GNU bug report logs -
#9301
dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g
Previous Next
Reported by: jidanni <at> jidanni.org
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:00:02 UTC
Severity: minor
Tags: fixed
Fixed in version 24.1
Done: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 9301 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 9301 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#9301; Package
emacs.
(Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:00:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
jidanni <at> jidanni.org:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org.
(Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:00:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
s runs the command dired-sort-toggle-or-edit, which is an interactive
compiled Lisp function in `dired.el'.
it says
ls switches (must contain -l): -al
Say instead
ls switches (must contain one of -log): -al ... or clearer:
ls switches (must contain -l or -o or -g): -al
Added tag(s) fixed.
Request was from
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
(Sun, 11 Sep 2011 02:38:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug marked as fixed in version 24.1, send any further explanations to
9301 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and jidanni <at> jidanni.org
Request was from
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
(Sun, 11 Sep 2011 02:38:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#9301; Package
emacs.
(Sun, 11 Sep 2011 02:40:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #12 received at 9301 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
jidanni <at> jidanni.org writes:
> ls switches (must contain one of -log): -al ... or clearer:
> ls switches (must contain -l or -o or -g): -al
Good idea. I've now done the latter.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#9301; Package
emacs.
(Sun, 11 Sep 2011 07:24:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #15 received at 9301 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
> jidanni <at> jidanni.org writes:
>
>> ls switches (must contain one of -log): -al ... or clearer:
>> ls switches (must contain -l or -o or -g): -al
>
> Good idea. I've now done the latter.
Not a good idea. On *BSD ls -o does not work. This should be reverted.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab <at> linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#9301; Package
emacs.
(Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:04:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #18 received at 9301 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org> writes:
> Not a good idea. On *BSD ls -o does not work. This should be reverted.
I've now removed -o, but kept -g.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#9301; Package
emacs.
(Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:34:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #21 received at 9301 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
> Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org> writes:
>
>> Not a good idea. On *BSD ls -o does not work. This should be reverted.
>
> I've now removed -o, but kept -g.
This is still not a good idea. How is -g special wrt. to the options
that may imply -l? The requirement that the options should include -l
is simple and does not need any amendment.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab <at> linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#9301; Package
emacs.
(Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:38:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #24 received at 9301 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org> writes:
> This is still not a good idea. How is -g special wrt. to the options
> that may imply -l? The requirement that the options should include -l
> is simple and does not need any amendment.
Because saying "include -l" sounds like you really need to have the
full, complete "-l" output, and then it turns out that you don't, which
makes me happy, because I hate the full "-l" output in dired buffers.
:-)
Perhaps the string should be more wishy-washy? "must be a sort-of full
listing, like -l or the like"? Too long, though.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#9301; Package
emacs.
(Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:56:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #27 received at 9301 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
> Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org> writes:
>
>> This is still not a good idea. How is -g special wrt. to the options
>> that may imply -l? The requirement that the options should include -l
>> is simple and does not need any amendment.
>
> Because saying "include -l" sounds like you really need to have the
> full, complete "-l" output, and then it turns out that you don't, which
> makes me happy, because I hate the full "-l" output in dired buffers.
> :-)
There is nothing that prevents you from using any additional options.
> Perhaps the string should be more wishy-washy? "must be a sort-of full
> listing, like -l or the like"? Too long, though.
Exactly. Saying "(must include -l)" is simple and clear, and fully
correct.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab <at> linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#9301; Package
emacs.
(Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:12:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #30 received at 9301 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org> writes:
> Exactly. Saying "(must include -l)" is simple and clear, and fully
> correct.
No, because it doesn't have to include -l. -o and -g does not imply -l.
It's kinda like -l, though.
So "(must include -l or similar)" might be best...
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#9301; Package
emacs.
(Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:19:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #33 received at 9301 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
> -o and -g does not imply -l.
They do.
> So "(must include -l or similar)" might be best...
Nobody needs that.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab <at> linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#9301; Package
emacs.
(Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:28:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #36 received at 9301 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org> writes:
> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
>
>> -o and -g does not imply -l.
>
> They do.
-g like -l, but do not list owner
>> So "(must include -l or similar)" might be best...
>
> Nobody needs that.
jidanni did, and I did. QED.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#9301; Package
emacs.
(Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:48:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #39 received at 9301 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
> Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org> writes:
>
>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
>>
>>> -o and -g does not imply -l.
>>
>> They do.
>
> -g like -l, but do not list owner
Like I said.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab <at> linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#9301; Package
emacs.
(Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:51:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #42 received at 9301 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org> writes:
>> Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org> writes:
>>
>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> -o and -g does not imply -l.
>>>
>>> They do.
>>
>> -g like -l, but do not list owner
>
> Like I said.
Like I said, it's like -l, but does not imply -l.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#9301; Package
emacs.
(Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:58:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #45 received at 9301 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
> Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org> writes:
>
>>> Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> -o and -g does not imply -l.
>>>>
>>>> They do.
>>>
>>> -g like -l, but do not list owner
>>
>> Like I said.
>
> Like I said, it's like -l, but does not imply -l.
You are wrong. "-lg" is the same as "-g".
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab <at> linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
(Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:24:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 12 years and 108 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.