GNU logs - #10888, boring messages

Message sent to bug-automake@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#10888: Wait, isn't rpath supposed to be set automagically?
Resent-From: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-automake@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:15:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.10888.B.133026924318598 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Miles Bader <miles@HIDDEN>
Cc: 10888 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, automake@HIDDEN
Message-ID: <4F4A4B7E.8000901@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:10:54 +0100
From: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <87obslbqj4.fsf@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87obslbqj4.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
 
 Content preview:  On 02/26/2012 03:47 PM, Miles Bader wrote: > I thought that
    as long as one used ".la" libraries, automake+libtool > was supposed to handle
    all the grotty stuff like rpath automatically, > adding -rpath $(libdir)
   if you depend on libraries installed to libdir > and libdir isn't on the system
    library search path. [Yeah, I also > know some people hate rpath, but ...]
    > > But ... it doesn't seem to. Is something broken, is there an option I
    > should set... or? > > [I guess I can add "-rpath <blahblaha>" somewhere
    in Makefile.am, but > I don't really want to add system-dependent stuff that
    libtool's > supposed to be handling; isn't that why libtool exists in the
    first > place?] > > automake version 1.11.3, libtool version 2.4.2 > > Thanks,
    > > -Miles > > > Example: > > configure.ac: > AC_INIT([blah], [0.1], [bob])
    > AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([foreign]) > LT_INIT > AC_PROG_CC > AC_CONFIG_FILES([Makefile])
    > AC_OUTPUT > Makefile.am: > bin_PROGRAMS = blah > lib_LTLIBRARIES = liboink.la
    > blah_SOURCES = blah.c > blah_LDADD = liboink.la > liboink_la_SOURCES =
   oink.c > blah.c: > extern void oink (); > int main () { oink (); } > oink.c:
    > void oink () { } > > Commands: > $ autoreconf --install > ... > $ ./configure
    > ... > $ make > ... > $ sudo make install > ... > $ /usr/local/bin/blah
   > /usr/local/bin/blah: error while loading shared libraries: liboink.so.0:
    cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory > $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib
    /usr/local/lib/blah > $ ldd /usr/local/bin/blah > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff247c5000)
    > liboink.so.0 => not found > libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
    (0x00007f5ceeb26000) > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f5ceeed1000) >
    $ readelf -d /usr/local/bin/blah | grep RPATH > $ > I must admit I know very
    little of the Automake's libtool support, so I'm not sure whether this is
    a bug or not; still, the automake documentation reads somewhere: [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (1.6 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL           RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
                             [208.118.235.92 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
  0.0 SINGLE_HEADER_2K       A single header contains 2K-3K characters
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (stefano.lattarini[at]gmail.com)
  0.8 SPF_NEUTRAL            SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral)
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid

On 02/26/2012 03:47 PM, Miles Bader wrote:
> I thought that as long as one used ".la" libraries, automake+libtool
> was supposed to handle all the grotty stuff like rpath automatically,
> adding -rpath $(libdir) if you depend on libraries installed to libdir
> and libdir isn't on the system library search path.  [Yeah, I also
> know some people hate rpath, but ...]
> 
> But ... it doesn't seem to.  Is something broken, is there an option I
> should set... or?
> 
> [I guess I can add "-rpath <blahblaha>" somewhere in Makefile.am, but
> I don't really want to add system-dependent stuff that libtool's
> supposed to be handling; isn't that why libtool exists in the first
> place?]
> 
> automake version 1.11.3, libtool version 2.4.2
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Miles
> 
> 
> Example:
> 
> configure.ac:
>         AC_INIT([blah], [0.1], [bob])
>         AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([foreign])
>         LT_INIT
>         AC_PROG_CC
>         AC_CONFIG_FILES([Makefile])
>         AC_OUTPUT
> Makefile.am:
>         bin_PROGRAMS = blah
>         lib_LTLIBRARIES = liboink.la
>         blah_SOURCES = blah.c
>         blah_LDADD = liboink.la
>         liboink_la_SOURCES = oink.c
> blah.c:
>         extern void oink ();
>         int main () { oink (); }
> oink.c:
>         void oink () { }
> 
> Commands:
>         $ autoreconf --install
>                 ...
>         $ ./configure
>                 ...
>         $ make
>                 ...
>         $ sudo make install
>                 ...
>         $ /usr/local/bin/blah
>         /usr/local/bin/blah: error while loading shared libraries: liboink.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
>         $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib /usr/local/lib/blah
>         $ ldd /usr/local/bin/blah
>                 linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007fff247c5000)
>                 liboink.so.0 => not found
>                 libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f5ceeb26000)
>                 /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f5ceeed1000)
>         $ readelf -d /usr/local/bin/blah | grep RPATH
>         $ 
> 
I must admit I know very little of the Automake's libtool support, so I'm
not sure whether this is a bug or not; still, the automake documentation
reads somewhere:

  For libraries whose destination directory is known when Automake runs,
  Automake will automatically supply the appropriate -rpath option to
  libtool. This is the case for libraries listed explicitly in some
  installable _LTLIBRARIES variables such as lib_LTLIBRARIES.

so we have *at least* a documentation issue.  I should look at this more
carefully (probably after the 1.12 release); for now, I'm opening a report
in the bug tracker so that we won't forget about the issue.

Thanks,
  Stefano

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.428 (Entity 5.428)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#10888: Acknowledgement (Wait, isn't rpath supposed to be set
 automagically?)
Message-ID: <handler.10888.B.133026924318598.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <4F4A4B7E.8000901@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 10888
X-Gnu-PR-Package: automake
Reply-To: 10888 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:15:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-automake@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 10888 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
10888: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D10888
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2012 15:23:24 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 26 10:23:24 2012
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58449 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1S1fwZ-00053n-IB
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:23:24 -0500
Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com ([74.125.83.44]:50935)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <stefano.lattarini@HIDDEN>) id 1S1fwX-00053g-In
	for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:23:22 -0500
Received: by eeke51 with SMTP id e51so726971eek.3
	for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:20:35 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of stefano.lattarini@HIDDEN
	designates 10.213.14.80 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=10.213.14.80; 
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
	stefano.lattarini@HIDDEN designates 10.213.14.80 as
	permitted sender) smtp.mail=stefano.lattarini@HIDDEN;
	dkim=pass header.i=stefano.lattarini@HIDDEN
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.213.14.80])
	by 10.213.14.80 with SMTP id f16mr2952637eba.135.1330269635166
	(num_hops = 1); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:20:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=p88CboNgYJEWfZZoFr93WE9rQ3QOd/Pc4vN0Qcbpmm4=;
	b=ILB/jBBnwCLfpNf3OB7c+VGxHpB0VQoUEY2mScvqbtdENKSuktuRhsoEQZMwbhNH6H
	TxEZshOJSaPEi9thJT8A9y6RrVFnB+oRVRditP71N3JcFdBtfrnlLxMe0zRKoHIe9TSM
	QjadAK6m15n9je9vs4iv8rQFwghxPauCadIw0=
Received: by 10.213.14.80 with SMTP id f16mr2232801eba.135.1330269635048;
	Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:20:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [87.4.94.37] (host37-94-dynamic.4-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it.
	[87.4.94.37])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w60sm46209624eeb.4.2012.02.26.07.20.32
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:20:33 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F4A4DBE.9060108@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:20:30 +0100
From: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: x
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)

submitter 10888 Miles Bader <miles@HIDDEN>
thanks

Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.