X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#12248: sleep is not arware of suspend mode Resent-From: Albrecht Frenzel <ajfrenzel@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.12248.B.134556334316604 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: report 12248 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.134556334316604 (code B ref -1); Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:36:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2012 15:35:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41673 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1T3qUY-0004Ji-0v for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:35:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51131) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ajfrenzel@HIDDEN>) id 1T3oA3-0000ud-C6 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:06:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ajfrenzel@HIDDEN>) id 1T3o9c-0003l1-SA for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:06:04 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:49277) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ajfrenzel@HIDDEN>) id 1T3o9c-0003km-Pc for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:05:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38358) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ajfrenzel@HIDDEN>) id 1T3o9b-00076W-Un for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:05:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ajfrenzel@HIDDEN>) id 1T3o9W-0003dB-BE for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:05:55 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:65332) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ajfrenzel@HIDDEN>) id 1T3o9V-0003cg-W2 for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:05:50 -0400 Received: from [172.30.5.24] ([95.113.197.190]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M5fhI-1TsMTM1Fdo-00xnRV for <bug-coreutils@HIDDEN>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:05:48 +0200 Message-ID: <503387AB.1040705@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:05:47 +0200 From: Albrecht Frenzel <ajfrenzel@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:qBpA2MtDk9YXKChouGBwyqV2jTF78XRE9cn7ZC4ccSo xmoNEvxqPI+mHe9rotvvQLlyiCFqkqU9dRSmu8tvYk3gPQxWpF 5DVdz4ZZDKNbhakj68oFmN6UAQxM/zaHEsKIydNALk2iXTa9/N 5yvf1Mbds9HdmDUK6MomzFZm5X90UI6StZqY+xx9TvN+aEbbuG XttL9BmBV/PUSBDzj2D0A== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:35:40 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) sleep (GNU coreutils) 8.13 on ubuntu 12.04 (64 bit) is not aware of suspend mode: sleep 5m <switch system to suspend mode for 2m> <wake up> The shell will be resumed after 7m
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.428 (Entity 5.428) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Albrecht Frenzel <ajfrenzel@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#12248: Acknowledgement (sleep is not arware of suspend mode) Message-ID: <handler.12248.B.134556334316604.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <503387AB.1040705@HIDDEN> X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 12248 X-Gnu-PR-Package: coreutils Reply-To: 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:36:02 +0000 Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): bug-coreutils@HIDDEN If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 12248: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D12248 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#12248: sleep is not arware of suspend mode Resent-From: Philipp Thomas <pth@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.12248.B.134556576220080 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12248 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.134556576220080 (code B ref -1); Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:17:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2012 16:16:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41701 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1T3r7a-0005Do-3e for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:16:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60157) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pth@HIDDEN>) id 1T3r7Y-0005DR-MB for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:16:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <pth@HIDDEN>) id 1T3r7C-0007bM-Ub for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:15:40 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:45503) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <pth@HIDDEN>) id 1T3r7C-0007b8-Rv for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:15:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38706) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <pth@HIDDEN>) id 1T3r77-0008Ms-T1 for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:15:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <pth@HIDDEN>) id 1T3r73-0007ZK-97 for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:15:33 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:53235 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <pth@HIDDEN>) id 1T3r73-0007Z6-37 for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:15:29 -0400 Received: from relay1.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03564A3DDD for <bug-coreutils@HIDDEN>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:15:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:15:27 +0200 From: Philipp Thomas <pth@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <20120821161527.GL1118@HIDDEN> References: <503387AB.1040705@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <503387AB.1040705@HIDDEN> X-Operating-System: openSUSE - Kernel Linux 3.4.2-1-desktop x86_64 Organization: SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix =?UTF-8?Q?Imend=C3=B6rffer,?= HRB 21284 (AG =?UTF-8?Q?N=C3=BCrnberg?=) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) * Albrecht Frenzel (ajfrenzel@HIDDEN) [20120821 18:05]: > sleep 5m > <switch system to suspend mode for 2m> > <wake up> > > The shell will be resumed after 7m That's how it should be. The complete system is frozen and after resuming continue where they were were stopped. Philipp
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#12248: sleep is not arware of suspend mode Resent-From: Bob Proulx <bob@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:00:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.12248.B12248.134556836023937 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12248 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Philipp Thomas <pth@HIDDEN> Cc: 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 12248-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B12248.134556836023937 (code B ref 12248); Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:00:01 +0000 Received: (at 12248) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2012 16:59:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41786 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1T3rnT-0006E0-H6 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:59:20 -0400 Received: from joseki.proulx.com ([216.17.153.58]:50421) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bob@HIDDEN>) id 1T3rnR-0006Dq-Cx; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:59:18 -0400 Received: from hysteria.proulx.com (hysteria.proulx.com [192.168.230.119]) by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC78421250; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:58:56 -0600 (MDT) Received: by hysteria.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9FEE22DC66; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:58:56 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:58:56 -0600 From: Bob Proulx <bob@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <20120821165856.GA5930@HIDDEN> References: <503387AB.1040705@HIDDEN> <20120821161527.GL1118@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120821161527.GL1118@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) tag 12248 + notabug close 12248 thanks Philipp Thomas wrote: > Albrecht Frenzel wrote: > > sleep 5m > > <switch system to suspend mode for 2m> > > <wake up> > > > > The shell will be resumed after 7m > > That's how it should be. The complete system is frozen and after resuming > continue where they were were stopped. Correct. That is the expected behavior. Therefore I am closing this bug. Bob
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2012 16:59:21 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 21 12:59:20 2012 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41788 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1T3rnU-0006E3-M1 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:59:20 -0400 Received: from joseki.proulx.com ([216.17.153.58]:50421) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bob@HIDDEN>) id 1T3rnR-0006Dq-Cx; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:59:18 -0400 Received: from hysteria.proulx.com (hysteria.proulx.com [192.168.230.119]) by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC78421250; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:58:56 -0600 (MDT) Received: by hysteria.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9FEE22DC66; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:58:56 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:58:56 -0600 From: Bob Proulx <bob@HIDDEN> To: Philipp Thomas <pth@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#12248: sleep is not arware of suspend mode Message-ID: <20120821165856.GA5930@HIDDEN> References: <503387AB.1040705@HIDDEN> <20120821161527.GL1118@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120821161527.GL1118@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control Cc: 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) tag 12248 + notabug close 12248 thanks Philipp Thomas wrote: > Albrecht Frenzel wrote: > > sleep 5m > > <switch system to suspend mode for 2m> > > <wake up> > > > > The shell will be resumed after 7m > > That's how it should be. The complete system is frozen and after resuming > continue where they were were stopped. Correct. That is the expected behavior. Therefore I am closing this bug. Bob
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2012 16:59:21 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 21 12:59:20 2012 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41788 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1T3rnU-0006E3-M1 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:59:20 -0400 Received: from joseki.proulx.com ([216.17.153.58]:50421) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bob@HIDDEN>) id 1T3rnR-0006Dq-Cx; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:59:18 -0400 Received: from hysteria.proulx.com (hysteria.proulx.com [192.168.230.119]) by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC78421250; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:58:56 -0600 (MDT) Received: by hysteria.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9FEE22DC66; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:58:56 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:58:56 -0600 From: Bob Proulx <bob@HIDDEN> To: Philipp Thomas <pth@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#12248: sleep is not arware of suspend mode Message-ID: <20120821165856.GA5930@HIDDEN> References: <503387AB.1040705@HIDDEN> <20120821161527.GL1118@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120821161527.GL1118@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control Cc: 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) tag 12248 + notabug close 12248 thanks Philipp Thomas wrote: > Albrecht Frenzel wrote: > > sleep 5m > > <switch system to suspend mode for 2m> > > <wake up> > > > > The shell will be resumed after 7m > > That's how it should be. The complete system is frozen and after resuming > continue where they were were stopped. Correct. That is the expected behavior. Therefore I am closing this bug. Bob
Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs@HIDDEN> Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: Did not alter fixed versions and reopened. Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:49:01 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # Did not alter fixed versions and reopened. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2012 20:50:18 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 21 16:50:18 2012 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42011 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1T3vP0-0005aR-67 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:50:18 -0400 Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.62]:40243) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <eggert@HIDDEN>) id 1T3vOy-0005aI-Qn for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:50:17 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C018439E800E for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:49:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GK4SZ0Fya5LR for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-108-23-119-2.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [108.23.119.2]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7769E39E800D for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5033F475.3070102@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:49:57 -0700 From: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN> Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: remove notabug tag Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) tags 12248 - notabug thanks
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#12248: sleep is not arware of suspend mode Resent-From: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.12248.B12248.134558227321592 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12248 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Bob Proulx <bob@HIDDEN> Cc: 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Albrecht Frenzel <ajfrenzel@HIDDEN> Received: via spool by 12248-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B12248.134558227321592 (code B ref 12248); Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:52:02 +0000 Received: (at 12248) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2012 20:51:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42016 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1T3vPs-0005cD-Lx for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:51:13 -0400 Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.62]:40289) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <eggert@HIDDEN>) id 1T3vPq-0005c6-TE for 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:51:11 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C814C39E800E; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:50:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E-XC-df4KTNZ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:50:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-108-23-119-2.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [108.23.119.2]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 797A939E800D; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:50:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5033F4AB.3070101@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:50:51 -0700 From: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN> Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <503387AB.1040705@HIDDEN> <20120821161527.GL1118@HIDDEN> <20120821165856.GA5930@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <20120821165856.GA5930@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) On 08/21/2012 09:58 AM, Bob Proulx wrote: > That is the expected behavior. It's not the behavior *I* expect. I expect 'sleep' to use realtime seconds, not seconds of some arbitrary clock that's way far from real time. I've taken the liberty of reopening this one, for further discussion.
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#12248: sleep is not arware of suspend mode Resent-From: Bob Proulx <bob@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.12248.B12248.134558298425887 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12248 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Albrecht Frenzel <ajfrenzel@HIDDEN> Received: via spool by 12248-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B12248.134558298425887 (code B ref 12248); Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:04:02 +0000 Received: (at 12248) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2012 21:03:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42025 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1T3vbL-0006jT-OM for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:03:04 -0400 Received: from joseki.proulx.com ([216.17.153.58]:51587) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bob@HIDDEN>) id 1T3vbI-0006j2-R6 for 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:03:01 -0400 Received: from hysteria.proulx.com (hysteria.proulx.com [192.168.230.119]) by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E03F21250; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:02:39 -0600 (MDT) Received: by hysteria.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 15E502DC72; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:02:38 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:02:38 -0600 From: Bob Proulx <bob@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <20120821210238.GA31684@HIDDEN> References: <503387AB.1040705@HIDDEN> <20120821161527.GL1118@HIDDEN> <20120821165856.GA5930@HIDDEN> <5033F4AB.3070101@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5033F4AB.3070101@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) Paul Eggert wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > That is the expected behavior. > > It's not the behavior *I* expect. I expect > 'sleep' to use realtime seconds, not seconds > of some arbitrary clock that's way far from > real time. Sleep has always been a pause in relative time from when the call is made to when it returns. Implementations have varied (signals, select, etc.) each with various issues causing a move from one to the other method. But if the system suspends then all processes suspend together. When the system wakes up then all processes proceed together from the point where they left off when suspending. I think anything else is going to create a lot of problems. I could see a big problem for many processes on the system if when the system resumes from suspend that all of the sleeping processes "all go off at once". It would cause a huge spike in system load as all of them fired all at one time. Granted that most sleeping processes are going to be sleeping in C code and no change to the coreutils sleep program will affect them. But any scripts that are using sleep would be affected. Also, the reason for sleep is often to add skew between two events. If upon wakeup all of the sleeping processes are all triggered then all relative skew will have been removed. Worse the wakeup would act as a synchronization point causing all of the sleeping processes to be deskewed. But I can definitely see that sleeping until a particular time would be useful behavior. But that would be such as large expansion of code and behavior that I think it should warrant a different program rather than expand sleep that much. Should we create a new command that sleeps until a particular system time? sleepuntil --date="now + 30 minutes" Bob
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#12248: sleep is not arware of suspend mode Resent-From: Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.12248.B12248.134558302925942 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12248 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN> Cc: 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Albrecht Frenzel <ajfrenzel@HIDDEN>, Bob Proulx <bob@HIDDEN> Received: via spool by 12248-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B12248.134558302925942 (code B ref 12248); Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:04:02 +0000 Received: (at 12248) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2012 21:03:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42028 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1T3vc4-0006kM-F1 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:03:48 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:16249) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <eblake@HIDDEN>) id 1T3vc1-0006kD-MF for 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:03:47 -0400 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7LL3Hmw007954 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:03:17 -0400 Received: from [10.3.113.100] (ovpn-113-100.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.100]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7LL3GTf018180; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:03:16 -0400 Message-ID: <5033F793.8060205@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:03:15 -0600 From: Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN> Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <503387AB.1040705@HIDDEN> <20120821161527.GL1118@HIDDEN> <20120821165856.GA5930@HIDDEN> <5033F4AB.3070101@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <5033F4AB.3070101@HIDDEN> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig870CA67E7C76E8C8A68FB28D" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23 X-Spam-Score: -7.1 (-------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -7.1 (-------) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig870CA67E7C76E8C8A68FB28D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/21/2012 02:50 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 08/21/2012 09:58 AM, Bob Proulx wrote: >> That is the expected behavior. >=20 > It's not the behavior *I* expect. I expect > 'sleep' to use realtime seconds, not seconds > of some arbitrary clock that's way far from > real time. In fact, I think both modes have their use, and that we probably ought to provide an option to choose between absolute wall clock deadline (stable realtime sleep even if the processor time jumps forwards or backwards or has gaps due to suspend) vs. elapsed relative processor time (where changing the processor clock can lengthen or shorten the sleep duration). If we do add code to support multiple flavors of sleep durations, I'd probably lean towards absolute wall time as the default. --=20 Eric Blake eblake@HIDDEN +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --------------enig870CA67E7C76E8C8A68FB28D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQM/eTAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqlLEH/31lL2yuJs+retonIi0hBGL6 fHl0siuk+4QvfT6RVbMBUDl3RTHFzW+zerSrG/eeuQKU84b8kpXfIA96ODk+J0gD McIMqEYpHhmeutR008GGE1KEcH+2qE5Die3+ZHsQ3COdXfksIQ1yo6Dbx8aQZxWE BImb0dwEaRNBb1Lzf4YHOBc+NnBVlwUMP2SY6j2/RqgAZ1DLCWmR8N2jN+mCPYPn nHf+8WYyFypfnUQXyQ9++oyvq4x3djorA+/uRZYAmUXPF+KAFcEZ2ExCQLiQcP5E 5QfF3OWeE6VfAfQvCkGirPee1k4aWcYvTmqAHVB4Eo3Yy9wUKJLhWRfD5gARZaE= =64f9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig870CA67E7C76E8C8A68FB28D--
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#12248: sleep is not arware of suspend mode Resent-From: Albrecht Frenzel <ajfrenzel@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 22:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.12248.B12248.13455883031086 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12248 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Bob Proulx <bob@HIDDEN> Cc: 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 12248-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B12248.13455883031086 (code B ref 12248); Tue, 21 Aug 2012 22:32:01 +0000 Received: (at 12248) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2012 22:31:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42105 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1T3wz9-0000HT-8w for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:31:43 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:58353) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ajfrenzel@HIDDEN>) id 1T3wz7-0000HL-91 for 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:31:42 -0400 Received: from [172.30.5.24] ([95.113.197.190]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MgOCo-1TGgR443Uc-00NDPE; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:31:13 +0200 Message-ID: <50340C30.1060805@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:31:12 +0200 From: Albrecht Frenzel <ajfrenzel@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <503387AB.1040705@HIDDEN> <20120821161527.GL1118@HIDDEN> <20120821165856.GA5930@HIDDEN> <5033F4AB.3070101@HIDDEN> <20120821210238.GA31684@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <20120821210238.GA31684@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:XG9aPzHkOBbfZuXJjU5U5EbqIXfEw+grgbTfqonVZKl rrUb8d9DOKYxyVk8V5I4UI/xseLqZrrIQczgE6Itt2ASRCVxc3 jPzmkV85ScIRqTrYMrh++smtDaf7VtpjBMb/4MV9xz83N5bhWp e/pJoRiQ25dN4sP6qQ9G6cccOG5wx1qAiou4ILE1oMIsyrdzPu 4fguIqiBU1iQNztqOeMxw== X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) > Granted that most sleeping processes are > going to be sleeping in C code and no change to the coreutils sleep > program will affect them. At script level, I would expect real time behaviour. At system level in C code, both is possible. Remember leap seconds. Albrecht
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#12248: sleep is not arware of suspend mode Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C3=A1draig?= Brady <P@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.12248.B12248.134559456210131 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12248 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN> Cc: 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>, Albrecht Frenzel <ajfrenzel@HIDDEN>, Bob Proulx <bob@HIDDEN> Received: via spool by 12248-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B12248.134559456210131 (code B ref 12248); Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:17:01 +0000 Received: (at 12248) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2012 00:16:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42166 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1T3yc5-0002dL-Tl for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:16:02 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56147) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <P@HIDDEN>) id 1T3yc3-0002cv-37 for 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:16:00 -0400 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7M0FYTK013124 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:15:34 -0400 Received: from [10.36.116.17] (ovpn-116-17.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.17]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7M0FVh6006349 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:15:32 -0400 Message-ID: <503424A3.1000409@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 01:15:31 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C3=A1draig?= Brady <P@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <503387AB.1040705@HIDDEN> <20120821161527.GL1118@HIDDEN> <20120821165856.GA5930@HIDDEN> <5033F4AB.3070101@HIDDEN> <5033F793.8060205@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <5033F793.8060205@HIDDEN> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mx1.redhat.com id q7M0FYTK013124 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) On 08/21/2012 10:03 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 08/21/2012 02:50 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: >> On 08/21/2012 09:58 AM, Bob Proulx wrote: >>> That is the expected behavior. >> >> It's not the behavior *I* expect. I expect >> 'sleep' to use realtime seconds, not seconds >> of some arbitrary clock that's way far from >> real time. >=20 > In fact, I think both modes have their use, and that we probably ought > to provide an option to choose between absolute wall clock deadline > (stable realtime sleep even if the processor time jumps forwards or > backwards or has gaps due to suspend) vs. elapsed relative processor > time (where changing the processor clock can lengthen or shorten the > sleep duration). If we do add code to support multiple flavors of slee= p > durations, I'd probably lean towards absolute wall time as the default. I agree that either behavior could be required. The default though should probably stay as is. I.E. when the system suspends, the timeout suspends too. Changing to "wall clock time" would require an option, as that can jump around due to suspend, ntp, ... We had this discussion recently also, in relation to timeout(1). timeout(1) currently uses timer_create(CLOCK_REALTIME). According to docs=C2=B9, that should jump due to settime()/settimeofday()= /resume though I can't reproduce here with a resume, or even when pushing the updated system clock down to the hardware: # timeout 3 sh -c 'date --set=3D$(LC_ALL=3DC date -d 10\ sec +@%s); hwclo= ck -w; sleep 1' # echo $? 0 Here is some pertinent info from nanosleep(2) (used by sleep(1)): POSIX.1 specifies that nanosleep() should measure time against th= e CLOCK_REALTIME clock. However, Linux measures the time using th= e CLOCK_MONOTONIC clock. This probably does not matter, since th= e POSIX.1 specification for clock_settime(2) says that discontinuou= s changes in CLOCK_REALTIME should not affect nanosleep(): Setting the value of the CLOCK_REALTIME clock via clock_set=E2= =80=90 time(2) shall have no effect on threads that are blocked waiting for a relative time service based upon this clock, including the nanosleep() function; ... Consequently, these time services shall expire when the requested relative interval elapses, inde=E2= =80=90 pendently of the new or old value of the clock. Maybe the kernel is incorrectly implementing this POSIX clause for our interval timer. Perhaps we need to specify TIMER_ABSTIME to timer_settime to avoid that? I need to look into that further. Anyway to explicitly select with an option, a "running time" rather than "wall time" we could use CLOCK_MONOTONIC (or CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW on newer= kernels). That's not always available though, so then we'd have to look at/document the inconsistency on systems without CLOCK_MONOTONIC. Note also that timeout currently doesn't handle a SIGSTOP or SIGTSTP spec= ially, as I was thinking it should count down system running time rather than job running time, as that is dependent on many factors. cheers, P=C3=A1draig. =C2=B9 http://juliusdavies.ca/posix_clocks/clock_realtime_linux_faq.html
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#12248: sleep is not arware of suspend mode Resent-From: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 03:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.12248.B12248.134560552926208 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12248 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C3=A1draig?= Brady <P@HIDDEN> Cc: 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN>, Albrecht Frenzel <ajfrenzel@HIDDEN>, Bob Proulx <bob@HIDDEN> Received: via spool by 12248-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B12248.134560552926208 (code B ref 12248); Wed, 22 Aug 2012 03:19:02 +0000 Received: (at 12248) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2012 03:18:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42296 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1T41Sy-0006of-Vn for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:18:49 -0400 Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.62]:54727) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <eggert@HIDDEN>) id 1T41Sw-0006oX-QH for 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:18:48 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D850839E8015; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:18:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OA0lxO-Ctx5O; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:18:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-108-23-119-2.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [108.23.119.2]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 698AB39E800E; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:18:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <50344F82.4050500@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:18:26 -0700 From: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN> Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <503387AB.1040705@HIDDEN> <20120821161527.GL1118@HIDDEN> <20120821165856.GA5930@HIDDEN> <5033F4AB.3070101@HIDDEN> <5033F793.8060205@HIDDEN> <503424A3.1000409@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <503424A3.1000409@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) On 08/21/2012 05:15 PM, P=C3=A1draig Brady wrote: > I agree that either behavior could be required. > The default though should probably stay as is. > I.E. when the system suspends, the timeout suspends too. But that's not what 'sleep' does, on systems where 'nanosleep' uses real time, which is what POSIX specifies. The Linux kernel uses CLOCK_MONOTONIC for nanosleep, as opposed to the POSIX-specified CLOCK_REALTIME. This is an infelicity. It'd be nicer if 'sleep' acted as if it were using a realtime clock when running under the Linux kernel, just as 'sleep' does on other POSIX systems.
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#12248: sleep is not arware of suspend mode Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C3=A1draig?= Brady <P@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 08:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.12248.B12248.13456257762090 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12248 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN> Cc: 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN>, Albrecht Frenzel <ajfrenzel@HIDDEN>, Bob Proulx <bob@HIDDEN> Received: via spool by 12248-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B12248.13456257762090 (code B ref 12248); Wed, 22 Aug 2012 08:57:02 +0000 Received: (at 12248) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2012 08:56:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42627 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1T46jX-0000Xe-JF for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 04:56:16 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32274) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <P@HIDDEN>) id 1T46jU-0000XW-Ds for 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 04:56:14 -0400 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7M8tkoi032592 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 22 Aug 2012 04:55:46 -0400 Received: from [10.36.116.69] (ovpn-116-69.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.69]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7M8tg1L011816 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 22 Aug 2012 04:55:44 -0400 Message-ID: <50349E8E.5050306@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:55:42 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C3=A1draig?= Brady <P@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <503387AB.1040705@HIDDEN> <20120821161527.GL1118@HIDDEN> <20120821165856.GA5930@HIDDEN> <5033F4AB.3070101@HIDDEN> <5033F793.8060205@HIDDEN> <503424A3.1000409@HIDDEN> <50344F82.4050500@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <50344F82.4050500@HIDDEN> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mx1.redhat.com id q7M8tkoi032592 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) On 08/22/2012 04:18 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 08/21/2012 05:15 PM, P=C3=A1draig Brady wrote: >> I agree that either behavior could be required. >> The default though should probably stay as is. >> I.E. when the system suspends, the timeout suspends too. >=20 > But that's not what 'sleep' does, on systems where > 'nanosleep' uses real time, which is what POSIX > specifies. >=20 > The Linux kernel uses CLOCK_MONOTONIC for nanosleep, > as opposed to the POSIX-specified CLOCK_REALTIME. > This is an infelicity. It'd be nicer if 'sleep' > acted as if it were using a realtime clock when > running under the Linux kernel, just as 'sleep' > does on other POSIX systems. POSIX states that: "Setting the value of the CLOCK_REALTIME clock via clock_set=E2=80=90 time(2) shall have no effect on threads that are blocked waiting for a relative time service based upon this clock" So I'm guessing that Linux is just using CLOCK_MONOTONIC for consistency so that nanosleep() behaves the same, whether or not CLOCK_REALTIME jumps due to suspend/resume or settime(). If other system's nanosleep() are dependent on settime() then that seems in contravention of POSIX. If other system's nanosleep() are dependent on suspend/resume then that seems inconsistent. It seems like we need to specify a TIMER_ABSTIME via clock_nanosleep() or timer_settime() to both provide that behavior as an option and possibly reduce inconsistency between systems. cheers, P=C3=A1draig.
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#12248: sleep is not arware of suspend mode References: <503387AB.1040705@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <503387AB.1040705@HIDDEN> Resent-From: Julian Bradfield <jcb@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 08:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.12248.B12248.13584962836923 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12248 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Paul Eggert <eggert@HIDDEN>, Eric Blake <eblake@HIDDEN>, Bob Proulx <bob@HIDDEN>, Albrecht Frenzel <ajfrenzel@HIDDEN> Received: via spool by 12248-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B12248.13584962836923 (code B ref 12248); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 08:05:01 +0000 Received: (at 12248) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2013 08:04:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37815 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1Tw6wM-0001nb-FI for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 03:04:43 -0500 Received: from nougat.ucs.ed.ac.uk ([129.215.13.205]:40983) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jcb@HIDDEN>) id 1Tw6fO-0001Nz-Ht for 12248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 02:47:12 -0500 Received: from beeknow.inf.ed.ac.uk (beeknow.inf.ed.ac.uk [129.215.33.12]) by nougat.ucs.ed.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id r0I7jqOl013848; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 07:45:52 GMT Received: from pula.lan (openvpn-125-134.inf.ed.ac.uk [129.215.125.134]) (authenticated bits=0) by beeknow.inf.ed.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0I7jnSA012673 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 07:45:50 GMT Received: by pula.lan (Postfix, from userid 28283) id 68E8623B18; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 07:45:50 +0000 (GMT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <20728.64941.948662.477504@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 07:45:49 +0000 From: Julian Bradfield <jcb@HIDDEN> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 21.4 (beta21) "JCB UNICODE V0.5" XEmacs Unicode (i686-pc-linux) X-Edinburgh-Scanned: at nougat.ucs.ed.ac.uk with MIMEDefang 2.60, Sophie, Sophos Anti-Virus, Clam AntiVirus Content-Disposition: inline X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.60 on 129.215.13.205 X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 03:04:41 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) I've just come across this thread, as I was trying to work out who was responsible for this (IMHO) undoubted bug. I wanted to respond to P=E1draig's last comment. P=E1draig said: > POSIX states that: >=20 > "Setting the value of the CLOCK_REALTIME clock via clock_set- > time(2) shall have no effect on threads that are blocked waiting > for a relative time service based upon this clock" I strongly suspect that this is an infelicity in the expression of the intended specification. Obviously relative CLOCK_REALTIME waits should not be be affected if the time changes because it's been set wrong. But that's a different matter from changing it because real time has elapsed without it noticing. Posix was not really written with modern systems in mind. (Leaving aside the question of whether adjusting the time after resume is done by userspace calling clock_settime() !) --=20 The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2018 17:37:52 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 15 13:37:52 2018 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51194 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gC6oR-00012C-U1 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:37:52 -0400 Received: from mail-it1-f169.google.com ([209.85.166.169]:38789) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <assafgordon@HIDDEN>) id 1gC6oP-00011z-SP for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:37:50 -0400 Received: by mail-it1-f169.google.com with SMTP id i76-v6so28821369ita.3 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:37:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DNJ9NRW4Ran5oeMf5g5IluyqlnzT/iSCMXx2C2zb9xM=; b=E3UsRdh5hiRaQQQ2qsfqS8muDBKzwESlndiI2JFSgR2ybS+nBKVGOGZ2tbXprUJAH5 i1jmK/MWGh+aAISnN4xSupKbT9NAM85xukVxKINq58wRzrdE9rNtcd3Dqk/iPikbkWeG DS7zRpVjZ6ZZlayr9uMAfDPMwcYExuEHOVkzjr2h9SgVzZBNUzEI7XhyvBGMt22Z6Z9z g2IMZAc/rGw4p2sQR0nHL1zP0q9N34QVEKIe/aLVvYJaD2pwnnZpXIR5KgCXOdXaGukZ aK6epcRQCCOVBXQRMWWhTs5tJc4Q3PGIyIerobs5T5HXKGaLTOw/UbDnJ81i4JqSHMFi aFzw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DNJ9NRW4Ran5oeMf5g5IluyqlnzT/iSCMXx2C2zb9xM=; b=O+wkMPGAQlBD9pACZZXV4SMjbIjvYnuwq+5eIs/a4Amh8YCbXgcCD3tQ2xzkEpSZiV BB2gW3bwSmV1VygLUJJDrYSF37bSBDgrCQ7igoghJm80J7aeihuBTJKeqJLk5NwjpCRH VXs1aDmA37e9H8gUyrXz+Ctr9jRu9IF3rMis4ps6EdAHDL27kaHNGLGM/AoEkAP5YaU+ zSCR1KOY3mPTysSFDHZctFSHt0ezDntuj3B695vB/ltMEYDV3vWxsctG0crIKduAlM8d efHSXx6Y+Ybxuudgo4b1iLWGcmqkEXdU/fU26LhQKmHDauIzcIYncJNUI73Zq7qbHpeN Jqfw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogSvcj7tNPIncoikb5iIrG97nLRobo2ZHKrXaTgTDBg9xSpix+i wlOUNUB1P2ru/0HP+Q626TD3fszaMaM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62AbBupslHxuuTJOHyF35VSQdf11c6xcY8MOTlnut9nJdVeDWMwZhmo8pwld+2Emn/vDpV/ew== X-Received: by 2002:a02:88f7:: with SMTP id b52-v6mr13542999jak.25.1539625063731; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:37:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tomato.housegordon.com (moose.housegordon.com. [184.68.105.38]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t190-v6sm4693205ita.39.2018.10.15.10.37.42 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:37:42 -0700 (PDT) To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org From: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <92ed409d-c9e7-5068-64ce-b8b34a19c8b2@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:37:40 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: severity 12248 wishlist retitle 12248 sleep: use realtime seconds, not relative seconds (be aware of suspend mode) [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.166.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.166.169 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (assafgordon[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) severity 12248 wishlist retitle 12248 sleep: use realtime seconds, not relative seconds (be aware of suspend mode)
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2018 17:37:52 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 15 13:37:52 2018 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51194 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gC6oR-00012C-U1 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:37:52 -0400 Received: from mail-it1-f169.google.com ([209.85.166.169]:38789) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <assafgordon@HIDDEN>) id 1gC6oP-00011z-SP for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:37:50 -0400 Received: by mail-it1-f169.google.com with SMTP id i76-v6so28821369ita.3 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:37:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DNJ9NRW4Ran5oeMf5g5IluyqlnzT/iSCMXx2C2zb9xM=; b=E3UsRdh5hiRaQQQ2qsfqS8muDBKzwESlndiI2JFSgR2ybS+nBKVGOGZ2tbXprUJAH5 i1jmK/MWGh+aAISnN4xSupKbT9NAM85xukVxKINq58wRzrdE9rNtcd3Dqk/iPikbkWeG DS7zRpVjZ6ZZlayr9uMAfDPMwcYExuEHOVkzjr2h9SgVzZBNUzEI7XhyvBGMt22Z6Z9z g2IMZAc/rGw4p2sQR0nHL1zP0q9N34QVEKIe/aLVvYJaD2pwnnZpXIR5KgCXOdXaGukZ aK6epcRQCCOVBXQRMWWhTs5tJc4Q3PGIyIerobs5T5HXKGaLTOw/UbDnJ81i4JqSHMFi aFzw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DNJ9NRW4Ran5oeMf5g5IluyqlnzT/iSCMXx2C2zb9xM=; b=O+wkMPGAQlBD9pACZZXV4SMjbIjvYnuwq+5eIs/a4Amh8YCbXgcCD3tQ2xzkEpSZiV BB2gW3bwSmV1VygLUJJDrYSF37bSBDgrCQ7igoghJm80J7aeihuBTJKeqJLk5NwjpCRH VXs1aDmA37e9H8gUyrXz+Ctr9jRu9IF3rMis4ps6EdAHDL27kaHNGLGM/AoEkAP5YaU+ zSCR1KOY3mPTysSFDHZctFSHt0ezDntuj3B695vB/ltMEYDV3vWxsctG0crIKduAlM8d efHSXx6Y+Ybxuudgo4b1iLWGcmqkEXdU/fU26LhQKmHDauIzcIYncJNUI73Zq7qbHpeN Jqfw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogSvcj7tNPIncoikb5iIrG97nLRobo2ZHKrXaTgTDBg9xSpix+i wlOUNUB1P2ru/0HP+Q626TD3fszaMaM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62AbBupslHxuuTJOHyF35VSQdf11c6xcY8MOTlnut9nJdVeDWMwZhmo8pwld+2Emn/vDpV/ew== X-Received: by 2002:a02:88f7:: with SMTP id b52-v6mr13542999jak.25.1539625063731; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:37:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tomato.housegordon.com (moose.housegordon.com. [184.68.105.38]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t190-v6sm4693205ita.39.2018.10.15.10.37.42 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:37:42 -0700 (PDT) To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org From: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <92ed409d-c9e7-5068-64ce-b8b34a19c8b2@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:37:40 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: severity 12248 wishlist retitle 12248 sleep: use realtime seconds, not relative seconds (be aware of suspend mode) [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.166.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.166.169 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (assafgordon[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) severity 12248 wishlist retitle 12248 sleep: use realtime seconds, not relative seconds (be aware of suspend mode)
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.