GNU bug report logs - #15843
Add cancel-edebug-on-entry or similar

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 15843 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 15843 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Nathan Trapuzzano <nbtrap <at> nbtrap.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 24.3.50; Edebug feature request
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 16:41:52 -0500

Edebug would benefit from something like debug.el's
`cancel-debug-on-entry'.  Especially after stepping through large
functions and into other functions therefrom, it's annoying to have to
manually re-eval them to remove the extra forms added by Edebug.

Message #8 received at 15843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Nathan Trapuzzano <nbtrap <at> nbtrap.com>
Cc: 15843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#15843: 24.3.50; Edebug feature request
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 23:58:39 -0500

> Edebug would benefit from something like debug.el's
> `cancel-debug-on-entry'.  Especially after stepping through large
> functions and into other functions therefrom, it's annoying to have to
> manually re-eval them to remove the extra forms added by Edebug.

Patch welcome, tho usually I just use `C-M-x c'.


        Stefan

Message #11 received at 15843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Nathan Trapuzzano <nbtrap <at> nbtrap.com>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 15843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#15843: 24.3.50; Edebug feature request
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 06:02:37 -0500

Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

> `C-M-x c'.

You mean just `C-M-x'?

Message #14 received at 15843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Nathan Trapuzzano <nbtrap <at> nbtrap.com>
Cc: 15843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#15843: 24.3.50; Edebug feature request
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:37:19 -0500

>> `C-M-x c'.
> You mean just `C-M-x'?

No: C-M-x "de-edebugs" the function, but I need a subsequent `c' to
continue the execution that was interrupted where I didn't want it.


        Stefan

Message #17 received at 15843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Nathan Trapuzzano <nbtrap <at> nbtrap.com>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 15843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#15843: 24.3.50; Edebug feature request
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:41:38 -0500

Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

> No: C-M-x "de-edebugs" the function, but I need a subsequent `c' to
> continue the execution that was interrupted where I didn't want it.

Oh yeah, that's what I do to.

Message #22 received at 15843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Nathan Trapuzzano <nbtrap <at> nbtrap.com>
Cc: 15843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#15843: 24.3.50; Edebug feature request
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 11:16:42 +0200

Nathan Trapuzzano <nbtrap <at> nbtrap.com> writes:

> Edebug would benefit from something like debug.el's
> `cancel-debug-on-entry'.  Especially after stepping through large
> functions and into other functions therefrom, it's annoying to have to
> manually re-eval them to remove the extra forms added by Edebug.

I think this sounds like a useful command -- I often find myself having
edebug-instrumented a whole bunch of functions, and having to manually
re-eval all of them is tedious.

So a command like `edebug-cancel-all-functions' would be nice, and I
looked into the bowels of edebug.el to see whether that would be
easy...  and...  I think so?

I think we basically have to go through all the symbols and see whether
any of those are edebugged, and if so, call `edebug-unwrap*' on them and
set the function definition to that?

Or is there a better way?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Message #25 received at 15843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Nathan Trapuzzano <nbtrap <at> nbtrap.com>
Cc: 15843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#15843: 24.3.50; Edebug feature request
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 11:30:38 +0200

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:

> I think we basically have to go through all the symbols and see whether
> any of those are edebugged, and if so, call `edebug-unwrap*' on them and
> set the function definition to that?

I wrote a function like that just to test, and to my surprise, it seems
to work in the test cases I had, so I installed it.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.