Received: (at 10080) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Oct 2022 17:17:32 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 10 13:17:31 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49757 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1ohwP8-0004oc-WC
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 13:17:31 -0400
Received: from mail-mw2nam12on2077.outbound.protection.outlook.com
([40.107.244.77]:60992 helo=NAM12-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <mdl@HIDDEN>) id 1ohwP3-0004oM-7K
for 10080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 13:17:26 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none;
b=WbdXUn/qW2JxtEIb31Uwdyqg9RU34piS8QUcT6uuu0M7iCp5uaqatr7A9E7Kq7zzoSjG3MDBChlb0rZAgpxz3pit+IKzCUnw0SoCKaKRGTnR63rcIr6f0zCTLaT+keDvFX02za00esxXZfncwA0Dqap0ACSpLcl4f2Aim0B4IKW7XkhQsjIG7g0GgA0pu4NodGZH6kD6SjB8FkYhh8uh2CTlsB4W8djtj2xDQNRHXT74RkcLQ7rcTQ4UnbQWr3qB1GiBeeah/h63TDhAlnjx4Jum9WlwGuUOBg55K4SsE1q0Sk/op6lrOOomWn67+/M5pISVN2NYo0g1hBSeY2aY8A==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;
s=arcselector9901;
h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1;
bh=kmSm3OVJKBLSrvvxhgPleCXNj0QI8dMe9pJ2qmn814s=;
b=RaQR6/6CeXO8hUpJ3FX0d0bNg1ACSzgqCgx3urD01PtG+ivqjygAeDI1beq2HUVF3J+0oySw3d/rPUVbBL4sYAxhGweB8I35xp+IV8+b0xcrYFHvvnFRGVZHPJOFOE8SKsy6LyLDpGPVk4KmCK4SsohOlJjMlv8WFGpld3CXzqTHkdTsIVzJEXbOMTO5rPH2KYSo9QGJS/m++mGBCyd8mNi2Mf+7NrhGP6Ci2uT3I4GpqIW4+RWwFwvbFCvVGlWIBeDahoZHxSpAjKTVypME/KjXJrKAIaPDmbZmO4iejgyE/TDw/wP8PJ2IktQYGRicp7NBT5UmpDk+anmv5Z0Sww==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is
18.7.68.33) smtp.rcpttodomain=gnu.org smtp.mailfrom=alum.mit.edu; dmarc=pass
(p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=alum.mit.edu; dkim=none
(message not signed); arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alum.mit.edu;
s=selector2;
h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;
bh=kmSm3OVJKBLSrvvxhgPleCXNj0QI8dMe9pJ2qmn814s=;
b=BmoqVk9O1Dz6+Bf+um5AaWZFLz08hjYlcwbzM0ciOBLyJlAxAG1R0rdKPbe4z0+ErUGsuAGak3bD6cBr4/fq7nrNBW3pwHvVpTiGtp1tfFKFf/oZyI3FpVHoaczhJ1SpvW0tceVUjuS1NreXfwMEf/ZGWr5s3M74mMCKcNSxlF4=
Received: from DS7PR06CA0051.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:8:54::21) by
BL1PR12MB5875.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:397::7) with
Microsoft
SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
15.20.5709.15; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 17:17:13 +0000
Received: from DM3NAM02FT046.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com
(2603:10b6:8:54:cafe::13) by DS7PR06CA0051.outlook.office365.com
(2603:10b6:8:54::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5709.15 via Frontend
Transport; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 17:17:13 +0000
X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 18.7.68.33)
smtp.mailfrom=alum.mit.edu; dkim=none (message not signed)
header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=alum.mit.edu;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of alum.mit.edu designates
18.7.68.33 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
client-ip=18.7.68.33; helo=outgoing-alum.mit.edu; pr=C
Received: from outgoing-alum.mit.edu (18.7.68.33) by
DM3NAM02FT046.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.4.67) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
15.20.5709.10 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 17:17:12 +0000
Received: from foil (c-71-198-24-3.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.198.24.3])
(authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as mdl@HIDDEN)
by outgoing-alum.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 29AHH9dK026315
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT);
Mon, 10 Oct 2022 13:17:10 -0400
From: Mark Lillibridge <mdl@HIDDEN>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#10080: 23.3;
Rmail shows an extra blank line at the end when displaying a non-MIME
message
In-Reply-To: <83illalgp1.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 26
Sep 2022 03:48:21 -0400)
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 10:17:08 -0700
Message-ID: <87czazlht7.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DM3NAM02FT046:EE_|BL1PR12MB5875:EE_
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 6b1e01bc-3bba-49a5-aa9f-08daaae345ad
X-LD-Processed: 3326b102-c043-408b-a990-b89e477d582f,ExtAddr,ExtFwd
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:18.7.68.33; CTRY:US; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:;
IPV:CAL; SFV:NSPM; H:outgoing-alum.mit.edu; PTR:outgoing-alum.mit.edu;
CAT:NONE;
SFS:(13230022)(39860400002)(396003)(136003)(346002)(376002)(451199015)(46966006)(36840700001)(40470700004)(26005)(40460700003)(47076005)(3450700001)(8936002)(2906002)(15650500001)(41300700001)(40480700001)(5660300002)(4326008)(86362001)(316002)(82310400005)(956004)(70586007)(4744005)(6916009)(70206006)(786003)(36860700001)(356005)(478600001)(82740400003)(7596003)(8676002)(2616005)(41320700001)(75432002)(336012)(83380400001)(186003);
DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
X-OriginatorOrg: alum.mit.edu
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Oct 2022 17:17:12.7779 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6b1e01bc-3bba-49a5-aa9f-08daaae345ad
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3326b102-c043-408b-a990-b89e477d582f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3326b102-c043-408b-a990-b89e477d582f; Ip=[18.7.68.33];
Helo=[outgoing-alum.mit.edu]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM3NAM02FT046.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BL1PR12MB5875
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10080
Cc: larsi@HIDDEN, 10080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: mdl@HIDDEN
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes:
> Can you explain why this is a problem? That is, why does it matter
> that a message, as shown in the Rmail reading buffer, has extra empty
> lines at the end? I use Rmail all the time, and know about these
> extra empty lines, but they never bother me, because I don't need to
> read empty lines. And forwarding a message with an extra empty line
> also should not cause any trouble on the receiving end.
>
> So I'm not sure we should do anything with this bug.
I agree this is not a particularly urgent/important bug. If there
are more important bugs to fix and we have limited fixer bandwidth, I
don't think it would be unreasonable to mark this as "won't fix" or the
like. I reopened this mostly because it was closed with the state
"fixed/gone", which is incorrect.
- Mark
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#10080; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 10080) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2022 10:53:52 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 26 06:53:52 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49378 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1oclkG-0005KV-6r for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 06:53:52 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:39684) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1oclkD-0005KI-VH for 10080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 06:53:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=IFc2POYV1UKOtSLPTDU9pBnmNXcvi9w457iVOySWBss=; b=AcZxlmGKVzsoV4MIFVO+KxyJ39 Qo1CovEFqszqDopC/JwqjZk0bhfBWx5PbKu8y1ZbhpfO/CLzhogC8Atfz85UyJdC6uZVDwbdFkyYG zIeALVD5ZJNg0ciTyX9L74IrSKN6tYm/FpEKFlS2PLBP7+CojAL3YL1BT/BUVwcSeofs=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1oclk5-0007Az-7s; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:53:43 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#10080: 23.3; Rmail shows an extra blank line at the end when displaying a non-MIME message In-Reply-To: <83illalgp1.fsf@HIDDEN> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:48:10 +0300") References: <8762ifeps3.fsf@HIDDEN> <87a66nbed0.fsf@HIDDEN> <83illalgp1.fsf@HIDDEN> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEUiHy9ANEEaGDPL e0n///8Oec6aAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+YJGgoyLOxCOvEAAAGpSURBVDjLbZSJdcQw CEQBNwBSA1hpIIr77y0Durx5YS+vvmEAIROFsRneL1Om5u1fAyB6L7DJAGlywIVAJT2W66QXxOQA p/m/MZG3A4RV2UtqwNlYBnBhaeKKyy97oNLLBOSCe7mEh6l1m6G8Qfo2/c5orZWlAT0UZF352Vlm KpByLPbGtezKE4QEVxG6+yeI+kzDcQPKbNEwMnL19vjLw4VMHB7O0v2IO0n+qOAWe2sgEGo3C8wn lGTv+UG2Uf1LI7ekPiD4umb7EzhpgjCk8OnxLFNawP8CeQHmuVyPxxisCWrfIG1pdzYAmr3yCQzA qC4glP27sopvgDLFMyeuhrsxBnj90EgowzEcVK+I9pSI7u2A3vFBXqlBEaqdbAeIjY6B9jgfBxg8 IqNRi64eookx3kS7JYPEfI6aF7AM1iPrD7BUaoI2Qo2ErQ51Mx9jsFoZIIsfYE37FEG7dG1t+GAS cQZGrHliAHDYWQ0NzuoxW+s4axwh4+65WYZ2vA4nmoks7xqR9sA5ltijO3Kb7sdEAMRyWiYjQj5L cHfb6yspOhezRcOFfgEKDG6WHUUrNgAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMi0wOS0yNlQxMDo1 MDo0NCswMDowMOd/rFEAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjItMDktMjZUMTA6NTA6NDQrMDA6 MDCWIhTtAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Fire Escape's _Abandon Head_: "Earthstick" Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:53:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87a66m9zkc.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes: > Can you explain why this is a problem? That is, why does it matter > that a message, as shown in the Rmail reading buffer, has extra empty > lines at the end? I use Rmail all the time, and know abou [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10080 Cc: mdl@HIDDEN, 10080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes: > Can you explain why this is a problem? That is, why does it matter > that a message, as shown in the Rmail reading buffer, has extra empty > lines at the end? I use Rmail all the time, and know about these > extra empty lines, but they never bother me, because I don't need to > read empty lines. And forwarding a message with an extra empty line > also should not cause any trouble on the receiving end. It doesn't sound optimal.
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#10080; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 10080) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2022 07:48:28 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 26 03:48:28 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49183 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ociqq-0000RB-Ce for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 03:48:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33748) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1ociqp-0000Qw-5E for 10080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 03:48:27 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59258) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1ociqj-0000kV-4c; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 03:48:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=8LHNO3TUyd1FWUXM45cJFCpLocZiF+EQW8f6euSaQ0w=; b=kUXokAL1yynv Q5cm770q0f8wCN8JwoxxS0AC79MH3mJSgs47UkwC5pOd3VWROqH2Yz+eBea4yqdRwajXHophLN/OO YebQcOGMi5FeHtFmIN+dpLfjRvHBQCoPYwE6Dnp0cu7FTX+ZDxV13qHfDDSWs7JDIOkW26mhhn50O J44610T7nS08l9+QvtZ0KNN74aGv7WZoEGz+bJyBmVFsdCOFwwL6WB/6ZTBO4P1amg9EmD/0La/Yj zBmMFN+e3XF0hlx+MfQ4xq2hP1ehrUmvrQvWRqmdc914LLeueLMlGvjWwioaycaJulcA+QSaK8NRy VTTlmt3MTBX852fhy8Mf2Q==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2042 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1ociqi-0000Ef-Jr; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 03:48:20 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:48:10 +0300 Message-Id: <83illalgp1.fsf@HIDDEN> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> To: mdl@HIDDEN In-Reply-To: <87a66nbed0.fsf@HIDDEN> (message from Mark Lillibridge on Sun, 25 Sep 2022 09:36:27 -0700) Subject: Re: bug#10080: 23.3; Rmail shows an extra blank line at the end when displaying a non-MIME message References: <8762ifeps3.fsf@HIDDEN> <87a66nbed0.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10080 Cc: larsi@HIDDEN, 10080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Mark Lillibridge <mdl@HIDDEN> > Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 09:36:27 -0700 > > I'm attaching a *mbox* file (this is the format used by rmail), > lightly edited from one of my older rmail files to hide email addresses. > It has two messages, the first with zero blank lines at the end and last > with 2 blank lines at the end. If you find file it then do M-x > rmail-mode and look at the first message, you will see that it has an > extra blank line at the end when displayed. The last one doesn't. (go > to the end of message with esc > or turn on line numbering to see where > the displayed message ends.) > > If you look at the rmail file before doing rmail-mode, you can see > the underlying formatting. You will see a blank line between the first > and second message; this is part of the mbox formatting, not a part of > either message. > > from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mbox > The mbox format uses a single blank line followed by the string 'From ' > (with a space) to delimit messages; this can create ambiguities if a > message contains the same sequence in the message text. > > (The original reproduction instructions probably no longer work because > it's actually quite hard to send a message that's not using MIME these > days.) > > To add insult to injury, if you attempt to forward the message, Rmail > will include the spurious blank line in the message it forwards. I hit > 'f' for this in emacs28.1 -q and get a # part with the blank line before > the closing tag. Can you explain why this is a problem? That is, why does it matter that a message, as shown in the Rmail reading buffer, has extra empty lines at the end? I use Rmail all the time, and know about these extra empty lines, but they never bother me, because I don't need to read empty lines. And forwarding a message with an extra empty line also should not cause any trouble on the receiving end. So I'm not sure we should do anything with this bug.
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#10080; Package emacs.
Full text available.
Received: (at 10080) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2022 16:36:41 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 25 12:36:40 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48446 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1ocUcS-0004c4-Gh
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 12:36:40 -0400
Received: from mail-bn7nam10on2053.outbound.protection.outlook.com
([40.107.92.53]:6529 helo=NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <mdl@HIDDEN>) id 1ocUcP-0004bp-Cx
for 10080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 12:36:38 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none;
b=OSPIQe0JhRlGgwBKrXg+ew3/dGDTRsctFcNYedl5WfhTE97gRSDfkOQtQXpXQVZpxpBg5PFu2L9PECxa+xrZfMztqy4+ZBUtuiacYH77QmP3PJgq1hlSsPvU6tcuJOLYKWCU7G5Y0vuQM1yTQlolile/zL9Xf7u8ga/p947uGVzbrrUVbT5asqmU8j9zBXpwbVCMuacDbKmzSXAZSrBW+z6JztDVJ4ylbbNAHCuku5ggHvS8WR5M8rnpfYFfur5ZttVNd+PMYESbQIIAwW94NOSKYwlU1QEr3CnUp9g501OAxLb7Fy27jU2leY7Y2vFufgTN0KOd0KtLVrjbAsX0dA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;
s=arcselector9901;
h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1;
bh=3y2+p8krTUSIHeLp0EBrEdAQK4zegLKVNwq1UttGxOU=;
b=egq7IZi82iebJMnqO8QqFFqCtbVbB2vdfoboV4caPrWKxwKneFUTWrAftUsFUWeQYfT5kLVyoe1zHt6xiKLsD4t4Zuk/6Soqbjl70ObWD86b1YSt2a4KFzVoJl+XDY4dfr9hDSOMVqi20CJ66BThJy0riwxpaXaL4pqriSkrbAPcZe2tF6SKvoRgoj3W7TZE6f7fVGrU+/nxipHdt4yE7PGh5MzsBoZ8SnBiI/j7RWRvVYcqtrgeKyauTtMhbFx/ncZXW/yHyHUKwEF9haAXcFB8C+8e7nBQSTB8MfDlJ/Eb4Kk4h0kVo7bXuAUA2tYUGkxbvCSzSPhAFFjsajMSnw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is
18.7.68.33) smtp.rcpttodomain=debbugs.gnu.org smtp.mailfrom=alum.mit.edu;
dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=alum.mit.edu;
dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alum.mit.edu;
s=selector2;
h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;
bh=3y2+p8krTUSIHeLp0EBrEdAQK4zegLKVNwq1UttGxOU=;
b=GeyEt4G95uyZLUTSx8i+MsU+YdOTYaa/EXQ8rZU92lpet5mzFVekXhx2ZG8qAc2ELZdYaY4AvQ4l10XSEaeUPTuP733rICrVL4je95qLtGOMf03G6UihcUtZEbPiKSTdAqMYtMZIBak4PiiJsT9ZzqC6bCCyu7Y6yDDvgXoLZtI=
Received: from DM6PR10CA0015.namprd10.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:60::28) by
MW4PR12MB5642.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:187::9) with
Microsoft
SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
15.20.5654.24; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 16:36:30 +0000
Received: from DM3NAM02FT019.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com
(2603:10b6:5:60:cafe::14) by DM6PR10CA0015.outlook.office365.com
(2603:10b6:5:60::28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5654.24 via Frontend
Transport; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 16:36:30 +0000
X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 18.7.68.33)
smtp.mailfrom=alum.mit.edu; dkim=none (message not signed)
header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=alum.mit.edu;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of alum.mit.edu designates
18.7.68.33 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
client-ip=18.7.68.33; helo=outgoing-alum.mit.edu; pr=C
Received: from outgoing-alum.mit.edu (18.7.68.33) by
DM3NAM02FT019.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.4.191) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
15.20.5654.14 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 16:36:30 +0000
Received: from foil (c-71-198-24-3.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.198.24.3])
(authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as mdl@HIDDEN)
by outgoing-alum.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 28PGaRVE002051
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT);
Sun, 25 Sep 2022 12:36:28 -0400
From: Mark Lillibridge <mdl@HIDDEN>
To: 10080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@HIDDEN
Subject: re: bug#10080: 23.3; Rmail shows an extra blank line at the end
when displaying a non-MIME message
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 09:36:27 -0700
Message-ID: <87a66nbed0.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DM3NAM02FT019:EE_|MW4PR12MB5642:EE_
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: ce3815d6-8705-474c-f3ad-08da9f1419bd
X-LD-Processed: 3326b102-c043-408b-a990-b89e477d582f,ExtAddr,ExtFwd
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:18.7.68.33; CTRY:US; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:;
IPV:CAL; SFV:NSPM; H:outgoing-alum.mit.edu; PTR:outgoing-alum.mit.edu;
CAT:NONE;
SFS:(13230022)(136003)(376002)(39860400002)(396003)(346002)(451199015)(36840700001)(46966006)(26005)(2616005)(41300700001)(2906002)(956004)(316002)(786003)(82740400003)(15650500001)(3450700001)(8676002)(70586007)(40480700001)(75432002)(8936002)(336012)(70206006)(47076005)(82310400005)(83380400001)(7596003)(235185007)(966005)(478600001)(86362001)(5660300002)(356005)(186003)(41320700001)(36860700001);
DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
X-OriginatorOrg: alum.mit.edu
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Sep 2022 16:36:30.4513 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: ce3815d6-8705-474c-f3ad-08da9f1419bd
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3326b102-c043-408b-a990-b89e477d582f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3326b102-c043-408b-a990-b89e477d582f; Ip=[18.7.68.33];
Helo=[outgoing-alum.mit.edu]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM3NAM02FT019.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MW4PR12MB5642
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10080
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: mdl@HIDDEN
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Lars wrote:
> I'm unable to reproduce this in Emacs 28, but I'm not quite sure I'm
> testing it correctly. Are you still seeing this issue in recent Emacs
> versions?
Yes, I can reproduce this in version 28.1.
I'm attaching a *mbox* file (this is the format used by rmail),
lightly edited from one of my older rmail files to hide email addresses.
It has two messages, the first with zero blank lines at the end and last
with 2 blank lines at the end. If you find file it then do M-x
rmail-mode and look at the first message, you will see that it has an
extra blank line at the end when displayed. The last one doesn't. (go
to the end of message with esc > or turn on line numbering to see where
the displayed message ends.)
If you look at the rmail file before doing rmail-mode, you can see
the underlying formatting. You will see a blank line between the first
and second message; this is part of the mbox formatting, not a part of
either message.
from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mbox
The mbox format uses a single blank line followed by the string 'From '
(with a space) to delimit messages; this can create ambiguities if a
message contains the same sequence in the message text.
(The original reproduction instructions probably no longer work because
it's actually quite hard to send a message that's not using MIME these
days.)
To add insult to injury, if you attempt to forward the message, Rmail
will include the spurious blank line in the message it forwards. I hit
'f' for this in emacs28.1 -q and get a # part with the blank line before
the closing tag.
- Mark
PS, I have gzipped the mbox file to prevent intermediate mailers from
corrupting it.
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/gzip
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=sample_mbox.gz
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64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--=-=-=--
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#10080; Package emacs.
Full text available.Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs@HIDDEN>
to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Mark Lillibridge <mdl@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Mark Lillibridge <mdl@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs@HIDDEN>
to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Received: (at 10080) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jun 2021 13:22:45 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 30 09:22:45 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56843 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1lyaAv-0003li-KL for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 09:22:45 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:57982) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1lyaAt-0003lQ-JG for 10080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 09:22:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=h7tpasH9d53AEQ4JGlS3ZbCafKPQkqevbmPafXxEh18=; b=J0AoF0zNK+JCiQseWiUvHDneT7 MGutCRKrAE8Nfdn94g1/o4qYVNR7zIY8pzrAs9qxtYQeBDjiDNe74/fw7kthNJUzq7TYkk/+ybphN FQuDpxpnhBUvYgBH4bSwD+qcFrXXLpR2czhG5a9widcGvjx1Ne/3cAIwDkEoVGjJyw/A=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1lyaAl-00025W-Iu; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 15:22:38 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> To: Mark Lillibridge <mark.lillibridge@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#10080: 23.3; Rmail shows an extra blank line at the end when displaying a non-MIME message References: <8762ifeps3.fsf@HIDDEN> <87sg20g19h.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Now-Playing: Jim O'Rourke's _To Magnetize Money and Return a Roving Eye (2)_: "To Magnetize Money and Return a Roving Eye pt2" Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 15:22:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87sg20g19h.fsf@HIDDEN> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 02 Jun 2021 09:43:22 +0200") Message-ID: <878s2r5vxg.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> writes: > I'm unable to reproduce this in Emacs 28, but I'm not quite sure I'm > testing it correctly. Are you still seeing this issue in recent Emacs > versions? More information was requested, but no response was given within a month, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10080 Cc: 10080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> writes: > I'm unable to reproduce this in Emacs 28, but I'm not quite sure I'm > testing it correctly. Are you still seeing this issue in recent Emacs > versions? More information was requested, but no response was given within a month, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#10080; Package emacs.
Full text available.Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Received: (at 10080) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jun 2021 07:43:35 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 02 03:43:35 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38650 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1loLXL-00080W-LA for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 03:43:35 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:54954) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1loLXK-00080H-8R for 10080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 03:43:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=CSNoh1mUBJCQH7xRsZclohT/Ndqgjfj9tWHV+LDGwf8=; b=KUnBokewSdkv4sqqlMdG6vCARy 4z2ALCX84xKZ6vi6yKX1urKkqky/lFTVgUHff3URJMaR/G1w4HaXIk2fPkOipahI4mO1OLyujGa6x aCNKiJ077cpUT/XJmvTXco0fIa3/2sLrmcT2Oeohd+beiA+baMpgXlgsgpe0+kdw1aCI=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1loLXA-0003PY-48; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 09:43:28 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> To: Mark Lillibridge <mark.lillibridge@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#10080: 23.3; Rmail shows an extra blank line at the end when displaying a non-MIME message References: <8762ifeps3.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Now-Playing: Nobukazu Takemura's _Child's View_: "Another Root (Menelik's Rap Mix)" Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 09:43:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8762ifeps3.fsf@HIDDEN> (Mark Lillibridge's message of "Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:00:28 -0800") Message-ID: <87sg20g19h.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Mark Lillibridge <mark.lillibridge@HIDDEN> writes: > This is easy to reproduce; just send yourself a plain text message > that has no extra blank lines after it. Incorporate it into Rmail and > notice that it is displayed with an extra blank line. For [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10080 Cc: 10080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Mark Lillibridge <mark.lillibridge@HIDDEN> writes: > This is easy to reproduce; just send yourself a plain text message > that has no extra blank lines after it. Incorporate it into Rmail and > notice that it is displayed with an extra blank line. For example, > >> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 12:05:50 -0800 >> Subject: no blank lines follow >> From: Mark Lillibridge <lillibridge@HIDDEN> >> To: mdl@HIDDEN >> >> this is the only line >> > > where I have added "> " before each line of the displayed message. If > you check the underlying mbox file, you'll see that indeed, "this is the > only line" is the last line of that message. (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately got no response at the time.) I'm unable to reproduce this in Emacs 28, but I'm not quite sure I'm testing it correctly. Are you still seeing this issue in recent Emacs versions? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#10080; Package emacs.
Full text available.
Received: (at 10080) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jan 2013 22:12:10 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 01 17:12:10 2013
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39409 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1TqA49-00032j-NI
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 17:12:10 -0500
Received: from alum-mailsec-scanner-2.mit.edu ([18.7.68.13]:55380)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <prvs=2713fa06b1=mdl@HIDDEN>)
id 1TqA47-00032V-H4; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 17:12:08 -0500
X-AuditID: 1207440d-b7f306d0000008b7-2c-50e35ee9bf3a
Received: from outgoing-alum.mit.edu (OUTGOING-ALUM.MIT.EDU [18.7.68.33])
by alum-mailsec-scanner-2.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with
SMTP id 45.52.02231.9EE53E05; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 17:10:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from foil.strangled.net (c-67-188-235-212.hsd1.ca.comcast.net
[67.188.235.212]) (authenticated bits=0)
(User authenticated as mdl@HIDDEN)
by outgoing-alum.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id r01MAlNF005765
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT);
Tue, 1 Jan 2013 17:10:48 -0500
From: Mark Lillibridge <mdl@HIDDEN>
To: 10080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: this bug (#10080) also causes an extra blank line to be appended to
forwarded messages
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:10:46 -0800
Message-ID: <87txr0tuzd.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA01Sb0gTYRz23d22c3pynlNfpxUNMjTm1MT2ob8UZSAhiR8szF71dKvtNu42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X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10080
Cc: 9521 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mdl@HIDDEN
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----)
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
For example, when I forward the example message using f I get:
|To:
|Subject: [mdl@HIDDEN: no blank lines follow]
|From: Mark Lillibridge <lillibridgem@HIDDEN>
|--text follows this line--
|
|
|
--=-=-=
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
|Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 12:05:50 -0800
|Subject: no blank lines follow
|From: Mark Lillibridge <lillibridge <at> gmail.com>
|To: mdl <at> alum.mit.edu
|this is the only line
|
|
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Notice the extra blank line at the end of the forwarded message.
Fixing #9521 properly (switching to forwarding raw instead of
decoded messages) should fix this. At the moment (post my 9521 patch),
it also appends a blank line to the end of the forwarded message.
- Mark
--=-=-=--
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#10080; Package emacs.
Full text available.
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Nov 2011 22:02:02 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 19 17:02:02 2011
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1RRsz1-0004AQ-SN
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:02:02 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92])
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <mark.lillibridge@HIDDEN>) id 1RRsyz-0004AI-0m
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:01:58 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <mark.lillibridge@HIDDEN>) id 1RRsxv-0002QQ-Qx
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:00:52 -0500
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:39547)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <mark.lillibridge@HIDDEN>) id 1RRsxv-0002QG-Mw
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:00:51 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56581)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <mark.lillibridge@HIDDEN>) id 1RRsxu-0001fw-Pp
for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:00:51 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <mark.lillibridge@HIDDEN>) id 1RRsxt-0002PK-KV
for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:00:50 -0500
Received: from madara.hpl.hp.com ([192.6.19.124]:38323)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <mark.lillibridge@HIDDEN>) id 1RRsxt-0002OC-7K
for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:00:49 -0500
Received: from mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com (mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com [15.25.115.25])
by madara.hpl.hp.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id
pAJM0kta016299
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:00:46 -0800
Received: from MDL ([16.213.66.251])
by mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/HPL-PA Hub) with ESMTP id
pAJM0f1k003057; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:00:43 -0800
From: Mark Lillibridge <mark.lillibridge@HIDDEN>
To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Subject: 23.3;
Rmail shows an extra blank line at the end when displaying a non-MIME
message
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:00:28 -0800
Message-ID: <8762ifeps3.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 15.0.152.124
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17
X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mark.lillibridge@HIDDEN
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------)
This is easy to reproduce; just send yourself a plain text message
that has no extra blank lines after it. Incorporate it into Rmail and
notice that it is displayed with an extra blank line. For example,
> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 12:05:50 -0800
> Subject: no blank lines follow
> From: Mark Lillibridge <lillibridge@HIDDEN>
> To: mdl@HIDDEN
>
> this is the only line
>
where I have added "> " before each line of the displayed message. If
you check the underlying mbox file, you'll see that indeed, "this is the
only line" is the last line of that message. (Remember that messages in
mbox format start with a "From " line and are followed by a blank
separator line that does not count as part of the message.) This extra
blank line is not displayed for MIME messages
The fix should be pretty easy; just make sure to check that any
other code that might be relying on the contents of the decoded buffer
(output as seen, edit?) doesn't get broken.
- Mark
mark.lillibridge@HIDDEN:bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#10080; Package emacs.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.