GNU bug report logs -
#39992
Merge external idlwave development efforts into GNU Emacs?
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 39992 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 39992 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
jdsmith <at> rain.mhr.utoledo.edu, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#39992
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 09 Mar 2020 01:46:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
jdsmith <at> rain.mhr.utoledo.edu, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Mon, 09 Mar 2020 01:46:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
X-Debbugs-CC: JD Smith <jdsmith <at> rain.mhr.utoledo.edu>
Hi,
I don't use it myself, but I noticed that there is ongoing development
of idlwave.el here:
https://github.com/jdtsmith/idlwave
As far as I can tell from the git log, the last change to idlwave by
JD Smith was on Fri Apr 27 19:34:22 2007 +0000.
Would it be possible to merge this effort into the version distributed
with GNU Emacs itself? That way more users could benefit from the
improvements.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Stefan Kangas
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#39992
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 19 Sep 2021 15:50:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at 39992 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se> writes:
> I don't use it myself, but I noticed that there is ongoing development
> of idlwave.el here:
>
> https://github.com/jdtsmith/idlwave
>
> As far as I can tell from the git log, the last change to idlwave by
> JD Smith was on Fri Apr 27 19:34:22 2007 +0000.
>
> Would it be possible to merge this effort into the version distributed
> with GNU Emacs itself? That way more users could benefit from the
> improvements.
I note that on the GitHub page, there has since been added a note:
Note: IDLWAVE is currently not maintained. In current form it
supports IDL v8.6, and is still in daily use by some users.
If you are interested in taking over IDLWAVE maintenance, please
post an issue. See the DEVELOP file for information on the file
structure layout.
I'm not sure what this means for the idlwave we ship with Emacs.
JD Smith, do you mind if someone else tries to on merge your external
development efforts into Emacs itself?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#39992
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 19 Sep 2021 16:06:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #13 received at 39992 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se> writes:
> Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se> writes:
>
>> I don't use it myself, but I noticed that there is ongoing development
>> of idlwave.el here:
>>
>> https://github.com/jdtsmith/idlwave
>>
>> As far as I can tell from the git log, the last change to idlwave by
>> JD Smith was on Fri Apr 27 19:34:22 2007 +0000.
>>
>> Would it be possible to merge this effort into the version distributed
>> with GNU Emacs itself? That way more users could benefit from the
>> improvements.
>
> I note that on the GitHub page, there has since been added a note:
>
> Note: IDLWAVE is currently not maintained. In current form it
> supports IDL v8.6, and is still in daily use by some users.
>
> If you are interested in taking over IDLWAVE maintenance, please
> post an issue. See the DEVELOP file for information on the file
> structure layout.
>
> I'm not sure what this means for the idlwave we ship with Emacs.
>
> JD Smith, do you mind if someone else tries to on merge your external
> development efforts into Emacs itself?
The above email bounced, so I have now copied in the email address used
in the GitHub repository.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#39992
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 19 Sep 2021 16:42:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 39992 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
I’m happy for anyone to work on merging the latest IDLWAVE into Emacs, and I can assist with this process as time allows. This might require some moderate effort, since I believe I refactored and simplified the code layout (in an attempt to attract a new maintainer) after my last push into emacs core. This refactoring occurred around 20015/16. My last commit on GitHub was actually in 2018.
I’ve also discussed with several of the emacs devels over the years moving IDLWAVE to a package on Elpa. I think that’s a more appropriate home, since there are not terribly many users (as judged by the number of email queries I get now vs. a decade ago).
I still use IDLWAVE, but far more rarely than before. There is currently a bug related to routine info scanning that I need to look into. I’m happy to do this in the context of a merged core/elpa package if someone is able to lead that effort. There were numerous changes on the emacs side based on obsoleted functions, etc. that I never found the time to bring over.
And needless to say, if you know of any users of IDLWAVE who are interested in taking over maintenance and overseeing its re-folding back into the emacs core/elpa, I’d be delighted to speak with them.
Best,
JDS
> On Sep 19, 2021, at 12:05 PM, Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se> wrote:
>
> Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se> writes:
>
>> Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se> writes:
>>
>>> I don't use it myself, but I noticed that there is ongoing development
>>> of idlwave.el here:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/jdtsmith/idlwave
>>>
>>> As far as I can tell from the git log, the last change to idlwave by
>>> JD Smith was on Fri Apr 27 19:34:22 2007 +0000.
>>>
>>> Would it be possible to merge this effort into the version distributed
>>> with GNU Emacs itself? That way more users could benefit from the
>>> improvements.
>>
>> I note that on the GitHub page, there has since been added a note:
>>
>> Note: IDLWAVE is currently not maintained. In current form it
>> supports IDL v8.6, and is still in daily use by some users.
>>
>> If you are interested in taking over IDLWAVE maintenance, please
>> post an issue. See the DEVELOP file for information on the file
>> structure layout.
>>
>> I'm not sure what this means for the idlwave we ship with Emacs.
>>
>> JD Smith, do you mind if someone else tries to on merge your external
>> development efforts into Emacs itself?
>
> The above email bounced, so I have now copied in the email address used
> in the GitHub repository.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#39992
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 19 Sep 2021 17:24:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 39992 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
JD Smith <jdtsmith <at> gmail.com> writes:
> I’m happy for anyone to work on merging the latest IDLWAVE into Emacs,
> and I can assist with this process as time allows. This might require
> some moderate effort, since I believe I refactored and simplified the
> code layout (in an attempt to attract a new maintainer) after my last
> push into emacs core. This refactoring occurred around 20015/16. My
> last commit on GitHub was actually in 2018.
Thank you for your efforts in maintaining this package. I don't
actually use it myself, so I only have a few observations on the
maintenance aspects below.
> I’ve also discussed with several of the emacs devels over the years
> moving IDLWAVE to a package on Elpa. I think that’s a more
> appropriate home, since there are not terribly many users (as judged
> by the number of email queries I get now vs. a decade ago).
That makes sense to me. I'm copying in Stefan Monnier, who is in charge
of GNU ELPA, in case he has anything to add.
> I still use IDLWAVE, but far more rarely than before. There is
> currently a bug related to routine info scanning that I need to look
> into. I’m happy to do this in the context of a merged core/elpa
> package if someone is able to lead that effort. There were numerous
> changes on the emacs side based on obsoleted functions, etc. that I
> never found the time to bring over.
If we could get those changes merged into your version, perhaps we could
just replace the one in Emacs with yours?
It would of course be excellent if you could eventually find the time to
do that, and a priori it sounds like much less works than going the
other way around.
> And needless to say, if you know of any users of IDLWAVE who are
> interested in taking over maintenance and overseeing its re-folding
> back into the emacs core/elpa, I’d be delighted to speak with them.
I currently don't, unfortunately. I suppose we shall have to wait and
see if there is someone interested.
Thanks again for getting back to us about this.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#39992
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 19 Sep 2021 17:42:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #22 received at 39992 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
> Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 10:23:02 -0700
> Cc: 39992 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
>
> > I’ve also discussed with several of the emacs devels over the years
> > moving IDLWAVE to a package on Elpa. I think that’s a more
> > appropriate home, since there are not terribly many users (as judged
> > by the number of email queries I get now vs. a decade ago).
>
> That makes sense to me. I'm copying in Stefan Monnier, who is in charge
> of GNU ELPA, in case he has anything to add.
Unfortunately, we cannot move anything from core to ELPA until we have
a way of producing a release tarball with ELPA packages.
Reply sent
to
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sun, 03 Nov 2024 15:34:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sun, 03 Nov 2024 15:34:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #27 received at 39992-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se> writes:
> X-Debbugs-CC: JD Smith <jdsmith <at> rain.mhr.utoledo.edu>
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't use it myself, but I noticed that there is ongoing development
> of idlwave.el here:
>
> https://github.com/jdtsmith/idlwave
>
> As far as I can tell from the git log, the last change to idlwave by
> JD Smith was on Fri Apr 27 19:34:22 2007 +0000.
>
> Would it be possible to merge this effort into the version distributed
> with GNU Emacs itself? That way more users could benefit from the
> improvements.
>
> Thanks in advance.
IDLWAVE was move to GNU ELPA in Bug#71157, so I'm closing this bug
report.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Mon, 02 Dec 2024 12:24:07 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 12 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.