GNU logs - #16287, boring messages

Message sent to bug-coreutils@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#16287: RFE rm "-x" == "--one-file-system"
Resent-From: Linda Walsh <coreutils@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 17:12:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.16287.B.138833707725011 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 16287 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Message-ID: <52C0579C.4010404@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 09:10:52 -0800
From: Linda Walsh <coreutils@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Thunderbird
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Would it be possible to let rm have a -x flag
to be consistent with other utils that use -x to mean
--one-file-system?  It seems to be a widespread
convention.

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.503)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Linda Walsh <coreutils@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#16287: Acknowledgement (RFE rm "-x" == "--one-file-system")
Message-ID: <handler.16287.B.138833707725011.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <52C0579C.4010404@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 16287
X-Gnu-PR-Package: coreutils
Reply-To: 16287 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 17:12:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-coreutils@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 16287 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
16287: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D16287
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-coreutils@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#16287: RFE rm "-x" == "--one-file-system"
Resent-From: Bernhard Voelker <mail@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 00:28:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.16287.B16287.138836326522751 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Linda Walsh <coreutils@HIDDEN>, 16287 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Message-ID: <52C0BDFB.6090405@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 01:27:39 +0100
From: Bernhard Voelker <mail@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <52C0579C.4010404@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <52C0579C.4010404@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

On 12/29/2013 06:10 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
> Would it be possible to let rm have a -x flag
> to be consistent with other utils that use -x to mean
> --one-file-system?  It seems to be a widespread
> convention.

Thanks for the suggestion.
However, although -x is indeed a common option of several
programs, we are reluctant to add new short options.

I'd only consider doing so for compatibility reasons if
there would already exist an implementation of 'rm -x'.
I didn't find any ... apart from 'srm' [1] which even
has a different program name.
Do you know any other?

[1] http://srm.sourceforge.net/

Have a nice day,
Berny

Message sent to bug-coreutils@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#16287: RFE rm "-x" == "--one-file-system"
Resent-From: Linda Walsh <coreutils@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 01:18:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.16287.B16287.138836625128148 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Bernhard Voelker <mail@HIDDEN>
Cc: 16287 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Message-ID: <52C0C99E.5000202@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 17:17:18 -0800
From: Linda Walsh <coreutils@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Thunderbird
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <52C0579C.4010404@HIDDEN> <52C0BDFB.6090405@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <52C0BDFB.6090405@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> On 12/29/2013 06:10 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
>> Would it be possible to let rm have a -x flag
>> to be consistent with other utils that use -x to mean
>> --one-file-system?  It seems to be a widespread
>> convention.
> 
> Thanks for the suggestion.
> However, although -x is indeed a common option of several
> programs, we are reluctant to add new short options.
> 
> I'd only consider doing so for compatibility reasons
----
	I'm looking at compatibility reasons with
coreutil programs that recurse directories.

More important that other implementations, would be an expectation
of similar switch options within one "distribution" of these programs.

Of the core utils that recurse directories, only "chgrp" does not
have an option to stay on the current file system.

All of the other *recursive* core utils that have the ability to
isolate action to 1 file system have -x.

chmod, cp, df, ls, dir, du

find uses "-xdev"
tar uses -x
secure rm (srm) uses -x
mkzftree uses -x (makes a zisofs)

primarily was thinking about consistency in the coreutils --
for that matter, chgrp should probably follow suit in providing
the ability to stay on 1 fs, and -x as it's the only recursive utils
that doesn't provide that ability.

As you mention the only other 'rm' util secure rm,
also provides -x.

Suppose you didn't put it to use to mean what all those other
utilities use it for.

How could would it be if it took on some completely different (and perhaps
cross-purpose) meaning?   Wouldn't consistency among those tools that
have recursive options be desirable?

Message sent to bug-coreutils@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#16287: RFE rm "-x" == "--one-file-system"
Resent-From: Bernhard Voelker <mail@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 09:43:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.16287.B16287.138839656823423 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16287
X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Linda Walsh <coreutils@HIDDEN>
Cc: 16287 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 16287-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B16287.138839656823423
          (code B ref 16287); Mon, 30 Dec 2013 09:43:02 +0000
Received: (at 16287) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2013 09:42:48 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51662 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1VxZN2-00065g-8l
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 04:42:48 -0500
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:51722)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
 (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1VxZMz-00065V-Do
 for 16287 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 04:42:46 -0500
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (p57A5CC82.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.165.204.130])
 by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap1) with ESMTP (Nemesis)
 id 0Lwoky-1VMIlX2KJU-016rse; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 10:42:43 +0100
Message-ID: <52C14012.3050909@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 10:42:42 +0100
From: Bernhard Voelker <mail@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <52C0579C.4010404@HIDDEN>
 <52C0BDFB.6090405@HIDDEN> <52C0C99E.5000202@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <52C0C99E.5000202@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:YtzFN/b5Qfl/Ss+/xuvuekn93LdgoFypTUMq+zWd0Mv
 5UeVT82/+vtG8PXcF1KW8pbsWEjddIebtppPvTxSqQUJAGWapJ
 OKpJtd8ybETFVevfqni9mmWbTMLxwbBizgy3BasDo9eHUAcCnK
 /JWtX9VEpL8HYJYXBnv0pAz/qFpNhMbHApkNKEqfkvld1/KEef
 sm4EJz8dATw9nSOB48gIB9ToOXjemVAt3xeh/klrk56IHX4Cr5
 /MUCZqsOjeku3eGN1I5ztpCCiEn3hT7ysuottAVnW1ighE8GoV
 xKNoyXemAKwZKrXYW/GS4C2fItrSQUgRRdrbGKzG5YGPs/PtVS
 0Wu1PqQGIsgb0aolD1gUf61ofY4JEpbsMDnGxgzY6
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)

On 12/30/2013 02:17 AM, Linda Walsh wrote:
> Bernhard Voelker wrote:
>> However, although -x is indeed a common option of several
>> programs, we are reluctant to add new short options.
>>
>> I'd only consider doing so for compatibility reasons
>
> 	I'm looking at compatibility reasons with
> coreutil programs that recurse directories.


> All of the other *recursive* core utils that have the ability to
> isolate action to 1 file system have -x.
> 
> chmod, cp, df, ls, dir, du
> 
> find uses "-xdev"
> tar uses -x
> secure rm (srm) uses -x
> mkzftree uses -x (makes a zisofs)
> 
> primarily was thinking about consistency in the coreutils --

Stop, stop, stop.
This is not an 'which program has a -x option?' contest.

Some of the above programs don't even have a -x or
--one-file-system option (e.g. chmod) while others have
a -x option, but that don't stand for --one-file-system
(e.g. df and ls); and finally, some are not even part of
coreutils package (e.g. tar).

To stick to your argument - "compatibility" among coreutils programs -
here is a little list:

* These coreutils programs have a -x option (with mostly a
  completely different meaning, of course):

    cp df du ls od shred stty test

* These coreutils programs have a --recursive option:

    chcon chgrp chmod chown cp ls rm

* These coreutils programs have a --one-file-system option:

    cp du rm

So even with that more accurate table, this is a quite weak
argument to add "rm -x".

What I meant (and I thought that would be obvious): I wanted
to know if there are other 'rm' implementations which have
the -x option - the *BSDs, Solaris, etc.

Have a nice day,
Berny

Message sent to bug-coreutils@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#16287: RFE rm "-x" == "--one-file-system"
Resent-From: Linda Walsh <coreutils@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 18:08:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.16287.B16287.138842682913968 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16287
X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Bernhard Voelker <mail@HIDDEN>
Cc: 16287 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 16287-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B16287.138842682913968
          (code B ref 16287); Mon, 30 Dec 2013 18:08:01 +0000
Received: (at 16287) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2013 18:07:09 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52961 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1VxhF7-0003dE-5A
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:07:09 -0500
Received: from ishtar.tlinx.org ([173.164.175.65]:48187)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
 (envelope-from <coreutils@HIDDEN>) id 1VxhF5-0003d4-79
 for 16287 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:07:07 -0500
Received: from [192.168.4.12] (Athenae [192.168.4.12])
 by Ishtar.tlinx.org (8.14.7/8.14.4/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id
 rBUI6xal067707; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 10:07:02 -0800
Message-ID: <52C1B643.1040909@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 10:06:59 -0800
From: Linda Walsh <coreutils@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Thunderbird
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <52C0579C.4010404@HIDDEN>
 <52C0BDFB.6090405@HIDDEN> <52C0C99E.5000202@HIDDEN>
 <52C14012.3050909@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <52C14012.3050909@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)



Bernhard Voelker wrote:

> * These coreutils programs have a --one-file-system option:
> 
>     cp du rm
-----

Guess I got a bit carried away.

On the above list with --one-file-system, only 'rm'
is missing -x as a shorthand for it.

I don't know that either BSD or Solaris have a
one-file-system option, so it seems unlikely they would
have a -x.

secure rm does have -x, which has the same meaning.

You can create any arbitrary set of conditions that
fulfill your need for acceptance or denial.

tar also uses -x and find uses -xdev.

Clearly there are 4 other utils that use -x to
mean stay on this file-system with -xdev being a weak
fifth since find doesn't have many (if any) "--long"
options.

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2018 23:28:39 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 19 19:28:39 2018
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59986 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gDeC6-00078p-Qm
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 19:28:39 -0400
Received: from mail-pl1-f178.google.com ([209.85.214.178]:38035)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <assafgordon@HIDDEN>) id 1gDeC3-00078X-HX
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 19:28:38 -0400
Received: by mail-pl1-f178.google.com with SMTP id q19-v6so13407951pll.5
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 16:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-language
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=SjrNhrInwWx5cLdYNPlLmkO8bRhGDy4DBVd8eD+bEy8=;
 b=bHvtauuVTK5QCMGVTSFpqUYM18QgfmfWbjTcmJxeQ2j2nSQBpN45oZaTvMxqJ/u7qc
 Ga3QgZUIm0mmsBtDmcJG5VmI5H8j7YpJktItEpOgA7xNxw7ARWyA6GSN8r1UzoMAHCTk
 JuN2OeSu1Fm4pWrN39cHnJvqaSqHG7yz/XhJ2jc7mKCvSpGke/d9RfZ+bY5uMyslyLTG
 J8lcmz8GIIl3TwE9d3tAsXR6dauRVzkj1HSVaMEWbCieHtpedEu97FwyELj6qrZvuI97
 Q58Ob0Cb14cEmDcV46WAx/8XKWH76AH/7ucWI6F4FiyrcpIq0DkesvBARcgdmJZpREKP
 s6+w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
 :content-language:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=SjrNhrInwWx5cLdYNPlLmkO8bRhGDy4DBVd8eD+bEy8=;
 b=a+Yj5Bu6cmacBlBDZlT847+z7T768hggYnUxDh81VkO2eIFrYniiK2CrtMCJzgkv7w
 cZHcKJabilC2597q7xBINN2XQY4wT3YmLCYSAN6/3vwIZdAsbS+Qbsm8C39HLbFmgryQ
 0+rKk7BKfjYWEAIKHN2+9qEkIRfmcUoL0UB0pcREPvVyBPeKx217e9IiXO2elT0lR6p2
 rOeeGUWei7iikSht8sjrhAqf2qIKsP6GuQGemOKdCDOMuWwrwdN2Q4vuqffZ/t9HrtCx
 WIlOXokdVkAwKRFEZPkqnnyq8miqU0niKNmF64Z5H4g9dzOV5W26UMG11pAhRBU6z0uI
 nhfA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfohM99XXvMrqMD8MjDC0Wgg8M/0icXzo09HH+aFqTpZ0IGyJrfbi
 SMMmu3V1JAL2TBi9PAlDH7+xsYXZbAA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61a+yaZri6sy0iRzxPAkNpxFR9PCJ5nqFpyVHglCeolpue9zfs0YO5grhsYjLUq6ySH+jNVPg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7842:: with SMTP id
 e2-v6mr35987819pln.104.1539991709027; 
 Fri, 19 Oct 2018 16:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tomato.housegordon.com (moose.housegordon.com. [184.68.105.38])
 by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
 i5-v6sm29193774pgl.46.2018.10.19.16.28.26
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Fri, 19 Oct 2018 16:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <53356d1f-8f6a-7115-93b1-294f8f02d2fb@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 17:28:26 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  severity 16287 wishlist retitle 16287 rm: add "-x" option
 alias for --one-file-system [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
 trust [209.85.214.178 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3      RBL: Good reputation (+3)
 [209.85.214.178 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
 (assafgordon[at]gmail.com)
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header
 0.2 NO_SUBJECT             Extra score for no subject
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)

severity 16287 wishlist
retitle 16287 rm: add "-x" option alias for --one-file-system

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2018 23:28:39 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 19 19:28:39 2018
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59986 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gDeC6-00078p-Qm
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 19:28:39 -0400
Received: from mail-pl1-f178.google.com ([209.85.214.178]:38035)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <assafgordon@HIDDEN>) id 1gDeC3-00078X-HX
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 19:28:38 -0400
Received: by mail-pl1-f178.google.com with SMTP id q19-v6so13407951pll.5
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 16:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-language
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=SjrNhrInwWx5cLdYNPlLmkO8bRhGDy4DBVd8eD+bEy8=;
 b=bHvtauuVTK5QCMGVTSFpqUYM18QgfmfWbjTcmJxeQ2j2nSQBpN45oZaTvMxqJ/u7qc
 Ga3QgZUIm0mmsBtDmcJG5VmI5H8j7YpJktItEpOgA7xNxw7ARWyA6GSN8r1UzoMAHCTk
 JuN2OeSu1Fm4pWrN39cHnJvqaSqHG7yz/XhJ2jc7mKCvSpGke/d9RfZ+bY5uMyslyLTG
 J8lcmz8GIIl3TwE9d3tAsXR6dauRVzkj1HSVaMEWbCieHtpedEu97FwyELj6qrZvuI97
 Q58Ob0Cb14cEmDcV46WAx/8XKWH76AH/7ucWI6F4FiyrcpIq0DkesvBARcgdmJZpREKP
 s6+w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
 :content-language:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=SjrNhrInwWx5cLdYNPlLmkO8bRhGDy4DBVd8eD+bEy8=;
 b=a+Yj5Bu6cmacBlBDZlT847+z7T768hggYnUxDh81VkO2eIFrYniiK2CrtMCJzgkv7w
 cZHcKJabilC2597q7xBINN2XQY4wT3YmLCYSAN6/3vwIZdAsbS+Qbsm8C39HLbFmgryQ
 0+rKk7BKfjYWEAIKHN2+9qEkIRfmcUoL0UB0pcREPvVyBPeKx217e9IiXO2elT0lR6p2
 rOeeGUWei7iikSht8sjrhAqf2qIKsP6GuQGemOKdCDOMuWwrwdN2Q4vuqffZ/t9HrtCx
 WIlOXokdVkAwKRFEZPkqnnyq8miqU0niKNmF64Z5H4g9dzOV5W26UMG11pAhRBU6z0uI
 nhfA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfohM99XXvMrqMD8MjDC0Wgg8M/0icXzo09HH+aFqTpZ0IGyJrfbi
 SMMmu3V1JAL2TBi9PAlDH7+xsYXZbAA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61a+yaZri6sy0iRzxPAkNpxFR9PCJ5nqFpyVHglCeolpue9zfs0YO5grhsYjLUq6ySH+jNVPg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7842:: with SMTP id
 e2-v6mr35987819pln.104.1539991709027; 
 Fri, 19 Oct 2018 16:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tomato.housegordon.com (moose.housegordon.com. [184.68.105.38])
 by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
 i5-v6sm29193774pgl.46.2018.10.19.16.28.26
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Fri, 19 Oct 2018 16:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <53356d1f-8f6a-7115-93b1-294f8f02d2fb@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 17:28:26 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  severity 16287 wishlist retitle 16287 rm: add "-x" option
 alias for --one-file-system [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
 trust [209.85.214.178 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3      RBL: Good reputation (+3)
 [209.85.214.178 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
 (assafgordon[at]gmail.com)
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header
 0.2 NO_SUBJECT             Extra score for no subject
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)

severity 16287 wishlist
retitle 16287 rm: add "-x" option alias for --one-file-system

Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.