GNU logs - #13685, boring messages

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#13685: a way to say that dir-locals should only apply to buffers with files
Resent-From: Glenn Morris <rgm@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 02:34:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.13685.B13685.136063639515875 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 13685 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Glenn Morris <rgm@HIDDEN>
References: <emtxpj7gzs.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 21:32:49 -0500
In-Reply-To: <emtxpj7gzs.fsf@HIDDEN> (Glenn Morris's message of
	"Sun, 10 Feb 2013 20:53:59 -0500")
Message-ID: <qspq06mfce.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Precedence: list
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org

Glenn Morris wrote:

> I think there should be some way in a dir-locals file to say
> "these settings should only be applied to buffers with files".
> Sometimes some options are not appropriate for file-less buffers.
> Ref bug#11127.

This seems easy to do, but I don't know what the best UI is.
An element in the dir-locals list:

  (fileonly . t)

or

  (apply-to . files)

The latter allows for

  (apply-to . nonfiles)

as well (though I can't think of a use for that).

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#13685: a way to say that dir-locals should only apply to buffers with files
Resent-From: Josh <josh@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 03:26:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.13685.B13685.136072592217103 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Glenn Morris <rgm@HIDDEN>
Cc: 13685 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <qspq06mfce.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <emtxpj7gzs.fsf@HIDDEN>
	<qspq06mfce.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Josh <josh@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:24:19 -0800
Message-ID: <CANdFEAETs4mXrO-560+qXeNhR_-MKxiqeHMO4t4SG+AZAkemrw@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Precedence: list
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Glenn Morris <rgm@HIDDEN> wrote:
> Glenn Morris wrote:
>
>> I think there should be some way in a dir-locals file to say
>> "these settings should only be applied to buffers with files".
>> Sometimes some options are not appropriate for file-less buffers.
>> Ref bug#11127.
>
> This seems easy to do, but I don't know what the best UI is.
> An element in the dir-locals list:
>
>   (fileonly . t)
>
> or
>
>   (apply-to . files)

Or more generally, the cdr could specify a predicate taking a single
argument (the buffer), e.g.
(apply-if . buffer-file-name)

> The latter allows for
>
>   (apply-to . nonfiles)
>
> as well (though I can't think of a use for that).

Likewise, (apply-if . (lambda (buffer) (not (buffer-file-name buffer))))

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#13685: a way to say that dir-locals should only apply to buffers with files
Resent-From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:37:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.13685.B13685.136074459827221 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Josh <josh@HIDDEN>
Cc: Glenn Morris <rgm@HIDDEN>, 13685 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@HIDDEN>
References: <emtxpj7gzs.fsf@HIDDEN>
	<qspq06mfce.fsf@HIDDEN>
	<CANdFEAETs4mXrO-560+qXeNhR_-MKxiqeHMO4t4SG+AZAkemrw@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:36:03 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CANdFEAETs4mXrO-560+qXeNhR_-MKxiqeHMO4t4SG+AZAkemrw@HIDDEN>
	(josh@HIDDEN's message of "Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:24:19 -0800")
Message-ID: <mvmobfo4nm4.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.93 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org

Josh <josh@HIDDEN> writes:

> Likewise, (apply-if . (lambda (buffer) (not (buffer-file-name buffer))))

Be careful about execution of arbitrary code.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@HIDDEN
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#13685: a way to say that dir-locals should only apply to buffers with files
Resent-From: Josh <josh@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:20:03 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.13685.B13685.136077595019041 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@HIDDEN>
Cc: Glenn Morris <rgm@HIDDEN>, 13685 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <mvmobfo4nm4.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <emtxpj7gzs.fsf@HIDDEN>
	<qspq06mfce.fsf@HIDDEN>
	<CANdFEAETs4mXrO-560+qXeNhR_-MKxiqeHMO4t4SG+AZAkemrw@HIDDEN>
	<mvmobfo4nm4.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: Josh <josh@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:18:05 -0800
Message-ID: <CANdFEAFx8rtfdpk+p+pmE9VNHWfES-O8-w279iYiWFnQksAs4A@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Precedence: list
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@HIDDEN> wrote:
> Josh <josh@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> Likewise, (apply-if . (lambda (buffer) (not (buffer-file-name buffer))))
>
> Be careful about execution of arbitrary code.
>
> Andreas.

Indeed, such a feature should be governed by `enable-local-eval' and
`safe-local-eval-forms' or similar, with `buffer-file-name' being an
element of the latter by default.

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#13685: a way to say that dir-locals should only apply to buffers with files
Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:19:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.13685.B13685.136146349921117 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13685
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Josh <josh@HIDDEN>
Cc: Glenn Morris <rgm@HIDDEN>, 13685 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 13685-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B13685.136146349921117
          (code B ref 13685); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:19:01 +0000
Received: (at 13685) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2013 16:18:19 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42626 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1U8Yqe-0005UX-QC
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:18:17 -0500
Received: from z.lifelogs.com ([173.255.230.239]:59972)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <tzz@HIDDEN>) id 1U8Yqc-0005UM-7H
	for 13685 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:18:15 -0500
Received: from heechee (c-24-60-176-11.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.60.176.11])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tzz)
	by z.lifelogs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F145D2085E;
	Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:16:55 +0000 (UTC)
From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@HIDDEN>
Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos
References: <emtxpj7gzs.fsf@HIDDEN>
	<qspq06mfce.fsf@HIDDEN>
	<CANdFEAETs4mXrO-560+qXeNhR_-MKxiqeHMO4t4SG+AZAkemrw@HIDDEN>
X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;
	d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT=
	D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx"
Mail-Copies-To: never
Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:16:55 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CANdFEAETs4mXrO-560+qXeNhR_-MKxiqeHMO4t4SG+AZAkemrw@HIDDEN>
	(josh@HIDDEN's message of "Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:24:19 -0800")
Message-ID: <874nh5wsjs.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)

On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:24:19 -0800 Josh <josh@HIDDEN> wrote: 

J> Or more generally, the cdr could specify a predicate taking a single
J> argument (the buffer), e.g.
J> (apply-if . buffer-file-name)
...

J> Likewise, (apply-if . (lambda (buffer) (not (buffer-file-name buffer))))

I like the idea, but why not structure it like a cond statement since
that's what you're doing anyway?

Ted

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2022 14:29:22 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 22 09:29:22 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40553 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1nMWAM-0000Mq-Bu
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 09:29:22 -0500
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:51928)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1nMWAK-0000MV-1k
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 09:29:20 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:
 MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
 :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=K7YqtngmLYtA6FRzFGJoOXAygrJW6LAipENmSjLkgYU=; b=OS20wAXmKhrZrh37iZMCHBG171
 nPtBEBsl4sTsCUthP8M3GHS39DGVNBFEQNDzZn80ID7wH7vzLuXFNkHOCNzE1S0BvtPQPLtGW+HOZ
 y7gkG5yQVce9XTVrSgGgDpnVU48rEpRT0Qk4CFY41W+pq2Tz+7BpLMq4JFBaMECs/93Y=;
Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant)
 by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1nMWAB-0006R0-9C
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 15:29:13 +0100
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 15:29:10 +0100
Message-Id: <87y2239dqh.fsf@HIDDEN>
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Subject: control message for bug #17489
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview:  forcemerge 17489 13685 quit 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

forcemerge 17489 13685
quit

Last modified: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 14:45:01 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.