X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#16173: 24.3.50; Inconsistency between goto-line an line numbering with narrowing
Resent-From: Nathan Trapuzzano <nbtrap@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 02:49:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.16173.B.138724849821827 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 16173
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: 16173 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.138724849821827
(code B ref -1); Tue, 17 Dec 2013 02:49:02 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2013 02:48:18 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54742 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1Vskhi-0005fs-Hh
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:48:18 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46242)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <nbtrap@HIDDEN>) id 1Vskhc-0005fb-CW
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:48:12 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <nbtrap@HIDDEN>) id 1VskhT-000136-Gs
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:48:08 -0500
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,T_DKIM_INVALID
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:35803)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <nbtrap@HIDDEN>) id 1VskhT-000132-Dw
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:47:59 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47869)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <nbtrap@HIDDEN>) id 1VskhL-0003xi-Ub
for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:47:59 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <nbtrap@HIDDEN>) id 1VskhE-00010e-EJ
for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:47:51 -0500
Received: from oproxy9-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([69.89.24.6]:35352)
by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <nbtrap@HIDDEN>) id 1VskhE-0000w6-45
for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:47:44 -0500
Received: (qmail 6706 invoked by uid 0); 17 Dec 2013 02:47:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO host393.hostmonster.com) (66.147.240.193)
by oproxy9.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 17 Dec 2013 02:47:51 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nbtrap.com;
s=default;
h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From;
bh=D57YikzT2M753v7irS1HoXYmZOUYcP8hQ/vzrsFJhj0=;
b=UCV4MkxQFqm7OhnHxZbLjtXzOfprU+y0o+yIkN/hnjCqJ8P2w7+4jquBRbRAn9x5QkRACe/F7/h+oguDbdws8saeSNwHbyoePJyBnbizijVdreh8Uh0Kz+FzNRHKhnWu;
Received: from [50.90.253.209] (port=39942 helo=Nathan-GNU)
by host393.hostmonster.com with esmtpsa (UNKNOWN:CAMELLIA128-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <nbtrap@HIDDEN>) id 1Vskgo-0005tN-JC
for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:47:18 -0700
From: Nathan Trapuzzano <nbtrap@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:47:08 -0500
Message-ID: <87txe88a8j.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Identified-User: {1585:host393.hostmonster.com:nbtrapco:nbtrap.com}
{sentby:smtp auth 50.90.253.209 authed with nbtrap@HIDDEN}
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address
(bad octet value).
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11
X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----)
Does it bother anyone that, with narrowing, line numbers according to
linum and differ from line numbers according to `goto-line'? (goto-line
widens before counting, linum doesn't.) Is changing this behavior a
possibility? Perhaps it's been around too long to change it now, but
what about adding a new goto-line variant?
Nathan
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.503) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Nathan Trapuzzano <nbtrap@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#16173: Acknowledgement (24.3.50; Inconsistency between goto-line an line numbering with narrowing) Message-ID: <handler.16173.B.138724849821827.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <87txe88a8j.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 16173 X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 16173 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 02:49:02 +0000 Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 16173 <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 16173: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D16173 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#16173: 24.3.50; Inconsistency between goto-line an line numbering with narrowing
Resent-From: Glenn Morris <rgm@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 03:01:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.16173.B16173.138724921223272 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16173
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: Nathan Trapuzzano <nbtrap@HIDDEN>
Cc: 16173 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 16173-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B16173.138724921223272
(code B ref 16173); Tue, 17 Dec 2013 03:01:02 +0000
Received: (at 16173) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2013 03:00:12 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54757 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1VsktH-00063F-Mp
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:00:12 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:54548)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <rgm@HIDDEN>) id 1VsktE-00062Q-5a
for 16173 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:00:09 -0500
Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <rgm@HIDDEN>)
id 1VsktC-00060D-O3; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:00:07 -0500
From: Glenn Morris <rgm@HIDDEN>
References: <87txe88a8j.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Spook: Skipjack Mossad plutonium mailbomb analyzer Abbas gamma
X-Ran: 8S}wC6>-t)WyL(5T*X'<~.WzlIWf*hxjF+suw1?{1Ohk%1q!@dQ(^xE):?nt^q$h|W)xwd
X-Hue: black
X-Attribution: GM
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:00:06 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87txe88a8j.fsf@HIDDEN> (Nathan Trapuzzano's message of "Mon,
16 Dec 2013 21:47:08 -0500")
Message-ID: <5zwqj4fah5.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Score: -5.3 (-----)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -5.3 (-----)
Nathan Trapuzzano wrote:
> Does it bother anyone that, with narrowing, line numbers according to
> linum and differ from line numbers according to `goto-line'?
http://debbugs.gnu.org/5042
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2013 03:01:40 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 16 22:01:40 2013 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54765 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1Vskui-00066K-5K for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:01:40 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:54578) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <rgm@HIDDEN>) id 1Vskug-00066C-RY for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:01:39 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rgm@HIDDEN>) id 1Vskug-0000bX-I7 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:01:38 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:01:38 -0500 Message-Id: <E1Vskug-0000bX-I7@HIDDEN> Subject: control message for bug 16173 To: <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris <rgm@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) forcemerge 5042 16173
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.