GNU bug report logs - #34238
Assertion `num >= 0' failed at regexec.c:1363

Previous Next

Package: grep;

Reported by: Hongxu Chen <leftcopy.chx <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 02:58:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Merged with 22793, 32806, 42946

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 34238 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-grep <at> gnu.org:
bug#34238; Package grep. (Tue, 29 Jan 2019 02:58:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Hongxu Chen <leftcopy.chx <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-grep <at> gnu.org. (Tue, 29 Jan 2019 02:58:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Hongxu Chen <leftcopy.chx <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-grep <at> gnu.org
Subject: Assertion `num >= 0' failed at regexec.c:1363
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 10:57:18 +0800
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,

    GNU grep 3.3.7-8df7 (and other versions such as 3.1) may trigger an
assertion failure by executing the following command.

    echo | grep -f regex.grep

Reading symbols from ./grep...done.
gdb$ run
Starting program: /home/hongxu/FOT/grep-asan/install/bin/grep -q -f
assert_regexec.c:1363.grep assert_regexec.c:1363.input
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
grep: ./regexec.c:1363: Idx pop_fail_stack(struct re_fail_stack_t *, Idx *,
Idx, regmatch_t *, re_node_set *): Assertion `num >= 0' failed.

Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
__GI_raise (sig=sig <at> entry=0x6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51
51      ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c: No such file or directory.
gdb$ bt
#0  __GI_raise (sig=sig <at> entry=0x6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51
#1  0x00007ffff6bd1801 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
#2  0x00007ffff6bc139a in __assert_fail_base (fmt=0x7ffff6d487d8
"%s%s%s:%u: %s%sAssertion `%s' failed.\n%n", assertion=assertion <at> entry=0x5f8d20
<.str.26> "num >= 0", file=file <at> entry=0x5f8a60 <.str.22> "./regexec.c",
line=line <at> entry=0x553, function=function <at> entry=0x5f8d60
<__PRETTY_FUNCTION__.pop_fail_stack> "Idx pop_fail_stack(struct
re_fail_stack_t *, Idx *, Idx, regmatch_t *, re_node_set *)") at assert.c:92
#3  0x00007ffff6bc1412 in __GI___assert_fail (assertion=0x5f8d20 <.str.26>
"num >= 0", file=0x5f8a60 <.str.22> "./regexec.c", line=0x553,
function=0x5f8d60 <__PRETTY_FUNCTION__.pop_fail_stack> "Idx
pop_fail_stack(struct re_fail_stack_t *, Idx *, Idx, regmatch_t *,
re_node_set *)") at assert.c:101
#4  0x00000000005d08f3 in pop_fail_stack (fs=0x7fffffffa3c0,
pidx=0x7fffffffa360, nregs=0x4, regs=0x606000000740,
eps_via_nodes=0x7fffffffa380) at ./regexec.c:1363
#5  0x00000000005b691b in set_regs (preg=0x60c000000380,
mctx=0x7fffffffa6a0, nmatch=0x4, pmatch=0x606000000740, fl_backtrack=0x1)
at ./regexec.c:1467
#6  0x0000000000588820 in re_search_internal (preg=0x60c000000380,
string=0x7fffffffb8d1 "\n", length=0x0, start=0x0, last_start=0x0,
stop=0x0, nmatch=0x4, pmatch=0x606000000740, eflags=0x0) at ./regexec.c:864
#7  0x0000000000589aa8 in re_search_stub (bufp=0x60c000000380,
string=0x7fffffffb8d1 "\n", length=0x0, start=0x0, range=0x0, stop=0x0,
regs=0x607000000430, ret_len=0x0) at ./regexec.c:425
#8  0x0000000000589e32 in rpl_re_search (bufp=0x60c000000380,
string=0x7fffffffb8d1 "\n", length=0x0, start=0x0, range=0x0,
regs=0x607000000430) at ./regexec.c:289
#9  0x00000000005160fe in EGexecute (vdc=0x607000000410, buf=0x7fffffffb8d1
"\n", size=0x1, match_size=0x7fffffffb8e0, start_ptr=0x0) at dfasearch.c:357
#10 0x000000000051abec in main (argc=0x5, argv=0x7fffffffbee8) at
grep.c:2894


    regex.grep is attached.

Best Regards,
Hongxu
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[regex.grep (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

Information forwarded to bug-grep <at> gnu.org:
bug#34238; Package grep. (Thu, 31 Jan 2019 03:22:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 34238 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
To: Hongxu Chen <leftcopy.chx <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 34238 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#34238: Assertion `num >= 0' failed at regexec.c:1363
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 19:21:36 -0800
Thanks for the test case. This appears to be the same as bug#22793 so
I'll merge them.

https://debbugs.gnu.org/22793




Merged 22793 32806 34238. Request was from Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 31 Jan 2019 03:23:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Merged 22793 32806 34238 42946. Request was from Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 21 Sep 2020 19:52:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 218 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.