X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#15056: Please indicate the meaning of block sizes in filesystem information Resent-From: Filipus Klutiero <chealer@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 04:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.15056.B.13760229453998 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: report 15056 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 15056 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13760229453998 (code B ref -1); Fri, 09 Aug 2013 04:36:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2013 04:35:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48515 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1V7eQS-00012P-KV for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 00:35:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41076) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <chealer@HIDDEN>) id 1V7eQO-000126-77 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 00:35:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <chealer@HIDDEN>) id 1V7eQD-0003Fi-Tv for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 00:35:34 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:33763) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <chealer@HIDDEN>) id 1V7eQD-0003FZ-Rk for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 00:35:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42747) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <chealer@HIDDEN>) id 1V7eQ7-0005dD-Ld for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 00:35:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <chealer@HIDDEN>) id 1V7eQ1-0003AZ-Ik for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 00:35:23 -0400 Received: from mail-qe0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22f]:51697) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <chealer@HIDDEN>) id 1V7eQ1-0003AO-Et for bug-coreutils@HIDDEN; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 00:35:17 -0400 Received: by mail-qe0-f47.google.com with SMTP id b10so2140453qen.20 for <bug-coreutils@HIDDEN>; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 21:35:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type; bh=z3ABiwJ4eT8QMkdyDTe93AuedLhFYoiujAvRYHJiLpc=; b=qqB4QG1uceDX1R7aJ5Euw22VfUfBnmH/Mz+mcByIN/U8/glkCq+tpv7smRXyJMQjHZ uyJh6neZCav1LnzQNwnnSl5TxpOwoOTutv++AX0hAlPdNcFyzLaBlwtjy3wHLacV8Bdt uU8iJmKPrfOR4vU0/BXwt3L89igTC9lgdF8LbBTFINQgQOmhTMwKLbh3DMtg8IFacMwR 4sTaK7ytl4TnCOzlTY+KgbRriPwGVHqD+e3f/YbvkN+Wa66UEedeh8XBcQFP3UqQZK/j HxN1/lp0lOQNoRhI8hGo25Vm1alxwaO12KzVkenMXw+vFFq2tkHd8B5cwRcHF008oyt5 guLQ== X-Received: by 10.224.46.202 with SMTP id k10mr9492075qaf.63.1376022916800; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 21:35:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (modemcable156.191-56-74.mc.videotron.ca. [74.56.191.156]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t9sm8519637qap.8.2013.08.08.21.35.15 for <bug-coreutils@HIDDEN> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Aug 2013 21:35:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5204717E.1090606@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 00:35:10 -0400 From: Filipus Klutiero <chealer@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010609090400020502060801" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010609090400020502060801 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Severity: wishlist stat -f provides information on the filesystem, including block sizes: > Block size: 4096 Fundamental block size: 4096 The unit used in unfortunately not specified. Considering the fdisk output I get... > Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes > I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes ... I guess bits are the unit. Note that the first measure ("Block size") is quite ambiguous. http://www.hitachi.co.jp/Prod/comp/soft1/manual/jp1en/d3R4900e/PCAU0135.HTM has some block size terminology which might help (if that's indeed the type of block we mean): > The basic block size (FFBS: Fundamental Filesystem Block Size) used in the field table of this record is the allocation unit used during file system creation. The number of blocks that corresponds to the basic block size is called the /basic block count/. The logical block size (PFBS: Preferred Filesystem Block Size) is the allocation unit used during input/output operations. The number of blocks that corresponds to the logical block size is called the /logical block count/. -- Filipus Klutiero http://www.philippecloutier.com --------------010609090400020502060801 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> Severity: wishlist<br> <br> stat -f provides information on the filesystem, including block sizes:<br> <blockquote type="cite">Block size: 4096 Fundamental block size: 4096</blockquote> The unit used in unfortunately not specified. Considering the fdisk output I get...<br> <blockquote type="cite">Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes<br> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes<br> </blockquote> ... I guess bits are the unit.<br> <br> Note that the first measure ("Block size") is quite ambiguous. <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.hitachi.co.jp/Prod/comp/soft1/manual/jp1en/d3R4900e/PCAU0135.HTM">http://www.hitachi.co.jp/Prod/comp/soft1/manual/jp1en/d3R4900e/PCAU0135.HTM</a> has some block size terminology which might help (if that's indeed the type of block we mean):<br> <blockquote type="cite">The basic block size (FFBS: Fundamental Filesystem Block Size) used in the field table of this record is the allocation unit used during file system creation. The number of blocks that corresponds to the basic block size is called the <font face="Times New Roman"><i>basic block count</i></font>. The logical block size (PFBS: Preferred Filesystem Block Size) is the allocation unit used during input/output operations. The number of blocks that corresponds to the logical block size is called the <font face="Times New Roman"><i>logical block count</i></font>.</blockquote> <pre class="moz-signature" cols="998">-- Filipus Klutiero <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.philippecloutier.com">http://www.philippecloutier.com</a></pre> </body> </html> --------------010609090400020502060801--
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.503) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Filipus Klutiero <chealer@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#15056: Acknowledgement (Please indicate the meaning of block sizes in filesystem information) Message-ID: <handler.15056.B.13760229453998.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <5204717E.1090606@HIDDEN> X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 15056 X-Gnu-PR-Package: coreutils Reply-To: 15056 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 04:36:02 +0000 Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): bug-coreutils@HIDDEN If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 15056 <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 15056: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D15056 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#15056: Please indicate the meaning of block sizes in filesystem information Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C3=A1draig?= Brady <P@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 04:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.15056.B15056.13760240216203 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15056 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Filipus Klutiero <chealer@HIDDEN> Cc: 15056 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 15056-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B15056.13760240216203 (code B ref 15056); Fri, 09 Aug 2013 04:54:01 +0000 Received: (at 15056) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2013 04:53:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48539 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1V7eho-0001by-OB for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 00:53:41 -0400 Received: from mail2.vodafone.ie ([213.233.128.44]:30443) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <P@HIDDEN>) id 1V7ehn-0001bl-1P for 15056 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 00:53:39 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBANN0BFJtTdNT/2dsb2JhbAANTr9mgnWBL4MYAQEBBDIBRhALDQEKCRYPCQMCAQIBRQYNAQcBAa51khiQGweEDgOeKoNpiHyBOg Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.79]) ([109.77.211.83]) by mail2.vodafone.ie with ESMTP; 09 Aug 2013 05:53:33 +0100 Message-ID: <520475CC.2050505@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 05:53:32 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C3=A1draig?= Brady <P@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5204717E.1090606@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <5204717E.1090606@HIDDEN> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) On 08/09/2013 05:35 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > Severity: wishlist > > stat -f provides information on the filesystem, including block sizes: >> Block size: 4096 Fundamental block size: 4096 > The unit used in unfortunately not specified. Considering the fdisk output I get... >> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes >> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes > ... I guess bits are the unit. always bytes There are generally 3 layers of block sizes between the file system and device: 1. physical defined by the hardware device 2. logical the smallest addressable unit used for the device 3. file system ditto for the file system So your numbers above are not the same item being represented. They're all in bytes and represent different values 1,2,3 above thanks, Pádraig.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.