GNU bug report logs - #16002
an improved input method for Esperanto

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Ivan Shmakov <ivan <at> siamics.net>

Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:56:06 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: patch, wontfix

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 16002 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 16002 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#16002; Package emacs. (Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:56:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Ivan Shmakov <oneingray <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:56:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ivan Shmakov <oneingray <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Cc: Ivan Shmakov <oneingray <at> gmail.com>
Subject: an improved input method for Esperanto
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:18:42 +0000
	As of e7203144, Emacs provides esperanto-postfix and
	esperanto-prefix input methods, which both require the use of up
	to two keystrokes per Esperanto letter.

	A more ergonomic approach is, however, to remap the letters not
	used in Esperanto (q, w, x, y), as well as the square brackets,
	to the “extra” letters needed, like (following the example of
	the ‘epo’ Xkb layout):

⋯✂⋯ C-h I esperanto RET ⋯✂⋯
     +----------------------------------------------------------------+
     | 1! | 2@ | 3# | 4$ | 5% | 6^ | 7& | 8* | 9( | 0) | -_ | =+ | `~ |
     +----------------------------------------------------------------+
       | ŝŜ | ĝĜ | eE | rR | tT | ŭŬ | uU | iI | oO | pP | ĵĴ | ĥĤ |
       +------------------------------------------------------------+
        | aA | sS | dD | fF | gG | hH | jJ | kK | lL | ;: | '" | \| |
        +-----------------------------------------------------------+
          | zZ | ĉĈ | cC | vV | bB | nN | mM | ,< | .> | /? |
          +-------------------------------------------------+
⋯✂⋯ C-h I esperanto RET ⋯✂⋯

-- 
FSF associate member #7257




Changed bug submitter to 'Ivan Shmakov <ivan <at> siamics.net>' from 'Ivan Shmakov <oneingray <at> gmail.com>' Request was from Ivan Shmakov <ivan <at> siamics.net> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 02 Dec 2013 09:42:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#16002; Package emacs. (Sat, 27 Dec 2014 08:11:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 16002 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ivan Shmakov <ivan <at> siamics.net>
To: 16002 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#16002: an improved input method for Esperanto 
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 08:10:36 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
>>>>> Ivan Shmakov <oneingray <at> gmail.com> writes:

 > As of e7203144, Emacs provides esperanto-postfix and esperanto-prefix
 > input methods, which both require the use of up to two keystrokes per
 > Esperanto letter.

	As of 36c43e95de5e (2014-12-18 16:44:11 +0000), the above still
	holds.

 > A more ergonomic approach is, however, to remap the letters not
 > used in Esperanto (q, w, x, y), as well as the square brackets, to
 > the “extra” letters needed, like (following the example of the ‘epo’
 > Xkb layout):

[…]

	… Which is easy to achieve with the quail code MIMEd.

	The question is: the code below doesn’t fit either latin-pre.el
	or latin-post.el.  Do we perhaps need to split esperanta layouts
	into a separate esperanto.el package?

	TIA.

-- 
FSF associate member #7257  http://boycottsystemd.org/  … 3013 B6A0 230E 334A
[Message part 2 (text/emacs-lisp, inline)]
(quail-define-package
 "esperanto" "Esperanto" "EO" nil
 "Esperanto input method without modifiers
Key translation rules are:
 X → ?Ĉ   W → ?Ĝ   } → ?Ĥ   { → ?Ĵ   Q → ?Ŝ   Y → ?Ŭ
 x → ?ĉ   w → ?ĝ   ] → ?ĥ   [ → ?ĵ   q → ?ŝ   y → ?ŭ
" nil t t nil t nil nil nil nil nil t)

(quail-define-rules
 ("X" ?Ĉ)
 ("W" ?Ĝ)
 ("{" ?Ĵ)
 ("}" ?Ĥ)
 ("Q" ?Ŝ)
 ("Y" ?Ŭ)
 ("x" ?ĉ)
 ("w" ?ĝ)
 ("[" ?ĵ)
 ("]" ?ĥ)
 ("q" ?ŝ)
 ("y" ?ŭ)
 )

Added tag(s) patch. Request was from Ivan Shmakov <ivan <at> siamics.net> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 29 Dec 2014 09:02:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#16002; Package emacs. (Wed, 24 Feb 2016 03:47:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #15 received at 16002 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: 16002 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Kenichi HANDA <handa <at> etl.go.jp>
Subject: Re: bug#16002: an improved input method for Esperanto
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:45:44 +1100
Ivan Shmakov <ivan <at> siamics.net> writes:

> 	… Which is easy to achieve with the quail code MIMEd.
>
> 	The question is: the code below doesn’t fit either latin-pre.el
> 	or latin-post.el.  Do we perhaps need to split esperanta layouts
> 	into a separate esperanto.el package?

I think that sounds like a good idea.

> (quail-define-package
>  "esperanto" "Esperanto" "EO" nil
>  "Esperanto input method without modifiers
> Key translation rules are:
>  X → ?Ĉ   W → ?Ĝ   } → ?Ĥ   { → ?Ĵ   Q → ?Ŝ   Y → ?Ŭ
>  x → ?ĉ   w → ?ĝ   ] → ?ĥ   [ → ?ĵ   q → ?ŝ   y → ?ŭ
> " nil t t nil t nil nil nil nil nil t)

> (quail-define-rules
>  ("X" ?Ĉ)
>  ("W" ?Ĝ)
>  ("{" ?Ĵ)
>  ("}" ?Ĥ)
>  ("Q" ?Ŝ)
>  ("Y" ?Ŭ)
>  ("x" ?ĉ)
>  ("w" ?ĝ)
>  ("[" ?ĵ)
>  ("]" ?ĥ)
>  ("q" ?ŝ)
>  ("y" ?ŭ)
>  )


-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#16002; Package emacs. (Wed, 26 Jun 2019 15:18:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #18 received at 16002 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Ivan Shmakov <oneingray <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 16002 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#16002: an improved input method for Esperanto
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 17:17:42 +0200
Ivan Shmakov <oneingray <at> gmail.com> writes:

> 	As of e7203144, Emacs provides esperanto-postfix and
> 	esperanto-prefix input methods, which both require the use of up
> 	to two keystrokes per Esperanto letter.
>
> 	A more ergonomic approach is, however, to remap the letters not
> 	used in Esperanto (q, w, x, y), as well as the square brackets,
> 	to the “extra” letters needed, like (following the example of
> 	the ‘epo’ Xkb layout):
>
> ⋯✂⋯ C-h I esperanto RET ⋯✂⋯
>      +----------------------------------------------------------------+
>      | 1! | 2@ | 3# | 4$ | 5% | 6^ | 7& | 8* | 9( | 0) | -_ | =+ | `~ |
>      +----------------------------------------------------------------+
>        | ŝŜ | ĝĜ | eE | rR | tT | ŭŬ | uU | iI | oO | pP | ĵĴ | ĥĤ |
>        +------------------------------------------------------------+
>         | aA | sS | dD | fF | gG | hH | jJ | kK | lL | ;: | '" | \| |
>         +-----------------------------------------------------------+
>           | zZ | ĉĈ | cC | vV | bB | nN | mM | ,< | .> | /? |
>           +-------------------------------------------------+
> ⋯✂⋯ C-h I esperanto RET ⋯✂⋯

But is this an input method that's commonly used by Esperanto users?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#16002; Package emacs. (Thu, 13 Aug 2020 10:52:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #21 received at 16002 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Ivan Shmakov <oneingray <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 16002 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#16002: an improved input method for Esperanto
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:50:58 +0200
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:

> But is this an input method that's commonly used by Esperanto users?

There was no follow-up on this when the patch was posted six years ago,
or when questioned four and one years ago, so I'm thinking that there
isn't much enthusiasm for this input method, and I'm closing this bug
report.  If this is something people would like to add to Emacs, please
respond, and we'll reopen.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




Added tag(s) wontfix. Request was from Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 13 Aug 2020 10:52:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug closed, send any further explanations to 16002 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Ivan Shmakov <ivan <at> siamics.net> Request was from Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 13 Aug 2020 10:52:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:24:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 218 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.