GNU bug report logs -
#22738
Build failure in vigra
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 22738 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 22738 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22738
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 19 Feb 2016 01:03:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Fri, 19 Feb 2016 01:03:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
/tmp/guix-build-vigra-1.10.0.drv-0/build
...
======================================================================
ERROR: test_arraytypes.testMethods
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/gnu/store/m71dy36xl5jcp1qgw9dkyab3yv9gpibx-python2-nose-1.3.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose-1.3.7-py2.7.egg/nose/case.py", line 197, in runTest
self.test(*self.arg)
File "/tmp/guix-build-vigra-1.10.0.drv-0/build/vigranumpy/test/test_arraytypes.py", line 1331, in testMethods
nz = n.nonzero()
File "/tmp/guix-build-vigra-1.10.0.drv-0/build/vigranumpy/vigra/arraytypes.py", line 1285, in nonzero
res[k].axistags = AxisTags(AxisInfo(self.axistags[k]))
AttributeError: 'numpy.ndarray' object has no attribute 'axistags'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22738
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 19 Feb 2016 04:00:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 22738 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 02:02:32AM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> /tmp/guix-build-vigra-1.10.0.drv-0/build
> ...
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: test_arraytypes.testMethods
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/gnu/store/m71dy36xl5jcp1qgw9dkyab3yv9gpibx-python2-nose-1.3.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose-1.3.7-py2.7.egg/nose/case.py", line 197, in runTest
> self.test(*self.arg)
> File "/tmp/guix-build-vigra-1.10.0.drv-0/build/vigranumpy/test/test_arraytypes.py", line 1331, in testMethods
> nz = n.nonzero()
> File "/tmp/guix-build-vigra-1.10.0.drv-0/build/vigranumpy/vigra/arraytypes.py", line 1285, in nonzero
> res[k].axistags = AxisTags(AxisInfo(self.axistags[k]))
> AttributeError: 'numpy.ndarray' object has no attribute 'axistags'
It looks like we need this module 'vigranumpy':
https://ukoethe.github.io/vigra/doc-release/vigranumpy/index.html
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22738
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:34:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 22738 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:59:11PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> It looks like we need this module 'vigranumpy':
> https://ukoethe.github.io/vigra/doc-release/vigranumpy/index.html
This is part of the vigra source code. There should soon be a new vigra
release:
https://mailhost.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/pipermail/vigra/2016-February/001317.html
but it also failed its tests for me (in another place).
I made a bug report on the vigra mailing list:
https://mailhost.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/pipermail/vigra/2016-February/001319.html
Andreas
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22738
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:31:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 22738 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:59:11PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> It looks like we need this module 'vigranumpy':
>> https://ukoethe.github.io/vigra/doc-release/vigranumpy/index.html
>
> This is part of the vigra source code. There should soon be a new vigra
> release:
> https://mailhost.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/pipermail/vigra/2016-February/001317.html
> but it also failed its tests for me (in another place).
>
> I made a bug report on the vigra mailing list:
> https://mailhost.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/pipermail/vigra/2016-February/001319.html
I’m told[1] that this is solved on branch “version-1-11-rc”, but I
haven’t been able to test this yet. Would anyone else like to try?
~~ Ricardo
[1]: https://github.com/ukoethe/vigra/issues/326#issuecomment-187669279
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22738
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:56:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 22738 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:30:38PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> I’m told[1] that this is solved on branch “version-1-11-rc”, but I
> haven’t been able to test this yet. Would anyone else like to try?
> [1]: https://github.com/ukoethe/vigra/issues/326#issuecomment-187669279
I have, but there is another problem there (see the second half
of my bug report).
Sorry I did not remember that you had opened an issue.
Andreas
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22738
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 24 Feb 2016 19:51:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 22738 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:32:52 +0100
Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:59:11PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> [...]
>
> This is part of the vigra source code. There should soon be a new vigra
> release:
> https://mailhost.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/pipermail/vigra/2016-February/001317.html
> but it also failed its tests for me (in another place).
>
> I made a bug report on the vigra mailing list:
> https://mailhost.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/pipermail/vigra/2016-February/001319.html
>
> Andreas
As a side note, once this builds libreoffice should build again. Currently
our version of libreoffice is vulnerable to cve-2016-{0794,0795} and should
be upgraded to 5.1.1. I didn't want to push the upgrade until I was sure it
would build correctly, but based on hydra's listed build times I'd be looking
at ~20 hours, so I'm not a good one to push that update when it comes.
https://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/src/5.1.1/
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22738
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 02 Mar 2016 20:23:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 22738 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Andreas Enge writes:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:59:11PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> It looks like we need this module 'vigranumpy':
>> https://ukoethe.github.io/vigra/doc-release/vigranumpy/index.html
>
> This is part of the vigra source code. There should soon be a new vigra
> release:
> https://mailhost.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/pipermail/vigra/2016-February/001317.html
> but it also failed its tests for me (in another place).
>
> I made a bug report on the vigra mailing list:
> https://mailhost.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/pipermail/vigra/2016-February/001319.html
>
> Andreas
It looks like this is fixed:
https://mailhost.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/pipermail/vigra/2016-February/001325.html
Is it possible to get an updated version of this package in, then?
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22738
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 25 Mar 2016 08:46:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #26 received at 22738 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Did the update in 019b38758c3895d80a27610d6488ae59455465d6 (March 17)
fix it?
(There are currently no substitutes for this on x86_64.)
Ludo’.
Merged 22653 22738.
Request was from
ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 25 Mar 2016 08:46:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22738
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 27 Mar 2016 22:35:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #31 received at 22738 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 09:44:27AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Did the update in 019b38758c3895d80a27610d6488ae59455465d6 (March 17)
> fix it?
>
> (There are currently no substitutes for this on x86_64.)
From the 'fix-letsencrypt' branch on Savannah (which includes that
commit), it works for me on x86_64, but when cross-building to i686, the
test suite fails with:
---
Entering test suite GraphAlgorithmTestSuite
Failure in GraphAlgorithmTest::testEdgeWeightComputation()
Assertion failed: Sequences differ at index 5 [4.24264 != 4.24264]
(/tmp/guix-build-vigra-1.11.0.drv-0/vigra-1.11.0/test/graph_algorithm/test.cxx:543)
1 of 6 tests failed in test suite GraphAlgorithmTestSuite
---
So, 4.24264 != 4.24264?
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22738
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 02 Jun 2016 19:40:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #34 received at 22738-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Vigra builds fine now, presumably since commit
019b38758c3895d80a27610d6488ae59455465d6 by Andreas, so closing this
bug.
Ludo’.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 01 Jul 2016 11:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 313 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.