X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#17364: possible bug in partprobe
Resent-From: Nuzhna Pomoshch <nuzhna_pomoshch@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-parted@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:46:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.17364.B.139871073918260 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 17364
X-GNU-PR-Package: parted
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: 17364 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-parted@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.139871073918260
(code B ref -1); Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:46:01 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Apr 2014 18:45:39 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44127 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1WeqYc-0004kR-4c
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:45:39 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46569)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <nuzhna_pomoshch@HIDDEN>) id 1WeqMC-0004Jp-69
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:32:49 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <nuzhna_pomoshch@HIDDEN>) id 1WeqLw-0005Xx-IV
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:32:42 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,
T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:50071)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <nuzhna_pomoshch@HIDDEN>) id 1WeqLw-0005Xs-Fk
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:32:32 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48259)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <nuzhna_pomoshch@HIDDEN>) id 1WeqLn-000449-8Z
for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:32:32 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <nuzhna_pomoshch@HIDDEN>) id 1WeqLe-0005Uh-2T
for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:32:23 -0400
Received: from nm48.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.120.55]:20936)
by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <nuzhna_pomoshch@HIDDEN>) id 1WeqLd-0005UV-OF
for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:32:14 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by nm48.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
28 Apr 2014 18:32:12 -0000
Received: from [98.138.226.176] by nm48.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
28 Apr 2014 18:29:12 -0000
Received: from [98.139.215.143] by tm11.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
28 Apr 2014 18:28:44 -0000
Received: from [98.139.212.238] by tm14.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
28 Apr 2014 18:28:44 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1047.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
28 Apr 2014 18:28:44 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-4
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 546251.85049.bm@HIDDEN
Received: (qmail 2495 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Apr 2014 18:28:44 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024;
t=1398709724; bh=yABiBBSdmTl5NY369CFNiPkul1faMORFQjoJC+LVh24=;
h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
b=sS2LluBPufAS4hV2BEqaZMK3cdpNlVssrSJpzHsouXw53w0pPLhWyDZFnfMvq4FpxUmXy76qoHz6JFB3GmWdXIgryGHnVG5wt4rMIYBGOYP4ctxXFfaqyXcmzQZKtULGO0Q6A4WRzeW62YVRFaEgibWsil72tdiBvUV5QuvwKtg=
X-YMail-OSG: PAirFF4VM1n5rqK.YyPWevPMUOFHcW4hm9XuwIi3jrhV2TS
6.wCIn.0ocVBVGpBJzRSJ8wD0.CQRrL2PwVMA.i3NzY0tUCJdMl_KChlsdNU
pcPR0gPeLmSRs4YlzJuF5TLUSaJDQl_t.zAGgQY9XngrizSlwVIPhQczVSdI
jn0Z3DkYqxiOTERkqC1y7jtjSBM.cv.X._NpmUAZBDYxGiV24m0S1Keipf6H
DLDA5uT1PZ6tiXUkdUfbzi96k0HAzNC.gzngMSv7mCg.soNpY5crJpwW2njL
p8UHuRxcIDm_9oHryclI.WlECT8Ca2xoAzmipu8crQjS3BP_b4I_bWNCJQnF
b5rmvTx8xgahJMDb.O7A5uUYvlt..nTEbc89sEVZ2QdO2T93YKLoX8mTylFN
XDj8aZ7oBB9w6tWget0u6LvTcuTqXcn4ERR1drABURk2da.DWXRhpeUva3Wy
D8K69d717g4Y25N7pnZ3obT8n03Cfqaz0QKRA3WzNE6NbfBSEjGXnVPgXWPV
arcLNta_QDA9XVvjSzfuiy61UBc.2NF3XofP7tHhSdjvtj8haChCvalpw_63
FSbFzbT..LnHn_g--
Received: from [122.60.72.200] by web165002.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Mon, 28 Apr 2014 11:28:44 PDT
X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,
SSBoYXZlIGZvdW5kIGEgYnVnIC0gSSBhbSBqdXN0IG5vdCBzdXJlIHdoZXRoZXIgaXQgaXMNCmEgYnVnIGluIHBhcnRwcm9iZSBvciBpdCBvcmlnaW5hdGVzIHNvbWV3aGVyZSBlbHNlLg0KDQpJIGVuY3J5cHRlZCBhIChyZW1vdmFibGUpIGhhcmQgZHJpdmUgd2l0aCB0aGUgaW50ZW50aW9uDQpvZiBwdXR0aW5nIHpmcyBzdG9yYWdlIHBvb2xzIG9uIGl0Og0KDQojIGNyeXB0c2V0dXAgLXYgbHVrc0Zvcm1hdCAvZGV2L3NkeA0KIyBjcnlwdHNldHVwIG9wZW4gL2Rldi9zZHggZGlzaw0KDQpUaGVuIEkgY3JlYXQBMAEBAQE-
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/534 YahooMailWebService/0.8.185.657
Message-ID: <1398709724.30785.YahooMailBasic@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 11:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nuzhna Pomoshch <nuzhna_pomoshch@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: FreeBSD 9.x
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address
(bad octet value).
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11
X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:45:35 -0400
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----)
I have found a bug - I am just not sure whether it is
a bug in partprobe or it originates somewhere else.
I encrypted a (removable) hard drive with the intention
of putting zfs storage pools on it:
# cryptsetup -v luksFormat /dev/sdx
# cryptsetup open /dev/sdx disk
Then I created partitions for the hard drive using gdisk.
[...]
Command (? for help): p
Disk /dev/mapper/disk: 732566133 sectors, 2.7 TiB
Logical sector size: 4096 bytes
Disk identifier (GUID): xxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx
Partition table holds up to 128 entries
First usable sector is 6, last usable sector is 732566127
Partitions will be aligned on 256-sector boundaries
Total free space is 250 sectors (1000.0 KiB)
Number Start (sector) End (sector) Size Code Name
1 256 16777471 64.0 GiB 8300 01
2 16777472 33554687 64.0 GiB 8300 02
3 33554688 50331903 64.0 GiB 8300 03
4 50331904 67109119 64.0 GiB 8300 04
5 67109120 83886335 64.0 GiB 8300 05
6 83886336 100663551 64.0 GiB 8300 06
7 100663552 117440767 64.0 GiB 8300 07
8 117440768 134217983 64.0 GiB 8300 08
9 134217984 150995199 64.0 GiB 8300 09
10 150995200 167772415 64.0 GiB 8300 10
11 167772416 184549631 64.0 GiB 8300 11
12 184549632 201326847 64.0 GiB 8300 12
13 201326848 218104063 64.0 GiB 8300 13
14 218104064 234881279 64.0 GiB 8300 14
15 234881280 251658495 64.0 GiB 8300 15
16 251658496 268435711 64.0 GiB 8300 16
17 268435712 285212927 64.0 GiB 8300 17
18 285212928 301990143 64.0 GiB 8300 18
19 301990144 318767359 64.0 GiB 8300 19
20 318767360 335544575 64.0 GiB 8300 20
21 335544576 352321791 64.0 GiB 8300 21
22 352321792 369099007 64.0 GiB 8300 22
23 369099008 385876223 64.0 GiB 8300 23
24 385876224 402653439 64.0 GiB 8300 24
25 402653440 419430655 64.0 GiB 8300 25
26 419430656 436207871 64.0 GiB 8300 26
27 436207872 452985087 64.0 GiB 8300 27
28 452985088 469762303 64.0 GiB 8300 28
29 469762304 486539519 64.0 GiB 8300 29
30 486539520 503316735 64.0 GiB 8300 30
31 503316736 520093951 64.0 GiB 8300 31
32 520093952 536871167 64.0 GiB 8300 32
33 536871168 553648383 64.0 GiB 8300 33
34 553648384 570425599 64.0 GiB 8300 34
35 570425600 587202815 64.0 GiB 8300 35
36 587202816 603980031 64.0 GiB 8300 36
37 603980032 620757247 64.0 GiB 8300 37
38 620757248 637534463 64.0 GiB 8300 38
39 637534464 654311679 64.0 GiB 8300 39
40 654311680 671088895 64.0 GiB 8300 40
41 671088896 687866111 64.0 GiB 8300 41
42 687866112 704643327 64.0 GiB 8300 42
43 704643328 721420543 64.0 GiB 8300 43
44 721420544 732566127 42.5 GiB 8300 44
Removed (unplugged), reinserted, remounted, and unlocked the hard drive.
None of the partitions showed up initially.
# ls -al /dev/mapper/
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 80 2014-04-27 05:24:20 ./
drwxr-xr-x 17 root root 5260 2014-04-27 05:24:20 ../
crw------- 1 root root 10, 236 2014-04-27 05:06:28 control
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 2014-04-27 05:24:20 disk -> ../dm-0
# ls -al /dev/dm-0
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 253, 0 2014-04-27 05:24:20 /dev/dm-0
So I ran partprobe to request that partition tables be re-read:
# partprobe
And only got the first sixteen partitions on the disk.
# ls -al /dev/mapper/
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 400 2014-04-27 18:42:29 ./
drwxr-xr-x 17 root root 5580 2014-04-27 18:42:29 ../
crw------- 1 root root 10, 236 2014-04-27 05:06:28 control
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 2014-04-27 18:42:30 st3000 -> ../dm-0
brw------- 1 root root 253, 1 2014-04-27 18:42:29 st3000p1
brw------- 1 root root 253, 10 2014-04-27 18:42:29 st3000p10
brw------- 1 root root 253, 11 2014-04-27 18:42:29 st3000p11
brw------- 1 root root 253, 12 2014-04-27 18:42:29 st3000p12
brw------- 1 root root 253, 13 2014-04-27 18:42:29 st3000p13
brw------- 1 root root 253, 14 2014-04-27 18:42:29 st3000p14
brw------- 1 root root 253, 15 2014-04-27 18:42:29 st3000p15
brw------- 1 root root 253, 16 2014-04-27 18:42:29 st3000p16
brw------- 1 root root 253, 2 2014-04-27 18:42:29 st3000p2
brw------- 1 root root 253, 3 2014-04-27 18:42:29 st3000p3
brw------- 1 root root 253, 4 2014-04-27 18:42:29 st3000p4
brw------- 1 root root 253, 5 2014-04-27 18:42:29 st3000p5
brw------- 1 root root 253, 6 2014-04-27 18:42:29 st3000p6
brw------- 1 root root 253, 7 2014-04-27 18:42:29 st3000p7
brw------- 1 root root 253, 8 2014-04-27 18:42:29 st3000p8
brw------- 1 root root 253, 9 2014-04-27 18:42:29 st3000p9
# ls -al /dev/dm-*
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 253, 0 2014-04-27 18:42:30 /dev/dm-0
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 253, 1 2014-04-27 18:42:31 /dev/dm-1
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 253, 10 2014-04-27 18:42:30 /dev/dm-10
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 253, 11 2014-04-27 18:42:31 /dev/dm-11
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 253, 12 2014-04-27 18:42:30 /dev/dm-12
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 253, 13 2014-04-27 18:42:31 /dev/dm-13
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 253, 14 2014-04-27 18:42:31 /dev/dm-14
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 253, 15 2014-04-27 18:42:31 /dev/dm-15
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 253, 16 2014-04-27 18:42:31 /dev/dm-16
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 253, 2 2014-04-27 18:42:31 /dev/dm-2
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 253, 3 2014-04-27 18:42:31 /dev/dm-3
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 253, 4 2014-04-27 18:42:30 /dev/dm-4
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 253, 5 2014-04-27 18:42:30 /dev/dm-5
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 253, 6 2014-04-27 18:42:30 /dev/dm-6
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 253, 7 2014-04-27 18:42:31 /dev/dm-7
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 253, 8 2014-04-27 18:42:30 /dev/dm-8
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 253, 9 2014-04-27 18:42:30 /dev/dm-9
I am also wondering if the entries in /dev/mapper should just
be links to /dev/dm-nn (as the entry for the entire disk is), but
that is more of a secondary issue.
The first sixteen partitions are set up correctly.
# dmsetup ls
st3000p2 (253:2)
st3000p1 (253:1)
st3000p16 (253:16)
st3000 (253:0)
st3000p9 (253:9)
st3000p15 (253:15)
st3000p8 (253:8)
st3000p14 (253:14)
st3000p7 (253:7)
st3000p13 (253:13)
st3000p6 (253:6)
st3000p12 (253:12)
st3000p5 (253:5)
st3000p11 (253:11)
st3000p4 (253:4)
st3000p10 (253:10)
st3000p3 (253:3)
Would appreciate your thoughts and help.
Thank you in advance.
Nuzhna
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.503) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Nuzhna Pomoshch <nuzhna_pomoshch@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#17364: Acknowledgement (possible bug in partprobe) Message-ID: <handler.17364.B.139871073918260.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <1398709724.30785.YahooMailBasic@HIDDEN> X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 17364 X-Gnu-PR-Package: parted Reply-To: 17364 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:46:02 +0000 Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): bug-parted@HIDDEN If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 17364 <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 17364: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D17364 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#17364: possible bug in partprobe
Resent-From: "Brian C. Lane" <bcl@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-parted@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:43:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.17364.B.139873212326726 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17364
X-GNU-PR-Package: parted
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: 17364 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-parted@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.139873212326726
(code B ref -1); Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:43:01 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2014 00:42:03 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44214 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1Wew7W-0006x0-H7
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:42:02 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54917)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <bcl@HIDDEN>) id 1Wew7R-0006wU-Pi
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:41:59 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <bcl@HIDDEN>) id 1Wew7D-0007ND-GM
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:41:52 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled
version=3.3.2
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:53595)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <bcl@HIDDEN>) id 1Wew7D-0007Mv-Ce
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:41:43 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56622)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <bcl@HIDDEN>) id 1Wew77-0004TP-6s
for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:41:43 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <bcl@HIDDEN>) id 1Wew71-0007G3-0z
for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:41:37 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35362)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <bcl@HIDDEN>) id 1Wew70-0007Fm-Pl
for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:41:30 -0400
Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
(int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24])
by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s3T0fSUJ026373
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK)
for <bug-parted@HIDDEN>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:41:28 -0400
Received: from lister.brianlane.com (ovpn-113-104.phx2.redhat.com
[10.3.113.104])
by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id
s3T0fQBW005180
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO)
for <bug-parted@HIDDEN>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:41:28 -0400
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:41:26 -0700
From: "Brian C. Lane" <bcl@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <20140429004126.GO27637@HIDDEN>
References: <1398709724.30785.YahooMailBasic@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1398709724.30785.YahooMailBasic@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address
(bad octet value).
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11
X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----)
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:28:44AM -0700, Nuzhna Pomoshch wrote:
> I have found a bug - I am just not sure whether it is
> a bug in partprobe or it originates somewhere else.
>
This will be fixed in the next release. commit 026736e9fed8 addressed
it.
--
Brian C. Lane | Anaconda Team | IRC: bcl #anaconda | Port Orchard, WA (PST8PDT)
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.