GNU bug report logs -
#41665
python-numpy: incorrect results on i686-linux
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 41665 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#41665
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 02 Jun 2020 16:17:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Diego Nicola Barbato <dnbarbato <at> posteo.de>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 02 Jun 2020 16:17:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Guix,
On i686-linux Numpy produces incorrect results for some matrix
products.
This minimal reproducer ...
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
python3 <<EOF
from numpy import array
from numpy.linalg import inv
A = array([[1. , 0. , 0. ],
[0. , 3. , 3. ],
[0. , 0. , 1. ]])
print(inv(A) @ A[:,2])
print((inv(A) @ A)[:,2])
EOF
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
... should return:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
[0. 0. 1.]
[0. 0. 1.]
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
On x86_64-linux, armhf-linux, and aarch64-linux I get the correct
result. On i686-linux I get this instead:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
[ 0.00000000e+00 -5.55111512e-17 1.00000000e+00]
[0. 0. 1.]
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I came across this bug while looking into https://debbugs.gnu.org/40406,
for which it seems to be the underlying cause.
I'm surprised this wasn't caught by Numpy's test suite.
Regards,
Diego
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 167 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.