GNU bug report logs -
#70779
[PATCH] Emacs 30 and warning about missing lexical-binding declaration
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 70779 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
There is no need to reopen the bug first.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-auctex <at> gnu.org
:
bug#70779
; Package
auctex
.
(Sun, 05 May 2024 11:05:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-auctex <at> gnu.org
.
(Sun, 05 May 2024 11:05:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi all,
Emacs 30 now emits a warning when it loads an .el file without the
lexical-binding cookie (commits 81bad84a6 and 1121f17d7c). This is the
entry from Emacs NEWS:
*** Warn about missing 'lexical-binding' directive.
The compiler now warns if an Elisp file lacks the standard
'-*- lexical-binding: ... -*-' cookie on the first line.
This line typically looks something like
;;; My little pony mode -*- lexical-binding: t -*-
It is needed to inform the compiler about which dialect of ELisp
your code is using: the modern dialect with lexical binding or
the old dialect with only dynamic binding.
Lexical binding avoids some name conflicts and allows the compiler to
detect more mistakes and generate more efficient code, so it is
recommended. For how to adapt your code to lexical binding, see the
manual section "(elisp) Converting to Lexical Binding".
If your code cannot be converted to lexical binding, you can insert
the line
;;; -*- lexical-binding: nil -*-
first in the file to declare that it uses the old dialect.
This change affects all auto-parsed style files when AUCTeX loads them.
I suggest the following change to `TeX-auto-store' in tex.el:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
diff --git a/tex.el b/tex.el
index cda1d7f6..32cfd21e 100644
--- a/tex.el
+++ b/tex.el
@@ -4267,6 +4267,8 @@ If TEX is a directory, generate style files for all files in the directory."
(TeX-unload-style style)
(with-current-buffer (generate-new-buffer file)
(erase-buffer)
+ (insert (concat ";;" (make-string 40 ?\s)
+ "-*- lexical-binding: t; -*-\n\n"))
(insert "(TeX-add-style-hook\n \""
style "\"\n (lambda ()")
(unless (string= tex-cmd-opts "")
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Any comments welcome.
Best, Arash
Information forwarded
to
bug-auctex <at> gnu.org
:
bug#70779
; Package
auctex
.
(Sun, 05 May 2024 12:44:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 70779 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org> writes:
> I suggest the following change to `TeX-auto-store' in tex.el:
Which can be reduced to:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
diff --git a/tex.el b/tex.el
index cda1d7f6..30f80c7e 100644
--- a/tex.el
+++ b/tex.el
@@ -4267,6 +4267,7 @@ If TEX is a directory, generate style files for all files in the directory."
(TeX-unload-style style)
(with-current-buffer (generate-new-buffer file)
(erase-buffer)
+ (insert ";;" (make-string 40 ?\s) "-*- lexical-binding: t; -*-\n\n")
(insert "(TeX-add-style-hook\n \""
style "\"\n (lambda ()")
(unless (string= tex-cmd-opts "")
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Any comments welcome.
Best, Arash
Information forwarded
to
bug-auctex <at> gnu.org
:
bug#70779
; Package
auctex
.
(Mon, 06 May 2024 05:28:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 70779 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> I suggest the following change to `TeX-auto-store' in tex.el:
>
> Which can be reduced to:
>
> diff --git a/tex.el b/tex.el
> index cda1d7f6..30f80c7e 100644
> --- a/tex.el
> +++ b/tex.el
> @@ -4267,6 +4267,7 @@ If TEX is a directory, generate style files for all files in the directory."
> (TeX-unload-style style)
> (with-current-buffer (generate-new-buffer file)
> (erase-buffer)
> + (insert ";;" (make-string 40 ?\s) "-*- lexical-binding: t; -*-\n\n")
> (insert "(TeX-add-style-hook\n \""
> style "\"\n (lambda ()")
> (unless (string= tex-cmd-opts "")
That change in Emacs in reverted (d51de0c5d9), but still, I think we can
turn lexical-binding on in auto-parsed style files as well. I will
install this in a day or two if there are no other comments.
Best, Arash
Information forwarded
to
bug-auctex <at> gnu.org
:
bug#70779
; Package
auctex
.
(Mon, 06 May 2024 06:57:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 70779 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Arash,
>>>>> Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org> writes:
> That change in Emacs in reverted (d51de0c5d9), but still, I think we can
> turn lexical-binding on in auto-parsed style files as well. I will
> install this in a day or two if there are no other comments.
I'm not actually against your proposal, but why do we need 40 spaces here?
>> + (insert ";;" (make-string 40 ?\s) "-*- lexical-binding: t; -*-\n\n")
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Best regards,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
#Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW
Information forwarded
to
bug-auctex <at> gnu.org
:
bug#70779
; Package
auctex
.
(Mon, 06 May 2024 11:58:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 70779 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Keita,
Ikumi Keita <ikumi <at> ikumi.que.jp> writes:
> I'm not actually against your proposal, but why do we need 40 spaces here?
>
>>> + (insert ";;" (make-string 40 ?\s) "-*- lexical-binding: t; -*-\n\n")
Thanks for your response; we don't really need them, it was driven by my
habit of having prop-lines justified right. A simple
;; -*- lexical-binding: t;
looked odd to me. What do you think is appropriate? I don't have a
strong opinion on this (and actually, I think I've found another more
serious bug while looking at the auto-generated file which I will
report.)
Best, Arash
Information forwarded
to
bug-auctex <at> gnu.org
:
bug#70779
; Package
auctex
.
(Mon, 06 May 2024 12:36:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 70779 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Arash,
>>>>> Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Thanks for your response; we don't really need them, it was driven by my
> habit of having prop-lines justified right. A simple
> ;; -*- lexical-binding: t;
> looked odd to me.
Hmm, it doesn't to me. :-)
> What do you think is appropriate?
I think these auto files are generally not intended for human eyes. So
we wouldn't have to care much about the justtification of the prop line.
I vote for simpler form.
Best,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
#Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW
Reply sent
to
Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Mon, 06 May 2024 15:04:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Mon, 06 May 2024 15:04:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #25 received at 70779-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ikumi Keita <ikumi <at> ikumi.que.jp> writes:
> I think these auto files are generally not intended for human eyes. So
> we wouldn't have to care much about the justtification of the prop line.
> I vote for simpler form.
Yes, Sir ;-) I installed the simple version, closing.
Best, Arash
This bug report was last modified 26 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.