+archive:sent.2024-04 Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 14:57:53 +0200 Message-ID: <yguy19tl1ym.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Df-Sender: c2ltb25AbmV0cGFuaWMub3Jn X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70178 Cc: 70178 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello John, John Kehayias via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@HIDDEN> writes: > I submitted a bunch of patches to mesa-updates a few days ago. From > what I can tell things have gone well on x86_64, with most of the > "new" failures listed are compared to previous mesa-updates and are > ones broken on master too. A few failed from some time issue on hydra > 128. And a few were legitimate failures which I have fixed. I'll go > through again and make sure I didn't miss anything. I've been using > this branch locally for a few things without issues so far. I've rolled out the branch on an old machine and it is looking all good here. The current mesa update also fixes an issue where rendering is broken with GTK4 applications in Gnome on master. Kind regards, -- Simon
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#70178; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2024 12:58:22 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 04 08:58:21 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60795 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rsMfc-0002jK-1F for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 08:58:21 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:37632) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <simon@HIDDEN>) id 1rsMfY-0002iA-Ex for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 08:58:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <simon@HIDDEN>) id 1rsMfO-0003B6-25 for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 08:58:06 -0400 Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de ([80.67.18.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <simon@HIDDEN>) id 1rsMfL-0005Q8-8G for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 08:58:04 -0400 Received: from [195.52.136.164] (helo=motorball) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from <simon@HIDDEN>) id 1rsMfF-000000000DO-1sSC; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 14:57:57 +0200 From: Simon Streit <simon@HIDDEN> To: John Kehayias via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#70178] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch In-Reply-To: <87ttkhvfie.fsf@HIDDEN> (John Kehayias via Guix-patches via's message of "Thu, 04 Apr 2024 05:55:08 +0000") References: <87ttkhvfie.fsf@HIDDEN> Gcc: nnfolder+archive:sent.2024-04 Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 14:57:53 +0200 Message-ID: <yguy19tl1ym.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Df-Sender: c2ltb25AbmV0cGFuaWMub3Jn Received-SPF: pass client-ip=80.67.18.43; envelope-from=simon@HIDDEN; helo=smtprelay01.ispgateway.de X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 70178 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) Hello John, John Kehayias via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@HIDDEN> writes: > I submitted a bunch of patches to mesa-updates a few days ago. From > what I can tell things have gone well on x86_64, with most of the > "new" failures listed are compared to previous mesa-updates and are > ones broken on master too. A few failed from some time issue on hydra > 128. And a few were legitimate failures which I have fixed. I'll go > through again and make sure I didn't miss anything. I've been using > this branch locally for a few things without issues so far. I've rolled out the branch on an old machine and it is looking all good here. The current mesa update also fixes an issue where rendering is broken with GTK4 applications in Gnome on master. Kind regards, -- Simon
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#70178; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 70178) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2024 08:14:16 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 04 04:14:16 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60455 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rsIEf-0007H9-7Z for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 04:14:16 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:43302) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1rsIEa-0007Gi-K8 for 70178 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 04:14:12 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [212.132.255.10]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFB1027BBE2; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 09:14:02 +0100 (BST) Received: from felis (localhost.lan [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id a68ce153; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 08:14:01 +0000 (UTC) From: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> To: John Kehayias via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#70178] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch In-Reply-To: <87ttkhvfie.fsf@HIDDEN> (John Kehayias via Guix-patches via's message of "Thu, 04 Apr 2024 05:55:08 +0000") References: <87ttkhvfie.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.2; emacs 29.3 Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 09:13:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87h6ghilyw.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70178 Cc: 70178 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain John Kehayias via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@HIDDEN> writes: > I submitted a bunch of patches to mesa-updates a few days ago. From > what I can tell things have gone well on x86_64, with most of the > "new" failures listed are compared to previous mesa-updates and are > ones broken on master too. A few failed from some time issue on hydra > 128. And a few were legitimate failures which I have fixed. I'll go > through again and make sure I didn't miss anything. I've been using > this branch locally for a few things without issues so far. > > So...I'm guessing the main thing is to wait for non-x86 coverage. Is > there a way to see that on Bordeaux? As always, please report any > issues, but hopefully this will be good to go once builds are done. The page on QA should show substitute availability [1]. It's probably going to take a week, probably closer to two to get to a reasonable level. 1: https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/mesa-updates --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmYOYUdfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9XdHMA//Wvl7ijMoy8xI8mq/BOAxtVa2lqYAdmdZ KK/IY9Miit3NqnfjBPz8a3ME3D4xMD1cZBzzgoORNYSHWeeVwgZxpZUmICxsGu4r kQvmv4GiMUBh8o6B5Enc4gE8MBf3usnqay6PtHdXo448tjwVNuWA9ckn82kHG0b7 wPRpwp7AyqLdWWyFkNrH83oDRz5BPMRb9AaIVRmSv+RhHw8cdnyAPuLLEW9PFnou QRTM1cjpgCcp8QtNUbOle7AK3Qtk38scZJeErJWZre3AFclGcphN1IT3Sn6YYAuv 0FrlQPVYFl8P53FP4suc8UN3Y9WOddhRdha85XTxKshUpQOSL+XKduiU0VgHOtei cu0sgE1OwKFuDMNyV2UHBKz/6xe6u3zMCQEwcnBjkyg4hX5HzuTM2YD6tZCXLD5y LLbM0ERuJ4o8tNNPi6Nu9c6e3Gkk51szHfrxkn3Vb1Kgds0mcfGC0emAzDp7JXTT THIWNi9Q5R8l5KdBtQVhxl3/XkJolOeV1Oy/Hs+XOnaDqk0XjxO27XPMNbtV/Ngt Nbm4WvAtRXawFsAlQG7tyskXlluZW3N50s1n1iqBJ30LAxpkY2ls/4hWsMCoLsl3 JrpcobDaqmLlTQLxJ0nvWwYFsK9Kb8YcpOM4oECyC8WJ3o0g941x1S3AtkRMM72A VhoSli6o3NU= =2r8n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#70178; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2024 08:14:21 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 04 04:14:21 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60458 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rsIEn-0007I9-4Y for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 04:14:21 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:39956) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1rsIEk-0007HB-Nq for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 04:14:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1rsIEY-0007DJ-GS for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 04:14:06 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1rsIEW-0006AS-Li for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 04:14:05 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [212.132.255.10]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFB1027BBE2; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 09:14:02 +0100 (BST) Received: from felis (localhost.lan [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id a68ce153; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 08:14:01 +0000 (UTC) From: Christopher Baines <mail@HIDDEN> To: John Kehayias via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: [bug#70178] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch In-Reply-To: <87ttkhvfie.fsf@HIDDEN> (John Kehayias via Guix-patches via's message of "Thu, 04 Apr 2024 05:55:08 +0000") References: <87ttkhvfie.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.2; emacs 29.3 Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 09:13:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87h6ghilyw.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.71.252.8; envelope-from=mail@HIDDEN; helo=mira.cbaines.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 70178 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain John Kehayias via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@HIDDEN> writes: > I submitted a bunch of patches to mesa-updates a few days ago. From > what I can tell things have gone well on x86_64, with most of the > "new" failures listed are compared to previous mesa-updates and are > ones broken on master too. A few failed from some time issue on hydra > 128. And a few were legitimate failures which I have fixed. I'll go > through again and make sure I didn't miss anything. I've been using > this branch locally for a few things without issues so far. > > So...I'm guessing the main thing is to wait for non-x86 coverage. Is > there a way to see that on Bordeaux? As always, please report any > issues, but hopefully this will be good to go once builds are done. The page on QA should show substitute availability [1]. It's probably going to take a week, probably closer to two to get to a reasonable level. 1: https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/mesa-updates --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmYOYUdfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9XdHMA//Wvl7ijMoy8xI8mq/BOAxtVa2lqYAdmdZ KK/IY9Miit3NqnfjBPz8a3ME3D4xMD1cZBzzgoORNYSHWeeVwgZxpZUmICxsGu4r kQvmv4GiMUBh8o6B5Enc4gE8MBf3usnqay6PtHdXo448tjwVNuWA9ckn82kHG0b7 wPRpwp7AyqLdWWyFkNrH83oDRz5BPMRb9AaIVRmSv+RhHw8cdnyAPuLLEW9PFnou QRTM1cjpgCcp8QtNUbOle7AK3Qtk38scZJeErJWZre3AFclGcphN1IT3Sn6YYAuv 0FrlQPVYFl8P53FP4suc8UN3Y9WOddhRdha85XTxKshUpQOSL+XKduiU0VgHOtei cu0sgE1OwKFuDMNyV2UHBKz/6xe6u3zMCQEwcnBjkyg4hX5HzuTM2YD6tZCXLD5y LLbM0ERuJ4o8tNNPi6Nu9c6e3Gkk51szHfrxkn3Vb1Kgds0mcfGC0emAzDp7JXTT THIWNi9Q5R8l5KdBtQVhxl3/XkJolOeV1Oy/Hs+XOnaDqk0XjxO27XPMNbtV/Ngt Nbm4WvAtRXawFsAlQG7tyskXlluZW3N50s1n1iqBJ30LAxpkY2ls/4hWsMCoLsl3 JrpcobDaqmLlTQLxJ0nvWwYFsK9Kb8YcpOM4oECyC8WJ3o0g941x1S3AtkRMM72A VhoSli6o3NU= =2r8n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#70178; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2024 05:55:32 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 04 01:55:32 2024 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60209 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rsG4S-00089N-7J for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 01:55:32 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:58800) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>) id 1rsG4P-000894-DH for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 01:55:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>) id 1rsG4E-0002Se-OV for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 01:55:18 -0400 Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.134]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>) id 1rsG4C-0002O6-IQ for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 01:55:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1712210113; x=1712469313; bh=LQ+HTPwXfanriHwAouZB23aHmbtAqo7PRJhQ4EwWSw0=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=wOcnoNC+QOgzZBAWYgYFI76nk7zCTInUu41dGimERnH5M5n1fe+xsR7y9e12eMFzL UcXWA9KcZ9DzBuq2hJP5t0eXl3Q7B+FqzfLYCtcvkjp1wP9aXYK238tTrjt2LByb3i 9kedvfk6JzwUsxRXVOnwLaP4HAEhAWvIikXGS8bnE/5729BuIq550u8Fvi8O/6X6NX xrrZO8ZAyltC/lD0rtzz5jE/hp4ElhuTJNyXyBjjiE1XOl1spOUdZdQZw67f3aG6uU /8W4xPZFHWfm2U3WhP2u6tRMlV6uB1m6DnwHHvzGrJdEFXiOd9K/3kBtgp7rkJ63RO Kx3k6xvaZAzog== Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 05:55:08 +0000 To: "guix-patches@HIDDEN" <guix-patches@HIDDEN> From: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN> Subject: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Message-ID: <87ttkhvfie.fsf@HIDDEN> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.134; envelope-from=john.kehayias@HIDDEN; helo=mail-40134.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hi Guix, I submitted a bunch of patches to mesa-updates a few days ago. From what I = can tell things have gone well on x86_64, with most of the "new" failures l= isted are compared to previous mesa-updates and are ones broken on master t= oo. A few failed from some time issue on hydra 128. And a few were legitima= te failures which I have fixed. I'll go through again and make sure I didn'= t miss anything. I've been using this branch locally for a few things witho= ut issues so far. So...I'm guessing the main thing is to wait for non-x86 coverage. Is there = a way to see that on Bordeaux? As always, please report any issues, but hop= efully this will be good to go once builds are done. John
John Kehayias <john.kehayias@HIDDEN>:guix-patches@HIDDEN.
Full text available.guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#70178; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.