GNU bug report logs -
#17006
*GNU Emacs* does not change font
Previous Next
Reported by: David Englund <public <at> beloved.name>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:29:01 UTC
Severity: minor
Tags: notabug
Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 17006 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 17006 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#17006
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:29:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
David Englund <public <at> beloved.name>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:29:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
All buffers except *GNU Emacs* change font. This is missleading as this
is the first visible buffer, the one you see when you restart Emacs.
Emacs are often restarted by newbies in order for them to test
fontifying Lisp in their .emacs. As a result they will think that the
font are not installed or similar and will only discover that this is
not the case only if they see another buffer that show the expected font.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#17006
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 13 Mar 2014 17:00:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 17006 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:28:49 +0100
> From: David Englund <public <at> beloved.name>
>
> All buffers except *GNU Emacs* change font. This is missleading as this
> is the first visible buffer, the one you see when you restart Emacs.
> Emacs are often restarted by newbies in order for them to test
> fontifying Lisp in their .emacs. As a result they will think that the
> font are not installed or similar and will only discover that this is
> not the case only if they see another buffer that show the expected font.
Took me some time to understand what is this about. You are
complaining that the splash screen uses fonts different from any other
buffer, is that right?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#17006
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 13 Mar 2014 21:05:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 17006 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>> All buffers except *GNU Emacs* change font. This is missleading as this
>> is the first visible buffer, the one you see when you restart Emacs.
>> Emacs are often restarted by newbies in order for them to test
>> fontifying Lisp in their .emacs. As a result they will think that the
>> font are not installed or similar and will only discover that this is
>> not the case only if they see another buffer that show the expected font.
I'm not sure I buy this argument.
IME, splash screens normally look different to how an application
"normally" looks, and I don't expect to be able to customize a splash
screen.
I think it far more likely that people will visit a file to see how the
fonts look.
But I have no evidence (but I assume you don't either).
Having said that, it's not obvious to me that the fancy splash screen
really _needs_ to use variable-pitch face (if that it is what this
report is actually about).
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#17006
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:45:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 17006 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
David Englund <public <at> beloved.name> writes:
> All buffers except *GNU Emacs* change font. This is missleading as
> this is the first visible buffer, the one you see when you restart
> Emacs. Emacs are often restarted by newbies in order for them to test
> fontifying Lisp in their .emacs. As a result they will think that the
> font are not installed or similar and will only discover that this is
> not the case only if they see another buffer that show the expected
> font.
I think the conclusion here is that Emacs works as designed in this
respect, and I'm closing this bug report.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
Added tag(s) notabug.
Request was from
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:45:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug closed, send any further explanations to
17006 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and David Englund <public <at> beloved.name>
Request was from
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:45:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 29 Nov 2019 12:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 147 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.