GNU bug report logs -
#18143
Vertical scroll bar does not work with Image files
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 18143 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 18143 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#18143
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 29 Jul 2014 10:58:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Angelo Graziosi <angelo.graziosi <at> alice.it>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 29 Jul 2014 10:58:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
When an image file (jpg, png..) is displayed greater than the frame
dimensions, a way to explore it is using the arrow keys (up, down, left
and right).
With the introduction of horizontal scroll bar, it is very nice to use
it in place of L-R arrow keys: the HSB works fine here!
This does not occur with vertical scroll bar. It has the full height of
the frame and cannot be moved U-D. So the only way to explore the image
vertically is to use the U-D keys.
I see this both with MSYS2/MinGW64 and Cygwin builds of Emacs trunk.
Ciao,
Angelo.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#18143
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 29 Jul 2014 12:03:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 18143 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 12:56:26 +0200
> From: Angelo Graziosi <angelo.graziosi <at> alice.it>
>
> When an image file (jpg, png..) is displayed greater than the frame
> dimensions, a way to explore it is using the arrow keys (up, down, left
> and right).
>
> With the introduction of horizontal scroll bar, it is very nice to use
> it in place of L-R arrow keys: the HSB works fine here!
>
> This does not occur with vertical scroll bar. It has the full height of
> the frame and cannot be moved U-D. So the only way to explore the image
> vertically is to use the U-D keys.
>
> I see this both with MSYS2/MinGW64 and Cygwin builds of Emacs trunk.
What you see is due to the difference between the 2 scroll bars in how
the size of the scroll-bar thumb is computed: in character units for
the vertical scroll bar vs pixel units for the horizontal scroll bar.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#18143
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 29 Jul 2014 12:14:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 18143 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Il 29/07/2014 14:02, Eli Zaretskii ha scritto:
>> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 12:56:26 +0200
>> From: Angelo Graziosi <angelo.graziosi <at> alice.it>
>>
>> When an image file (jpg, png..) is displayed greater than the frame
>> dimensions, a way to explore it is using the arrow keys (up, down, left
>> and right).
>>
>> With the introduction of horizontal scroll bar, it is very nice to use
>> it in place of L-R arrow keys: the HSB works fine here!
>>
>> This does not occur with vertical scroll bar. It has the full height of
>> the frame and cannot be moved U-D. So the only way to explore the image
>> vertically is to use the U-D keys.
>>
>> I see this both with MSYS2/MinGW64 and Cygwin builds of Emacs trunk.
>
> What you see is due to the difference between the 2 scroll bars in how
> the size of the scroll-bar thumb is computed: in character units for
> the vertical scroll bar vs pixel units for the horizontal scroll bar.
>
But is this a bug? I would convert also the vertical scroll bar to pixel
unit..
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#18143
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 29 Jul 2014 12:30:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 18143 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:13:27 +0200
> From: Angelo Graziosi <angelo.graziosi <at> alice.it>
> CC: 18143 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > What you see is due to the difference between the 2 scroll bars in how
> > the size of the scroll-bar thumb is computed: in character units for
> > the vertical scroll bar vs pixel units for the horizontal scroll bar.
>
> But is this a bug?
No, it's a direct consequence of how the thumb size calculation was
designed to work.
> I would convert also the vertical scroll bar to pixel unit.
Please suggest a method of doing that. I thought about that, and
concluded that it wasn't trivial. I'd be happy to learn what I
missed.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#18143
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 12 Aug 2020 18:40:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 18143 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:13:27 +0200
>> From: Angelo Graziosi <angelo.graziosi <at> alice.it>
>> CC: 18143 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>>
>> > What you see is due to the difference between the 2 scroll bars in how
>> > the size of the scroll-bar thumb is computed: in character units for
>> > the vertical scroll bar vs pixel units for the horizontal scroll bar.
>>
>> But is this a bug?
>
> No, it's a direct consequence of how the thumb size calculation was
> designed to work.
So there is no bug in that regard.
>> I would convert also the vertical scroll bar to pixel unit.
>
> Please suggest a method of doing that. I thought about that, and
> concluded that it wasn't trivial. I'd be happy to learn what I
> missed.
No one has suggested such a method within 6 years. So should this be
closed, or is there anything more to do here?
Best regards,
Stefan Kangas
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#18143
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 13 Aug 2020 09:55:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 18143 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Too much time has passed and I can't remember the details... please close.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#18143
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:05:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 18143 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Angelo Graziosi <angelo.g0 <at> libero.it> writes:
> Too much time has passed and I can't remember the details... please close.
Thanks for replying back. I'm closing this bug report.
Best regards,
Stefan Kangas
Reply sent
to
Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Thu, 01 Oct 2020 12:13:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Angelo Graziosi <angelo.graziosi <at> alice.it>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Thu, 01 Oct 2020 12:13:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #28 received at 18143-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se> writes:
> Angelo Graziosi <angelo.g0 <at> libero.it> writes:
>
>> Too much time has passed and I can't remember the details... please close.
>
> Thanks for replying back. I'm closing this bug report.
Accidentally left this open; closing now.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:24:09 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 172 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.