GNU bug report logs -
#50985
Merging gnulib for Emacs 28.1?
Previous Next
Reported by: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2021 03:43:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: fixed
Fixed in version 28.1
Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 50985 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 50985 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#50985
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 03 Oct 2021 03:43:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Sun, 03 Oct 2021 03:43:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
X-Debbugs-CC: eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu
AFAICT, the last merge of Gnulib was in January:
commit 7c9841b8428edfbc369eccf54788b668d4b27328
Author: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
Date: Sat Jan 23 11:35:44 2021 -0800
Update from Gnulib by running admin/merge-gnulib
Running admin/merge-gnulib also gives these new files:
lib/realloc.c
m4/malloc.m4
m4/realloc.m4
m4/year2038.m4
Should we merge the latest changes from Gnulib into the emacs-28
branch? There seems to have been a fair bit of portability bug fixes,
but I don't know how important they are:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/log/
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#50985
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 03 Oct 2021 19:38:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 50985 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 10/2/21 8:42 PM, Stefan Kangas wrote:
> Should we merge the latest changes from Gnulib into the emacs-28
> branch?
Yes, as there have been a fair number of Gnulib changes that Emacs could
use for the usual portability and correctness reasons. Among other
things, emacs-28 currently doesn't build on Fedora 34 (the current
Fedora release) when you configure with --enable-gcc-warnings.
In July Eli gave the OK for me to merge Gnulib (see Bug#33847) but
unfortunately I put it off. I'll look into doing that now.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#50985
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 04 Oct 2021 06:38:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 50985 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On 10/3/21 12:37 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> In July Eli gave the OK for me to merge Gnulib (see Bug#33847) but
> unfortunately I put it off. I'll look into doing that now.
OK, attached are proposed patches to emacs-28 to merge Gnulib into the
emacs-28 branch. This is intended to be what I posted to Bug#33847 in
July, except taking more-recent Emacs and Gnulib changes into account.
Although the 1st patch is large, it's almost all automatically-generated
by admin/merge-gnulib. I haven't tested the 2nd patch, as it's
Microsoft-specific and I am mostly just guessing about Microsoft.
As you can see from recent activity in the emacs-28 branch I have also
fixed a few glitches that prevent Emacs from building on Fedora 34 if
configured with --enable-gcc-warnings, or from building on draft C2x
platforms; those fixes are small and are independent of the attached
patches. The attached patches fix several more glitches of this sort. A
few such glitches still remain; I plan to look into those after this
patchset is installed.
[0001-Update-from-Gnulib.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[0002-Port-recent-Gnulib-changes-to-MS-Windows.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#50985
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 04 Oct 2021 12:21:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 50985 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
> Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2021 23:37:09 -0700
> Cc: 50985 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
> OK, attached are proposed patches to emacs-28 to merge Gnulib into the
> emacs-28 branch. This is intended to be what I posted to Bug#33847 in
> July, except taking more-recent Emacs and Gnulib changes into account.
> Although the 1st patch is large, it's almost all automatically-generated
> by admin/merge-gnulib. I haven't tested the 2nd patch, as it's
> Microsoft-specific and I am mostly just guessing about Microsoft.
Thanks.
> -Use --disable-largefile to omit support for files larger than 2GB on
> -systems which support that.
> +Use --disable-largefile to omit support for files larger than 2GB, and
> +--disable-year2038 to omit support for timestamps past the year 2038,
> +on systems which allow omitting such support. This may help when
> +linking Emacs to a library with an ABI that requires a particular
> +width for off_t or for time_t.
At the time we discussed this, you said that --disable-year2038 has
effect only on 32-bit GNU/Linux x86 and ARM systems. Is that still
so? If so, I think we should mention that, as well as the relevant
glibc versions, otherwise this option's audience is not well defined
and users will not know whether it's for them or not.
The rest of the patches seem OK to me on first glance. It is hard to
know whether they could cause problems, but I guess we will know soon
enough ;-)
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#50985
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 04 Oct 2021 22:27:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 50985 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 10/4/21 05:19, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> At the time we discussed this, you said that --disable-year2038 has
> effect only on 32-bit GNU/Linux x86 and ARM systems. Is that still
> so? If so, I think we should mention that, as well as the relevant
> glibc versions, otherwise this option's audience is not well defined
> and users will not know whether it's for them or not.
OK, I installed it into emacs-28 with the following reworded NEWS item:
** There is a new configure option '--disable-year2038' to cause
Emacs to use only 32-bit time_t on platforms that have both 32- and
64-bit time_t. This may help link Emacs to a library with ABI
requiring traditional 32-bit time_t. This option currently affects
only 32-bit ARM and x86 running GNU/Linux with glibc 2.34 and later.
Emacs now defaults to 64-bit time_t on these platforms.
> The rest of the patches seem OK to me on first glance. It is hard to
> know whether they could cause problems, but I guess we will know soon
> enough ;-)
Yes, there will surely be some glitches, and not just on MS-Windows.
I'll send a brief word of warning to emacs-devel.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#50985
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 04 Oct 2021 23:19:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Mon 04 Oct 2021, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
>> Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2021 23:37:09 -0700
>> Cc: 50985 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>>
>> OK, attached are proposed patches to emacs-28 to merge Gnulib into the
>> emacs-28 branch. This is intended to be what I posted to Bug#33847 in
>> July, except taking more-recent Emacs and Gnulib changes into account.
>> Although the 1st patch is large, it's almost all automatically-generated
>> by admin/merge-gnulib. I haven't tested the 2nd patch, as it's
>> Microsoft-specific and I am mostly just guessing about Microsoft.
>
> Thanks.
>
>> -Use --disable-largefile to omit support for files larger than 2GB on
>> -systems which support that.
>> +Use --disable-largefile to omit support for files larger than 2GB, and
>> +--disable-year2038 to omit support for timestamps past the year 2038,
>> +on systems which allow omitting such support. This may help when
>> +linking Emacs to a library with an ABI that requires a particular
>> +width for off_t or for time_t.
>
> At the time we discussed this, you said that --disable-year2038 has
> effect only on 32-bit GNU/Linux x86 and ARM systems. Is that still
> so? If so, I think we should mention that, as well as the relevant
> glibc versions, otherwise this option's audience is not well defined
> and users will not know whether it's for them or not.
>
> The rest of the patches seem OK to me on first glance. It is hard to
> know whether they could cause problems, but I guess we will know soon
> enough ;-)
After these gnulib updates were installed I tried bootstrapping emacs-28
from a clean git tree on Windows (mingw64 64bit). After autogen and
configure, make failed with several errors of the form:
In file included from C:/emacs/git/emacs/emacs-28/nt/inc/stdint.h:24,
from C:/emacs/git/emacs/emacs-28/nt/inc/ms-w32.h:327,
from C:/emacs/git/emacs/emacs-28/src/conf_post.h:44,
from ../src/config.h:2726,
from C:/emacs/git/emacs/emacs-28/lib/fingerprint.c:20:
./stdint.h:89:5: error: #if with no expression
89 | #if
| ^
This appears to be caused by a change in "lib/stdint.h.in":
emacs-28/lib/stint.h.in: #if @GNULIBHEADERS_OVERRIDE_WINT_T@
master/lib/stint.h.in: #if @GNULIB_OVERRIDES_WINT_T@
emacs-28/configure.ac still has:
# Emacs does not use the wchar or wctype-h modules.
AC_DEFUN([gt_TYPE_WINT_T],
[GNULIB_OVERRIDES_WINT_T=0
AC_SUBST([GNULIB_OVERRIDES_WINT_T])])
It looks like this needs updating to use the new name.
AndyM
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#50985
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 04 Oct 2021 23:45:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Tue 05 Oct 2021, Andy Moreton wrote:
> On Mon 04 Oct 2021, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
>>> From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
>>> Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2021 23:37:09 -0700
>>> Cc: 50985 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>>>
>>> OK, attached are proposed patches to emacs-28 to merge Gnulib into the
>>> emacs-28 branch. This is intended to be what I posted to Bug#33847 in
>>> July, except taking more-recent Emacs and Gnulib changes into account.
>>> Although the 1st patch is large, it's almost all automatically-generated
>>> by admin/merge-gnulib. I haven't tested the 2nd patch, as it's
>>> Microsoft-specific and I am mostly just guessing about Microsoft.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>> -Use --disable-largefile to omit support for files larger than 2GB on
>>> -systems which support that.
>>> +Use --disable-largefile to omit support for files larger than 2GB, and
>>> +--disable-year2038 to omit support for timestamps past the year 2038,
>>> +on systems which allow omitting such support. This may help when
>>> +linking Emacs to a library with an ABI that requires a particular
>>> +width for off_t or for time_t.
>>
>> At the time we discussed this, you said that --disable-year2038 has
>> effect only on 32-bit GNU/Linux x86 and ARM systems. Is that still
>> so? If so, I think we should mention that, as well as the relevant
>> glibc versions, otherwise this option's audience is not well defined
>> and users will not know whether it's for them or not.
>>
>> The rest of the patches seem OK to me on first glance. It is hard to
>> know whether they could cause problems, but I guess we will know soon
>> enough ;-)
>
> After these gnulib updates were installed I tried bootstrapping emacs-28
> from a clean git tree on Windows (mingw64 64bit). After autogen and
> configure, make failed with several errors of the form:
>
> In file included from C:/emacs/git/emacs/emacs-28/nt/inc/stdint.h:24,
> from C:/emacs/git/emacs/emacs-28/nt/inc/ms-w32.h:327,
> from C:/emacs/git/emacs/emacs-28/src/conf_post.h:44,
> from ../src/config.h:2726,
> from C:/emacs/git/emacs/emacs-28/lib/fingerprint.c:20:
> ./stdint.h:89:5: error: #if with no expression
> 89 | #if
> | ^
>
> This appears to be caused by a change in "lib/stdint.h.in":
>
> emacs-28/lib/stint.h.in: #if @GNULIBHEADERS_OVERRIDE_WINT_T@
> master/lib/stint.h.in: #if @GNULIB_OVERRIDES_WINT_T@
>
> emacs-28/configure.ac still has:
>
> # Emacs does not use the wchar or wctype-h modules.
> AC_DEFUN([gt_TYPE_WINT_T],
> [GNULIB_OVERRIDES_WINT_T=0
> AC_SUBST([GNULIB_OVERRIDES_WINT_T])])
>
> It looks like this needs updating to use the new name.
...and a similar fix is also needed to "lib/gnulib.mk.in". That gets
further through the build, but then fails with a link error:
CCLD temacs.exe
C:/msys64/mingw64/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/10.3.0/../../../../x86_64-w64-mingw32/bin/ld.exe: comp.o: in function `comp_hash_source_file':
C:/emacs/git/emacs/emacs-28/src/comp.c:725: undefined reference to `md5_stream'
collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [Makefile:647: temacs.exe] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/c/emacs/git/emacs/emacs-28/build/mingw64-x86_64-O2-native/src'
make: *** [Makefile:449: src] Error 2
That looks like relying on something that has moved to a different
gnulib module, or the native compiler code will need some adjustment.
AndyM
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#50985
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 05 Oct 2021 12:45:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #26 received at 50985 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 10/4/2021 7:44 PM, Andy Moreton wrote:
> CCLD temacs.exe
> C:/msys64/mingw64/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/10.3.0/../../../../x86_64-w64-mingw32/bin/ld.exe: comp.o: in function `comp_hash_source_file':
> C:/emacs/git/emacs/emacs-28/src/comp.c:725: undefined reference to `md5_stream'
> collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [Makefile:647: temacs.exe] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/c/emacs/git/emacs/emacs-28/build/mingw64-x86_64-O2-native/src'
> make: *** [Makefile:449: src] Error 2
>
> That looks like relying on something that has moved to a different
> gnulib module, or the native compiler code will need some adjustment.
md5_stream has moved to a new file, md5-stream.c, which didn't get imported into
emacs:
commit 439979c0004197d6e0dd67c7807f57edacdf8a0d
Author: Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org>
Date: Sun Sep 19 01:35:19 2021 +0200
md5: Clarify module to source relation.
* lib/md5-stream.c: New file, extracted from lib/md5.c.
* lib/md5.c: Don't include stdlib.h, unlocked-io.h.
(BLOCKSIZE, md5_stream): Moved to md5-stream.c.
* lib/md5.h: Tweak.
* modules/crypto/md5 (Files): Add lib/md5-stream.c.
(configure.ac): Don't define GL_COMPILE_CRYPTO_STREAM.
(Makefile.am): Arrange to compile md5-stream.c.
(Link): Mention $(LIB_CRYPTO).
Ken
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#50985
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 05 Oct 2021 12:59:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #29 received at 50985 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Andy Moreton <andrewjmoreton <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 00:18:11 +0100
>
> In file included from C:/emacs/git/emacs/emacs-28/nt/inc/stdint.h:24,
> from C:/emacs/git/emacs/emacs-28/nt/inc/ms-w32.h:327,
> from C:/emacs/git/emacs/emacs-28/src/conf_post.h:44,
> from ../src/config.h:2726,
> from C:/emacs/git/emacs/emacs-28/lib/fingerprint.c:20:
> ./stdint.h:89:5: error: #if with no expression
> 89 | #if
> | ^
>
> This appears to be caused by a change in "lib/stdint.h.in":
>
> emacs-28/lib/stint.h.in: #if @GNULIBHEADERS_OVERRIDE_WINT_T@
> master/lib/stint.h.in: #if @GNULIB_OVERRIDES_WINT_T@
>
> emacs-28/configure.ac still has:
>
> # Emacs does not use the wchar or wctype-h modules.
> AC_DEFUN([gt_TYPE_WINT_T],
> [GNULIB_OVERRIDES_WINT_T=0
> AC_SUBST([GNULIB_OVERRIDES_WINT_T])])
>
> It looks like this needs updating to use the new name.
Thanks, I installed this and the other change you proposed, to allow
people build Emacs, until Paul fixes this "properly".
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#50985
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 05 Oct 2021 13:00:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #32 received at 50985 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Andy Moreton <andrewjmoreton <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 00:44:01 +0100
>
> CCLD temacs.exe
> C:/msys64/mingw64/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/10.3.0/../../../../x86_64-w64-mingw32/bin/ld.exe: comp.o: in function `comp_hash_source_file':
> C:/emacs/git/emacs/emacs-28/src/comp.c:725: undefined reference to `md5_stream'
> collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [Makefile:647: temacs.exe] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/c/emacs/git/emacs/emacs-28/build/mingw64-x86_64-O2-native/src'
> make: *** [Makefile:449: src] Error 2
>
> That looks like relying on something that has moved to a different
> gnulib module, or the native compiler code will need some adjustment.
md5_stream was moved to a separate file. If someone knows how to
import that, please do; until then the native-compilation build will
fail.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#50985
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 05 Oct 2021 13:46:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #35 received at 50985 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
>>>>> On Tue, 05 Oct 2021 15:58:05 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> said:
>> From: Andy Moreton <andrewjmoreton <at> gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 00:18:11 +0100
>>
>> In file included from C:/emacs/git/emacs/emacs-28/nt/inc/stdint.h:24,
>> from C:/emacs/git/emacs/emacs-28/nt/inc/ms-w32.h:327,
>> from C:/emacs/git/emacs/emacs-28/src/conf_post.h:44,
>> from ../src/config.h:2726,
>> from C:/emacs/git/emacs/emacs-28/lib/fingerprint.c:20:
>> ./stdint.h:89:5: error: #if with no expression
>> 89 | #if
>> | ^
>>
>> This appears to be caused by a change in "lib/stdint.h.in":
>>
>> emacs-28/lib/stint.h.in: #if @GNULIBHEADERS_OVERRIDE_WINT_T@
>> master/lib/stint.h.in: #if @GNULIB_OVERRIDES_WINT_T@
>>
>> emacs-28/configure.ac still has:
>>
>> # Emacs does not use the wchar or wctype-h modules.
>> AC_DEFUN([gt_TYPE_WINT_T],
>> [GNULIB_OVERRIDES_WINT_T=0
>> AC_SUBST([GNULIB_OVERRIDES_WINT_T])])
>>
>> It looks like this needs updating to use the new name.
Eli> Thanks, I installed this and the other change you proposed, to allow
Eli> people build Emacs, until Paul fixes this "properly".
Hereʼs what I did to get it to build --with-native-compilation. Not
pushing, since no doubt my method and commit message are all wrong :-)
[0001-Unbreak-with-native-compilation-build-after-gnulib-u.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Robert
--
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#50985
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 05 Oct 2021 14:10:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #38 received at 50985 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 10/5/2021 9:44 AM, Robert Pluim wrote:
> Hereʼs what I did to get it to build --with-native-compilation. Not
> pushing, since no doubt my method and commit message are all wrong :-)
FWIW, I came up with essentially the same patch, using a much clumsier method.
One trivial remark:
> @@ -79,6 +90,7 @@
> # count-leading-zeros \
> # count-one-bits \
> # count-trailing-zeros \
> +# crypto/md5 \
> # crypto/md5-buffer \
> # crypto/sha1-buffer \
> # crypto/sha256-buffer \
You can omit crypto/md5-buffer, since it's pulled in by crypto/md5.
Ken
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#50985
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 05 Oct 2021 14:13:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #41 received at 50985 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>>>>> On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 10:09:47 -0400, Ken Brown <kbrown <at> cornell.edu> said:
Ken> On 10/5/2021 9:44 AM, Robert Pluim wrote:
>> Hereʼs what I did to get it to build --with-native-compilation. Not
>> pushing, since no doubt my method and commit message are all wrong :-)
Ken> FWIW, I came up with essentially the same patch, using a much clumsier method.
Ken> One trivial remark:
>> @@ -79,6 +90,7 @@
>> # count-leading-zeros \
>> # count-one-bits \
>> # count-trailing-zeros \
>> +# crypto/md5 \
>> # crypto/md5-buffer \
>> # crypto/sha1-buffer \
>> # crypto/sha256-buffer \
Ken> You can omit crypto/md5-buffer, since it's pulled in by crypto/md5.
Probably. When it comes to gnulib I prefer to leave it to people who
know what theyʼre doing :-)
Robert
--
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#50985
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:17:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #44 received at 50985 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On 10/5/21 7:11 AM, Robert Pluim wrote:
> Probably. When it comes to gnulib I prefer to leave it to people who
> know what theyʼre doing :-)
We can't wait for *that* (:-), so I charged ahead and installed the
attached patches into the emacs-28 branch. This fixed the md5_stream
issue for me.
The key issue here is whether Emacs wants to use cryptography algorithms
supported by the Linux kernel, if available. I expect that Emacs doesn't
want to bother, because its use of md5_stream is not that performance-
or security-relevant and because if we wanted Emacs to use the kernel
stuff that'd drag in a lot more Gnulib modules which would be more
trouble than it's worth. Comments welcome of course, since this is a
judgment call.
I hadn't run into this earlier because I was doing a default
configure+build, which on my platform didn't use native compilation.
[0001-Tweak-recent-configure-fix.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[0002-Fix-md5-issue-in-recent-Gnulib-merge.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#50985
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:20:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #47 received at 50985 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 10/5/21 7:09 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
> You can omit crypto/md5-buffer, since it's pulled in by crypto/md5.
emacs/src/fns.c uses md5_buffer directly, so I kept crypto/md5-buffer in
admin/merge-gnulib's GNULIB_MODULES list. The idea is that
GNULIB_MODULES says what Emacs needs directly, and that the rest of
admin/merge-gnulib deduces the indirect dependencies.
Added tag(s) fixed.
Request was from
Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:24:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#50985
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 05 Oct 2021 18:16:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #52 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Tue 05 Oct 2021, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 10/5/21 7:11 AM, Robert Pluim wrote:
>> Probably. When it comes to gnulib I prefer to leave it to people who
>> know what theyʼre doing :-)
>
> We can't wait for *that* (:-), so I charged ahead and installed the attached
> patches into the emacs-28 branch. This fixed the md5_stream issue for me.
>
> The key issue here is whether Emacs wants to use cryptography algorithms
> supported by the Linux kernel, if available. I expect that Emacs doesn't want
> to bother, because its use of md5_stream is not that performance- or
> security-relevant and because if we wanted Emacs to use the kernel stuff
> that'd drag in a lot more Gnulib modules which would be more trouble than it's
> worth. Comments welcome of course, since this is a judgment call.
>
> I hadn't run into this earlier because I was doing a default configure+build,
> which on my platform didn't use native compilation.
Thanks building for native compilation from a clean checkout now work
for me for the emacs-28 branch.
The same issue with md5-stream now occurs on master, as the most recent
merge from emacs-28 to master did not pick up the md5-stream changes.
AndyM
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#50985
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 06 Oct 2021 07:25:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #55 received at 50985 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>>>>> On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 09:16:13 -0700, Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu> said:
Paul> On 10/5/21 7:11 AM, Robert Pluim wrote:
>> Probably. When it comes to gnulib I prefer to leave it to people who
>> know what theyʼre doing :-)
Paul> We can't wait for *that* (:-), so I charged ahead and installed the
Paul> attached patches into the emacs-28 branch. This fixed the md5_stream
Paul> issue for me.
Your patch just proves my point: mine was less minimal than it could
have been because I made a mistake in adding crypto/af_alg, then
removing it, and thus having an excessive addition to AVOIDED_MODULES.
Paul> The key issue here is whether Emacs wants to use cryptography
Paul> algorithms supported by the Linux kernel, if available. I expect that
Paul> Emacs doesn't want to bother, because its use of md5_stream is not
Paul> that performance- or security-relevant and because if we wanted Emacs
Paul> to use the kernel stuff that'd drag in a lot more Gnulib modules which
Paul> would be more trouble than it's worth. Comments welcome of course,
Paul> since this is a judgment call.
Seems sound to me. --with-native-compilation works for me now on
GNU/Linux.
Paul> I hadn't run into this earlier because I was doing a default
Paul> configure+build, which on my platform didn't use native compilation.
I donʼt think any platform does native compilation by default (yet?).
Robert
--
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#50985
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 07 Oct 2021 09:16:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #58 received at 50985 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
gnulib has now been merged on both emacs-28 and on master, so I'm
closing this bug report.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
bug marked as fixed in version 28.1, send any further explanations to
50985 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
Request was from
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 07 Oct 2021 09:16:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 04 Nov 2021 11:24:06 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 11 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.