GNU logs - #18314, boring messages

Message sent to bug-parted@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#18314: [bug] fail to print device info
Resent-From: lumin <cdluminate@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-parted@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 01:53:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.18314.B.140867236229147 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 18314 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Message-ID: <1408671081.2906.14.camel@int>
From: lumin <cdluminate@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 01:31:21 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

parted version: 3.2 (debian jessie)
debian package version: 
> parted/testing,testing,now 3.2-4 amd64

hello,
I am new at bug reporting, and I am trying to provide enough information
about the BUG I have encountered.

I have dd'ed a debian 7.6 DVD installation media(iso) directly into my
USB stick(USB3.0). I am sure there is no damage on this device. 
Then I'd like to make a new partition table,then I typed 'print' first:

```
(parted) print
Warning: The driver descriptor says the physical block size is 2048
bytes, but Linux says it is 512 bytes.
Ignore/Cancel? I
```

then the bug occured.
this is device info required by the program:
```
(parted)
print                                                            
Warning: The driver descriptor says the physical block size is 2048
bytes, but
Linux says it is 512 bytes.
Ignore/Cancel?
C                                                          
Model: Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdc: 15356160s
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: unknown
Disk Flags: 
```
when I say Ignore:
```
***
Command History:
unit
s
print
I

Error: A general SIGSEGV signal was encountered.
```

this is the original BUG:
(parted /dev/sdc)
```
Command History:
print
I

Error: SEGV_MAPERR (Address not mapped to object)
Backtrace has 16 calls on stack:
  16: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_assert+0x31)
[0x7ffbda65f5f1]
  15: parted() [0x40a684]
  14: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x35480) [0x7ffbd9e6a480]
  13: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x90875) [0x7ffbd9ec5875]
  12: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x1817e) [0x7ffbda66a17e]
  11: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_geometry_read+0x35)
[0x7ffbda665a85]
  10: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x1ce16) [0x7ffbda66ee16]
  9: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_file_system_probe_specific
+0x37) [0x7ffbda660a07]
  8: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_file_system_probe+0x4e)
[0x7ffbda660ace]
  7: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x2954c) [0x7ffbda67b54c]
  6: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_disk_new+0x48)
[0x7ffbda6644b8]
  5: parted() [0x407659]
  4: parted(interactive_mode+0xff) [0x40c6ef]
  3: parted(main+0x1175) [0x405f45]
  2: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5)
[0x7ffbd9e56b45]
  1: parted() [0x405f98]
```

then I erased the first sector of the disk:
sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc bs=512 count=1
then ALL things went back to normal.
seems like matter of Device driver.

-- 
Regards,
  C.D.Luminate

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.503)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: lumin <cdluminate@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#18314: Acknowledgement ([bug] fail to print device info)
Message-ID: <handler.18314.B.140867236229147.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <1408671081.2906.14.camel@int>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 18314
X-Gnu-PR-Package: parted
Reply-To: 18314 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 01:53:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-parted@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 18314 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
18314: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D18314
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-parted@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#18314: [bug] fail to print device info
Resent-From: "Brian C. Lane" <bcl@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-parted@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 15:32:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.18314.B.140872150718456 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 18314 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 08:31:13 -0700
From: "Brian C. Lane" <bcl@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <20140822153113.GF27864@HIDDEN>
References: <1408671081.2906.14.camel@int>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1408671081.2906.14.camel@int>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 01:31:21AM +0000, lumin wrote:
 
> Error: SEGV_MAPERR (Address not mapped to object)
> Backtrace has 16 calls on stack:
>   16: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_assert+0x31)
> [0x7ffbda65f5f1]
>   15: parted() [0x40a684]
>   14: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x35480) [0x7ffbd9e6a480]
>   13: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x90875) [0x7ffbd9ec5875]
>   12: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x1817e) [0x7ffbda66a17e]
>   11: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_geometry_read+0x35)
> [0x7ffbda665a85]
>   10: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x1ce16) [0x7ffbda66ee16]
>   9: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_file_system_probe_specific
> +0x37) [0x7ffbda660a07]
>   8: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_file_system_probe+0x4e)
> [0x7ffbda660ace]
>   7: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x2954c) [0x7ffbda67b54c]
>   6: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_disk_new+0x48)
> [0x7ffbda6644b8]
>   5: parted() [0x407659]
>   4: parted(interactive_mode+0xff) [0x40c6ef]
>   3: parted(main+0x1175) [0x405f45]
>   2: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5)
> [0x7ffbd9e56b45]
>   1: parted() [0x405f98]
> ```
> 
> then I erased the first sector of the disk:
> sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc bs=512 count=1
> then ALL things went back to normal.
> seems like matter of Device driver.

Did you happen to make a copy of the sector? If not there isn't much we
can do to reproduce this.

-- 
Brian C. Lane | Anaconda Team | IRC: bcl #anaconda | Port Orchard, WA (PST8PDT)

Message sent to bug-parted@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#18314: [bug] fail to print device info
Resent-From: lumin <cdluminate@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-parted@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:26:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.18314.B.14127783371545 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 18314 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: bcl@HIDDEN
Message-ID: <1412778288.6204.1.camel@HIDDEN>
From: lumin <cdluminate@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:24:48 +0000
In-Reply-To: <handler.18314.B.140867236229147.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <1408671081.2906.14.camel@int>
 <handler.18314.B.140867236229147.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Sorry to reply after so long time.
I tried to replay it, then I dd'ed a iso file into the flash disk,
But it doesn't happen again, even if partprobe said :

Warning: The driver descriptor says the physical block size is 2048
bytes, but Linux says it is 512 bytes.

NO ANY PROBLEM even if I choose "Ignore" always.
Jessie updated its kernel to 3.16 recently,
Maybe it is kernel-related... I don't know.
-- 
Regards,
  C.D.Luminate

Message sent to bug-parted@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#18314: [bug] fail to print device info
Resent-From: lumin <cdluminate@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-parted@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:26:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.18314.B18314.14127783071498 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18314
X-GNU-PR-Package: parted
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: 18314 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: bcl@HIDDEN
X-Debbugs-Original-To: 18314 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-parted <bug-parted@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 18314-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B18314.14127783071498
          (code B ref 18314); Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:26:02 +0000
Received: (at 18314) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2014 14:25:07 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38165 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1XbsAs-0000O5-Hu
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 10:25:07 -0400
Received: from mail-pd0-f169.google.com ([209.85.192.169]:44286)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
 (envelope-from <cdluminate@HIDDEN>) id 1XbsAq-0000Nv-62
 for 18314 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 10:25:04 -0400
Received: by mail-pd0-f169.google.com with SMTP id w10so6972799pde.14
 for <18314 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 07:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references
 :content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=zBF+HCKxwBAYaSzFJKhz1AzF7Bs+xhSfiduyxU09GbM=;
 b=jd5h4sneowQ6u+PDTSQ3W+EIe/Z6uHe/A4a4nHywryLYELHSltc/pMskjx/TSFE3aH
 9/tskDAbu0YRS/KWAKph84rVQnLwl6oOkRgRpPBCiQHi55gMhUMUVkMmAk1cWMc30Gpe
 KEa1YevZ+WxXFouz+fFdkNH3QArj02/YDHQjG2vN2qu4a43hLjMEgpS6mZWY9Ug3dKrC
 fFXls7L0++L4xX1VKSOWLcoi469o+71dHjkbXjGmj7Wgrle9pHX6gj/vDvvuVfyVLo2+
 aRysPhPETdo0ir4vdDPgIr2XEYaNYdNzp8u34YXH6uRE48Jc4Z0BQpjSvN6skh4NJ1KC
 y8jQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.165.4 with SMTP id yu4mr1917746pab.157.1412778303048;
 Wed, 08 Oct 2014 07:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from int ([117.35.57.93])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ha10sm223885pbd.7.2014.10.08.07.24.56
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Wed, 08 Oct 2014 07:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1412778288.6204.1.camel@HIDDEN>
From: lumin <cdluminate@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:24:48 +0000
In-Reply-To: <handler.18314.B.140867236229147.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <1408671081.2906.14.camel@int>
 <handler.18314.B.140867236229147.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.6-1 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)

Sorry to reply after so long time.
I tried to replay it, then I dd'ed a iso file into the flash disk,
But it doesn't happen again, even if partprobe said :

Warning: The driver descriptor says the physical block size is 2048
bytes, but Linux says it is 512 bytes.

NO ANY PROBLEM even if I choose "Ignore" always.
Jessie updated its kernel to 3.16 recently,
Maybe it is kernel-related... I don't know.
-- 
Regards,
  C.D.Luminate

Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.