GNU logs - #14047, boring messages

Message sent to bug-guile@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#14047: more aggressive inlining
Resent-From: Daniel Llorens <daniel.llorens@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-guile@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 09:45:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.14047.B.136420469731716 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 14047 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
From: Daniel Llorens <daniel.llorens@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87k3prlai3.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:42:25 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <18DDEE8E-F660-4D33-82A6-5F51E75A967A@HIDDEN>
References: <mailman.153.1351958430.10005.guile-devel@HIDDEN>
	<0F432FA1-CFF8-4A22-A477-5291A1B9925D@HIDDEN>
	<87ip9mgzp4.fsf@HIDDEN> <878v7m5xdh.fsf@HIDDEN>
	<2E5FFE0D-9001-409C-BCD4-9EE3BF9883F0@HIDDEN>
	<87mww0nu8l.fsf@HIDDEN>
	<2D31D517-08F8-4D07-84DB-098E335AE0AD@HIDDEN>
	<874nh9boqe.fsf@HIDDEN>
	<96617E9F-D83C-48EE-B84D-7CD45C4181C2@HIDDEN>
	<CA+U71=Pj1Ywr1Ay+w-u1jWd4ZZ8Xk1b27YEg-ME8JRVchYRuCA@HIDDEN>
	<441E015F-F545-48DF-AF96-E1FEA64F64A3@HIDDEN>
	<CA+U71=MvGqHWqLgF5BOUiVCmimwPChmRwehJ0VQhACEPBDLzTg@HIDDEN>
	<14C63C7B-DEA6-4C0C-AB18-17695BC5FAD3@HIDDEN>
	<87k3prlai3.fsf@HIDDEN>
Precedence: list
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org


On Mar 1, 2013, at 10:44, Andy Wingo wrote:

> On Fri 01 Mar 2013 10:01, Daniel Llorens <daniel.llorens@HIDDEN> =
writes:
>=20
>> scheme@(guile-user)> ,optimize (vector-ref #(1 2 3) 0)
>> $1 =3D 1
>> scheme@(guile-user)> ,optimize (array-ref #(1 2 3) 0)
>> $2 =3D (array-ref '#(1 2 3) 0)
>=20
> File a bug for this case, this sort of thing is totally fixable :)

So I think this use of array-ref should be inlined.

Same for other simple functions such as e.g.

scheme@(guile-user)> ,optimize (real-part 1+1i)
$1 =3D (real-part 1.0+1.0i)
scheme@(guile-user)>=20

imag-part, magnitude, and so on.

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.428 (Entity 5.428)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Daniel Llorens <daniel.llorens@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#14047: Acknowledgement (more aggressive inlining)
Message-ID: <handler.14047.B.136420469731716.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <18DDEE8E-F660-4D33-82A6-5F51E75A967A@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 14047
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guile
Reply-To: 14047 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 09:45:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guile@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 14047 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
14047: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D14047
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-guile@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#14047: more aggressive inlining
Resent-From: Andy Wingo <wingo@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-guile@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 19:34:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.14047.B14047.13644128367190 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Daniel Llorens <daniel.llorens@HIDDEN>
Cc: 14047 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc
	:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version
	:content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ow9DWtKqAfRdgrDgxwXh5UF1iDBgt5WQ
	hNUPGSzrNXoza86oWsTzvD8vRo8gw+adXpnRWIgkildOqu76QVt/hkGJrgOmyR19
	3kS7jKdoaVj6P/hDiVjB2TmR4UWMArTl+tY3rc8p3xgVvtH4zGnJosvDWqV8wY8h
	E4W+Zcf4jqc=
From: Andy Wingo <wingo@HIDDEN>
References: <mailman.153.1351958430.10005.guile-devel@HIDDEN>
	<0F432FA1-CFF8-4A22-A477-5291A1B9925D@HIDDEN>
	<87ip9mgzp4.fsf@HIDDEN> <878v7m5xdh.fsf@HIDDEN>
	<2E5FFE0D-9001-409C-BCD4-9EE3BF9883F0@HIDDEN>
	<87mww0nu8l.fsf@HIDDEN>
	<2D31D517-08F8-4D07-84DB-098E335AE0AD@HIDDEN>
	<874nh9boqe.fsf@HIDDEN>
	<96617E9F-D83C-48EE-B84D-7CD45C4181C2@HIDDEN>
	<CA+U71=Pj1Ywr1Ay+w-u1jWd4ZZ8Xk1b27YEg-ME8JRVchYRuCA@HIDDEN>
	<441E015F-F545-48DF-AF96-E1FEA64F64A3@HIDDEN>
	<CA+U71=MvGqHWqLgF5BOUiVCmimwPChmRwehJ0VQhACEPBDLzTg@HIDDEN>
	<14C63C7B-DEA6-4C0C-AB18-17695BC5FAD3@HIDDEN>
	<87k3prlai3.fsf@HIDDEN>
	<18DDEE8E-F660-4D33-82A6-5F51E75A967A@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:31:22 +0100
In-Reply-To: <18DDEE8E-F660-4D33-82A6-5F51E75A967A@HIDDEN> (Daniel
	Llorens's message of "Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:42:25 +0100")
Message-ID: <87hajwmygl.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org

On Mon 25 Mar 2013 10:42, Daniel Llorens <daniel.llorens@HIDDEN> writes:

>> On Fri 01 Mar 2013 10:01, Daniel Llorens <daniel.llorens@HIDDEN> writes:
>> 
>>> scheme@(guile-user)> ,optimize (vector-ref #(1 2 3) 0)
>>> $1 = 1
>>> scheme@(guile-user)> ,optimize (array-ref #(1 2 3) 0)
>>> $2 = (array-ref '#(1 2 3) 0)
>> 
>> File a bug for this case, this sort of thing is totally fixable :)
>
> So I think this use of array-ref should be inlined.
>
> Same for other simple functions such as e.g.
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> ,optimize (real-part 1+1i)
> $1 = (real-part 1.0+1.0i)
> scheme@(guile-user)> 
>
> imag-part, magnitude, and so on.

If you would like to make a precise list, that would be helpful.

Cheers,

A
-- 
http://wingolog.org/

Message sent to bug-guile@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#14047: more aggressive inlining
Resent-From: Daniel Llorens <daniel.llorens@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-CC: bug-guile@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:43:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.14047.B14047.136441695617796 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Andy Wingo <wingo@HIDDEN>
Cc: 14047 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: Daniel Llorens <daniel.llorens@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87hajwmygl.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 21:40:02 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <ADB89AF6-B98F-49FE-B1CE-FB4F598E6A67@HIDDEN>
References: <mailman.153.1351958430.10005.guile-devel@HIDDEN>
	<0F432FA1-CFF8-4A22-A477-5291A1B9925D@HIDDEN>
	<87ip9mgzp4.fsf@HIDDEN> <878v7m5xdh.fsf@HIDDEN>
	<2E5FFE0D-9001-409C-BCD4-9EE3BF9883F0@HIDDEN>
	<87mww0nu8l.fsf@HIDDEN>
	<2D31D517-08F8-4D07-84DB-098E335AE0AD@HIDDEN>
	<874nh9boqe.fsf@HIDDEN>
	<96617E9F-D83C-48EE-B84D-7CD45C4181C2@HIDDEN>
	<CA+U71=Pj1Ywr1Ay+w-u1jWd4ZZ8Xk1b27YEg-ME8JRVchYRuCA@HIDDEN>
	<441E015F-F545-48DF-AF96-E1FEA64F64A3@HIDDEN>
	<CA+U71=MvGqHWqLgF5BOUiVCmimwPChmRwehJ0VQhACEPBDLzTg@HIDDEN>
	<14C63C7B-DEA6-4C0C-AB18-17695BC5FAD3@HIDDEN>
	<87k3prlai3.fsf@HIDDEN>
	<18DDEE8E-F660-4D33-82A6-5F51E75A967A@HIDDEN>
	<87hajwmygl.fsf@HIDDEN>
Precedence: list
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org


On Mar 27, 2013, at 20:31, Andy Wingo wrote:

> If you would like to make a precise list, that would be helpful.


At least everything from =A76.6.2.7 to =A76.6.2.13 in =
http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/

I've noticed that a few of these are already reduced, it seems quite =
random. For example everything in =A76.6.2.8 is reduced, then logand is =
reduced but logior is not.

odd? *
even? *
quotient
modulo
remainder
gcd
lcm
modulo-expt
exact-integer-sqrt
make-rectangular
make-polar
real-part
imag-part
magnitude
angle
abs
min
max
truncate
round
floor
ceiling
euclidean/, -quotient, -remainder
floor/, -quotient, -remainder
ceiling/, -quotient, -remainder
truncate/, -quotient, -remainder
centered/, -quotient, -remainder
round/, -quotient, -remainder
sqrt
expt
sin
cos
tan
asin
acos
atan
exp
log
log10
sinh
cosh
tanh
asinh
acosh
atanh
logand *
logior
lognot *
logtest
ash *
logcount
integer-length
integer-expt
bit-extract

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Apr 2013 19:09:24 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 14 15:09:24 2013
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50555 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1URSIm-0007Bg-8U
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:09:24 -0400
Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:41435)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1URSIk-0007BZ-2W
	for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:09:22 -0400
Received: from 209-6-91-212.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com
	([209.6.91.212] helo=tines.lan)
	by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>)
	id 1URSEf-0007Gd-9Y; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:05:09 -0400
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:05:01 -0400
Message-ID: <87txn92asi.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
	has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
	label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview: severity 14047 wishlist severity 13644 wishlist
	severity 13382
	wishlist retitle 11083 Guile on Solaris 10 retitle 11776 Guile on
	GNU/Hurd merge 11776 11783 thanks [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (2.8 points, 10.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ----------------------
	--------------------------------------------------
	0.8 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4997]
	1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header
	0.2 NO_SUBJECT             Extra score for no subject
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
	<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  severity 14047 wishlist severity 13644 wishlist severity 13382
    wishlist retitle 11083 Guile on Solaris 10 retitle 11776 Guile on GNU/Hurd
    merge 11776 11783 thanks [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 BAYES_40               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40%
                             [score: 0.3244]
  1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header
  0.2 NO_SUBJECT             Extra score for no subject

severity 14047 wishlist
severity 13644 wishlist
severity 13382 wishlist
retitle 11083 Guile on Solaris 10
retitle 11776 Guile on GNU/Hurd
merge 11776 11783
thanks

Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.