X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#13094: Problem with emacsclient not raising frame is back Resent-From: nyc4bos@HIDDEN Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 23:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.13094.B.135474999626566 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: report 13094 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.135474999626566 (code B ref -1); Wed, 05 Dec 2012 23:27:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2012 23:26:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55463 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1TgOMO-0006uP-82 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 18:26:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48018) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nyc4bos@HIDDEN>) id 1TgOMK-0006uE-AE for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 18:26:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <nyc4bos@HIDDEN>) id 1TgOM7-00030O-AU for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 18:26:22 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_XBL, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:49048) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <nyc4bos@HIDDEN>) id 1TgOM7-00030K-7C for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 18:26:19 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59368) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <nyc4bos@HIDDEN>) id 1TgOM4-0004HL-Bs for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 18:26:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <nyc4bos@HIDDEN>) id 1TgOM0-0002zm-H3 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 18:26:16 -0500 Received: from imr-da02.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.144]:63577) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <nyc4bos@HIDDEN>) id 1TgOM0-0002ze-Co for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 18:26:12 -0500 Received: from mtaout-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.131]) by imr-da02.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 7DC2B1C0000A2 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 18:26:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from RPLSBCAPC06 (unknown [63.117.244.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mtaout-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPSA id 2C645E0000A1 for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 18:26:11 -0500 (EST) From: nyc4bos@HIDDEN Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 18:25:57 -0500 Message-ID: <xl5k3swrshm.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (windows-nt) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1354749971; bh=lS8ibH1tblNnPdPfgG7/YtBCgJUlytwC8zUG/qjXq9o=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SwrZ9M2YlhKK1YYhUjL1jVPtSUSbWbFcjN0PUd6kff7XjI3vwZPGYK+bkx1efNulY dDkNX3eOn1xV9gi+QLzLkOcylZ1mXXt29z0JyebgBb50ZnegdgPFgImp7HXMAodtaU fXR1/wXyWCVWsRLY0wKfz48dpC5wNy7gayyfJ5Dc= X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:503365440:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d338350bfd811058e X-AOL-IP: 63.117.244.126 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) This bug report will be sent to the Bug-GNU-Emacs mailing list and the GNU bug tracker at debbugs.gnu.org. Please check that the From: line contains a valid email address. After a delay of up to one day, you should receive an acknowledgment at that address. Please write in English if possible, as the Emacs maintainers usually do not have translators for other languages. Please describe exactly what actions triggered the bug, and the precise symptoms of the bug. If you can, give a recipe starting from `emacs -Q': Hi, It appears that the problem with Emacs not raising the frame which I originally reported (http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7658) is back. It was fixed sometime after this release of Emacs: GNU Emacs 24.0.92.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2011-12-06 on MARVIN and Sun, 26 Aug 2012 22:13:07 -0400 when Juanma However, the problem (below) is now back (at least on Windows 7 professional): http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7658#11 "The Emacs tile (at the bottom of the screen) turns orange for a few seconds but the Emacs instance (frame) does not come to the forefront if it is already deiconified. However, if it is iconified, emacsclient (calling `select-frame-by-name') does deiconify it, as expected. So the problem appears to be when it is deiconified and then calling `select-frame-by-name'." This problem is also present in the trunk bzr r111077 Thanks. If Emacs crashed, and you have the Emacs process in the gdb debugger, please include the output from the following gdb commands: `bt full' and `xbacktrace'. For information about debugging Emacs, please read the file e:/emacs-24.2.90/etc/DEBUG. In GNU Emacs 24.2.90.1 (i386-mingw-nt6.1.7601) of 2012-12-03 on MS-W7-DANI Bzr revision: 110985 lekktu@HIDDEN Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601 Configured using: `configure --with-gcc (4.7) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags -Ic:/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.10/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.10/src -Ic:/emacs/libs/libpng-1.2.37-lib/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/zlib-1.2.5 -Ic:/emacs/libs/giflib-4.1.4-1-lib/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/jpeg-6b-4-lib/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/tiff-3.8.2-1-lib/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/libxml2-2.7.8-w32-bin/include/libxml2 -Ic:/emacs/libs/gnutls-3.0.9-w32-bin/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/libiconv-1.9.2-1-lib/include' Important settings: value of $LANG: en_US locale-coding-system: cp1252 default enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: Lisp Interaction Minor modes in effect: tooltip-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t Recent input: <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> <help-echo> <menu-bar> <help-menu> <send-emacs-bug -report> Recent messages: For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a. Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (shadow sort gnus-util mail-extr emacsbug message format-spec rfc822 mml easymenu mml-sec mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231 mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader sendmail rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-util mail-prsvr mail-utils time-date tooltip ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel dos-w32 ls-lisp w32-common-fns disp-table w32-win w32-vars tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list newcomment lisp-mode register page menu-bar rfn-eshadow timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core frame cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev minibuffer button faces cus-face macroexp files text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote make-network-process w32 multi-tty emacs)
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.428 (Entity 5.428) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System) To: nyc4bos@HIDDEN Subject: bug#13094: Acknowledgement (Problem with emacsclient not raising frame is back) Message-ID: <handler.13094.B.135474999626566.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <xl5k3swrshm.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 13094 X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 13094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 23:27:02 +0000 Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 13094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 13094: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D13094 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#13094: Problem with emacsclient not raising frame is back -- regression References: <xl5k3swrshm.fsf@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <xl5k3swrshm.fsf@HIDDEN> Resent-From: nyc4bos@HIDDEN Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.13094.B13094.135560392228485 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13094 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@HIDDEN> Received: via spool by 13094-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B13094.135560392228485 (code B ref 13094); Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:39:01 +0000 Received: (at 13094) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2012 20:38:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44393 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1TjyVN-0007PO-Vu for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 15:38:42 -0500 Received: from imr-ma05.mx.aol.com ([64.12.100.31]:53166) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nyc4bos@HIDDEN>) id 1TjyVL-0007PG-Jv for 13094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 15:38:41 -0500 Received: from mtaout-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.132]) by imr-ma05.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id B9DD41C00009E; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 15:37:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from RPLSBCAPC03 (unknown [63.117.244.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mtaout-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPSA id 69CE7E00009D; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 15:37:33 -0500 (EST) From: nyc4bos@HIDDEN Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:26:24 +0000 Message-ID: <xl5a9tfawpb.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (windows-nt) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1355603853; bh=avMeoRaBXTXC/S0lO90Z0+1fLw0dd8Ybm1tbvOVWAlQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ta+ACm9EEXgAyl8K6oQrQPp8KO3L8URDcvlqrxsm+jJIbsq1pfp+QMTzm9rf2TLyY Qca4pvRHgETWf29Z2SukBDo+CorLqKcSQBix1JO9jNN01/Yk1/pjoKr+PIjPy9u/h6 CufUzrthHscUWz/A7YVZyzk4NTqVszs2gH8JU5tI= X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:477297568:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d338450ccdf8b01ad X-AOL-IP: 63.117.244.126 X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Hi, There appears to be a regression in terms of this bug using the latest branch version available for MS Windows (24.2.91, bzr 111040): In GNU Emacs 24.2.91.1 (i386-mingw-nt6.1.7601) of 2012-12-15 on MS-W7-DANI Bzr revision: 111040 cyd@HIDDEN Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601 Configured using: `configure --with-gcc (4.7) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags -Ic:/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.10/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.10/src -Ic:/emacs/libs/libpng-1.2.37-lib/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/zlib-1.2.5 -Ic:/emacs/libs/giflib-4.1.4-1-lib/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/jpeg-6b-4-lib/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/tiff-3.8.2-1-lib/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/libxml2-2.7.8-w32-bin/include/libxml2 -Ic:/emacs/libs/gnutls-3.0.9-w32-bin/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/libiconv-1.9.2-1-lib/include' As also specified originally in bug#7658 which was fixed: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7658#20 I am able to use a version of emacsclient.exe that works with GNU Emacs 24.2.91.1 pretest which I also wrote in that bug report: [FWIW, if I use the emacsclient.exe from Lennart's patched version: GNU Emacs 23.1.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2009-11-03 on LENNART-69DE564 (patched) against the latest emacs.exe trunk version, it works as expected.] So it would appear that since bug#7658 was fixed, a change in emacsclient.exe since then has manifested this problem again. It would be great if this problem were to be fixed before the next version of GNU Emacs 24.3 were released. Thanks.
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2012 03:56:20 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 20 22:56:20 2012 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53281 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1Tltid-0004SP-TO for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:56:20 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f51.google.com ([209.85.160.51]:47827) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <seewhydee@HIDDEN>) id 1Tltic-0004SF-6H for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:56:18 -0500 Received: by mail-pb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id ro12so2433976pbb.10 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:56:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=Tw4JftZ89liKH3Gttf85PtTWEPmCM//NU/cwCR8XWWs=; b=CfwZSvjoamQ1buw2vUFwZLu0UWsFLzu3YEKbuKVK2JKagXM2Z2E+zXIRgYdIeM2Ca4 atKDPVxdkHHOAMuIC/EhBQd5mpIHcw2hQzVnYYgx8kwmFrxrLRnDYJ5miqW3H4nV4nKZ u/hBGpBHDfWkotUXWpYjm8uwk3nUDecf14zuasz/hAMOlWrwbQfp9EC7Kl6IrSK6WwNL mSbaj2Jai9OiDCbAtXv+BNQnpVX3J6a4VZplWBHDLn0uvraYbNRF3Zo4EfInV0Ygxv5r krT6NZfXIDPtwqIfBDFeI0kDQUkbtNVhot2+duWcLs87mV/LP4i9W3glitnyJy/mmhj0 ehxw== X-Received: by 10.68.234.201 with SMTP id ug9mr36054431pbc.63.1356062166304; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:56:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ulysses ([155.69.18.203]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o11sm6181144pby.8.2012.12.20.19.56.03 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:56:05 -0800 (PST) From: Chong Yidong <cyd@HIDDEN> To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: severity 13094 important Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:56:00 +0800 Message-ID: <87y5gsukhb.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) severity 13094 important thanks
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#13094: Problem with emacsclient not raising frame is back -- regression Resent-From: Chong Yidong <cyd@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 03:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.13094.B13094.135726838714990 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13094 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: nyc4bos@HIDDEN Cc: 13094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@HIDDEN> Received: via spool by 13094-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B13094.135726838714990 (code B ref 13094); Fri, 04 Jan 2013 03:00:02 +0000 Received: (at 13094) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2013 02:59:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42350 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1TqxVb-0003ti-7N for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:59:47 -0500 Received: from mail-da0-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41]:33705) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <seewhydee@HIDDEN>) id 1TqxVY-0003ta-JC for 13094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:59:45 -0500 Received: by mail-da0-f41.google.com with SMTP id e20so7251557dak.14 for <13094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:59:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=4lrvenMqnn32TKtiPDs6mWYKRGvJ7JqqyrcTeZzx9AE=; b=yZrV9nikOpvY5m2HnSPzp7nCbANWmGRvfsddtuUnYi34386VHpiueD6aHXXRjx1YdV FP6gN5v7ZM+ni/6FPCqSZR6Af0mq2797l9RP7MswK8HCCtLWG94bU0A9/YvqXcnTETbv X/SEp8pvDpID3klQXneL+HJ2PbkhAJD4AnZBYSNOHCocVdxJp0p2Az2YhnfGXlypfU8r 56XR6ZDdUOx60W/1Jk7tPHTvpUGGGLP5nL2VnPZ+6GqQwlIOlQhJBFLh6n5frKrNQjRX 03Vgqd7CX3E9zfqrIJncJ2UXtV+lKB4GKKfKraMCKqqDxJBKytKn3tRD9WnfCqxDm2dN AeIQ== X-Received: by 10.66.75.100 with SMTP id b4mr151017566paw.0.1357268379218; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:59:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from ulysses ([155.69.16.140]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l8sm18363174pax.9.2013.01.03.18.59.35 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:59:37 -0800 (PST) From: Chong Yidong <cyd@HIDDEN> References: <xl5k3swrshm.fsf@HIDDEN> <xl5a9tfawpb.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:59:32 +0800 In-Reply-To: <xl5a9tfawpb.fsf@HIDDEN> (nyc4bos@HIDDEN's message of "Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:26:24 +0000") Message-ID: <87pq1lzm97.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) nyc4bos@HIDDEN writes: > There appears to be a regression in terms of this bug using the > latest branch version available for MS Windows (24.2.91, bzr 111040): Could you bisect to find the commit which caused this problem to occur? Thanks.
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#13094: Problem with emacsclient not raising frame is back -- regression Resent-From: nyc4bos@HIDDEN Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 21:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.13094.B13094.135733368030800 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13094 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Chong Yidong <cyd@HIDDEN> Cc: 13094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@HIDDEN> Received: via spool by 13094-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B13094.135733368030800 (code B ref 13094); Fri, 04 Jan 2013 21:08:01 +0000 Received: (at 13094) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2013 21:08:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43930 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1TrEUe-00080j-Gn for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:08:00 -0500 Received: from imr-da02.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.144]:65157) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nyc4bos@HIDDEN>) id 1TrEUY-00080d-2v for 13094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:07:54 -0500 Received: from mtaout-mb04.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-mb04.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.68]) by imr-da02.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 2AAAF1C0000BB; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:07:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from RPLSBCAPC04 (unknown [63.117.244.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mtaout-mb04.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPSA id D4726E0000A6; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:07:40 -0500 (EST) From: nyc4bos@HIDDEN References: <xl5k3swrshm.fsf@HIDDEN> <xl5a9tfawpb.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pq1lzm97.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:07:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87pq1lzm97.fsf@HIDDEN> (Chong Yidong's message of "Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:59:32 +0800") Message-ID: <xl5mwwo3be6.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (windows-nt) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1357333661; bh=G/VTZHXwb6vnkU/wSJKRZqA3ewvFe4f0z9jxILHBhKA=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Hq9sP+1+JuEidE5FklyONKha3e2oSwAY3iEQuLt/8mkGmM2qXzFT691foZWz0B05V zZdnF2Sr9CMC6R1MHHnsgYEKwh/5VVowsCKjm61Jx/4RoZdIi+OXYqOt+AjWb69rUb OlRhLE2U8Sa0n6OINEvd1u3FMinKwfb9Qp/6yvvI= X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:417600672:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d294450e7449c210d X-AOL-IP: 63.117.244.126 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Chong Yidong <cyd@HIDDEN> writes: > nyc4bos@HIDDEN writes: > >> There appears to be a regression in terms of this bug using the >> latest branch version available for MS Windows (24.2.91, bzr 111040): > > Could you bisect to find the commit which caused this problem to occur? I only have the provided Windows binaries. I'll see if I can hunt them down and see which Bzr version first exhibited the regression. (FWIW, emacsclient.exe from Lennart's patch version against Gnu Emacs Bzr revision: 111393 works just fine.) GNU Emacs 23.1.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt6.1.7601) of 2009-11-03 on LENNART-69DE564 (patched) Thanks.
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2013 20:08:08 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 27 15:08:08 2013 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51677 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1TzYWN-0005LA-Pq for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 15:08:08 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:39671) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <rgm@HIDDEN>) id 1TzYWM-0005L3-4K for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 15:08:06 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rgm@HIDDEN>) id 1TzYW0-0008Tf-Ki for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 15:07:44 -0500 Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 15:07:44 -0500 Message-Id: <E1TzYW0-0008Tf-Ki@HIDDEN> Subject: control message for bug 13094 To: <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris <rgm@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) tag 13094 moreinfo
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jan 2013 00:21:36 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 27 19:21:36 2013 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51759 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1TzcTf-0003kf-S1 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:21:36 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:42896) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <rgm@HIDDEN>) id 1TzcTe-0003kZ-9U for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:21:34 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rgm@HIDDEN>) id 1TzcTH-0005Ti-Pq for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:21:11 -0500 Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:21:11 -0500 Message-Id: <E1TzcTH-0005Ti-Pq@HIDDEN> Subject: control message for bug 13094 To: <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris <rgm@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) severity 13094 normal
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#13094: Problem with emacsclient not raising frame is back -- regression Resent-From: nyc4bos@HIDDEN Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.13094.B13094.135949266419984 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13094 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Chong Yidong <cyd@HIDDEN> Cc: 13094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@HIDDEN>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> Received: via spool by 13094-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B13094.135949266419984 (code B ref 13094); Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:52:01 +0000 Received: (at 13094) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2013 20:51:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54691 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1U0I91-0005CH-O9 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:51:04 -0500 Received: from imr-db03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.91.97]:33051) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nyc4bos@HIDDEN>) id 1U0I8y-0005Br-Ke for 13094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:51:01 -0500 Received: from mtaout-db01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-db01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.193]) by imr-db03.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 5E614380000A1; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:50:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from RPLSBCAPC02 (unknown [63.117.244.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mtaout-db01.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPSA id B2138E0000A1; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:50:25 -0500 (EST) From: nyc4bos@HIDDEN References: <xl5k3swrshm.fsf@HIDDEN> <xl5a9tfawpb.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pq1lzm97.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:50:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87pq1lzm97.fsf@HIDDEN> (Chong Yidong's message of "Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:59:32 +0800") Message-ID: <xl5pq0nhfxz.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (windows-nt) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1359492627; bh=HbHzSPlIfrUStpmwU5pRmeVwr1Uh384hf6S7KKI6rHw=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AH/32BmpOrowf1Uz7FX6jHFwT3GPJXgXTdaeK09kazvxj2Oyw37A1gcl75bP2yXDF FwWQadDp1c/bPr7tBfNiLYA4pobZjl0xvtJu5jzQKNS9IqCW8dOCi8K4SDEZ4peoKM DL8+7yKMq7+U2um3ZzDNs8XekP9KHTT96TysTdFs= X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:432005152:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d33c1510836110d5e X-AOL-IP: 63.117.244.126 X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Hi, Eli asked for a clear reproducible recipe not referenced in older reports: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2013-01/msg00627.html So here is the clear recipe consolidated in this bug report: 0. On MS Windows open up at least one application so that you have at least one Window on the screen. 1. C:\emacs-24.2.92\bin\runemacs.exe -Q When the Emacs frame appears, position it so that it is on top of the an application you previously opened. 2. M-x server-start 3. Iconify Emacs 4. From a MS Windows command prompt, type the following (on one line): C:\emacs-24.3.50\bin\emacsclient.exe -n --eval "(select-frame-by-name \"emacs@<SYSTEM>\")" where <SYSTEM> is your system name so that NAME matches the name of the Emacs titlebar. Emacs should now be deiconified, at the forefront (raised), and ready for input. 5. Click on the MS Window command prompt and execute step 4 again You should then notice that Emacs does NOT come to the forefront (top-most raised Window) but that the MS Windows command prompt Window is still selected after step 4. You should also see that the Gnu Emacs (tile?) at the bottom of the screen "blinks" but the Emacs frame is not raised and selected. [FWIW, if I use the emacsclient.exe from Lennart's patched version: GNU Emacs 23.1.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2009-11-03 on LENNART-69DE564 (patched) against the latest Gnu Emacs pretest available to me (Bzr revision: 111199) or the trunk version (Bzr revision 111604), it works as expected.] Thanks.
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#13094: Problem with emacsclient not raising frame is back -- regression Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:30:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.13094.B13094.135957055826308 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13094 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: nyc4bos@HIDDEN Cc: 13094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, lekktu@HIDDEN, cyd@HIDDEN Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> Received: via spool by 13094-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B13094.135957055826308 (code B ref 13094); Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:30:01 +0000 Received: (at 13094) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2013 18:29:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56092 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1U0cPN-0006qG-AD for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:29:18 -0500 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:37937) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <eliz@HIDDEN>) id 1U0cPJ-0006q3-7j for 13094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:29:15 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MHG00100B5QHY00@HIDDEN> for 13094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:28:10 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MHG0016VBAXB240@HIDDEN>; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:28:10 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:27:57 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> In-reply-to: <xl5pq0nhfxz.fsf@HIDDEN> X-012-Sender: halo1@HIDDEN Message-id: <83txpyh6fm.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <xl5k3swrshm.fsf@HIDDEN> <xl5a9tfawpb.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pq1lzm97.fsf@HIDDEN> <xl5pq0nhfxz.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) > From: nyc4bos@HIDDEN > Cc: 13094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@HIDDEN>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> > Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:50:16 -0500 > > 0. On MS Windows open up at least one application so that you have > at least one Window on the screen. > 1. C:\emacs-24.2.92\bin\runemacs.exe -Q > > When the Emacs frame appears, position it so that it is on top > of the an application you previously opened. > > 2. M-x server-start > 3. Iconify Emacs > 4. From a MS Windows command prompt, type the following (on one line): > > C:\emacs-24.3.50\bin\emacsclient.exe -n > --eval "(select-frame-by-name \"emacs@<SYSTEM>\")" > > where <SYSTEM> is your system name so that NAME matches the name of > the Emacs titlebar. > > Emacs should now be deiconified, at the forefront (raised), and ready > for input. > > 5. Click on the MS Window command prompt and execute step 4 again > > You should then notice that Emacs does NOT come to the forefront (top-most > raised Window) but that the MS Windows command prompt Window is still > selected after step 4. > > You should also see that the Gnu Emacs (tile?) at the bottom of the screen > "blinks" but the Emacs frame is not raised and selected. Thanks. Now I understand the problem and its reason(s). > [FWIW, if I use the emacsclient.exe from Lennart's patched version: > > GNU Emacs 23.1.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2009-11-03 on LENNART-69DE564 (patched) > > against the latest Gnu Emacs pretest available to me (Bzr revision: 111199) > or the trunk version (Bzr revision 111604), it works as expected.] This is not really relevant: Lennart's emacsclient is such a different beast in how it launches Emacs that it is impossible to reason about this issue from what that emacsclient does or doesn't do. So let's forget about this part of the puzzle. My analysis of this is that it has nothing to do with emacsclient per se, and neither is it a regression since Emacs 24.1: I see the same behavior in stock 24.1 on 2 different Windows machines. (It _is_ a regression from Emacs 23.3, though.) So the old bug reports where you reported similar problems sound unrelated to this one, if indeed they were resolved (of which I'm not sure). The reason for this problem is that raise-frame on Windows does not raise the frame to the top of z-order, in this particular use case. It just gives that frame input focus (which you can see if you make the cursor of the Emacs frame visible before running the emacsclient command the 2nd time: you will see the cursor starts blinking). To see that raise-frame is th culprit, modify your recipe like this, after step 4: 4.1. Type into the *scratch* buffer: (defun raise-frame-by-name (name) "" (let* ((frame-names-alist (make-frame-names-alist)) (frame (cdr (assoc name frame-names-alist)))) (when frame (message "Raising %s..." frame) (raise-frame frame)))) 4.2 Evaluate this function. 4.3 Click on the Command Prompt window to make it the foreground window. Then move the Command Prompt window on display so that the echo area of the Emacs's frame is visible. 5. Execute the following command from the Command Prompt window: C:\emacs-24.3.50\bin\emacsclient.exe -n --eval "(raise-frame-by-name \"emacs@<SYSTEM>\")" You will see the "Raising" message in the echo area of Emacs, but the frame will not come to the forefront. Doing the same in Emacs 23.3 does bring the frame to the forefront. Conclusion: emacsclient does its job by telling Emacs to invoke raise-frame, and Emacs does. But raise-frame does not produce the expected effect. I believe this change in behavior since 23.3 is a side effect of fixing another bug: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11513 That change fixed a similar, but evidently distinct aspect of raise-frame's behavior. We could try reverting that change, but then there will be another user who will claim that a bug solved long ago "is back". It would be nice to solve this problem without un-fixing the other one. But for this, Someone(TM) who knows much more than I do about Windows GUI should step forward and show us how to do that. We don't have such a knowledgeable person on board at this time, unfortunately. As a temporary workaround, you could customize w32-grab-focus-on-raise to nil; my testing indicates that you will have the behavior you want then.
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#13094: Problem with emacsclient not raising frame is back -- regression Resent-From: nyc4bos@HIDDEN Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 21:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.13094.B13094.135975298616827 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13094 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> Cc: 13094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, lekktu@HIDDEN, cyd@HIDDEN Received: via spool by 13094-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B13094.135975298616827 (code B ref 13094); Fri, 01 Feb 2013 21:10:02 +0000 Received: (at 13094) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2013 21:09:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59838 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1U1Nrl-0004NL-Ga for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 16:09:46 -0500 Received: from imr-mb01.mx.aol.com ([64.12.207.164]:53628) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nyc4bos@HIDDEN>) id 1U1Nrh-0004N0-3d for 13094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 16:09:43 -0500 Received: from mtaout-ma03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-ma03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.3]) by imr-mb01.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 09E361C000106; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 16:08:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from RPLSBCAPC02 (unknown [63.117.244.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mtaout-ma03.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPSA id 9DC68E0001E8; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 16:08:50 -0500 (EST) From: nyc4bos@HIDDEN References: <xl5k3swrshm.fsf@HIDDEN> <xl5a9tfawpb.fsf@HIDDEN> <87pq1lzm97.fsf@HIDDEN> <xl5pq0nhfxz.fsf@HIDDEN> <83txpyh6fm.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 16:08:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <83txpyh6fm.fsf@HIDDEN> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:27:57 +0200") Message-ID: <xl5zjzn4u93.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (windows-nt) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1359752930; bh=Srz6NE1MRq5U5nyijhNG9MWG23OdQyI1Od0+0BYzUVk=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rCf++4YrDjRyAqXkchqlIHDrvCr+M2qLdNT3pAn9sOyMYDrXhMuAmt2qWVj1eaTGV l4c0APX4uqW/3VWN0UFzw1cxcxn1CDu35aIOJDBuMu34qZDIZ6oPFnKgqM2BrQHMAm 7ePpQYLwApZFXV/atRMFG45Vow/Gkv+YxQXb0VRo= X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:381708832:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d2903510c2ee26613 X-AOL-IP: 63.117.244.126 X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.2 (--) Eli Zaretskii <eliz@HIDDEN> writes: [...] > My analysis of this is that it has nothing to do with emacsclient per > se, and neither is it a regression since Emacs 24.1: I see the same > behavior in stock 24.1 on 2 different Windows machines. (It _is_ a > regression from Emacs 23.3, though.) So the old bug reports where you > reported similar problems sound unrelated to this one, if indeed they > were resolved (of which I'm not sure). > > The reason for this problem is that raise-frame on Windows does not > raise the frame to the top of z-order, in this particular use case. > It just gives that frame input focus (which you can see if you make > the cursor of the Emacs frame visible before running the emacsclient > command the 2nd time: you will see the cursor starts blinking). To > see that raise-frame is th culprit, modify your recipe like this, > after step 4: > > 4.1. Type into the *scratch* buffer: > > (defun raise-frame-by-name (name) > "" > (let* ((frame-names-alist (make-frame-names-alist)) > (frame (cdr (assoc name frame-names-alist)))) > (when frame > (message "Raising %s..." frame) > (raise-frame frame)))) > > 4.2 Evaluate this function. > > 4.3 Click on the Command Prompt window to make it the foreground > window. Then move the Command Prompt window on display so that the > echo area of the Emacs's frame is visible. > > 5. Execute the following command from the Command Prompt window: > > C:\emacs-24.3.50\bin\emacsclient.exe -n > --eval "(raise-frame-by-name \"emacs@<SYSTEM>\")" > > You will see the "Raising" message in the echo area of Emacs, but the > frame will not come to the forefront. > > Doing the same in Emacs 23.3 does bring the frame to the forefront. > > Conclusion: emacsclient does its job by telling Emacs to invoke > raise-frame, and Emacs does. But raise-frame does not produce the > expected effect. > > I believe this change in behavior since 23.3 is a side effect of > fixing another bug: > > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11513 > > That change fixed a similar, but evidently distinct aspect of > raise-frame's behavior. We could try reverting that change, but then > there will be another user who will claim that a bug solved long ago > "is back". > > It would be nice to solve this problem without un-fixing the other > one. But for this, Someone(TM) who knows much more than I do about > Windows GUI should step forward and show us how to do that. We don't > have such a knowledgeable person on board at this time, unfortunately. > > As a temporary workaround, you could customize w32-grab-focus-on-raise > to nil; my testing indicates that you will have the behavior you want > then. Thanks for your thorough analysis aand explanation. Yes, this temporary workaround raises the frame. Unfortunatly, it doesn't also gain focus like when it starts out being iconified and then the command is invoked, at least not for me.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.