Received: (at 17152) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jun 2016 13:32:14 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 12 09:32:14 2016 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37746 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1bC5Us-0001tC-EW for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 09:32:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36838) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1bC5Uq-0001sw-E7 for 17152 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 09:32:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1bC5Ui-0006rM-3e for 17152 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 09:32:07 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:40419) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1bC5Ui-0006rG-0W; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 09:32:04 -0400 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:42296 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1bC5Ug-00068C-4x; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 09:32:02 -0400 From: ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: =?utf-8?Q?K=E1=BA=8Fra?= <kxra@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#17152: References: <CABhyRUitf7CbPZ-S5a_eqqPsA21=27ZutPPw64uj+7jkLDvYhQ@HIDDEN> <CABhyRUh0caM_mqkPR+diqX1m_WmxkeH4N3ByXaLH2Rs63tsEng@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 15:31:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: <CABhyRUh0caM_mqkPR+diqX1m_WmxkeH4N3ByXaLH2Rs63tsEng@HIDDEN> (=?utf-8?Q?=22K=E1=BA=8Fra=22's?= message of "Mon, 31 Mar 2014 17:14:53 -0400") Message-ID: <87lh2amt2o.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 17152 Cc: 17152 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) Hi! K=E1=BA=8Fra <kxra@HIDDEN> skribis: > I also filed against PackageKit here: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D76810 FWIW, a Nix back-end has just been merged: https://github.com/hughsie/PackageKit/pull/126 https://github.com/hughsie/PackageKit/pull/126/commits/108da8ed6784673758= ea7a7a240eda0f8bdddc28 I think a Guix back-end may be simpler, notably because Guix has a notion of package whereas all Nix sees is derivations, which are low-level. The Guix back-end, as I imagine, could essentially embed Guile into PackageKit and have most of the code written in Scheme. That way it could trivially use all the support code we have in (guix profiles), (guix packages), and (gnu packages). Any takers? :-) Ludo=E2=80=99.
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#17152; Package guix.
Full text available.ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic Courtès)
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Received: (at 17152) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Mar 2014 22:23:06 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 31 18:23:06 2014 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58398 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1WUkbh-0000z9-8g for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 18:23:05 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:56690) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1WUkbe-0000yz-No for 17152 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 18:23:03 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48AD2214B; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 00:23:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XuLowcDrYG53; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 00:23:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pluto (reverse-83.fdn.fr [80.67.176.83]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7D681B07; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 00:23:01 +0200 (CEST) From: ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: =?utf-8?Q?K=E1=BA=8Fra?= <kxra@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#17152: References: <CABhyRUitf7CbPZ-S5a_eqqPsA21=27ZutPPw64uj+7jkLDvYhQ@HIDDEN> <CABhyRUh0caM_mqkPR+diqX1m_WmxkeH4N3ByXaLH2Rs63tsEng@HIDDEN> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 12 Germinal an 222 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 00:23:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <CABhyRUh0caM_mqkPR+diqX1m_WmxkeH4N3ByXaLH2Rs63tsEng@HIDDEN> (=?utf-8?Q?=22K=E1=BA=8Fra=22's?= message of "Mon, 31 Mar 2014 17:14:53 -0400") Message-ID: <87txae3t4q.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 17152 Cc: 17152 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) K=E1=BA=8Fra <kxra@HIDDEN> skribis: > I also filed against PackageKit here: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D76810 > > and gnome-software here: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D727= 367 This is a good idea, but looking at <https://gitorious.org/packagekit/packagekit/source/e7bf8d39548e6edb6802c70= 58239d457e3f63845:src/org.freedesktop.PackageKit.Transaction.xml>, it seems that PackageKit is not well suited for non-root install systems and per-user profiles, for instance. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#17152; Package guix.
Full text available.
Received: (at 17152) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Mar 2014 21:15:18 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 31 17:15:18 2014
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58326 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1WUjY5-0007kW-Do
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 17:15:18 -0400
Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]:58178)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <danny.piccirillo@HIDDEN>) id 1WUjY2-0007kL-9w
for 17152 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 17:15:15 -0400
Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id uy5so9857808obc.20
for <17152 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
bh=WhTjUz8B8QVElcvpTk6Kl8umEPLCkNe9E70ovOWvLng=;
b=KE5arq4wR3FGFBf6Jzz4a/3t18F8v/Fy2DuT3cKiNtvjD8X08wLq9DZ+R7Kwh/Tjmj
ea9XC2XmwBhQ0UaBohHUVtv9X6gedV76DxNfBk0BLOvQraB5aXUKq+WFIdk/3G9CRTMN
uxrRqbxMSiQZkUPP967i5kcLFcMGlpqTbJUm4x/m+Q6m/W9T97tdfacXdB1dS3VJvHA0
uXhaoUI6DYDNTPQBPQs+HFExsxkqwqrcRuk1PoGwZ6eyh5pZ2IEH2ZUTmEmKqv/GSone
W0T5MRQCcAUrv5jfa87gALOs3fsCsVgq4P20o4TbkdgPO3uJLcNGQ64zBGY9pBLSUf7d
UYhQ==
X-Received: by 10.182.40.201 with SMTP id z9mr5248751obk.45.1396300513096;
Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.177.228 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: =?UTF-8?B?S+G6j3Jh?= <kxra@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 17:14:53 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: rLgnprg3U3VU5LuhfCyOrRwb1lQ
Message-ID: <CABhyRUh0caM_mqkPR+diqX1m_WmxkeH4N3ByXaLH2Rs63tsEng@HIDDEN>
Subject:
To: 17152 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c33b0215954904f5ed8c0a
X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: I also filed against PackageKit here:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76810
and gnome-software here: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727367
I also filed against PackageKit here:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76810 [...]
Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(danny.piccirillo[at]gmail.com)
-0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
trust [209.85.214.175 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty
0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
0.0 TVD_SPACE_RATIO TVD_SPACE_RATIO
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 17152
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: I also filed against PackageKit here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76810
and gnome-software here: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727367
I also filed against PackageKit here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76810
[...]
Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
trust
[209.85.214.175 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(danny.piccirillo[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty
0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
0.0 TVD_SPACE_RATIO TVD_SPACE_RATIO
--001a11c33b0215954904f5ed8c0a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I also filed against PackageKit here:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76810
and gnome-software here: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727367
--001a11c33b0215954904f5ed8c0a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">I also filed against PackageKit here: <a href=3D"https://b=
ugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D76810">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/s=
how_bug.cgi?id=3D76810</a><br><br>and gnome-software here: <a href=3D"https=
://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D727367">https://bugzilla.gnome.org/=
show_bug.cgi?id=3D727367</a></div>
--001a11c33b0215954904f5ed8c0a--
bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#17152; Package guix.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Mar 2014 20:11:12 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 31 16:11:12 2014 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58259 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1WUiY4-000672-1X for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:11:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:32995) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <danny.piccirillo@HIDDEN>) id 1WUiKU-0004dQ-Fv for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:57:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <danny.piccirillo@HIDDEN>) id 1WUiKT-0007lh-CS for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:57:10 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:59880) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <danny.piccirillo@HIDDEN>) id 1WUiKT-0007lc-9z for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:57:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34713) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <danny.piccirillo@HIDDEN>) id 1WUiKS-0001LY-Jl for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:57:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <danny.piccirillo@HIDDEN>) id 1WUiKR-0007lD-DY for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:57:08 -0400 Received: from mail-oa0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c02::230]:61757) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <danny.piccirillo@HIDDEN>) id 1WUiKR-0007kz-6o for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:57:07 -0400 Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id m1so9782577oag.7 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:57:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=NxDFjQJmTpXb7ifCq3myT5+zVphoB8i7w59+dbEQpnU=; b=mbhe0YtHFZ0BMU3B6f+Af2Sa0AwmMK7t9sysAM0C2WeMDFzwGsycV0Syd6X8yY2J6q 1MsLnIQwOXB3xlYdPJgkEFoc2S/SkkLKCS9bUeQaDGjPER9O6C2XVWeXj7JA+16BqTP+ 9t6MvfdMdZU3v0xMeSObqlLZ2UmicHIXdnaWH95JnDOeBCUF1BUms/wtt5VpNCe6ur8J XAExCOhtwMuj7nFn12PTwU0CtzpzFBMWurBksl49ZQJq5bP0hVx4qQoTO1FIr/+rbG18 AO/xgHXdpcOCNRdZEfZWc1GZH3TEil9xGiFZ5JrpAqLogTDr22hVVdmw26CXBRXxeERN yJDA== X-Received: by 10.182.241.67 with SMTP id wg3mr25029675obc.16.1396295825976; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:57:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.177.228 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:56:45 -0700 (PDT) From: =?UTF-8?B?S+G6j3Jh?= <kxra@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:56:45 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: guDI8BiMPYJY8FmWfOxh2avZbAs Message-ID: <CABhyRUitf7CbPZ-S5a_eqqPsA21=27ZutPPw64uj+7jkLDvYhQ@HIDDEN> Subject: GNU Guix backend for PackageKit / Gnome-Software To: bug-guix@HIDDEN Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2efb8b5778304f5ec74cd X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:11:10 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) --001a11c2efb8b5778304f5ec74cd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 This will make GNU Guix much more accessible to a wider audience. --001a11c2efb8b5778304f5ec74cd Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 <div dir="ltr">This will make GNU Guix much more accessible to a wider audience. <br></div> --001a11c2efb8b5778304f5ec74cd--
Kẏra <kxra@HIDDEN>:bug-guix@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN:bug#17152; Package guix.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.