X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#12956: 24.2; Move hl-line-mode to display engine so performance reason.
Resent-From: Oleksandr Gavenko <gavenkoa@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:19:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.12956.B.135353630923515 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 12956
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: 12956 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.135353630923515
(code B ref -1); Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:19:01 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Nov 2012 22:18:29 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59767 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1TbIcn-00067D-4M
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:18:29 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42247)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <gavenkoa@HIDDEN>) id 1TbIck-000675-QD
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:18:27 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <gavenkoa@HIDDEN>) id 1TbIbV-0000zY-13
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:17:09 -0500
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:34360)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <gavenkoa@HIDDEN>) id 1TbIbU-0000zU-U7
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:17:08 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60494)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <gavenkoa@HIDDEN>) id 1TbIbT-0001Ht-S4
for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:17:08 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <gavenkoa@HIDDEN>) id 1TbIbS-0000yz-SZ
for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:17:07 -0500
Received: from mail-ea0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:44710)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <gavenkoa@HIDDEN>) id 1TbIbS-0000yt-M5
for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:17:06 -0500
Received: by mail-ea0-f169.google.com with SMTP id a12so2571958eaa.0
for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:17:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;
bh=m45+4Qw5Gb/eYvBTdKKlElx3SGUTDeqyuCGRMbdvYYU=;
b=VNIXkCsEd26vA3woeSr5kkILhBg5qe2VNehgpN9RcHKc7sxDwm32PDalsbXVXt064v
zrgu48VIWygSqq5ogPzClwLv8FCwDeBSEkK69bKLqruCLHL/DxeTjNPXfEvAGgy2suRN
Xpw2vfIONiV8d4ddA4RUzDtusoDm44ftnLQZLZop5KszhTXpWO/Xaw6SJDnEF8lmS1T8
gs2UNpNwN4VPeRWqSuUvm4vweDOUfLHZkGJWFQjbv+vfJMlfLoaZRgHUsBkF7gfZmHe0
da2hHEwuP1qIKhyydeZsx5WsE8XrXYmH4uAJJG7IBY2WiZQPf3tZb71ldzy2KPyeHAps
Fy/g==
Received: by 10.14.209.201 with SMTP id s49mr50396523eeo.7.1353536226050;
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:17:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from desktop ([37.229.16.202])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 2sm2906931eef.17.2012.11.21.14.17.04
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:17:05 -0800 (PST)
From: Oleksandr Gavenko <gavenkoa@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:17:02 +0200
Message-ID: <87sj82zjmp.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy]
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x
X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17
X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---)
From http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12927
> > Also I found that "(global-hl-line-mode 1)" slow down scrolling in CC-mode
> > enabled buffers in two or more times. Do I need report a bug?
> No, this is expected. hl-line-mode adds itself to post-command-hook,
> and moves its overlay after each command that changes the current
> line. What this does is completely disable the redisplay
> optimizations used when only the cursor moves without any other
> changes to the text, because moving an overlay requires a thorough
> redisplay of the window, which is more expensive.
> The only bug report that I can think of is a feature request to move
> hl-line-mode into the display engine, because the display engine
> knowns very well where's the current line (when it decides where to
> display the cursor), and can do this highlighting better and much more
> efficiently.
--
Best regards!
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.428 (Entity 5.428) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Oleksandr Gavenko <gavenkoa@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#12956: Acknowledgement (24.2; Move hl-line-mode to display engine so performance reason.) Message-ID: <handler.12956.B.135353630923515.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <87sj82zjmp.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 12956 X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 12956 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:19:01 +0000 Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 12956 <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 12956: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D12956 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Nov 2012 22:21:36 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 21 17:21:36 2012 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59772 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1TbIff-0006Be-JL for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:21:31 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:59578) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <rgm@HIDDEN>) id 1TbIfe-0006BW-0Y for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:21:26 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rgm@HIDDEN>) id 1TbIeO-0007sH-JK for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:20:08 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:20:08 -0500 Message-Id: <E1TbIeO-0007sH-JK@HIDDEN> Subject: control message for bug 12956 To: <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris <rgm@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -4.5 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.5 (----) forcemerge 12953 12956
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2012 00:57:15 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 21 19:57:15 2012
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59956 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1TbL6R-0003Gi-1v
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:57:15 -0500
Received: from mail-ea0-f172.google.com ([209.85.215.172]:49393)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <lekktu@HIDDEN>) id 1TbL6P-0003Ga-AJ
for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:57:13 -0500
Received: by mail-ea0-f172.google.com with SMTP id a1so2474020eaa.3
for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:55:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
bh=8SxHdRuHy8NDsN+hBba61h3ILPX/Ms7EsRAnzGenQDA=;
b=OhjBkOyNUTOyRBsEZqgbmW62VlVd26DjPhEJXfbBMGlZZ7jjGuNfk5IGhfRIjzL4je
tFNAVWVefvg7I6jdScYtRagzdjnvBzjAqAe7/JGAw/FxDXJp8XAheWfehYm0wzY/JtKy
EF5IFJUOUK4bRUPZYXSSlX94MN9ER+fcYGRRpb/yQuLbTcODzrb1ZhqSbPw/MFFQvHTN
mL7K2DHs+Tg5/C6xT6NXxb0N22FRITiDMc12vBF+GXIO0LT6pxhUeRwcnDvZX56JdFlK
V4ok4OXjodm9DL4n9VwgMan05SW3OZDU2ka3Qo6p/TGIf6wiDDI/Ixq858M9S5LkbRKS
/ZMA==
Received: by 10.14.203.2 with SMTP id e2mr28585582eeo.20.1353545754973; Wed,
21 Nov 2012 16:55:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.4.209 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:55:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 01:55:14 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAeL0SQx4cddU-n0AhxK_0bee50jEvQ2Y6=YDkQ_8X6EXL_=4g@HIDDEN>
Subject:
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
label similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: merge 12953 12956 quit [...]
Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(lekktu[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.5000]
-0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low trust [209.85.215.172 listed in list.dnswl.org]
2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty
0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: merge 12953 12956 quit [...]
Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
trust
[209.85.215.172 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(lekktu[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.5000]
2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty
0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
merge 12953 12956
quit
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#12956: 24.2; Move hl-line-mode to display engine so performance reason.
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 03:48:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.12956.B12956.135355604130818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12956
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: Oleksandr Gavenko <gavenkoa@HIDDEN>
Cc: 12956 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 12956-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B12956.135355604130818
(code B ref 12956); Thu, 22 Nov 2012 03:48:02 +0000
Received: (at 12956) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2012 03:47:21 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60105 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1TbNl2-00080y-E6
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:47:20 -0500
Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:44802)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1TbNkz-00080n-M7
for 12956 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:47:18 -0500
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by
a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id
<0MDV00000EAMYJ00@HIDDEN> for
12956 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 05:45:58 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il
(HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id
<0MDV000DMEGLT770@HIDDEN>;
Thu, 22 Nov 2012 05:45:58 +0200 (IST)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 05:45:42 +0200
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
In-reply-to: <87sj82zjmp.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-012-Sender: halo1@HIDDEN
Message-id: <837gpeuwpl.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87sj82zjmp.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
label similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: > From: Oleksandr Gavenko <gavenkoa@HIDDEN> > Date:
Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:17:02 +0200 > > >From
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12927
> > > > Also I found that "(global-hl-line-mode 1)" slow down scrolling
in
CC-mode > > > enabled buffers in two or more times. Do I need report a
bug? > > > No,
this is expected. hl-line-mode adds itself to post-command-hook,
> > and moves its overlay after each command that changes the current >
> line. What this does is completely disable the redisplay > >
optimizations
used when only the cursor moves without any other > > changes to the
text,
because moving an overlay requires a thorough > > redisplay of the
window,
which is more expensive. > > > The only bug report that I can think of
is
a feature request to move > > hl-line-mode into the display engine,
because
the display engine > > knowns very well where's the current line (when
it decides where to > > display the cursor),
and can do this highlighting better
and much more > > efficiently. [...]
Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [80.179.55.169 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.5000]
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: > From: Oleksandr Gavenko <gavenkoa@HIDDEN> > Date: Thu,
22 Nov 2012 00:17:02 +0200 > > >From http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12927
> > > > Also I found that "(global-hl-line-mode 1)" slow down scrolling in
CC-mode > > > enabled buffers in two or more times. Do I need report a bug?
> > > No, this is expected. hl-line-mode adds itself to post-command-hook,
> > and moves its overlay after each command that changes the current > >
line. What this does is completely disable the redisplay > > optimizations
used when only the cursor moves without any other > > changes to the text,
because moving an overlay requires a thorough > > redisplay of the window,
which is more expensive. > > > The only bug report that I can think of is
a feature request to move > > hl-line-mode into the display engine, because
the display engine > > knowns very well where's the current line (when it
decides where to > > display the cursor), and can do this highlighting better
and much more > > efficiently. [...]
Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
trust
[80.179.55.169 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.4998]
> From: Oleksandr Gavenko <gavenkoa@HIDDEN>
> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:17:02 +0200
>
> >From http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12927
>
> > > Also I found that "(global-hl-line-mode 1)" slow down scrolling in CC-mode
> > > enabled buffers in two or more times. Do I need report a bug?
>
> > No, this is expected. hl-line-mode adds itself to post-command-hook,
> > and moves its overlay after each command that changes the current
> > line. What this does is completely disable the redisplay
> > optimizations used when only the cursor moves without any other
> > changes to the text, because moving an overlay requires a thorough
> > redisplay of the window, which is more expensive.
>
> > The only bug report that I can think of is a feature request to move
> > hl-line-mode into the display engine, because the display engine
> > knowns very well where's the current line (when it decides where to
> > display the cursor), and can do this highlighting better and much more
> > efficiently.
This is a duplicate of 12953.
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2012 03:48:07 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 21 22:48:07 2012
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60110 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1TbNln-00082Q-1d
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:48:07 -0500
Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:57919)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1TbNll-00082J-QP
for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:48:06 -0500
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by
a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id
<0MDV00500ECS1C00@HIDDEN> for
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 05:46:47 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il
(HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id
<0MDV004ROEHYOT70@HIDDEN> for
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 05:46:47 +0200 (IST)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 05:46:31 +0200
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#12956: 24.2;
Move hl-line-mode to display engine so performance reason.
X-012-Sender: halo1@HIDDEN
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Message-id: <83624yuwo8.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
label similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: merge 12956 12953 stop [...]
Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [80.179.55.166 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.5000]
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: merge 12956 12953 stop [...]
Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
trust
[80.179.55.166 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.4972]
merge 12956 12953
stop
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#12956: 24.2; Move hl-line-mode to display engine so performance reason.
Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:03:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.12956.B12956.135361815819746 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12956
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN>
Cc: 12956 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Oleksandr Gavenko <gavenkoa@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 12956-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B12956.135361815819746
(code B ref 12956); Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:03:01 +0000
Received: (at 12956) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2012 21:02:38 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33587 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1Tbduw-00058R-6e
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:02:38 -0500
Received: from mail-ea0-f172.google.com ([209.85.215.172]:44091)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <lekktu@HIDDEN>) id 1Tbdut-00058K-U9
for 12956 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:02:36 -0500
Received: by mail-ea0-f172.google.com with SMTP id a1so2836381eaa.3
for <12956 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:01:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=CA78vsBUheDBbA8S/GiYIVSrAFICNdLAQuVDLLOBv+g=;
b=aJpcb51S4452gXawgHJMTbB9+7z3qaUUHLn/cJJJjh61afPzkJHUmZ6dKqLJ0qtYi9
fe12qMw8kFHC4jgHIqPZY21VOj0/WsP1nagu9tj3Y5UtUi5p3BzgQyDjEvifMp3KwkDv
iulEzck6gf39hs3IAqb7R0h9ktr3rgNI7NzewftuSFO9yoND8fKesG7K8gEgwJvJsDG7
mRxZ/7a0fg2b08laHpdCecxSedqBDx1pfqsk3OIuRXNPKnGKjyc2u4augdO+NtSssUUY
JjfDbFSnWMOJs8VNrwB1e4Ia3jyZvbKKBkfgRc36gnUpnwVrvpkkuYiKu9XrXpWI/JTy
QzCA==
Received: by 10.14.210.200 with SMTP id u48mr5132074eeo.29.1353618072942; Thu,
22 Nov 2012 13:01:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.4.209 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:00:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <837gpeuwpl.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <87sj82zjmp.fsf@HIDDEN> <837gpeuwpl.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:00:31 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAeL0SSaJrsAmcNzZGrESx+MD=x0UhTReagbg68v72qoW77Rrw@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> wrote:
> This is a duplicate of 12953.
It's already merged.
Juanma
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.