X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#11085: factor only supports decimal numbers, doh Resent-From: Adam Back <adam@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 18:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.11085.B.133261394324512 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: report 11085 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 11085 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.133261394324512 (code B ref -1); Sat, 24 Mar 2012 18:33:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Mar 2012 18:32:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37140 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1SBVl1-0006N2-Qv for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:32:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58488) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <adam.back@HIDDEN>) id 1SBT0Q-0001Qb-No for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 11:36:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <adam.back@HIDDEN>) id 1SBSWQ-0001ln-A4 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 11:04:51 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:33059) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <adam.back@HIDDEN>) id 1SBSWQ-0001lj-6m for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 11:04:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39030) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <adam.back@HIDDEN>) id 1SBSWO-0003Io-I7 for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 11:04:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <adam.back@HIDDEN>) id 1SBSWM-0001lT-Ql for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 11:04:47 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:37207) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <adam.back@HIDDEN>) id 1SBSWM-0001l8-Kg for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 11:04:46 -0400 Received: by wgbdr1 with SMTP id dr1so2101935wgb.30 for <bug-coreutils@HIDDEN>; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 08:04:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.88.199 with SMTP id bi7mr5433436wib.12.1332601483545; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 08:04:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from netbook (c107-41.i07-27.onvol.net. [92.251.107.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ff2sm38672097wib.9.2012.03.24.08.04.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 24 Mar 2012 08:04:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by netbook (Postfix, from userid 204881528) id A036334029D; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 16:07:12 +0100 (CET) Received: by eee (hashcash-sendmail, from uid 204881528); Sat, 24 Mar 2012 16:07:11 +0100 Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 16:07:11 +0100 From: Adam Back <adam@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <20120324150711.GA24123@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Hashcash: 1:20:120324:bug-coreutils@HIDDEN::bYbJ9A70ORHxtmq1:0000000000000000 0000000000000000000000003QSV X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:32:06 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) Which is stupid because in most cryptographic applications, which is the main practical use of factor, if people are going to include this in distrubitons, use hexadecimal. The underlying crypto library obviously supports hex and its is more native number system anyway, so please enable hex numbers. eg 0xF it might be nice if the factors were in the same base as the input, or if there was a flag to control the output radix... Adam
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.428 (Entity 5.428) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Adam Back <adam@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#11085: Acknowledgement (factor only supports decimal numbers, doh) Message-ID: <handler.11085.B.133261394324512.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <20120324150711.GA24123@HIDDEN> X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 11085 X-Gnu-PR-Package: coreutils Reply-To: 11085 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 18:33:02 +0000 Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): bug-coreutils@HIDDEN If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 11085 <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 11085: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D11085 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#11085: factor only supports decimal numbers, doh Resent-From: Jim Meyering <jim@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 08:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.11085.B11085.13326639612654 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11085 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Adam Back <adam@HIDDEN> Cc: 11085 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 11085-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B11085.13326639612654 (code B ref 11085); Sun, 25 Mar 2012 08:27:01 +0000 Received: (at 11085) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Mar 2012 08:26:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37457 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1SBilz-0000gc-UO for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 04:26:01 -0400 Received: from mx.meyering.net ([88.168.87.75]:53017) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jim@HIDDEN>) id 1SBilk-0000gH-9a for 11085 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 04:25:58 -0400 Received: from rho.meyering.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rho.meyering.net (Acme Bit-Twister) with ESMTP id 45D1660118; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 09:54:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Jim Meyering <jim@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <20120324150711.GA24123@HIDDEN> (Adam Back's message of "Sat, 24 Mar 2012 16:07:11 +0100") References: <20120324150711.GA24123@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 09:54:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87aa35yv28.fsf@HIDDEN> Lines: 29 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Adam Back wrote: > Which is stupid because in most cryptographic applications, which is the > main practical use of factor, if people are going to include this in > distrubitons, use hexadecimal. The underlying crypto library obviously A feature request that starts with "your implementation is stupid..." generally doesn't get far, even when it has merit. What would be near-sighted (I wouldn't say "stupid") would be to add explicit support for hexadecimal input when you can get the same effect via your shell: factor $((0x1fffffffffffffff)) If the input is larger than 2^64, use bc or dc: factor $(echo 'ibase=16; FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF' |bc) > supports hex and its is more native number system anyway, so please enable > hex numbers. eg 0xF it might be nice if the factors were in the same base > as the input, or if there was a flag to control the output radix... You might have heard about the Unix Philosophy? It is about connecting tools like factor and bc or your shell so that we don't have to duplicate base-conversion functionality in every tool that accepts an integer input. Similarly, if you require hexadecimal output, use printf %x for small numbers or bc/dc/perl/python to convert.
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#11085: factor only supports decimal numbers, doh Resent-From: Adam Back <adam@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 13:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.11085.B11085.13326835175725 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11085 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Jim Meyering <jim@HIDDEN> Cc: 11085 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 11085-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B11085.13326835175725 (code B ref 11085); Sun, 25 Mar 2012 13:52:02 +0000 Received: (at 11085) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Mar 2012 13:51:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37693 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1SBnrQ-0001UI-9d for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 09:51:57 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:45606) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <adam.back@HIDDEN>) id 1SBnr9-0001Tx-PO for 11085 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 09:51:54 -0400 Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so2010209wgb.3 for <11085 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 06:20:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.104.230 with SMTP id gh6mr10946228wib.22.1332681634795; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 06:20:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from netbook (c107-41.i07-27.onvol.net. [92.251.107.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w10sm52496255wiy.3.2012.03.25.06.20.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 25 Mar 2012 06:20:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by netbook (Postfix, from userid 204881528) id 6E32E34029D; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:23:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by eee (hashcash-sendmail, from uid 204881528); Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:23:02 +0200 Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:23:01 +0200 From: Adam Back <adam@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <20120325132301.GA26476@HIDDEN> References: <20120324150711.GA24123@HIDDEN> <87aa35yv28.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87aa35yv28.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Hashcash: 1:20:120325:jim@HIDDEN::kmxjP3SJJNlzaEfW:03Wvw X-Hashcash: 1:20:120325:11085 <at> debbugs.gnu.org::EYqRoxtz5f7yMglh:0000000000000000 0000000000000000000000005yYq X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Hi, Thanks for replying. I am aware of bc, dc etc. And in fact that was what I did to work around (used bc), but it seems like unnecessary feature removal when the underlying crypto library the tool is calling to actually do the work is more natively working with hex (binary). Sorry about getting off on the wrong foot with the "stupid" word mixed into my thought. I have been using unix exclusively since 1989, and yes I am a fan of the unix philosophy. I would qualify "it is possible to use other tools to work around the lack of this feature" to more the tools are scalable, conveniently pluggable etc. And convenient pluggability applies IMO. Eg lets say od can output in different formats (-tx1 I use commonly if I need convert a file into something suitable to chain with some other crypto command line tool) ... you "could" no doubt work around that with awk, perl or maybe even bc if you were creative, but it just makes things less convenient to chain if the default or only output is not directly compatibile with the main consuming next in the chain tools natural, default or only input... Adam On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 09:54:39AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: >Adam Back wrote: >> Which is stupid because in most cryptographic applications, which is the >> main practical use of factor, if people are going to include this in >> distrubitons, use hexadecimal. The underlying crypto library obviously > >A feature request that starts with "your implementation is stupid..." >generally doesn't get far, even when it has merit. > >What would be near-sighted (I wouldn't say "stupid") >would be to add explicit support for hexadecimal input >when you can get the same effect via your shell: > > factor $((0x1fffffffffffffff)) > >If the input is larger than 2^64, use bc or dc: > > factor $(echo 'ibase=16; FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF' |bc) > > >> supports hex and its is more native number system anyway, so please enable >> hex numbers. eg 0xF it might be nice if the factors were in the same base >> as the input, or if there was a flag to control the output radix... > >You might have heard about the Unix Philosophy? >It is about connecting tools like factor and bc or your shell >so that we don't have to duplicate base-conversion functionality >in every tool that accepts an integer input. Similarly, if you >require hexadecimal output, use printf %x for small numbers or >bc/dc/perl/python to convert.
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#11085: factor only supports decimal numbers, doh Resent-From: Jim Meyering <jim@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.11085.B11085.133283618915852 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11085 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Adam Back <adam@HIDDEN> Cc: 11085 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 11085-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B11085.133283618915852 (code B ref 11085); Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:17:02 +0000 Received: (at 11085) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Mar 2012 08:16:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40607 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1SCRZn-00047X-DH for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 04:16:29 -0400 Received: from mx.meyering.net ([88.168.87.75]:60678) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jim@HIDDEN>) id 1SCRZW-000473-2V; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 04:16:22 -0400 Received: from rho.meyering.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rho.meyering.net (Acme Bit-Twister) with ESMTP id 23D3E60094; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:44:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Jim Meyering <jim@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <20120325132301.GA26476@HIDDEN> (Adam Back's message of "Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:23:01 +0200") References: <20120324150711.GA24123@HIDDEN> <87aa35yv28.fsf@HIDDEN> <20120325132301.GA26476@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:44:48 +0200 Message-ID: <8762dqwkr3.fsf@HIDDEN> Lines: 61 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) severity 11085 wishlist tags 11085 notabug retitle 11085 RFE: teach factor to read/write hexadecimal thanks Adam Back wrote: > Thanks for replying. I am aware of bc, dc etc. And in fact that was what I > did to work around (used bc), but it seems like unnecessary feature removal > when the underlying crypto library the tool is calling to actually do the > work is more natively working with hex (binary). > > Sorry about getting off on the wrong foot with the "stupid" word mixed into > my thought. > > I have been using unix exclusively since 1989, and yes I am a fan of the > unix philosophy. I would qualify "it is possible to use other tools to work > around the lack of this feature" to more the tools are scalable, > conveniently pluggable etc. And convenient pluggability applies IMO. > > Eg lets say od can output in different formats (-tx1 I use commonly if I > need convert a file into something suitable to chain with some other crypto > command line tool) ... you "could" no doubt work around that with awk, perl > or maybe even bc if you were creative, but it just makes things less > convenient to chain if the default or only output is not directly > compatibile with the main consuming next in the chain tools natural, default > or only input... You can define a shell function like this to handle the input conversion: f2(){ factor $( { echo ibase=16\;;echo "$*"|tr a-f A-F|tr -s ' ' \;; } |bc); } and use it like this: $ f2 FF FFF 255: 3 5 17 4095: 3 3 5 7 13 Considering that to get the same effect internally (in factor.c), I would have to change two separate code paths (with/without GMP), and -- perhaps more importantly -- that yours is the first request for this feature, your using the simple wrapper is preferable. And that is considering only the input conversion. I'm sure you can find or write a tool that parses an arbitrary stream of integers and converts them from decimal to hexadecimal. So far, it does not seem justified to add an option for that. However, if someone is interested enough to write patches, you might be able to convince us that a hexadecimal input should be accepted and should cause factors to be printed in hexadecimal. e.g., $ factor 0xFF 0xFFF 0xFF: 3 5 11 0xFFF: 3 3 5 7 C Then there's no need for a new option. But realize that this is no trivial task and would require an FSF copyright assignment. As usual, the change set would also have to add tests (be sure to exercise both code paths) and update documentation and NEWS.
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Mar 2012 08:16:30 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 27 04:16:30 2012 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40609 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1SCRZt-00047i-MY for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 04:16:30 -0400 Received: from mx.meyering.net ([88.168.87.75]:60678) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jim@HIDDEN>) id 1SCRZW-000473-2V; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 04:16:22 -0400 Received: from rho.meyering.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rho.meyering.net (Acme Bit-Twister) with ESMTP id 23D3E60094; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:44:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Jim Meyering <jim@HIDDEN> To: Adam Back <adam@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#11085: factor only supports decimal numbers, doh In-Reply-To: <20120325132301.GA26476@HIDDEN> (Adam Back's message of "Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:23:01 +0200") References: <20120324150711.GA24123@HIDDEN> <87aa35yv28.fsf@HIDDEN> <20120325132301.GA26476@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:44:48 +0200 Message-ID: <8762dqwkr3.fsf@HIDDEN> Lines: 61 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control Cc: 11085 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) severity 11085 wishlist tags 11085 notabug retitle 11085 RFE: teach factor to read/write hexadecimal thanks Adam Back wrote: > Thanks for replying. I am aware of bc, dc etc. And in fact that was what I > did to work around (used bc), but it seems like unnecessary feature removal > when the underlying crypto library the tool is calling to actually do the > work is more natively working with hex (binary). > > Sorry about getting off on the wrong foot with the "stupid" word mixed into > my thought. > > I have been using unix exclusively since 1989, and yes I am a fan of the > unix philosophy. I would qualify "it is possible to use other tools to work > around the lack of this feature" to more the tools are scalable, > conveniently pluggable etc. And convenient pluggability applies IMO. > > Eg lets say od can output in different formats (-tx1 I use commonly if I > need convert a file into something suitable to chain with some other crypto > command line tool) ... you "could" no doubt work around that with awk, perl > or maybe even bc if you were creative, but it just makes things less > convenient to chain if the default or only output is not directly > compatibile with the main consuming next in the chain tools natural, default > or only input... You can define a shell function like this to handle the input conversion: f2(){ factor $( { echo ibase=16\;;echo "$*"|tr a-f A-F|tr -s ' ' \;; } |bc); } and use it like this: $ f2 FF FFF 255: 3 5 17 4095: 3 3 5 7 13 Considering that to get the same effect internally (in factor.c), I would have to change two separate code paths (with/without GMP), and -- perhaps more importantly -- that yours is the first request for this feature, your using the simple wrapper is preferable. And that is considering only the input conversion. I'm sure you can find or write a tool that parses an arbitrary stream of integers and converts them from decimal to hexadecimal. So far, it does not seem justified to add an option for that. However, if someone is interested enough to write patches, you might be able to convince us that a hexadecimal input should be accepted and should cause factors to be printed in hexadecimal. e.g., $ factor 0xFF 0xFFF 0xFF: 3 5 11 0xFFF: 3 3 5 7 C Then there's no need for a new option. But realize that this is no trivial task and would require an FSF copyright assignment. As usual, the change set would also have to add tests (be sure to exercise both code paths) and update documentation and NEWS.
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Mar 2012 08:16:30 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 27 04:16:30 2012 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40609 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1SCRZt-00047i-MY for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 04:16:30 -0400 Received: from mx.meyering.net ([88.168.87.75]:60678) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jim@HIDDEN>) id 1SCRZW-000473-2V; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 04:16:22 -0400 Received: from rho.meyering.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rho.meyering.net (Acme Bit-Twister) with ESMTP id 23D3E60094; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:44:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Jim Meyering <jim@HIDDEN> To: Adam Back <adam@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#11085: factor only supports decimal numbers, doh In-Reply-To: <20120325132301.GA26476@HIDDEN> (Adam Back's message of "Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:23:01 +0200") References: <20120324150711.GA24123@HIDDEN> <87aa35yv28.fsf@HIDDEN> <20120325132301.GA26476@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:44:48 +0200 Message-ID: <8762dqwkr3.fsf@HIDDEN> Lines: 61 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control Cc: 11085 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) severity 11085 wishlist tags 11085 notabug retitle 11085 RFE: teach factor to read/write hexadecimal thanks Adam Back wrote: > Thanks for replying. I am aware of bc, dc etc. And in fact that was what I > did to work around (used bc), but it seems like unnecessary feature removal > when the underlying crypto library the tool is calling to actually do the > work is more natively working with hex (binary). > > Sorry about getting off on the wrong foot with the "stupid" word mixed into > my thought. > > I have been using unix exclusively since 1989, and yes I am a fan of the > unix philosophy. I would qualify "it is possible to use other tools to work > around the lack of this feature" to more the tools are scalable, > conveniently pluggable etc. And convenient pluggability applies IMO. > > Eg lets say od can output in different formats (-tx1 I use commonly if I > need convert a file into something suitable to chain with some other crypto > command line tool) ... you "could" no doubt work around that with awk, perl > or maybe even bc if you were creative, but it just makes things less > convenient to chain if the default or only output is not directly > compatibile with the main consuming next in the chain tools natural, default > or only input... You can define a shell function like this to handle the input conversion: f2(){ factor $( { echo ibase=16\;;echo "$*"|tr a-f A-F|tr -s ' ' \;; } |bc); } and use it like this: $ f2 FF FFF 255: 3 5 17 4095: 3 3 5 7 13 Considering that to get the same effect internally (in factor.c), I would have to change two separate code paths (with/without GMP), and -- perhaps more importantly -- that yours is the first request for this feature, your using the simple wrapper is preferable. And that is considering only the input conversion. I'm sure you can find or write a tool that parses an arbitrary stream of integers and converts them from decimal to hexadecimal. So far, it does not seem justified to add an option for that. However, if someone is interested enough to write patches, you might be able to convince us that a hexadecimal input should be accepted and should cause factors to be printed in hexadecimal. e.g., $ factor 0xFF 0xFFF 0xFF: 3 5 11 0xFFF: 3 3 5 7 C Then there's no need for a new option. But realize that this is no trivial task and would require an FSF copyright assignment. As usual, the change set would also have to add tests (be sure to exercise both code paths) and update documentation and NEWS.
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Mar 2012 08:16:30 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 27 04:16:30 2012 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40609 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1SCRZt-00047i-MY for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 04:16:30 -0400 Received: from mx.meyering.net ([88.168.87.75]:60678) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jim@HIDDEN>) id 1SCRZW-000473-2V; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 04:16:22 -0400 Received: from rho.meyering.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rho.meyering.net (Acme Bit-Twister) with ESMTP id 23D3E60094; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:44:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Jim Meyering <jim@HIDDEN> To: Adam Back <adam@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#11085: factor only supports decimal numbers, doh In-Reply-To: <20120325132301.GA26476@HIDDEN> (Adam Back's message of "Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:23:01 +0200") References: <20120324150711.GA24123@HIDDEN> <87aa35yv28.fsf@HIDDEN> <20120325132301.GA26476@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:44:48 +0200 Message-ID: <8762dqwkr3.fsf@HIDDEN> Lines: 61 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control Cc: 11085 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) severity 11085 wishlist tags 11085 notabug retitle 11085 RFE: teach factor to read/write hexadecimal thanks Adam Back wrote: > Thanks for replying. I am aware of bc, dc etc. And in fact that was what I > did to work around (used bc), but it seems like unnecessary feature removal > when the underlying crypto library the tool is calling to actually do the > work is more natively working with hex (binary). > > Sorry about getting off on the wrong foot with the "stupid" word mixed into > my thought. > > I have been using unix exclusively since 1989, and yes I am a fan of the > unix philosophy. I would qualify "it is possible to use other tools to work > around the lack of this feature" to more the tools are scalable, > conveniently pluggable etc. And convenient pluggability applies IMO. > > Eg lets say od can output in different formats (-tx1 I use commonly if I > need convert a file into something suitable to chain with some other crypto > command line tool) ... you "could" no doubt work around that with awk, perl > or maybe even bc if you were creative, but it just makes things less > convenient to chain if the default or only output is not directly > compatibile with the main consuming next in the chain tools natural, default > or only input... You can define a shell function like this to handle the input conversion: f2(){ factor $( { echo ibase=16\;;echo "$*"|tr a-f A-F|tr -s ' ' \;; } |bc); } and use it like this: $ f2 FF FFF 255: 3 5 17 4095: 3 3 5 7 13 Considering that to get the same effect internally (in factor.c), I would have to change two separate code paths (with/without GMP), and -- perhaps more importantly -- that yours is the first request for this feature, your using the simple wrapper is preferable. And that is considering only the input conversion. I'm sure you can find or write a tool that parses an arbitrary stream of integers and converts them from decimal to hexadecimal. So far, it does not seem justified to add an option for that. However, if someone is interested enough to write patches, you might be able to convince us that a hexadecimal input should be accepted and should cause factors to be printed in hexadecimal. e.g., $ factor 0xFF 0xFFF 0xFF: 3 5 11 0xFFF: 3 3 5 7 C Then there's no need for a new option. But realize that this is no trivial task and would require an FSF copyright assignment. As usual, the change set would also have to add tests (be sure to exercise both code paths) and update documentation and NEWS.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.